Download Constrictive Pericarditis

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Pericardial Disease
Simulation
training
Curriculum
Constrictive Pericarditis
Etiology
•
•
•
•
•
•
Idiopathic
Irradiation
Post-surgical
Infectious
Neoplastic
Connective tissue
disorder
•
•
•
•
•
Uremia
Trauma
Sarcoid
Methysergide therapy
Epicardial implantable
defibrillator patches
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
Kussmaul’s Sign
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
Cardiac
Tamponade
40
20
0
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
Balloon Pericardiotomy
Case 1: Constrictive Pericarditis
•
•
•
•
•
64 year old female
1 Year s/p 3-vessel CABG
Presents with 6 months of progressive dyspnea
and atypical chest pain
At angiography, all grafts are patent
Hemodynamics
40
Right atrium
20
0
40
20
0
LV vs. RV
40
20
0
LV vs. RV with Valsalva
Constrictive Pericarditis
Right Atrial Tracing
X-descent
y-descent
Constrictive Pericarditis – LV vs. RV.
Tachycardia Obscures Evaluation
PVB
Kussmaul sign
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
CATHSAP6: Coronary Angiography and Intervention
Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Ventricular Interdependence During Respirations
Differentiates Constrictive Pericarditis from
Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Constrictive
Pericarditis
(LV and RV discordant)
Hurrell et al, Circulation 1996; 93:2007
Restrictive
Cardiomyopathy
(LV and RV concordant)
Sensitivities, Specificities, Positive Predictive
Values, and Negative Predictive Values as a
[Return to Article]
Function of Criteria
Table 3. Sensitivities, Specificities, Positive Predictive Values, and Negative Predictive Values as a Function
Criteria
Conventional
LVEDP–RVEDP mm Hg
RVEDP/RVSP >1/3
PASP <55 mm Hg
LV RFW mm Hg
Respiratory change in RAP <3 mm Hg
Dynamic respiratory
PCWP/LV respiratory gradient mm Hg
LV/RV interdependence
5
7
5
Sensitivity,
%
Specificity,
%
PPV,
%
NPV,
%
60
93
93
93
93
38
38
24
57
48
4
52
47
61
58
57
89
25
92
92
93
100
81
95
78
94
94
100
PPV indicates positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; and RAP, right atrial pressure.
[Return
Article]
Hurrellto et
al, Circulation
1996; 93:2007
Constrictive Pericarditis vs. Restrictive
Cardiomyopathy
• Greater ventricular interdependence in constrictive
pericarditis
• Greater separation of diastolic pressure in restrictive
cardiomyopathy
• LV and RV diastolic filling more rapid in constrictive
pericarditis
• Pulmonary pressures higher in restrictive
cardiomyopathy
• Adjunctive tests: evidence of pericardial thickening
(normal 1-2 mm; thickening ≥ 3 mm); pericardial
calcification, RV biopsy, exploratory thoracotomy
Case 3: Pericardial Tamponade
• 37 year old female
• 2 day history of dyspnea, fatigue and
dizziness
• Mastectomy for breast cancer 3 years ago
• Echocardiogram suggests pericardial
tamponade
• Hemodynamics
Cardiac Tamponade
Pulsus Paradoxus
200 Femoral artery
inspiration
100
0
expiration
40
Right atrium
20
0
40
20
0
Right ventricle
40
20
0
Pulmonary artery
40
20
0
Pulmonary capillary wedge
40
Before Pericardiocentesis;
Pericardium vs. RA
20
0
After Pericardiocentesis
40
20
Right atrium
Pericardium
0
After Pericardiocentesis
40
20
0
Right ventricle
After Pericardiocentesis
40
Pulmonary capillary wedge
20
0
Long-Term Effectiveness of
Pericardiocentesis
• 2/3 of patients with malignant pericardial effusions
redevelop tamponade after a median of 7 days
• More than 80% of patients with non-malignant
pericardial effusion require no further intervention
Laham et al, Heart 1996; 75:67
Variants on Constrictive-Restrictive
Physiology
• Acute enlargement of the heart with constriction
by normal pericardium
– right ventricular infarct, tricuspid regurgitation,
mitral regurgitation
• Low pressure tamponade
• Effusive-constrictive pericarditis
• Single chamber tamponade
• Localized constriction
• Occult constrictive pericarditis
Severe, Acute
Tricuspid
Regurgitation
Associated With
ConstrictiveRestrictive
Physiology
Severe, Acute Mitral Regurgitation Associated
With Constrictive-Restrictive Physiology
Variants on Constrictive-Restrictive
Physiology
• Acute enlargement of the heart with constriction
by normal pericardium
– right ventricular infarct, tricuspid regurgitation,
mitral regurgitation
• Low pressure tamponade
• Effusive-constrictive pericarditis
• Single chamber tamponade
• Localized constriction
• Occult constrictive pericarditis
Related documents