Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chapter 14 Resistance-Training Strategies for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Developmental Disabilities • • • • • • Mental retardation Cerebral palsy Autism Spina bifida Vision or hearing impairment Other delays Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Mental Retardation (MR) • Intellectual and developmental disorder • Characterized by substandard intelligence quotient (IQ) and need of support • Most common developmental disorder in industrialized society Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. MR • Previous classification system based on IQ scores: – – – – Mild Moderate Severe Profound Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. New Classification System by AAIDD • American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) • Defines MR as being manifested by significantly subaverage intellectual functioning Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. New Classification System by AAIDD • Exists concurrently with related limitations in two or more adaptive skills areas • Must be evident before age 18 Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) • Adds schooling to other criteria for MR • Individuals with MR usually have IQ below 70 – Plus several deficits in adaptive skills Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Two Classification Levels of MR • Mild and severe • Classification based on: – How well individual functions in adaptive skill areas – Level of support required due to deficit • More support required, less functional the individual Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Four Levels of Support 1. Intermittent – Support on as-needed basis – Either high or low intensity 2. Limited – Support needed consistently over time – Lesser intensity Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Four Levels of Support 3. Extensive – Regular support 4. Pervasive – Constant care Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Prevalence of MR • In industrialized society, 3 percent of total population • Approximately 9 million in US • More than 90 percent of all individuals with MR classified as mild Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Prevalence of MR • Less than 10 percent of all individuals with MR classified as severe • Severe MR – IQ levels below 50 • Often below 35 Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Economic Impact of MR • Most live either independently, with family, in group homes, or in assisted living facilities • De-institutionalization movement in progress for last 30 to 40 years • Most fully/partially integrated in society Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Mortality Rates • One and one-half to four times higher than average population • Linked to: – Low IQ – Poor self-care skills – Physical inactivity Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Mortality Rates • Most common medical problems include cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders – Except Down syndrome (DS) • More susceptible to infections, leukemia, and early onset Alzheimer’s disease Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Etiology of MR • Specific cause usually unknown • Leading cause: – Fetal alcohol syndrome • Second leading cause: – Maternal drug abuse Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Etiology of MR • Other causes: – – – – – Birth-related trauma Infectious diseases Maternal disorders Genetic disorders Chromosomal abnormalities • E.g., DS Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Other Causes of MR • Poverty • Malnutrition • Infections during pregnancy – E.g., rubella, herpes • Severe stimulus deprivation Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Other Causes of MR • Perinatal factors – E.g., prematurity • Postnatal factors – E.g., lead poisoning Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DS • Most common manifestation of MR • Occurs in approximately 1 per 800 to 1 per 1000 births • Risks increase with maternal age Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Physical Characteristics of DS • • • • • Short stature Short arms and legs Foot and toe malformations Visual impairments Joint laxity related to atlanto-axial instability Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Physical Characteristics of DS • • • • • Skeletal muscle hypotonia Pulmonary hypoplasia Congenital heart disease Reduced immune function Higher risks for developing leukemia and Alzheimer’s disease Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Benefits of Resistance Training • Likely plays important role in developing and maintaining independent living • Increases muscle strength • Increases quality of life, independence, and (potentially) vocational productivity Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Comparative Levels of Muscle Strength • Individuals with MR have very low levels of strength – 30 to 50 percent lower than nondisabled peers • Individuals with DS have even lower levels of strength – 30 to 40 percent lower than MR peers – Less than 50 percent of nondisabled peers Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Comparative Levels of Muscle Strength • Persistent problem from childhood into adulthood • Even very active MR individuals still 25 percent below normal strength values • Few existing studies have found lower body strength to be low Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Leg and Back Strength from Childhood to Early Adulthood Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Implications of Low Muscle Strength • Limits recreational activities • Limits vocational productivity • Hinders aerobic capacity and endurance Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Research Supports Resistance Training • Improvements shown in muscle endurance • Beneficial effects reflect type of training conducted • Self-motivated individuals with mild MR can maintain strength gains independently Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Research Supports Resistance Training • For individuals with DS, studies show changes in strength with variety of training approaches • Refer to Table 14.1 Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Program Design Considerations • Level of understanding • Attention span • Level of fitness – Prior exercise experience • Age Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Program Design Considerations • Potential physical impairments – Significant coordination problems • Individualization of program • Reason for program – Individual’s goals • Medications Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Health Screening • Includes: – – – – – Cardiovascular disease Diabetes Cancer Lung disease Infectious diseases Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Health Screening • Includes: – – – – Neurological conditions Orthopedic conditions Medications Exercise and lifestyle history Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Exercise Testing Considerations • Conduct thorough health history screening • Involve parent/guardian • Screen individuals with DS for: – Congenital heart and related conditions – Atlanto-axial instability – Lax ligaments Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Exercise Testing Considerations • Obtain physician clearance when individual has serious medical complication • Include familiarization process to increase individual’s comfort level and understanding of process – Ongoing • Use weight machines for testing Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Exercise Testing Considerations • Use either standard 1 RM testing protocols or submaximal loads estimating 1 RM • Perform 10- to 12-repetition set to fatigue • Fatigue may be hard to ascertain – Repeat test, as needed • Test eight to 12 exercises using major muscle groups Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Program Components • Ensure individual can perform exercise using proper form • Teach proper breathing techniques to avoid Valsalva maneuver • Teach lower weights during two- to threeweek initial period at intensity of 40 to 50 percent of 1 RM Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Program Components • Begin with warm-up of five to seven minutes • Follow with “easy” set – E.g., 40 to 50 percent of 1 RM • Follow with normal set • Include flexibility training before/after Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Program Components • After first few weeks, follow ACSM guidelines for resistance training programs for healthy adults • Re-test frequently • Gauge signs of muscular fatigue to assess intensity Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Program Components • Exercises should stress all major muscle groups • Modify exercises based on individual’s physical limitations – Refer to Table 14.2 • Spotting required • See sample 24-Week Program Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.