Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
LEGAL & REGULATORY ASPECTS OF THE CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM JUAN RODRIGO WALSH Climate Change and CDM Projects: Understanding the Legal Issues at stake Designing and implementing CDM or related Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction projects requires understanding the underlying legal and institutional frameworks on several planes or levels: • The International Legal Framework • Investor Nation Regulatory & Institutional Issues • Host Country Legal & Institutional Requirements • Contractual Issues between Investors and Developers • Contractual Issues related to sale of CERs Climate Change and CDM Projects: Understanding the Legal Issues at stake Designing and implementing CDM or related Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction projects requires understanding the existing International legal and institutional frameworks: The International Legal Framework UNFCC Kyoto Protocol COP/MOP Resolutions & Decisions Executive Board History of the Negotiations CLIMATE CHANGE HISTORY THE KYOTO PROTOCOL: 1980 W.M.O. & UNEP Workshops 1988 IPCC Meeting Together with the UNFCC, the Kyoto Protocol constitutes the most important global agreement on the environment to date. 1990 WORLD CLIMATE Conference 1992 UNCED RIO Conference & UNFCC 1993/6 COP 1 to 3 1997 KYOTO PROTOCOL 1998 COP 4 (Buenos Aires Action Plan) 2001 BONN ACCORDS 2001 COP 7 (Marrakech Accords) CDM Executive Board set up The Protocol establishes Emission Reduction Targets for the period 2008-2012 for industrialized countries 5,2% below 1990 level emissions Kyoto also creates the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) for developing countries Emphasising cooperation and “flexible mechanisms” to achieve the Protocol’s goals These mechanisms are: Emissions Trading Joint Implementation Clean Development Mechanism (ET) (J I ) (CDM) GHG Committments undertaken by Annexe 1 Countries • The Kyoto Protocol mandates Developed Countries to reduce overall GHG emissions by 5 % during the period 2008-2012, against 1990 levels of emissions. • Other Annex 1 Countries have committed to greater levels of reduction: Some Examples: • Canada plans GHG reductions of 6 % below 1990 levels. Current Emissions versus Goals 300 U.S.A. 200 100 0 EU Japan Canada Other OECD Australia -100 EE New EU Ukraine -200 -300 Russia -400 Source: Royal Institute of International Affairs Flexible Mechanisms Introduced by the Kyoto Protocol The Kyoto Protocol establishes strict committments for Annex I Countries, allowing for compliance by means of “flexibility mechanisms” : • Emissions Trading (ET) 2008-2012 • Joint Implementation (JI) 2008-2012 • Clean Development 2000-2012 Mechanism (CDM) Emissions Trading (ET) • Article 17 of the Kyoto Protocolo provides for emissions trading transactions between Annexe 1 Countries • All ET Transactions must be supplementary to national policies adopted by governments pursuant to the quantifiable emissions reductions committed to by Annexe 1 Countries Joint Implementation • Article 6 establishes that Emissions Reductions Units may be transferred between Annexe 1 Countries in the case of Joint Implementation Projects. • Joint Implementation Activities must be complementary to domestic emission reductions policies. Clean Development Mechanism • Article 12 allows for projects to be jointly executed by developed and developing countries. • These activities may start in 2000. Developed Countries may therefore invest in GHG reduction projects in developing countries and utilise the credits obtained from these reductions toward compliance with national committments. CDM projects must meet the following requirements: • Contribute to the sustainable development of developing countries • Have a demonstrable effect on climate change mitigation • GHG Reductions must be measurable and certifiable over a period of time • Environmental Benefits must be permanent and additional to any that might occur in absence of the project CDM requirements • Acceptability – Host Country Acceptability – At an International Level – For the Investor Nation • Additionality – Must be real and measurable – Must consider existing and future trends • Externalities – Must consider social effects and sustainability – Must consider environmental impacts What is Additionality ? • Environmental Additionality – Emissions reductions must be over and above a “business as usual scenario” • Financial Additionality – Investments must be real. Resources from Annexe 1 Countries must e additional to existing financial committments and ODA • Business as Usual Scenario – Some degree of Technical Innovation required Carbon Quantification Additionality = project – Base Line Carbon storage due to the Project 250 200 tC/ha 150 100 PROJECT - E. globulus (11 year rotation) BASELINE - Pasture / ex-agricultural land 50 0 0 10 Time (yr) 20 30 Source: Ecosecurities 2002 Other Issues to be Considered in CDM Projects • Social Impacts – Employment: • Are jobs created ? – Infrastructure and Know How: • How does the project contribute to local expertise and infrastructure ? • Environmental Benefits – Other emissions reductions and environmental benefits Required Phases for CDM Projects Pre-Investment Phase Project Design Base Line Determination Project Approval Project Registry Implementation Investment & Operation Verification Certification Monitoring Award of CERs Pre-investment Phase Pre Feasibility Criteria Carbon Issues Other Considerations • Project Timeframe • Overall Environmental Impacts • Defining the Baseline •Defining Additionality • Identifying “Leakages” • Net Carbon Benefits • Potential CERs Biodiversity Waste management Watershed Management • Sustainable Development • Host Country Approval • Training requirements • Technology transfer Implementation Phase Validation: Must be carried out by an Independent Third Party in order to obtain approval as a CDM Project Verification: Must also be carried out by an independent Third Party. Verification requires periodical control and ex post verification of emissions reductions o carbon sequestration in sinks Certification: Must also be carried out by an Independent Third Party. Certification consists in a formal, written statement to the effect that, during a certain lapse of time, a particular project has achieved the targets set for emissions reductions or sequestration, as verified. CERs awarded by the CDM Executive Board What are CERs ? • Certificates of Emissions Reductions, measured in tons of CO2. (CERs). • Emissions Reductions must comply with the following criteria: – Measurable, and; – Verifiable by Independent Thir Parties . • They must also pass the test of “Additionality” Climate Change and CDM Projects: Understanding the Legal Issues at stake Designing and implementing CDM or related Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction projects usually requires understanding the existing legal and institutional framework in the “Investor Country” or the country of the purchaser of the CERs: Investor Nation Regulatory & Institutional Issues Annexe 1 Country Party to Kyoto? Domestic CO2 Programme? (ERUPT & CERUPT) Company to Company Climate Change and CDM Projects: Understanding the Legal Issues at stake Designing and implementing CDM or related Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction projects requires a fundamental understanding of the legal and institutional framework of the Host Country: Host Country Legal & Institutional Requirements Regulatory Requirements for approval Existence of a Host Country CDM office Environmental and Regulatory requirements applicable to the CDM Project Legal, taxation and other regulatory requirements for FDI Host Country Approval Process: The case of Argentina Environment Secretariat Resolution 169/2001 Establishes the guidelines for evaluation and approval for projects submitted to the Secretariat acting as “Focal Poi Projects are subject to independent peer review and external evaluation Special “Climate Change Office” ( OAMDL) Coordination of environmental policies and Negotiating Positions at UNFCC and COP/MOP meetings CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION STRATEGY: The Case of Argentina Sectors to be given special attention: Energy Sector, Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry Sectors (LULUCF), Farming Sector Waste Management Sector SMAyDS OAMDL Executive Committee Advisory Comittee SAyDS Sec. of Energy Sec. of Industry Sec. of Transport Sec. of Science & Technology Agriculture Foreign Affairs Business Associations Academia NGO’s Sector Committees Energy, Industry & Transport Forestry Farming Waste Management OAMDL FUNCTIONS • Identify prioritary sectors to implement CDM projects and activities •Define CDM Policy OAMDL • Establish methodologies and procedures for identifying, preparing and evaluating projects • Full cycle management and Host Country approval of CDM projects National Climate Change Programs • Establish relationships with sources of financing for projects Impacts & Adaptation Mitigation Awareness building & Participation CDM Project Management Rules for submission of projects Project Design Documents (PDD) Evaluating Institutions Registry (RIE) Organization of the National CDM Authority • Design of the legal context for the presentation and management of projects – Legal requirements – Policy Issues • Methodological support for the preparation and assessment of projects – Pre/ and feasibility Studies, Standardised Baseline Studies & Monitoring Programs – Policy Guidelines Regulatory Aspects of CDM Projects and the Climate Change Office (OAMDL) • Registration and Acreditation of Evaluating Institutions for National Project Cycle Assessment • Adaptation of Project Presentation Documents and standardized formats (PIN, PDD, etc) • Evaluation Criteria and Sustainability Indices • Liaison Offices with Provincial and Local Governments • Proposals for simplified Project Evaluation Technical Support provided by Climate Change Office • Colaboration in designing National Climate Change and Mitigation Strategies • Coordination of National Climate Change Programmes, Projects and related research activities • Establishment of Project data bases and general awareness building • Administrative Management of OAMDL Working Groups OAMDL’s Activities Creation of sector-specific Committees – Sectors: • • • • Energy, Industry & Transport Forestry Farming Waste Management – Objectives: • Identify opportunities for projects for potential investors • Preparation of a strategy for the mitigation of GHG emissions on a sector-specific basis, in order to achieve the country’s best mitigation potential for each sector • Establishment of sector-specific baseline • Methodological Guidelines for projects Climate Change and CDM Projects: Understanding the Legal Issues at stake Designing and implementing CDM or related Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction projects also requires understanding the legal implications and potential risks for both Project Developers and Investors: Contractual Issues between Investors and Developers Applicable Rules for FDI Multilateral or Bilateral Investment Agreements Taxation & Repatriation of Profits Issues Technology Transfer & Intellectual Property Issues Project Due Diligence between Developers and Investors Who is purchasing Certified Emissions Reductions (CERs) ? • • • • • Energy Sector Companies Chemical Companies Oil & Gas Companies Paper, Cement, and Steel Industries Investment Funds Prices: Which Way? LEVEL OF TRADE/ PRICING SCENARIO PRICE IN 2010 (US$/Tonne CO2 – expressed in current prices ) SOURCE BP AMOCO HIGH 34.42 MEDIUM 28.05 LOW 22 EU TRADE 58 33 5 Green Paper on GHG Trading Within The EU, European Commission, 2000. ANNEX I TRADE 98 78 67 The Energy Journal – Kyoto Special Issue, IAEE, 1999 GLOBAL TRADE 31.5 21 10.5 The Energy Journal – Kyoto Special Issue, IAEE, 1999 CURRENT PRICES 11 3 0.5 Utility Environment Report; Petroleum Economist, Natsource LLC; Electricity International, Platts; Ecolog; Utility Week; Reuters; Canada National Post BP Amoco; The Energy Journal – Kyoto Special Issue, IAEE, 1999. “High” based on current price of US$27; “Medium” based on pilot phase upper value of US$22/tonne; “Low” based on pilot phase lower value of US$17/tonne. Assumed real growth rate of 3.31% p.a. from 2001 to 2020 (average implied growth rate from model simulations detailed in The Energy Journal. What is the market paying for Carbon ? • PFC - US$ 3.5-5 / Ton CO2 (depending on risk factors) • ERUPT - Euro 5-9/Ton CO2 • Institutional Funds – On a one by one negotiated basis • Private Corporations - US$ 50cents to $1.50 per Ton CO2 ( Within or without Kyoto) • Options (depending on price and timespan US$ 25c to 75c/Ton CO2) ERUPT Results Project Company Country and Project ERUs Municipal Cogeneration Cluj-Napoca (Romania) BTG Biomass Technology Group BV A biomass energy portfolio (Czech) United Power Co. (joint venture of Surduc – Nehoiasu Hydro SC Hidroelectrica SA and Harza Power Plant (Romania) Engineering Company LP) Nuon International Projects BV Skrobotowo Windpark (Poland) Price per Ton Co2 NV Nuon 924.590 US$ 9,08 522.320 US$ 9,00 612.631 US$ 5,00 583.500 US$ 8,75 www.senter.nl/erupt Comparison of IRR in Carbon Projects: Renewable Energy Country Project Romania Costa Rica Jamaica Morocco Chile Costa Rica Guyana Nicaragua Brazil Latvia District heating Wind Wind Wind Hydro Hydro Bagasse Bagasse Biomass Methane B as U IRR IRR (w/CER) Increment IRR 10,5 9,7 17,0 12,7 9,2 7,1 7,2 14,6 8,3 11,4 11,4 10,6 18,0 14,0 10,4 9,7 7,7 18,2 13,5 18,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,3 1,2 2,6 0,5 3,6 5,2 7,4 IRR Percentage 9 9 6 10 13 37 7 25 63 65 Source: World Bank 2001 Selling Carbon Credits • This Phase is usually carried out simultaneously with the project design and approval phases • Early Identification of potential Investors • Enhanced security and feasibility for Project • Direct Negotiations • Involvement of Brokers: Success Fee for sale of CERs Climate Change and CDM Projects: Understanding the Legal Issues at stake Designing and implementing CDM or related Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction projects requires understanding the legal aspects of the Carbon Market and the sale of CERs: Contractual Issues related to sale of CERs • • • • Long term purchase contracts Brokerage fees Monitoring requirements, auditing and Independent Verification Managing Risk: Insurance The Way Forward • The Climate Change Regime has been controversial • The Kyoto Protocol has been rejected by the U.S. as “fatally flawed” • Entry into force requires at least 55 countries with 55% of global GHG emissions • Technical uncertainties (Forestry and LULUCF) • Russian ratification? The Way Forward • Experience is growing – – – – PCF UK ETS EU Directives U.S. State regimes • Climate Change is a problem that will not disappear!!