Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
L2 Igneous Geology David Brown Course 1. Dynamics 2. Classification of igneous rocks and properties of magma 3. Generation and differentiation of magma 1 4. Generation and differentiation of magma 2 5. Sub-volcanic plumbing system 6. Physical volcanology 1 7. Physical volcanology 2 Volcanology Outline • Explosive basaltic eruptions (Hawaiian, Strombolian) • “Effusive” intermediate/silicic eruptions – • Lavas Explosive intermediate/silicic eruptions (Vulcanian, Plinian, Peléan) – Pyroclastic rocks • • • Types and deposits Models of deposition Caldera collapse EXPLOSIVE BASALTIC ERUPTIONS (Icelandic, Hawaiian, Strombolian) Vent-related deposits • Spatter – – – fluid molten lava ejected from a vent flatten and congeal ramparts, small cones/domes Mull – Hornitos (“rootless” cone) • fed by lava, not conduit Vent-related deposits • Pele’s tears – – – after Hawaiian goddess of volcanoes molten lava from fountains often associated with Pele’s hair Vent-related deposits • Scoria – – – • Reticulite – – • Strombolian eruptions highly vesicular red-brown to black burst vesicle walls honeycomb texture “Basaltic pumice” EFFUSIVE INTERMEDIATE/SILICIC ERUPTIONS Lavas • High viscosity, low T • • Form lava domes Small-volume flows • Flow banded – – mineral layers, differentiation viscous shear Lascar, Chile Mt Pelée, Martinique Iceland Lavas • Rapidly cooled silicic lavas may produce flow banded obsidian Torfajökull, Iceland Teide, Tenerife Lavas • Some large-volume silicic lavas – controversial origin….. Obsidian Cliff, Yellowstone EXPLOSIVE INTERMEDIATE/SILICIC ERUPTIONS (Vulcanian, Plinian, Peléan) Pyroclastic Rocks • A multitude of terms and deposits! • Comprise ash, lapilli, lithic blocks, crystals and pumice • Pumice similar to liquid foam produced when you open a coke bottle Fragmentation and Eruption Plinian Eruption Example • Convective region – column entrains cold air – mixed air dilutes column, is heated – reduces density, increases buoyancy = RISE • Gas thrust region – high velocity jet of gas and particles – 100-400 m s-1 Plinian Eruption Example • Umbrella region – convective column continues to build – density column = density atmosphere Redoubt, Alaska column stops rising and spreads out UMBRELLA Sheveluch (Kamchatka) in Russia Plinian Eruption Example • What happens next? • Depends on density – ρ column vs. ρ atmosphere • If ρ column < ρ atmosphere – buoyant eruption plume – pyroclastic FALL deposits • If ρ column > ρ atmosphere – eruption column collapses under gravity – pyroclastic DENSITY CURRENT deposits Fall Deposits • Fall deposits – Ash, pumice settling from eruption column (scoria, bombs in basaltic eruptions) – Ash-fall or pumice-fall – Produce TUFF or LAPILLI-TUFF – Mantle topography Fall Deposits • Finely-laminated or massive • Typically well sorted and graded – normal: larger clasts settle – reverse: pulsed eruptions, gas input Arequipa, Peru Laacher See, Germany Santorini, Greece Fall Deposits • Pyroclast dispersal Fall Deposits • Pyroclast dispersal Density Current Deposits • Pyroclastic density current – general term for a “ground-hugging” current of pyroclasts and gas (including air) – moves because denser than surrounding atmosphere (or water) • Ignimbrite (“ash flow tuff”) – deposit of a PDC, rich in pumice or pumiceous ash shards (gas bubble wall, cuspate) Density Current Deposits • Ignimbrite – May contain various massive and stratified lithofacies – TUFF, LAPILLI-TUFF, BRECCIA Tuff and Lapilli-Tuff, Tenerife XBD, Laacher See, Germany Breccia, Tenerife Density Current Deposits • Ignimbrite pyroclasts – Juvenile (magmatic fragments: pumice, shards, glass) – Crystals – Lithics • Cognate (non-vesiculated magma fragments that have solidified) • Accessory (country rock explosively ejected/fragmented during eruption) • Accidental (clasts picked up by PDCs during eruption) Lithics Juvenile Crystals Density Current Deposits • Welding – – – – high temperature emplacement of PDC pumice and glass still malleable/plastic fusing together of pumice and glass shards compaction No, not that type! • Fiamme – lens or “flame-shaped object” – typically forms from flattened pumice/shards in a welded ignimbrite • Eutaxitic texture – Planar fabric of deformed shards and fiamme, typically formed by hot-state compaction in welded ignimbrites Density Current Deposits Coire Dubh, Rum Wan Tsai, HK Tejeda, Gran Canaria Fiamme Eutaxitic texture Density Current Deposits • Welding textures – extreme welding = vitrophyre (glassy) Non-welded Fine-grained ash matrix Welded Lithic fragments Pumice blocks and lapilli Compacted & welded ash matrix Vitrophyre Fiamme Highly compacted glassy matrix Density Current Deposits • Welding textures – extreme welding = vitrophyre (glassy) Non-welded Fine-grained ash matrix Welded Lithic fragments Pumice blocks and lapilli Compacted & welded ash matrix Vitrophyre Fiamme Highly compacted glassy matrix PDC Eruptions • Eruption column collapse – pumice-rich ignimbrite • Upwelling and overflow with no eruption column – pumice-poor ignimbrite • Lava dome/flow collapse – “block and ash flow” • Lateral blast PDC Deposition Models • “Classic terminology”: Flow vs. Surge FLOW SURGE • Flow: high-particle concentration PDC – fill topography – massive, poorly sorted • Surge: low-particle concentration PDC – mantle topography AND topographically controlled – sedimentary bedforms PDC Deposition Models • “Flow” deposits – valley filling • “Surge” deposits – cross bedding Laacher See, Germany PDC Deposition Models • “Surge” deposits b Dunes Antidunes Laacher See, Germany Standard Ignimbrite Flow Unit 3b: Co-ignimbrite ash 3a: Ash-cloud Surge (Sparks, 1976) 2b: Flow Reverse pumice Normal lithics 2a: Basal Flow <1 m thick Reverse pumice Reverse lithics 1: Ground Surge (Fall deposit at base) Ash-cloud surge: dilute top of flow Ground surge: in advance of flow Not always present! Pyroclastic flow Standard Ignimbrite Flow Unit “PLUG FLOW” CONCEPT 3b: Co-ignimbrite ash (Sparks, 1976) 3a: Ash-cloud Surge 2b: Flow Reverse pumice Normal lithics 2a: Basal Flow <1 m thick Reverse pumice Reverse lithics 1: Ground Surge (Fall deposit at base) TURBULENT TURBULENT Not always present! LAMINAR “PLUG FLOW” Plug Flow (en masse) • Laminar flow above basal shear layer • “Freezes” en masse when driving stress falls (Sparks, 1976) Assumptions • Based on massive ignimbrite units – Absence of tractional structures = non-turbulent flow • Two end member types – Turbulent low-concentration currents (surges) – Non-turbulent, laminar to plug-flow high-concentration currents (flows) • Multiple units = multiple eruptions Problems • Surge deposits not always present • Gradations between “flow” (massive) and “surge” (traction-stratified) deposits • Ignimbrites show vertical chemical zoning • Not considered possible through Plug Flow! Progressive aggradation • Deposit accumulates gradually (Branney & Kokelaar, 1992) Progressive aggradation • Deposited incrementally during the sustained passage of a single particulate current • Deposition at denser basal part of flow • Particles agglutinate, become non-particulate Progressive aggradation • NPF continues to aggrade – continual supply from over-riding particulate flow • Changes in stratification – variations in flow steadiness and material at source Progressive aggradation 1) Early part of eruption: High energy = coarse deposit Rhyolite magma 1. Deposition Progressive aggradation 2) Middle part of eruption: Low energy = fine deposit Dacite magma 2. 1. Deposition Progressive aggradation 3) End part of eruption: High energy = coarse deposit Andesite magma 3. 2. 1. Deposition Progressive aggradation Welding occurs during and after eruption WELDING Rheomorphism • Folds formed during slumping and welding of non-particulate flow Kilchrist, Skye Stob Dearg, Glencoe Rheomorphism • Folds formed during slumping and welding of non-particulate flow Snake River, Idaho Ignimbrite or Lava?! • Rheomorphic folds and columnar joints • Ignimbrites may look like lavas! Tejeda, Gran Canaria Block and Ash Flows • Collapse of lava dome (Peléan eruption) • Dense, poorly to nonvesiculated blocky fragments in ashy matrix • Monomict • No pumice Montserrat, Caribbean Tejeda, Gran Canaria Caldera Collapse • Magma rising up the fractures – may reach the surface forming a caldera Caldera Collapse • Classic caldera model of Smith & Bailey (1968) Domes Domes Tumescence/ rifting Central vent/ ring vent Synchronous Inward piston • Caldera collapse diagram. Resurgence Resurgence Collapse? • • • • Piston Piecemeal Trapdoor Downsag Caldera Fill • Ignimbrite and collapse breccias – – Megabreccia (>1 m), mesobreccia (<1 m) Shed from caldera walls, fault scarps Caldera Fill – Landslides, debris flows across caldera floor Caldera Fill • Volcaniclastic breccia – comminuted matrix Sgurr nan Gillean, Rum Caldera Fill • Ignimbrite Outline • Explosive basaltic eruptions (Hawaiian, Strombolian) • “Effusive” intermediate/silicic eruptions – • Lavas Explosive intermediate/silicic eruptions (Vulcanian, Plinian, Peléan) – Pyroclastic rocks • • • Types and deposits Models of deposition Caldera collapse