* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Future rice production in Madagascar
Survey
Document related concepts
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Future rice production in Madagascar Where and how much ? Robert Hijmans & Alice Laborte International Rice Research Institute Background • Madagascar’s population is largely rural, very poor & dependent on agriculture • Rice is the main crop and staple food & cassava is also important. • Madagascar is a net rice importer. Government aims to double rice production between 2005 and 2012 • Production (kg) = Area (ha) * Yield (kg / ha) • Area expansion (habitat loss?) or intensification (pollution?) 2 modeling approaches • Regression: Where would area expansion take place? • Simulation: Climate change effect on yield Where is rice grown ? BD50 IDFN1 Regression model Rice area as function of: a) b) c) d) biophysical factors socioeconomic factors biophysical + socioeconomic factors bio. + soc. factors (2 regions: W, CE) Biophysical variables Socio-economic variables Model Variable Unit Intercept 1a 17.039** b2 0.364** c 3 12.469** Elevation km -0.679** -0.490** Slope deg -0.055** -0.063** Slope – focal mean deg -0.147** -0.114** Sqr(Slope) deg2 0.005** 0.005** Rainfall m 0.757** 0.677** Mean temperature °C -1.255** -0.851** Sqr(Temperature) °C2 0.022** 0.013** Distance to roads km -0.121** -0.114** Distance to towns km -0.094** -0.091** Population density person km-2 0.009** 0.002** Population density – change % Income million francs -0.002** 1.458** 2.165** D2 0.09 0.11 0.16 Area under ROC 0.70 0.73 0.76 26,930 26,382 24,928 AIC **Significant at 0%, * 5% Model d Variable Unit Intercept Elevation km Sqr(Elevation) West AS, MA, TL Center-East AV, FI, TM 8.722** -14.417** -3.304** -4.306** 2.007** 1.295** Slope deg -0.071** Slope – focal mean deg -0.125** -0.150** Sqr(Slope) deg2 0.003** 0.005** Flow accumulation – focal mean -0.012** Rainfall m 1.817** Mean temperature °C -0.328** Sqr(Temperature) °C2 Distance to roads km -0.150** -0.125** Distance to towns km -0.097** -0.107** Population density person km-2 0.009** 0.002** Population density – change % -0.035** 0.011** Income million francs 2.393** -0.075** 5.139** D2 0.18 0.20 Area under ROC 0.78 0.79 **Significant at 0%, *1% Biophysical variables Socio-economic variables Biophysical & socioeconmic variables Two regions Biophysical variables Socio-economic variables Biophysical & socioeconmic variables Two regions Forest loss model Business as usual: Forest area reduced by 25% in 2032 50% by 2077. Rice growth simulation model Baseline Climate: 1960-1990 (CO2 = 340 ppm) Cultivar: IR72 Model: Oryza Pot. yld. (t / ha) January April July October < 2.5 2.5 - 5 5 - 7.5 7.5 - 10 > 10 November planting of IR64, irrigated 2080 A2a, Hadcm3 Current conditions < 2.5 2.5 - 5 5 - 7.5 7.5 - 10 > 10 IR64, rainfed Implications? Part of the climate change effects on yield potential can be easily dealt with (length of growing season) Current yields are very low; Need for intensification; opportunities are not much affected. Water supply, double cropping? Resilience to extreme events (flooding, drought) More rice in the central highlands? Or diversification to high value crops? • Intensification: – less pressure on the land; – more pollution, where would that be a threat? • Extensification: – Not necessarily in the forest areas – Rehabilitation of irrigation schemes – Need for alternative livelihoods