Download Today`s Powerpoint - Physics and Astronomy

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

CoRoT wikipedia , lookup

Kepler (spacecraft) wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Week 5 Day 1: Announcements
Comments on Mastering Astronomy
How do we know what know and why do we believe it
Ancient Science vs. Modern Science
"Geocentric Model" of the Solar System
Ancient Greek astronomers knew of Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars,
Jupiter and Saturn.
Aristotle (dates) vs. Aristarchus (dates):
Aristotle: Sun, Moon, Planets and Stars rotate around fixed Earth.
Aristarchus: Used geometry of eclipses to show Sun bigger than Earth
(and Moon smaller), so guessed that Earth orbits the Sun. Also guessed
Earth spins on its axis once a day => apparent motion of stars.
Aristotle: But there's no wind or parallax (apparent movement of stars).
Difficulty with Aristotle's "Geocentric" model: "Retrograde motion of the
planets".
But if you support geocentric model, you must attribute retrograde
motion to actual motions of planets, leading to loops called “epicycles”.
Ptolemy's geocentric model (A.D. 140)
"Heliocentric" Model
●
Rediscovered by Copernicus in 16th century.
●
Put Sun at the center of everything.
Much simpler. Almost got rid of retrograde
motion.
●
But orbits circular in his model. In reality,
they’re elliptical, so it didn’t fit the data well.
●
●
Not generally accepted then.
Copernicus 1473-1543
Planets generally move in one direction relative
to the stars, but sometimes they appear to loop
back. This is "retrograde motion".
Planets generally move in one direction
relative to the stars, but sometimes they appear
to loop back. This is "retrograde motion".
Apparent motion
of Mars against
"fixed" stars
Mars
July
7
*
Earth
7
6
*
6
5
3
4
4
3
1
5
2
2
*
1
January
*
*
*
Clicker Question:
A flaw in Copernicus’s model for the
solar system was:
A: It didn’t explain retrograde motion.
B: He used circular orbits.
C: The Earth was still at the center.
D: He used the same mass for all the planets.
E: All of the above
Galileo (1564-1642)
Built his own telescope (1609).
Discovered four moons orbiting Jupiter =>
Earth is not the center of all things!
Co-discovered sunspots. Deduced Sun
rotated on its axis.
Discovered phases of Venus, inconsistent
with geocentric model.
Discovered craters and mare on the moon
(celestial objects not perfect)
Problems with Models of Solar System before Kepler
Kepler (1571-1630)
Used Tycho Brahe's precise data on
apparent planet motions and relative
distances.
Deduced three laws of planetary
motion.
Kepler showed his laws fit Brahe’s
observation data (accuracy – one arc
minute) for Mars better than Ptolemaic
model
Kepler's First Law
The orbits of the planets are elliptical (not circular)
with the Sun at one focus of the ellipse.
Ellipses
distance between foci
eccentricity =
major axis length
(flatness of ellipse)
Kepler's Second Law
A line connecting the Sun and a planet sweeps out equal areas
in equal times.
slower
Translation: planets move faster
when closer to the Sun.
faster
Kepler's Third Law
The square of a planet's orbital period is proportional to the
cube of its semi-major axis.
P2
is proportional to
or
P2  a3
(for circular orbits, a=b=radius).
Translation: the larger a planet's orbit,
the longer the period.
a3
a
b
Kepler's Third Law
The square of a planet's orbital period is proportional to the
cube of its semi-major axis. If P measured in Earth years, and
a in AU,
P2 = a3
(for circular orbits, a=radius).
Translation: the larger a planet's orbit,
the longer the period.
Solar System Orbits
Orbits of some planets (or dwarf planets):
Planet
a (AU)
Venus
Earth
Jupiter
Pluto
0.723
1.0
5.2
39.5
P (Earth years)
0.615
1.0
12
249
Copernican model (with Kepler modifications) was a triumph
of the Scientific Method
Scientific Method:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Make high quality observations of some natural phenomenon
Come up with a theory that explains the observations
Use the theory to predict future behavior
Make further observations to test the theory
Refine the theory, or if it no longer works, make a new one
- Occam’s Razor: Simpler Theories are better
-You can prove a theory WRONG but not
RIGHT
Prediction
Observation
Theory
At this time, actual distances of planets from Sun were
unknown, but were later measured. One technique is "parallax"
"Earth-baseline parallax" uses
telescopes on either side of Earth to
measure planet distances.
Newton (1642-1727)
Kepler's laws were basically playing with
mathematical shapes and equations and seeing
what worked.
Newton's work based on experiments of how
objects interact.
His three laws of motion and law of gravity
described how all objects interact with each other.
Newton's Zeroeth Law of Motion
Objects are dumb. They do not know the past and they are not
good predictors of the future. They only know what forces act
on them right now.
Newton's Zeroeth Law of Motion
DEMO - Pushing the cart on track
Newton's First Law of Motion
Every object continues in a state of rest or a state of motion with
a constant speed in a straight line unless acted on by a force.
Newton's First Law of Motion
DEMO - Air Puck motion
DEMO - Smash the HAND
DEMO - Tablecloth