Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
FIRE – Status • FIRE offering – draft service portfolio – By FIA Prague • FIRE expert group is working on a white paper – First public draft version by FIA Prague • Draft FIRE overall architecture under discussion – Put testbeds and FIRE facility into a global context (incl. National Initiatives, GENI, etc.) – An agreed FIRE version by FIA Prague Vision for Future Internet based on a scenario Emotional Web Background • Started from linking machines via Internet • Followed by linking information via the WWW • Now we are linking both people and things with social networking and Internet of things Background • Internet is good to convey thoughts through messages with words, images and videos – E.g. attach an image to an incoming call • Not effective to convey our feelings compared to what humans are used to do through live, direct, communication Scenario • Imagine the Future Internet is able to feel your feelings and respond in a ubiquitous way to: – cheer you when you feel unhappy – help you discover when you feel curious – keep you company and help you meet other people when you feel lonely –… • Feel through the Web whether the people in our neighborhood, city, country, society, feel anxious, cheerful, worried, … Challenges • Enable the Future Internet through the necessary technology evolution, to convey better - whenever and to whomever we want - our emotional status as if we were in direct, live, face-to-face communication • Enable efficient ways for a human-internet symbiosis: – explore how humans themselves can be the extended senses of the internet • vs. Internet of things (sensors or others) being the extended senses of humans Questions • Can we test this scenario? – If yes, then how? – What disciplines are involved? – How do the experimental environment look like? • Possible ethical / privacy questions – Pervasive objects • Hyper personalization : a bad or good idea? – Perception / emotion • Neurosciences impact on interfaces and usages Possible contributing areas • • • • • • Semantic web Internet of things Virtual Presence Social networking Living Labs … Some references • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sepandar_Kam var • http://www.number27.org/biography.html • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZUaX Dm4qik • http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoI d=47353 • http://www.wefeelfine.org • http://www.iwantyoutowantme.org/ Vision for Future Internet based on a scenario Energy efficiency Energy efficiency / climate change • There exist best practices on how to develop and design systems with energy efficiency in mind e.g. ETSI • Focus group on ICTs and climate change established by ITU-T/TSAG in July 2008 • Ongoing work in several inititatives – – – – Profiling devices for energy management purposes Status monitoring Standby management Grid management Internet of Energy Internet of Energy Source: SmartW@tts ref. in brochure of German federal ministry of Economics and Technology http://www.e-energy.info Questions related to testbeds • What are the energy efficiency metrics? – E.g. energy efficiency per function attained – What are the functions? • We can measure that on the elements level, but how to assess it on the system level? • How would testbeds for energy efficiency look like?