Download Source Transformations

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Operational amplifier wikipedia , lookup

Josephson voltage standard wikipedia , lookup

Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup

Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup

CMOS wikipedia , lookup

TRIAC wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup

Current mirror wikipedia , lookup

Surge protector wikipedia , lookup

Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup

Power electronics wikipedia , lookup

Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Network analysis (electrical circuits) wikipedia , lookup

Current source wikipedia , lookup

Ohm's law wikipedia , lookup

Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ECE 221
Electric Circuit Analysis I
Chapter 11
Source Transformations
Herbert G. Mayer, PSU
Status 10/28/2015
1
Syllabus







Goal
CVS With Rp Removed
CCS With Rs Removed
CVS to CCS Transformation
Detailed Sample
Conclusion
Exercises
2
Goal
 The Node Voltage and Mesh Current Methods are
powerful tools to compute circuit parameters
 Cramer’s Rule is a useful mathematical tool for
solving equations with a large number of unknowns
 Sometimes a circuit can be transformed into another
one that is simpler, yet electrically equivalent
 Generally that will simplify computation
 We’ll learn about source transformations
 Method 1: remove parallel load from CVS
 Method 2: remove serial load from CCS
 Method 3: Transform CVS  CCS bilaterally
3
CVS With Rp Removed
4
CVS With Rp Removed
 Removing the load Rp parallel to the CVS has
no impact on externally connected loads RL
 Such loads RL—not drawn here— will be in
series with load resistor R
 Removal of Rp decreases the amount of
current that the CVS has to produce, to
deliver equal voltage to both Rp and the
series of R and load RL
 This simplification is one of several obvious
source transformations an engineer should
look for, before computing unknowns in a
circuit
5
CCS With Rs Removed
6
CCS With Rs Removed
 Removing the load Rs in series with the CCS
has no impact on external loads RL
 Such a load RL—not drawn here— will be
parallel to resistor R
 Removal of Rs will certainly decrease the
amount of voltage the CCS has to produce,
to deliver equal current to both Rs in series
with R parallel to RL
 Such a removal is one of several source
transformations to simplify computing
unknown units in a circuit
7
CVS to CCS Bilateral Transformation
R
+
Vs
-
iL
iL
RL
i
s
R
CCS // internal resistance R
CVS + internal resistance R
8
RL
CVS to CCS Transformation
 A given CVS of Vs Volt with resistor R in series
produces a current iL in loads R and RL, connected
externally
 That current through loads R and RL
iL = Vs / ( R + RL )
 A CCS of iS Ampere with parallel resistor R produces
a current iL in an externally connected load RL
 For the transformation to be correct, these currents
must be equal for all loads RL
iL = is * R / ( R + RL )
 Setting the two equations for iL equal, we get:
is = Vs / R
Vs = is * R
9
CVS to CCS Bilateral Transformation
10
A Detailed Sample Transformation
11
Detailed Sample Transformation
 We’ll use these simplifications in the next example
to generate an equivalent circuit that is minimal
 I.e. eliminate all redundancies from right to left
 This example is taken from [1], page 110-111,
expanded for added detail
 First we analyze the sample, identifying all
# of Essential nodes ____
# of Essential branches ____
 Then we compute the power consumed or produced
in the 6V CVS
12
Detailed Sample Transformation, Step a
13
Detailed Sample Transformation
identify all:
# of Essential nodes __4__
# of Essential branches __6__
14
Detailed
Sample Transformation, Step b
,
15
Detailed
Sample Transformation, Step c
,
16
Detailed
Sample Transformation, Step d
,
17
Detailed
Sample Transformation, Step e
,
18
Detailed
Sample Transformation, Step f
,
19
Detailed
Sample Transformation, Step g
,
20
Detailed
Sample Transformation, Step h
,
21
Power in 6 V CVS
 The current through network Step h, in the direction
of the 6 V CVS source is:
i = ( 19.2 - 6 ) / ( 4 + 12 ) [ V / Ω ]
i = 0.825 [ A ]
 Power in the 6 V CVS, being current * voltage is:
P = P6V = i * V = 0.825 * 6
P6V = 4.95 W
 That power is absorbed in the 6 V source, it is not
being delivered by the 6 V source! It is delivered by
the higher voltage CVS of 19.2 V
22
Conclusion about Transformations
 Such source transformations are not always
possible
 Exploiting them requires that there be a
certain degree of redundancy
 Frequently that is the case, and then we can
simplify
 Engineers must check carefully, how much
simplification is feasible, and then simplify
 But no more 
23
Exercise 1
To Practice Transformations
24
Exercise 1
 Taken from [1], page 112, Example 4.9,
part a)
 Given the circuit on the following page,
compute the voltage drop v0 across the
100 Ω resistor
 Solely using source transformations
 Do not even resort to KCL or KVL, just
simplify and then use Ohm’s Law
25
Exercise 1
26
Exercise 1
 We know that the circuit does not change,
when we remove a resistor parallel to a CVS

Only the power delivered by the CVS will change
 So we can remove the 125 Ω resistor
 We also know that the circuit does not
change, when we remove a resistor in series
with a CCS

Only the overall power delivered by the CCS will change
 So we can remove the 10 Ω resistor
27
Exercise 1, Simplified Step 1
28
Exercise 1, Cont’d
 Computation of v0 does not change with
these 2 simplifications
 If we substitute the 250 V CVS with an
equivalent CCS, we have 2 parallel CCS
 These 2 CCSs can be combined
29
Exercise 1, Simplified Step 3
30
Exercise 1, Cont’d
 Combine 2 parallel CCS of 10 A and -8 A
 And combine 3 parallel resistors: 25 || 100 ||
20 Ω = 10 Ω
 Yielding an equivalent circuit that is simpler,
and shows the desired voltage drop v0 along
the equivalent source, and equivalent
resistor
31
Exercise 1, Simplified Step 2
32
Exercise 1, Cont’d
 We can compute v0
v0 = 2 A * 10 Ω
v0 = 20 V
33
Exercise 1
Using Ohm’s Law to compute v0
34
Exercise 1, Using Ohm’s Law
i25
i3R
25 Ω
+
+
250 V
-
8 A
100 Ω
i8A
v0
-
Compute v0 using Ohm’s Law
35
5Ω
15 Ω
Exercise 1, Using Ohm’s Law
i25
i8A
i25
i3R
i3R
=
=
=
=
=
i3R + i8A
8 A
( 250 - v0 ) / 25
v0 / ( 100 Ohm || 20 Ohm )
v0 * 3 / 50
(250 - v0)/25 = 8 + v0 * 3/50
2*250 - 2*v0
= 8*50 + 3*v0
v0
= 20 V
36
Exercise 2
37
Exercise 2, Compute Power of V 250
 Next compute the power ps delivered (or
if sign reversed: absorbed) by the 250 V
CVS
 The current delivered by the CVS is
named is
 And it equals the sum of i125 and i25
38
Exercise 2, Compute Power of V 250
39
Exercise 2, Compute Power of V 250
is
is
is
is
=
=
=
=
i125 + i25
250/125 + (250 - v0)/25
250/125 + (250 - 20)/25
11.2 A
Power ps is i * v
ps = 250 * 11.2 = 2,800 W
40
Exercise 3, Compute Power of 8 A CCS
 Next compute the power p8A delivered
by the 8 A CCS
 First we find the voltage drop across the
8 A CCS, from the top essential node
toward the 10 Ω resistor, named v8A
 The voltage drop across the 10 Ω
resistor is simply 10 Ω * the current, by
definition 8 A
 We name this voltage drop v10Ω
 That is v10Ω = 80 V
41
Exercise 3, Compute Power of 8 A CCS
42
Exercise 3, Compute Power of 8 A CCS
V0
V0
20
v8A
v8A
= v8A + v10Ω
= 20 V
= 8*10 + v8A
= 20 - 80
= -60
Power p8A is:
p8A = i8A * v8A
43