Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
LGS WFS Design Status & Issues Dekany, Delacroix, & Velur Caltech Optical Observatories LGS WFS concept at SF review 2 LGS WFS parameters WFS type (# of sensors) Location Sensing wavelength (nm) Input platesc ale (um/") # of subapertures Detector platescale( "/pixel) Filters Pupil sampling Field of regard (arcsec) Comments LGS HOWFS (9) after WF relay 589 nm 727 16x16, 32x32, 64x64 1.45 no filter 64x64, 32x32, 16x16 174 Theta-phi OSM Location Type Range of travel Min. step size (est.) LGS channel (individual unit focus) delta Z ~10 mm 10 um LGS lenslet changer deltaX, Y delta X = 20 mm, delta Y = 2 mm 1 um LGS channel relay and camera focus for pupil sampling change delta Z 5 mm 0.1 um Pick off (theta mech) Pick off (phi mech.) LGS WFS unit overall travel Rotation of the WFS (sans the central WFS) delta theta delta phi 0.2 (UP)/ 115" (LA) 0.2" (UP)/ 300" (LA) 360 deg. 360 deg. delta Z 130 mm 1 mm delta (thetaphi) 360 deg. 100" WFS type Length in Z [mm] Breadth X [mm] Width Y [mm] # of sensors Pick off mech. Cooling LGS WFS 850 150 150 9 LGS theta-phi 3 stage Peltier 3 SF review LGS WFS conceptual design 4 Post SF review changes to LGS WFS architecture • • • • • • 4 fixed + 3 (PnS) LGS sensors (as compared to 1 fixed + 8 mobile sensors) Field of regard of PnS sensors is 120 arcsec dia. and the fixed sensors are positioned to accept LGS light at 10 arcsec. radius (as compared to 10-150 arcsec continuous FoR (dia.) for sensors in the pentagon formation and 10174” arcsec continuous FoR (dia.) for PnS sensors) Only 2 pupil sampling scales – 64x64, 32x32 (no 16x16). LGS TT mirror to be implemented on the downlink – not appraised as part of WFS costs, neither have the motion controls for these mirrors defined as part of LGS WFS (this was a recent change). LGS WFS’s are not refrigerated and are fed through a window (or a pair of windows) – sensors are not required to operate -17C but need to work at -5 C. Lesser motion control Total laser power has been reduced and the sodium return numbers have been scaled accordingly for performance in Mauna Kea. 5 Current optical design (Lick) 6 LGS WFS design concept (needs refinement) Camera Rotation axis Reflective tetrahedron Fixed frame 4 Fixed Cameras Camera Translation LGS WFS TT stages are not implemented yet (we realized the need to accommodate TT sensor last week). 7 FLAMINGOS-2 OIWFS 8 LGS WFS issues • The most extreme RMS wavefront error in the LGS path is 1.5-1.7micron, and the largest spot size is about 250 miliarcsec - these static aberrations on the LGS caused a shift of the centroids of 5% of a sub-aperture (at most) [Kupke] Laser Guide Star Size Calculation Finite Object Size We have started working with Lick to understand what WF quality is required at the LGS input (Gemini and TMT may have overspecified their sensor). Intrinsic guide star diameter 0.00 arcsec Inherent aberrations in the uplink beam: 0.90 arcsec Beam movement contribution to uplink 0.33 arcsec Residual seeing contribution to uplink 0.60 arcsec Diameter of point source laser at Na layer: 1.08 arcsec Natural seeing FWHM at GS wavelength 0.58 arcsec Subaperture Tip/Tilt corrected FWHM 0.47 arcsec Contribution due to seeing 0.47 arcsec 0.00 m 1.27 arcsec Avg. Elongation 0.85 arcsec Contribution due to elongation 0.85 arcsec 0.25 arcsec RMS blurring due to atmospheric dispersion 0.000 arcsec Total size of detected return beam: 1.47 arcsec Charge Diffusion 0.25 pixels Contribution due to Charge Diffusion 0.40 arcsec 0.66 arcsec 1.66 arcsec Uplink formation of the beacon(s) Perfect Uplink AO? NO Seeing Elongation Distance from LLT to telescope axis: Use Max. Elongation? NO System Aberrations Aberrations in AO thru to WFS Atmospheric Dispersion ADC in HOWFS? NO Sensing Approach Pyramid WFS? NO Charge Diffusion Subaperture Diffraction Lambda/d (for sensing) Spot size used for centroiding 9 LGS WFS design concept Pick off arms search area Pick off arms effective 120” search area Tetrahedron to direct light to fixed WFS’s. 10 Issues & to-dos: • Need to update all relevant requirements and nail down as many #s and parameters as possible. • Refine the LGS sensor concept to work as 4 fixed + 3 PnS (conceptual work has already started). • Redesign pick off arm with pupil access and TTM. • Now that a 256x256 pixel CCD is being talked about in meetings – should we make it our baseline? If so, what is the pixel size? • We need to model 2 more windows in zemax as the sensor resides outside the refrigerated chamber. 11 LGS spots with sensor in the current optical design The AO design team and the WFS team are trying to hash out details to be able to build a integrated optical model with version control. 12 Other WFS related changes • No narrow field TWFS. • No ADC on NGS WFS. • No ADC in the TWFS. • In general, the system has undergone many changes, any design work without nailing down requirements might mean re-work. • Next 2 weeks will mostly be spent in updating the requirements database. • Alex is already obtained a Contour account and is getting familiar with the software, the requirements and the PBS. 13