Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Peripheral Vascular MR Angiography • Indications • Equipment • Technique • Image Analysis • Example Cases • Reporting - Billing Thank You Yi Wang, PhD Richard Watts, PhD Priscilla Winchester, MD Neil Khilnani, MD David Trost, MD Craig Kent, MD Bernie Redd, MD Qian Dong, MD Jim Meaney, MD Vince Ho, MD Tom Chenevert, PhD Indications: – Intermittent Claudication – Non-healing ulcer – Post bypass graft – Aneurysm – Pre free-flap – Pediatric Indications for MRA • Difficult access • Renal insufficiency Cr > 2.0 • Allergy to iodinated contrast • Patient refuses conventional angiography Advantages of MRA –No nephrotoxicity –Allergic reactions rare –3D –Anatomy and Physiology –High Accuracy –Affordable (reimbursement = $1159) Advantages of Gadolinium • No pulsatility artifact • No slice misregistration • No in-plane saturation • High resolution (1.8 x 1.6 x 2.6 mm) • Fast Equipment for Peripheral MRA • Magnet: – 1.5 Tesla high SNR – 0.5 Tesla requires more Gd – High performance gradients • Coil: body and head coil • Injector vs hand injection • Foam and straps Table Positioning Pole PVC tubing 2 inch diameter 3-4 meters long holes at 36 or 40 cm spacings Table Positioning Blocks Technique: younger vs older Young Adult Older patient 2D TOF Tech (30 years old) 2D TOF Radiologist (41 years old) 2D TOF: 1 hour 3D Gd MRA: 87 seconds Technique • Pediatric – Young Adult (fast flow) + Head or extermity coil + 2D time-of-flight + Gd almost never necessary + Gating +/- • Older Patients (slow flow) – Head coil + 2D projection MRA of ankle-feet – Body coil + 3D Bolus chase MRA: Renals distal calf + 3D phase contrast of renal arteries 3 Critical Details • Positioning Unsubtracted • Bolus timing • Subtraction Subtracted Bolus Chase MRA Technique • 2D Projection MRA (timing): • Floating Table – Sag Loc – Axial Loc – Cor 3D-Gd-MRA + Pre + During • 3D phase contrast (renals) 1 min 7 min 1 min 3 min 1.5 min 1.5 min 7 min Total Imaging Time 15 min Total Exam Time <1 hr 2D Projection MRA: ankle-feet Raw image Complex subtraction Left Right Coronal T1 2D Projection MRA: + complex subtraction Ankles Knee 2D Projection MRA (Left foot) 20.3 sec 24.4 sec 28.4 sec 32.5 sec 72.7 sec • Time to fill distal station = 24 seconds • Time to fill pelvis = 2/3 (24 sec) = 16 sec • Time for venous contamination = 60 sec Calculation of Bolus-Chase Injection Timing Parameters Time to venous contamination = 60 seconds Time to fill pelvis = 16 seconds Centers of k-space scan delay 6 6 Station 1 = pelvis Station 2 = thigh 6 Station 3 = calf 0 10 30 45 65 Bolus Chase MRA Preparations • level legs • secure feet with curlex • determine length of stations • landmark above umbilicus Position for Overlap at Critical Sites Overlap Trifurcation Overlap Common Femoral Bifurcation Bolus Chase Positioning 2D TOF Internal iliac P 60 A 25 Common femoral Popliteal P 45 A 30 Ankle P 20 Selecting Imaging Parameters A 24.8 P 60.2 Slice thickness = 3 (2-5) mm # of slices = 28 (20-40) Frequency = 256 Phase = 160 (128-256) Phase FOV = 0.8 (1-0.6) Bandwidth = 31 (31 or 62) 3D Gadolinium Bolus Chase MRA • Breathhold 1st station • Use oxygen liberally • Scan delay ~ 10 sec Image Post Processing • Digital subtraction: pre from post + Complex Fourier Subtraction + Do not subtract MIPs • MIP subtracted source images • Reformat into lateral & oblique projections • Subvolume MIPs for selected regions + renal arteries + mesenteric arteries + common femoral bifurcations + regions of greatest interest • Examine pulsatility artifact on 2D TOF images Oblique views obtained by reformatting data on computer even after patient leaves Coronal MIP Oblique MIP Popliteal Artery Aneurysm • Male>>> female • Risk of complications • thrombosis => high • emboli => high • rupture => low • Associated with other aneurysms Patient could not straighter knee 2D Projection MRA Peripheral Vascular MRA Year Owen (NEJM) 1992 Baum (JAMA) 1995 Prince (Radiology) 1995 Snidow (Radiology) 1996 Hany (Radiology) 1997 Ho (Radiology) 1998 Meaney (Radiology) 1998 Yamashita (JMRI) 1998 Lee (Radiology) 1998 Winchester (JMRI) 1998 Link (Radiology) 1999 # Patients Technique 23 155 43 32 39 28 20 20 23 22 67 2D TOF 2D TOF 3D Gd 3D Gd 3D Gd Bolus chase Bolus Chase 3D Gd 2D Gd 2D Gd 3D Gd (post stent) Sensitivity Specificity superior to DSA 82 84 94 98 100 98 93-96 96-100 93 98 81-89 91-95 96 83 94 91 90 98 100 83 Reporting Useful Descriptors Descriptor • • • • • • Occluded Severe stenosis Moderate stenosis Mild stenosis Normal Widely patent • Ectatic • Aneurysmal Meaning > 75% narrowing 50-75% < 50% narrowing normal wide open: +/- tortuosity +/- atherosclerotic irregularity diameter < 50% more than normal diameter > 50% over normal Useless Descriptors Descriptor • Stenotic • Patent Meaning “I think there is a stenosis” “I see the artery” MRA Summary – No Ionizing Radiation – No Contrast Injection necessary – If Contrast No nephrotoxicity – Reformat to obtain an view – Anatomy and Physiology – High Accuracy – Tremendous Future