Download Slide 1

Objective ENV02
ESSIP Plan 2014
Bernd HILL
DPS/PEPR
19.09.2014
Explanation

It concerns Collaborative Environment Management (CEM) at airports

The minimization of noise and gaseous emissions resulting from aircraft
operations at the terminal airspace and ground will be enabled through the
establishment at individual airports of formal partnership arrangements
between ANSP, Airport and Aircraft Operators, to facilitate joint
environmental improvements.

The objective provides a framework for the establishment of formal
partnership arrangements amongst operational stakeholders (ANSP, Airport
and Aircraft Operators) to collaborate and decide on implementing airport
related environment mitigation techniques such as minimizing aircraft noise
and gaseous emissions in and around airports.

It is a process (Regular Meetings, Agreed actions plans)…and not an
“operational” implementation

Operational implementation (e.g. CDO) can be decided through CEM but its
implementation is monitored separately through ESSIP Objective ENV 01
ESSIP Plan 2014 / Objective ENV02
2
What has changed since LSSIP 2013 ?

The Objective was aligned with SESAR OI Steps AO-0703, AO-0705 and
AO-0706

The overall FOC date is extended to 12/2016

All SLoA dates were extended to either 12/2015 or 12/2016

Additional Supporting material has been added

Measurable finalisation criteria have been added
Link to European ATM Master Plan

OI step - [AO-0703]-Aircraft Noise Management and Mitigation at and around
Airports

Description:
To ensure that local decisions on achieving the optimum environmental
performance from aircraft operations at and around airports, by the most
appropriate balance between social, economic and environmental imperatives. A
key aim will be to balance sometimes conflicting needs for noise and atmospheric
emission reduction.
A correctly balanced environmental regime at an airport can help to ensure that
the Legal compliance is maintained, the rules are harmonised to the extent
possible, the global and local impacts are minimised to the extent possible, non
optimal environmental procedures and constraints are not applied and where
such constraints are being considered, the least damaging options are selected.
The optimum environmental efficiency and capacity can be achieved at and
around airports through the collaborative local selection of the most appropriate
ATM capabilities and OIs available, within an overarching and harmonising
framework.
IOC: 12/2008
FOC: 12/2016


Link to European ATM Master Plan

OI step - [AO-0705]-Reduced Water Pollution

Description:
De-icing stations are created where the fluids, spoiled on the apron, can be
collected and treated. Furthermore, technical solutions for the bio-degradation of
de-icing fluids are implemented. Application techniques are developed in
collaboration with airlines to improve the anti-icing treatment on aircraft at the
stands so that the amount of glycol released in the storm water can be reduced.

IOC: 12/2007

FOC: 12/2015
Link to European ATM Master Plan

OI step - [AO-0706]-(Local) Monitoring of Environmental Performance

Description:
The environmental performance (compliance to operational procedures, key
performance indicators) of ATM stakeholders at the airport is recorded and
monitored in support of continuous improvement process. In particular, it is
possible to determine the amount of airport related versus external pollution.
This improvement involves use of noise monitoring systems, flight tracking and
air quality monitoring systems.

IOC: 12/2007

FOC: 12/2015
Most important SLoA(s)
ENV02-ASP01 & APO01:

A regular (minimum twice per annum) CEM group meeting takes place that
has the full backing of top management;

The CEM group is always attended by representatives of the Airport
Operator, the Aircraft Operators (a minimum of the lead carrier or sufficient
carriers to cover 50%+ of movements) and the ANSP;

A shared environmental vision for the airport has been agreed by all core
Stakeholders and plans for its delivery have been agreed;

Regular joint progress reports against SMART objectives/targets are made
through appropriate channels.

See also CEM Guidelines (Airport Environmental Partnership, p17): “How
do I know that I am compliant with this guidance?”)
Most important SLoA(s)
ENV02-APO02

In accordance with locally agreed CEM priorities, ensure the availability of
timely, accurate and relevant environmental information at Airports

This may entail investment in appropriate environmental monitoring or
modelling systems at Airports to record and monitor noise, emissions, air
quality, etc.

Data availability is essential in support of the continuous performance
improvement process.
Finalisation Criteria and Closed Questions
ENV02-ASP01 & APO01:
 If a shared environmental vision for the airport has been agreed by all core
Stakeholders and plans for its delivery available, what are the main priority
mitigation[1] measure(s) to be covered?

Please provide at least one – only titles are required:
[1] For example: Noise track adherence, CDO, Auxiliary Power Unit controls, joint
community relations, noise abatement procedures, airfield fuel and emissions
reduction, joint support for airport growth plans and so on. More information can
be found in the EUROCONTROL Specification for collaborative Environmental
Management (CEM) at
http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/singlesky/specifications/20140908-cem-spec-v1.0.pdf
ENV02-AOP02:
 Environmental monitoring or information systems are implemented and
functioning
Objective’s completion criteria

Partially completed:
The CEM working arrangement has been established and is formulating a
shared environmental vision; but no further actions have been taken yet.

Completed:
CDO is established as an operational procedure and procedures were
formally published. A working arrangement to track performance and seek
improvement has been established and environmental monitoring or
information systems are implemented and functioning.
ESSIP Report 2013

At the level of Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs), the Objective has been
declared completed by more than half of the ANSPs in the ECAC area.

At the level of Military Operators (MIL) the Objective has been declared completed by
a small portion of Military Stakeholders in the ECAC area. No Military Operators
declared that deployment of this Objective is ongoing. One Military Operator declared
still being in the planning process and another one declared that he has No Plan to
implement this Objective. However, the big majority of Military Operators declared
that this Objective is not applicable, mostly because Military does not operate at Civil
Airports.

At the level of Air Airport Operators (APOs) the Objective has been declared
completed by one-third of the APOs in the ECAC area. Almost half of the APOs
declared that deployment of this Objective is ongoing. A small portion of APOs
declared still being in the planning process and No APO declared that the Objective
ins not achieved in time. However, another small portion of APOs declared that they
have No Plan to implement this Objective without providing thorough
information. Some APOs declared that this Objective is not applicable,
although they are included in the List of Applicable Airports.
Objective Coordinator’s Analysis

States need to indicate and describe effective progress in the SLoAs for all
and each airport before declaring it as “Completed” or even “Partially
Completed”.

The Objective is closely linked to CDO procedures prescribed in Objective
ENV01. State Focal Points should ensure that there is no deviation on the
implementation status between Objectives ENV01 and ENV02 for each
stakeholder. In case there is deviation, a thorough justification should be
made explaining the reasons.

Airports should enhance the implementation to be better synchronised with
the ANSP (see also list of Airports in ESSIP Plan 2013).

Military Aircraft Operators who do not make use of a Civil Airport (see also
list of Airports in ESSIP Plan 2013) should declare “Not Applicable” and
justify it.
Links and contacts

Objective Coordinator:
Hill, B. +32 2 729 5058
[email protected]

DSS Objective Expert(s):
Watt A., +32 2 729 5049
[email protected]
Mahony, S., +32 2 729 4745
[email protected]