Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
2014 John Maurer, SASHE, CHFM, CHSP Engineering Department The Joint Commission © Copyright, The Joint Commission THE HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT THE TOP 20 ISSUES Engineering Department 2014- 2 © Copyright, The Joint Commission 2013/2014 CHALLENGING STANDARDS 2013 Non Compliance EC.02.05.01 53% 47% LS.02.01.20 52% 52% EC.02.06.01 51% 39% EC.02.03.05 50% 45% IC.02.02.01 50% 46% LS.02.01.10 49% 48% RC.01.01.01 49% 52% LS.02.01.30 46% 45% LS.02.01.35 44% 36% EC.02.02.01 36% 34% Department of Engineering 2014 - 3 © Copyright, The Joint Commission 2014 Non Compliance, First 6 months Standard/NPSG 2013 Non Compliance MM.03.01.01 32% 35% PC.01.03.01 29% 27% EC.02.05.09 27% 21% PC.02.01.03 27% 18% MM.04.01.01 24% 22% PC.03.01.03 24% 20% LD.01.03.01 23% 19% LD.04.01.05 22% 14% EC.02.05.07 21% 23% MM.05.01.01 20% 16% Department of Engineering 2014 - 4 © Copyright, The Joint Commission 2014 Non Compliance, First 6 months Standard/NPSG TOP 10 CITED STANDARDS: 2011 – 2014 (YTD) 2014 2013 2012 2011 EC.02.05.01: Utility Systems Risks #1 #4 #10 #13 LS.02.01.20: Means of Egress #2 #1 #2 #2 EC.02.06.01: Built Environment #3 #8 #7 #11 EC.02.03.05: Fire Safety Systems #4 #7 #5 #5 LS.02.01.10: General Bldg Req’s #6 #3 #3 #3 LS.02.01.30: Protection #8 #6 #6 #4 LS.02.01.35: Extinguishment #9 #9 #9 #10 EC.02.02.01: HazMat & Waste #10 #11 #11 #15 Department of Engineering 2014 - 5 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Standard #18 LD.4.01.05 The hospital effectively manages its programs, services, sites, or departments Problematic EP: EP 4: Staff are held accountable for their responsibilities to exist without correction Sometimes used when situation is serious but does not warrant a “decision rule” Engineering Department 2014- 6 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Used when leadership has allowed non compliance WHAT IS YOUR APPROACH TO ESC? responsible? Do you do what you need to do to “make it go away” or are the issues analyzed to determine why the non compliance is present? Do you use this standard ESC response: “We have reeducated the “Fill In The Blank”?” Have you looked at patient safety events and near misses/close calls in relation to non compliance identified during your survey? Have you considered what the short term and long term impact will be if you are unsuccessful in correcting the RFIs? Department of Engineering 2014 - 7 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Do you have a team approach or is one person WHAT IS YOUR APPROACH TO ESC? root causes of the RFIs? Does the safety culture in your organization encourage staff and medical staff to identify system and process problems so they can be addressed quickly or do you wait until something happens or a surveyor finds it? When you develop your ESC do you find a way to incorporate it into daily activities and processes or do you lay it on top of everything else staff have to do? Is the culture in your organization one that allows the importance of the ESC to fade after a few months or is patient safety and compliance embedded in your mission/vision? Department of Engineering 2014 - 8 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Do you develop generic ESC or are your ESC specific to the Department of Engineering 2014 - 9 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Bottom Line! If you don’t address the issues the first time you will be continually be doing rework and patient safety and quality suffer! SOME THINGS TO CONSIDER… Do you have the right people at the table to address the issues identified? Are you focusing on systems and processes and how to improve them? Have you had an issue with this requirement on previous surveys? determine whether or not the ESC has been effective over the long term? If you find that your ESC hasn’t worked how do you go about fixing that? Department of Engineering 2014 - 10 © Copyright, The Joint Commission What kind of follow up monitoring have you planned to 2014 THE HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT © Copyright, The Joint Commission STANDARDS UPDATE Risk RISK ICON • • • • Proximity to patient Probability of harm Severity of harm Number of patients at risk Integrated into the Manuals, E-dition, AMP, & FSA Tool for three risk-focused categories: 1. National Patient Safety Goals 2. Accreditation program-specific risk area standards 3. Selected direct/indirect impact standards In addition, the FSA Tool will use the R icon to identify the fourth risk category: 4. RFI standards from current cycle survey events. Department of Engineering 2014 - 12 © Copyright, The Joint Commission All products will display a single icon at the EP level The Joint Commission EC chapter defines time as: Daily, weekly, monthly are calendar references Quarterly is once every three months +/- 10 days effective January 1, 2014 Semi-annual is 6 months from the last scheduled event month +/- 20 days Annual is 12 months from the last scheduled event month +/- 30 days 3 years is 36 months from the last scheduled event month +/- 45 days NOTE 1: The above does not apply to required frequencies NOTE 2: An alternative of developing either a unique, written policy or adopting NFPA definitions when available is acceptable Department of Engineering 2014 - 13 © Copyright, The Joint Commission TIME RE-DEFINED Quarterly: +/- 10 days Semiannual: +/- 20 days Annual: +/- 30 days 10 20 Scheduled Month Due Date + 10 10 20 20 30 30 Quarterly Jan Semiannual June Annual Jan Aug Sept March Apr Oct Dec Nov F M A M J J A S O N 10 20 30 30 February July Scheduled Month + D Jan Frequencies required by Code may not be modified (e.g. EC.02.05.07 EP 4 & 7) Engineering Department 2014- 14 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Due Date Changes to Elements of Performance Effective 7/1/2014 Added: “Fire drills are held at unexpected times and under varying conditions.” Engineering Department 2014- 15 © Copyright, The Joint Commission EC.02.03.03, EP 3 When quarterly fire drills are required, at least 50% are unannounced. Fire drills are held at unexpected times and under varying conditions. Changes to Elements of Performance Effective 7/1/2014 Staff who work in buildings where patients are housed or treated participate in drills according to the hospital’s fire response plan. Note: When drills are conducted between 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., the hospital may use alternative methods to notify staff instead of activating audible alarms. Replaced: “…the buildings fire alarm system.” Engineering Department 2014- 16 © Copyright, The Joint Commission EC.02.03.03, EP 4 EC.02.02.01 EP 18 Effective July 2, 2014 For hospitals that use Joint Commission for Engineering Department 2014- 17 © Copyright, The Joint Commission deemed status purposes: Radiation workers are checked periodically, by use of exposure meters or badge tests, for the amount of radiation exposure EC.02.02.01 EP 19 Effective July 2, 2014 For hospitals that use Joint Commission for Engineering Department 2014- 18 © Copyright, The Joint Commission deemed status purposes: The hospital has procedures for the proper routine storage and prompt disposal of trash. EC.02.03.03 EP 3 When quarterly fire drills are required, at least 50% are unannounced. Fire drills are held at unexpected times and under varying conditions. Added: “Fire drills are held at unexpected times Engineering Department 2014- 19 © Copyright, The Joint Commission and under varying conditions.” EC.02.03.03 EP 4 Staff who work in buildings where patients are housed or treated participate in drills according to the hospital’s fire response plan. Note: When drills are conducted between 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., the hospital may use alternative methods to notify staff instead of activating audible alarms. Replaced “building’s fire alarm system.” See NFPA 101-2000, 19.7.1.2 “…a coded announcement shall be permitted to be used instead of audible alarms.” Engineering Department 2014- 20 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Engineering Department 2014- 21 © Copyright, The Joint Commission CLINICAL ALARM SAFETY Clinical Alarms – Brief History In 2004 there was a NPSG on clinical alarms Goal retired, survey the issue under Environment of Care EC.02.04.01 EC.02.04.03 CoP Physical Environment 482.41 Clinical Alarm Device Summit http://www.aami.org/hottopics/alarms/AAMI/2011_Alarms_Summit_ publication.pdf http://www.aami.org/publications/AlarmHorizons/index.html Healthcare Technology Safety Institute (HTSI) Plan, Do, Check, Act: Using Action Research to Manage Alarms, Signals, and Responses http://www.aami.org/htsi/safety_innovation.html Engineering Department 2014- 22 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Clinical Alarms – Brief History Number 1 on ECRI top 10 for 2013 and 2014 Incidents of alarms being silenced or shut off Default settings Incidents of inadequate staffing to support No mechanisms for monitoring/responding Incidents of “alarm fatigue” Overuse, too many types of alarms, etc. Patient deaths have occurred Engineering Department 2014- 23 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Clinical Alarms – Brief History throughout the hospital PC.02.01.19: The hospital recognizes and responds to changes in the patient’s condition LD.03.06.01 EP3: Leaders provide for a sufficient number and mix of individuals to support safe, quality care, treatment and services. CoP 482.23 (b) Nursing Services HR.01.06.01: Staff are competent to perform their responsibilities. CoP 482.23 (b)(5) Nursing Services Engineering Department 2014- 24 © Copyright, The Joint Commission PC.02.01.11: Resuscitation services are available Clinical Alarms – Brief History EC.02.04.01: Equipment Management EP 2 Inventory EP 3 maintenance, inspection and testing activities EC.02.04.03: Equipment Reliability EP 2 Life support devices EP 3 Non-life support devices EC.04.01.01: Monitoring & Reporting Continually monitoring medical equipment problems or failures. CoP 482.13(c)(2) Patient Rights Engineering Department 2014- 25 © Copyright, The Joint Commission The Alarming Problem More and more devices and alarms based devices 150-400+ alarms per patient per day in a typical critical care unit Alarm-based devices are not standardized in many organizations Inconsistent use of alarms due to flexible alarm setting features Engineering Department 2014- 26 © Copyright, The Joint Commission More patients connected to alarms or alarm- © Copyright, The Joint Commission Engineering Department 2014- 27 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Engineering Department 2014- 28 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Engineering Department 2014- 29 NPSG on Alarm Mgmt In Phase I (beginning January 2014) (by 7/14) establish alarms as an organization priority (during 2014) identify the most important alarms to manage based on their own internal situations. Input from medical staff and clinical depts Risk to patients due to lack of response, malfunction Are specific alarms needed or contributing to noise/fatigue Potential for patient harm based on internal incident history Published best practices/guidelines Engineering Department 2014- 30 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Hospitals will be required to: NPSG on Alarm Mgmt In Phase II (as of January 2016) develop and implement specific components of policies and procedures that address at minimum: Clinically appropriate settings When they can be disabled When parameters can be changed Who can set and who can change parameters and who can set to “off” Monitoring and response expectations Checking individual alarm signals for accurate settings, proper operation and detectability educate those in the organization about alarm system management for which they are responsible Engineering Department 2014- 31 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Hospitals will be expected to: Questions to Consider a priority? Who is on the team addressing the NPSG? How far along are you in identifying the most important alarm signals to manage? What is your biggest challenge? Remember that the entire goal must be fully implemented by January of 2016! Engineering Department 2014- 32 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Have you identified clinical alarm safety as What’s in a Name? name, which indicates that technology that impacts patient care is managed. CE: Clinical Engineer. 4 year Engineering degree with emphasis in Clinical Engineering. BME: BioMedical Engineer: 4 year degree, typically working in Research and Manufacturing for Healthcare BMET: BioMedical Equipment Technologist. Typically has a 2 or 4 year degree (or military equivalent), working directly in a healthcare setting. CBET: Certified Biomedical Equipment Technician. A formal certification by the International Certification Commission (ICC) for the BMET who achieve this certification Engineering Department 2014- 33 © Copyright, The Joint Commission HTM: Healthcare Technology Management is the department EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT APPLIES ONLY TO HOSPITAL & CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL PROGRAMS © Copyright, The Joint Commission MEDICAL EQUIPMENT: EC.02.04.01, EC.02.04.03 UTILITY SYSTEMS: EC.02.05.01, EC.02.05.05 S&C 14-07-HOSPITAL S&C 12-07-Hospital Superceded A hospital may adjust its maintenance, inspection, and testing frequency and activities for facility and medical equipment from what is recommended by the manufacturer, based on a risk-based assessment by qualified personnel, unless: Other Federal or state law; or hospital Conditions of Participation (CoPs) require adherence to manufacturers’ recommendations and/or set specific requirements. • For example, all imaging/radiologic equipment must be maintained per manufacturers’ recommendations; or The equipment is a medical laser device; or New equipment without a sufficient amount of maintenance history has been acquired. Department of Engineering 2014 - 35 © Copyright, The Joint Commission S&C 14-07-HOSPITAL The organization inspects, tests & maintains New Provided by the organization’s contractors Available publically from nationally recognized sources Through the organization’s experience over time Department of Engineering 2014 - 36 © Copyright, The Joint Commission medical equipment or operating components of utility systems in accordance with manufacturers’ recommendations with insufficient maintenance history to support the use of alternative maintenance strategies. Maintenance history may be gathered from documented evidence such as EC.02.04.01 Standard EC.02.04.01 The hospital manages medical equipment risks Department of Engineering 2014 - 37 © Copyright, The Joint Commission EC.02.04.01 EP 1 The hospital solicits input from individuals who operate and service equipment when it selects and acquires medical equipment. For hospitals that do not use Joint Commission accreditation for deemed status purposes: The hospital maintains either a written inventory of all medical equipment or a written inventory of selected equipment categorized by physical risk associated with use (including all life-support equipment) and equipment incident history. The hospital evaluates new types of equipment before initial use to determine whether they should be included in the inventory. Department of Engineering 2014 - 38 © Copyright, The Joint Commission EC.02.04.01 EP 2 EFFECTIVE JULY 2, 2014 MAINTAINING MEDICAL EQUIPMENT Inventory is populated based on one of two strategies: All equipment inclusion Physical risk based process For example, evaluating: • Function • Risk Levels • Maintenance Requirement Utilize resources, i.e. the FDA MAUDE report All life support equipment is included All new types of equipment evaluated for inclusion Department of Engineering 2014 - 39 © Copyright, The Joint Commission EC.02.04.01 EP 2 CONTINUED Department of Engineering 2014 - 40 © Copyright, The Joint Commission For hospitals that use Joint Commission accreditation for deemed status purposes: The hospital maintains a written inventory of all medical equipment. INVENTORY DEFINITIONS diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and direct care of individuals. Life-support equipment—Any device used for the purpose of sustaining life and whose failure to perform its primary function, when used according to the manufacturer’s instructions and clinical protocol, will lead to patient death in the absence of immediate intervention (for example, ventilators, anesthesia machines, heartlung bypass machines, defibrillators). High-risk equipment—Any device or components of building utility systems for which there is a risk of serious injury or death to a patient or staff member if the device or component fails. High-risk equipment includes life support equipment. Source: Glossary from the Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals, The Joint Commission. See also September 2014 Perspectives Department of Engineering 2014 - 41 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Medical equipment—Fixed and portable equipment used for the EC.02.04.01 EP 3 EFFECTIVE JULY 2, 2014 Note: High-risk medical equipment includes life-support equipment Department of Engineering 2014 - 42 © Copyright, The Joint Commission The hospital identifies high-risk medical equipment on the inventory for which there is a risk of serious injury or death to a patient or staff member should the equipment fail. HIGH-RISK MEDICAL EQUIPMENT High-risk equipment Includes Life Support Heart/lung bypass machine Anesthesia equipment Circulatory Assist Equipment • IABP • LVAD Ventilations • Adult; Infant; MRI-Compatible Other High-risk equipment Defibrillators Robotic surgery devices Department of Engineering 2014 - 43 © Copyright, The Joint Commission JOINT COMMISSION MEDICAL EQUIPMENT Medical equipment includes equipment used in for monitoring, such as Bedside monitors Department of Engineering 2014 - 44 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Telemetry monitors JOINT COMMISSION MEDICAL EQUIPMENT Electro-surgery Lasers Diathermy Diagnostic, such as Laboratory analyzers Radiology equipment Endoscopes Taken from the Environment of Care Handbook Chapter 5 (page 73) 3rd edition Patient support, such as Patient beds Specialty beds Lifts Department of Engineering 2014 - 45 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Treatment, such as CMS INVENTORY Biomedical equipment Radiological equipment Patient beds, stretchers IV infusion equipment Ventilators Laboratory equipment Etc. Department of Engineering 2014 - 46 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Medical Equipment includes SCOPES Number 6 on ECRI Top 10 for 2014, #8 in 2013 result in follow-up survey under COP §482.42 IC.02.02.02 EP 1 &2 hi/lo level disinfection IC.01.03.01 EP 1 – 5 risk assess & surveillance IC.01.05.01 EP 1 for policy issues Score at EC.02.05.01 EP 6 for ventilation issues, will result in follow-up survey under COP §482.42 Department of Engineering 2014 - 47 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Score at IC. For infection control issues, and will EC.02.04.01 EP 4 Note: The strategies of an AEM program must not reduce the safety of equipment and must be based on accepted standards of practice. An example of standards for a medical equipment program is ANSI/AAMI EQ56:2013, Recommended Practice for a Medical Equipment Management Program Department of Engineering 2014 - 48 © Copyright, The Joint Commission The hospital identifies the activities and associated frequencies, in writing, for maintenance, inspecting, and testing all medical equipment on the inventory. These activities and associated frequencies are in accordance with manufacturers’ recommendations or with strategies of an alternative equipment maintenance (AEM) program. EC.02.04.01 EP 5 Equipment subject to federal or state law or Medicare Conditions of Participation in which inspecting, testing, and maintaining be in accordance with manufacturers’ recommendations, or otherwise establishes more stringent maintenance requirements Department of Engineering 2014 - 49 © Copyright, The Joint Commission For hospitals that use Joint Commission for deemed status purposes: The hospital’s activities and frequencies for inspecting, testing, and maintaining the following items must be in accordance with manufacturers’ recommendations EC.02.04.01 EP 5 CONTINUED Medical laser devices Imaging and radiologic equipment (whether used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes) New medical equipment with insufficient maintenance history to support the use of alternative maintenance strategies Note: Maintenance history includes any of the following documented evidence: Records provided by the hospital’s contractors Information made public by nationally recognized sources Records of the hospital’s experience over time Department of Engineering 2014 - 50 © Copyright, The Joint Commission EC.02.04.01 EP 6 For hospitals that use Joint Commission for deemed status purposes: A qualified individual(s) uses written criteria to support the determination whether it is safe to permit medical equipment to be maintained in an alternative manner that includes the following: and prevalence of harm during normal use Department of Engineering 2014 - 51 © Copyright, The Joint Commission How the equipment is used, including the seriousness EC.02.04.01 EP 6 CONTINUED Likely consequences of failure or malfunction, (For more information on defining staff qualifications, refer to Standard HR.01.02.01) Department of Engineering 2014 - 52 © Copyright, The Joint Commission including seriousness of and prevalence of harm Availability of alternative or back-up equipment in the event the equipment fails or malfunctions Incident history of identical or similar equipment Maintenance requirements of the equipment EC.02.04.01 EP 7 Department of Engineering 2014 - 53 © Copyright, The Joint Commission For hospitals that use Joint Commission for deemed status purposes: The hospital identifies medical equipment on its inventory that is included in an alternative equipment maintenance program. EC.02.04.03 Department of Engineering 2014 - 54 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Standard EC.02.04.03 The hospital inspects, tests, and maintains medical equipment MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TESTING EC.02.04.03 The hospital inspects, tests, and Department of Engineering 2014 - 55 © Copyright, The Joint Commission maintains medical equipment EP 1: For hospitals that do not use Joint Commission accreditation for deemed status purposes: Before initial use of medical equipment on the inventory the organization performs safety, operational, and functional checks. MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TESTING For hospitals that use Joint Commission accreditation for deemed status purposes: Before initial use and after major repairs or upgrades of medical equipment on the medical equipment inventory, the hospital performs safety, operational, and functional checks. Department of Engineering 2014 - 56 © Copyright, The Joint Commission EP 1 (continued): MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TESTING EC.02.04.03 The hospital inspects, tests, and maintains medical equipment EP 2. The hospital inspects, tests, and maintains all life support high-risk equipment. These activities are documented. Department of Engineering 2014 - 57 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Note: High-risk medical equipment includes life support equipment MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TESTING EP 4: The hospital conducts performance testing of and maintains all sterilizers. These activities are documented. Department of Engineering 2014 - 58 © Copyright, The Joint Commission EP 3: The hospital inspects, tests, and maintains non-life support non-high-risk equipment identified on the medical equipment inventory. These activities are documented. MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TESTING EP 14: For hospitals that use Joint Commission accreditation for deemed status purposes: Qualified hospital staff inspect, test, and calibrate nuclear medicine equipment annually. The dates of these activities are documented. Department of Engineering 2014 - 59 © Copyright, The Joint Commission EP 5: The hospital performs equipment maintenance and chemical and biological testing of water used in hemodialysis. These activities are documented. MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TESTING EP 17: For hospitals in California that provide computed tomography (CT) services: A qualified medical physicist measures actual radiation dose produced by each CT imaging system at least annually. abdomen, and pediatric brain protocols is within 20 percent of actual dose delivered. Dates of the verifications are documented Department of Engineering 2014 - 60 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Verifies dose displayed for adult brain, adult Documentation is completed for High-risk, life support and non-high-risk devices on the inventory Accuracy of Inventory All High-risk and Life Support equipment must be on the inventory and identified Preventive maintenance frequencies must be clearly defined in writing Confirm work done as per scheduled activities Ensure appropriate work is scheduled based on maintenance strategies Evaluate equipment failure and scheduled actions Department of Engineering 2014 - 61 © Copyright, The Joint Commission EQUIPMENT SURVEY PROCESS SURVEY PROCESS: STAFF INTERVIEWS Department Leader Evaluate the qualifications of the leader Review appropriate documentation Evaluate how the inventory was created If an alternative maintenance program is in use, evaluate the inclusion process Evaluate the Monitoring processes Evaluate the effectiveness of the program What criteria is used to evaluate Evaluate the Completion rate of maintenance activities Department of Engineering 2014 - 62 © Copyright, The Joint Commission SURVEY PROCESS: STAFF INTERVIEWS Equipment Maintainers of the maintenance process/strategies Evaluate staff knowledge related to the alternative maintenance program Evaluate assignment of maintenance activities Evaluate competencies based on repeat work orders Evaluate work scheduled against completed Department of Engineering 2014 - 63 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Evaluate their understanding © Copyright, The Joint Commission Department of Engineering 2014 - 64 SURVEY PROCESS: STAFF INTERVIEW Contract Services Evaluate the process used to ensure contractors use qualified personnel Evaluate reliability of equipment serviced Evaluate integration of the process Department of Engineering 2014 - 65 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Users of the Equipment Evaluate equipment reliability Evaluate response time when equipment fails Evaluate emergency response process Evaluate “Culture of Safety” Appropriate training of staff related to equipment use Customer satisfaction with department EVALUATING PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS policies & procedures Evaluating the program: How is equipment evaluated to ensure no degradation of performance? Consider miscalibration of equipment Consider test equipment calibration confirmation How are equipment-related incidents investigated? Could the malfunction have been avoided? Did the alternative maintenance strategy contribute to the malfunction? How to sequester equipment deemed unsafe? Department of Engineering 2014 - 66 © Copyright, The Joint Commission The equipment management programs must have written EVALUATING PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS modifications to the maintenance strategy are needed? Evaluate the accuracy of the inventory High-risk equipment segregated in the inventory? Equipment in an alternative maintenance program segregated? Grouping of like equipment is acceptable Are imaging/radiologic equipment and medical laser devices exempt from the alternative maintenance program? Department of Engineering 2014 - 67 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Is there a performance process to evaluate if EVALUATING PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS: MISCELLANEOUS TOPICS Survey should focus on High-risk equipment operation manuals and maintenance schedules available? Verify the inspection, testing & maintaining activities and frequencies are documented Evaluate the various maintenance strategies used Are they appropriate? Are they effective? Is the equipment reliable? Department of Engineering 2014 - 68 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Are appropriate EQUIPMENT NOT FOUND OR IN USE If a device is not available because it is not found or in use Create policy describing how the device will be looked for • How will the users be involved • How it impact the users If the device was looked for “on time” then the PM Completion rate will not be impacted • The device must be reconciled • Surveyors will be reviewing those “equipment not found” or “in use” for reconciliation − Example: during the next month if 500 scheduled, 10 not found the total activities should be 510 Department of Engineering 2014 - 69 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Manage the situation EQUIPMENT NOT FOUND OR IN USE If the device was looked for “on time” then the PM Completion rate will not be impacted The device must be reconciled Surveyors will be reviewing those “equipment not found” or “in use” for reconciliation • Example: Each month 500 activities are scheduled − One month 10 devices are “not available” − Next month the 500 scheduled devices will be done plus the missed 10 devices Department of Engineering 2014 - 70 © Copyright, The Joint Commission − DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING Three phases of implementation for hospitals, critical access hospitals, and ambulatory care organizations Includes ambulatory care organizations that have achieved Advanced Diagnostic Imaging certification Phase 1 Deferred to January 1, 2015 Exceptions: not applicable to dental cone beam CT radiographic imaging studies performed for diagnosis of conditions affecting the maxillofacial region or to obtain guidance for the treatment of such conditions. Phase 1.5: minimum qualifications for radiologists performing CT scans Phase 2: fluoroscopy qualifications for non-radiologists performing imaging exams and cone beam CT, and for dental or oral surgical procedures Department of Engineering 2014 - 71 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Phase 1: Deferred to January 1, 2015 Computed tomography (CT), nuclear medicine (NM), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Minimum competency for radiology technologists, including registration and certification by July 1, 2015 Annual performance evaluations of imaging equipment by a medical physicist Documentation of CT radiation dose in the patient’s clinical record Meeting the needs of the pediatric population through imaging protocols and by considering patient size or body habitus when establishing imaging protocols Department of Engineering 2014 - 72 © Copyright, The Joint Commission DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING Phase 1: Deferred to January 1, 2015 Management of safety risks in the MRI environment Collection of data on incidents during which identified radiation dose limits have been exceeded Minimum quarterly review of staff dosimetry results New, replacement or modification to rooms Medical physicist to perform structural shielding design New equipment or rooms where ionizing radiation is emitted or radioactive material is stored Medical physicist to perform radiation protection survey Department of Engineering 2014 - 73 © Copyright, The Joint Commission DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING STANDARDS COMMENTS OPEN TO OCTOBER 24, 2014 We are interested in your comments on standards changes http://www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/field_reviews.aspx?Stan dardsFieldReviewId=C9K2vcyLB3mFHMTk7hiBm7aLRzbz3AxdZHBivEICNzc%3d for more information Department of Engineering 2014 - 74 © Copyright, The Joint Commission that address the following areas: Minimum qualifications for radiologic and nuclear medicine technologists that perform computed tomography (CT) exams. Orientation of technologists on safe practices related to the provision of diagnostic imaging Documentation of CT radiation dose RELOCATABLE POWER TAPS (RPTS) 70, NFPA 99 and NFPA 101 all have regulations that control the electrical components and equipment in a patient room. It appears that it is the intent of these documents to restrict RPT use so that it is not used in conjunction with medical equipment CMS 3/2014: “RPT’s are not to be used with medical equipment in patient care areas. This includes critical areas such as operating rooms, recovery areas, intensive care areas, and non-critical patient care areas such as patient rooms, diagnostic areas, exam areas, etc.” Department of Engineering 2014 - 75 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Healthcare Interpretation Task Force (12/2007) stated NFPA RELOCATABLE POWER TAPS equipment assembly. See NFPA 99-1999 7-5.1.2.5(2) Ceiling drops are acceptable. See NFPA 99-1999 7-5.1.2.5(3) RPTs may be used for non-patient care equipment such as computers/monitors/printers, and in areas such as waiting rooms, offices, nurse stations, support areas, corridors, etc. Precautions needed if RPT’s are used include: ensuring they are never “daisy-chained” preventing cords from becoming tripping hazards installing internal ground fault and over-current protection devices using power strips that are adequate for the number and types of devices used Department of Engineering 2014 - 76 © Copyright, The Joint Commission RPTs may be used in anesthetizing locations if they are part of the CMS is permitting a categorical waiver to allow for the use of power strips in existing and new health care facility patient care areas, if you are in compliance with all applicable 2012 LSC power strip requirements and with all other 2000 LSC electrical system and equipment provisions. The organization must follow all requirements of the categorical waiver process This includes identifying where they are located at the unit level Department of Engineering 2014 - 77 © Copyright, The Joint Commission S&C: 14-46-LSC 9/26/2014 If the organization decides to use this categorical waiver they must 1. Ensure full compliance with the appropriate code reference 2. Document the decision to adopt the categorical waiver The Relocatable Power Tap is not a LSC issue but an Environment of Care issue • For Environment of Care items document by Minutes in discussion at the Environment of Care Committee (or equivalent) 3. Declare the decision at the beginning of any survey See also November 2013 Perspectives Department of Engineering 2014 - 78 © Copyright, The Joint Commission CATEGORICAL WAIVER PROCESS DEFINITIONS FROM NFPA 99-2012 patient sleeping bed, or the bed or procedure table of a critical care area. Patient-care-related electrical equipment is defined in section 3.3.137 as electrical equipment that is intended to be used for diagnostic, therapeutic, or monitoring purposes in the patient care vicinity; Patient care room is defined in section 3.3.138 as any room of a health care facility wherein patients are intended to be examined or treated. Note that this term replaces the term “patient care area” used in the 1999 NFPA 99, but the definition has not changed. Patient care vicinity is defined in section 3.3.139 as a space, within a location intended for the examination and treatment of patients (i.e., patient care room) extending 6 ft. beyond the normal location of the bed, chair, table, treadmill, or other device that supports the patient during examination and treatment and extends vertically 7 ft. 6 in. above the floor. Department of Engineering 2014 - 79 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Patient bed location is defined in section 3.3.136 as the location of a REQUIREMENTS Power strips may be used in a patient care vicinity to power rack-, table-, The receptacles are permanently attached to the equipment assembly. The sum of the ampacity of all appliances connected to the receptacles shall not exceed 75 percent of the ampacity of the flexible cord supplying the receptacles. The ampacity of the flexible cord is suitable in accordance with the current edition of NFPA 70, National Electric Code. The electrical and mechanical integrity of the assembly is regularly verified and documented through an ongoing maintenance program. Means are employed to ensure that additional devices or nonmedical equipment cannot be connected to the multiple outlet extension cord after leakage currents have been verified as safe. Department of Engineering 2014 - 80 © Copyright, The Joint Commission pedestal-or cart-mounted patient care-related electrical equipment assemblies, provided all of the following conditions are met, as required by section 10.2.3.6: REQUIREMENTS existing facilities that undergo renovation or a change in occupancy, shall be provided with the minimum number of receptacles as required by section 6.3.2.2.6.2. Power strips providing power to rack-, table-, pedestal-, or cart-mounted patient care-related electrical equipment assemblies are not required to be an integral component of manufacturer tested equipment. Power strips may be permanently attached to mounted equipment assemblies by personnel who are qualified to ensure compliance with section 10.2.3.6. Department of Engineering 2014 - 81 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Patient bed locations in new health care facilities, or in REQUIREMENTS power non-patient care-related electrical equipment (e.g., personal electronics). Power strips may be used outside of the patient care vicinity for both patient care-related electrical equipment & nonpatient-care-related electrical equipment. Power strips providing power to patient care-related electrical equipment must be Special-Purpose Relocatable Power Taps (SPRPT) listed as UL 1363A or UL 60601-1. Power strips providing power to non- patient-care-related electrical equipment must be Relocatable Power Taps (RPT) listed as UL 1363. Department of Engineering 2014 - 82 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Power strips may not be used in a patient care vicinity to DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING 630 792 5900 George Mills, MBA, FASHE, CEM, CHFM, CHSP, Green Belt Director Anne Guglielmo, CFPS, LEED, A.P., CHSP, CHFM Engineer John Maurer, SASHE, CHFM, CHSP Kathy Tolomeo, CHEM Engineer James Woodson, P.E., CHFM Engineer Department of Engineering 2014 - 83 © Copyright, The Joint Commission Engineer THE JOINT COMMISSION DISCLAIMER Commission reserves the right to change the content of the information, as appropriate. These slides are only meant to be cue points, which were expounded upon verbally by the original presenter and are not meant to be comprehensive statements of standards interpretation or represent all the content of the presentation. Thus, care should be exercised in interpreting Joint Commission requirements based solely on the content of these slides. These slides are copyrighted and may not be further used, shared or distributed without permission of the original presenter or The Joint Commission. Department of Engineering 2014 - 84 © Copyright, The Joint Commission These slides are current as of 10/1/2014. The Joint