Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Modeling Small Network Dynamics
Whitman Richards M. I. T.
Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural Shifts
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
28 Feb 07
Sageman & Chen, 2005
A Complex Network Structure
Clumps
Central Staff
Core Arab
Southeast Asian
Maghreb Arab
Node Size
Leader
Lieutenant
Other people
Fate
Dead
Captured
Militant Core => a small social network
Leaders < 3
Soldiers < 12 +/-
Supporters 10 - 50+
Itza
Church
Start-up
Street Gang
Sports Team
Activist Group
Mafia
Militia
Terrorist Cell
Three Aspects of Small Groups
Goals, beliefs: sacred vs secular values
Model for Core (i.e leader-soldier relations): a network
Model for Recruitment: conformity vs consistency
Part I: Recruitment
Conformity - Consistency Model (Page et al.)
Conformity: want to be like “one of the BIG guys”
Consistency: want your beliefs to be in harmony
A Surprise: Time to Equilibrium (mean field)
*
*
*
*
*
Sacred Beliefs:
1
Consanguineous Marriages (Bittles et al.)
Part II
Small Network Models
Leaders < 3
Soldiers < 12 +/-
Small Graphs
Supporters 10 - 50+
1. Impossibility “Theorem”:
think small !
2. New Representation: leader dominance vs bonding
2004 Australian Bombing (Militant Minority) [Atran, Magourik et al]
Ring Banten Group
An-Nur Group
Kompak Group
Accommodations
Group
Core Bombing Group
= Lukmanul Group
= Ngruki Ties
= an-Nur Group
= Ring Banten Group
= Kompak Group
= Afghan Ties
= Misc Other
+ = Dead
= Arrest
Descriptive Parameters: graphs: {# nodes, #edges}
Model Abstraction: Dominance of Leader vs Coherence of Network
Two Measures of Social Network Structure
Leadership Dominance: {max. vtx. deg,}
Coherence: {cluster coeff.}
(Freeman, 1978)
Watts & Strogatz (1998), Newman(2004)
2004 Australian Bombing (Militant Minority) [Atran et al]
Ring Banten Group
Max. Vtx. Deg = 3
An-Nur Group
# Triangles = 1
n=4
Kompak Group
Coherence, C:
Leadership, L:
Accommodations
Group
= Lukmanul Group
#triangles / nC3
= Ngruki Ties
= an-Nur Group
= Ring Banten Group
∑(MaxDeg - VtxDeg.)/(n-1)*(n-2)
= Kompak Group
Core Bombing Group
= Afghan Ties
= Misc Other
+ = Dead
= Arrest
Key observation: as bonding increases, dominance of leader decreases
Lacunae: Data lacking on…..
• Street Gang Evolution
Hmong, Haitian, Yakusa, Somali…
• Street Gang Recruitment
What’s sacred? Why join?
Buddy vs friend of friend
Roles of contact, video, email
• Mergers: from Small to Global
More Lacunae
Mergers: Physical vs Virtual links; given 2 gangs,
which member of each is most likely to build bridge?
Web networking: friends of friends (myspace, etc.);
likely candidates for militant acts (eg High School)
How to evaluate trust in a network?
Disenchantment (return to earlier beliefs)
Email analysis: text style -> tag for hidden content (analog to
voice analysis.)
Violent vs non-violent spectrum: what are key parameters?
Long term supporters (requires different model.)
Extent of strategizing; at what level? Emotional factors.
Y-factor: propaganda, secular vs sacred.
MURI Scope
Network
Complexity
WWII
Society
Community
Jihad
Itza
Street Gang
Contextual
Complexity
Football
Family
chess
Individual
Morra,
Chicken
Colored Trails
Strategic
Complexity
The Team
Belief Structures:
Scott Atran, Univ. of Michigan & John Jay, CUNY, Anthropology
Doug Medin, Northwestern University,
Psychology
Ken Forbus,
Northwestern Univ.,
Computer Science and Education
Mark Finlayson & P. H. Winston, MIT,
Computer Science and AI
Network Structure & Evolution
Joshua Tenenbaum,
MIT,
Computation and Cognitive Science
Jenna Bednar, Univ. of Michigan, Political Science & Public Policy
Scott Page, University of Michigan, Political Science & Complexity
Whitman Richards, MIT,
Cognition and Artificial Intelligence
Decision-Making & Strategic Planning:
Brian Stankiewicz, Univ. of Texas, Austin, Expt’l Psychology
Avi Pfeffer,
Harvard,
Computer Science
Consultants:
Robert Axelrod, University of Michigan, Political Science
Marc Sageman, University of Penna., M.D., PhD.