Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Sustainable Palm Oil Research Unit (SPOR) Sustainability Challenges in Oil Palm Mono-cultivation: Are Microbes the Solution? Khim-Phin,Chong Sustainable Palm Oil Research Unit (SPOR) Universiti Malaysia Sabah Content of Talk: Oil Palm Success and Challenges: In Brief Fundamental of Microbial in Agriculture Case Studies: -Roles of Microbes in Oil Palm Improvement: -Roles of Microbes in Enhancing Oil Palm Disease Resistant -Microbial Diversity in Oil Palm Soil Conclusions Oil Palm World Palm Oil production increase from 13 to 28% from 1990 to 2011, with increase of exports from 36 to 57% Two key exporting countries: Malaysia (47%) and Indonesia (46%). Account 93% of world palm oil exports Malaysia: 5 Million Ha of Oil Palm. Contributing over 11% of global supply of edible oils and fats with 0.1% of the total global agricultural land area High Land Productivity Oil Palm vs Other Oil Seeds: 11x more than soyabean 10x more than sunflower 7x more than rapeseed In 2011, Malaysia’s Export revenue of oil palm products reached a record high of RM80.4 billion, an increase of 34.5% against RM59.8 billion achieved in 2010. Palm Oil Industry: At Crossroad or Under Real Threat? Workers SocioEnvironment Human Capital Productivity Cost of Production Soil Environments • Surface and subsurface soils are typically nutrientpoor environments for microbes • Rhizosphere is enriched in nutrients as a result of nearby plant activities Rhizosphere • Rhizoplane – soil in direct contact with plant root • Endophytes – microbes attached to root surface Increasing organic C Decreasing moisture Organic material in rhizosphere • Exudates – low molecular weight compounds released from plant cells in a nonmetabolic manner (leakage) • Secretions – compounds metabolically released from plant cells • Lysates – compounds released from moribund cells during autolysis • Plant mucilage – plant polysacchrides • Some bacteria and blue green algae are able to fix nitrogen from the atmosphere to enrich soil with nitrogen and increase its fertility. • These microbes are commonly called biological nitrogen fixers. • Rhizobium bacteria is involved in the fixation of nitrogen in leguminous plants (pulses). Rhizobium lives in the root nodules of leguminous plants, such as beans and peas, with which it has a symbiotic relationship. • Sometimes nitrogen gets fixed through the action of lightning. • Our atmosphere has 78% nitrogen gas. Nitrogen is one of the essential constituents of all living organisms as part of proteins, chlorophyll, nucleic acids and vitamins. The atmospheric nitrogen cannot be taken directly by plants and animals. • Certain bacteria and blue green algae present in the soil fix nitrogen from the atmosphere and convert into compounds of nitrogen. • Once nitrogen is converted into these usable compounds, it can be utilized by plants from the soil through their root system. • Nitrogen is then used for the synthesis of plant proteins and other compounds. Animals feeding on plants get these proteins and other nitrogen compounds. • When plants and animals die, bacteria and fungi present in the soil convert the nitrogenous wastes into nitrogenous compounds to be used by plants again. • Certain other bacteria convert some part of them to nitrogen gas which goes back into the atmosphere. As a result, the percentage of nitrogen in the atmosphere remains more or less constant. Beneficial root-microbe interactions • Atmosphere contains 1015 tons N2 gas – Biological nitrogen fixation – Minimum of 70 million tons N fixed/year Sources of Fixed Nitrogen Biological Lightning Fertilizer 25% 10% 65% Vegetative Growth Improvement-Nursery (Johor Estate) • Combinations of Bacillus spp, Aspergillus spp & Pseudomonas spp Feb 2010 : Seed sowing May 2010 : Transplanting to main nursery June 2010 : 1st Application Oct 2010 : 2nd Application Dec 2010 : Field transplanting Microbes treated Untreated Courtesy of Agrinos Results show the averages for each parameters measure for microorganisms treated oil palm seedlings compared to control (Kalimantan Nursery, Indonesia) Observation (Avg) Treated Control Frond Length (cm) 133.8 125.6 Leaflet Length (cm) 41.8 36.8 Number of Total Fronds 21.2 20.4 Girth (cm) 37.2 30.4 Root Length (cm) 122.8 111.4 Seedling Height (cm) 154.8 140.2 Courtesy of Agrinos Yield-Immature Plantings (Tawau Estate) • Nitrogen based fertilizer reduction: 1st Yr Planting-0% 2nd Yr Planting-15% Subsequent Yr-25% • Yield Improvement (%) 1st Yr Harvesting-80% 2nd Yr Harvesting-120% 3rd Yr Harvesting-49% 4th Yr Harvesting-17% 5th Yr Harvesting-11% 3.57% bigger girth 10% > LAI Courtesy of Agrinos Soil Analysis Block Depth(cm) Opt pH Exchg. K Available P Organic C (p.p.p.m) (%) Total Available Organic N (%) 4.55.5 0.30 400 20.00 2.50 0.25 TreatBlk 1 0-15 5.6 0.38 187 20.30 0.77 0.13 TreatBlk 1 15-35 5.8 0.17 199 11.80 0.99 0.18 ContBlk 2 0-15 5.5 0.66 178 6.90 0.66 0.12 ContBlk 2 15-35 4.7 0.65 137 5.10 0.37 0.09 Courtesy of Agrinos Yield-Mature Plantings (Sandakan Estate) • 1st application of microbes: 10 years age • Yield Improvement (%) 1st Yr treatment-12% 2nd Yr treatment-15% 3rd Yr treatment-25% 4th Yr treatment-28% Years of treatment *Salinity and sandy problem Courtesy of Agrinos Percentage of Ganoderma infection after two months based on ergosterol (fungal sterol) content and growth on GSM for oil palm seedlings pre-treated with various combination of microbes Microbes Ergosterol (Average) Infection percentage GSM percentage Bacillus spp. and Trichoderma spp. 0.19 µg/mL-1 30 % 30% Lactobacillus, Nattobacillus and Yeasts 0.19 µg/mL-1 60 % 60 % Bacillus spp, Aspergillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. 0.23 µg/mL-1 100 % 100 % Control (Infect without microbes) 1.52 µg/mL-1 100% 100% Control (Healthy) 0 µg/mL-1 0% 0% Percentage of Ganoderma infection after four months based on ergosterol (fungal sterol) content and growth on GSM for oil palm seedlings pre-treated with various combination of microbes Microbes Ergosterol (Average) Infection percentage GSM percentage Bacillus spp. and Trichoderma spp. 0.22 µg/mL-1 60 % 60% Lactobacillus, Nattobacillus and Yeasts 0.34 µg/mL-1 50 % 50% Bacillus spp, Aspergillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. 0.22 µg/mL-1 60 % 60 % Control (Infect without microbes) 2.35 µg/mL-1 100% 100% Control (Healthy) 0 µg/mL-1 0% 0% A Ergosterol A B C Ergosterol HPLC Chromatograms of ergosterol, peak was detected at RT 7-8 min. (A) Ergosterol standard (B) Healthy palm (C) Infected palm. Ergosterol peaks are arrowed. B Oil palm roots cultured on Ganoderma Selective Media (GSM) after 5 days of incubation. A: Infected oil palm roots, indicated by Ganoderma growth. B: Uninfected oil palm roots. Ganoderma-inoculated oil palm seedling roots treated with different combination of microbes. A: Bacillus sp and Trichoderma sp. B: Bacillus sp., Aspergillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. C: Lactobacillus, Nattobacillus and Yeasts , D: Control. Bar= 3 cm Blue line: control Green line: Microbes treated 2nd App 1st App Oil palm estate soil inoculated with Ganoderma boninense and treated with combinations of Bacillus spp, Aspergillus spp and Pseudomonas spp Courtesy of Agrinos & UPM 2nd App Hyphal extension of G. boninense in sterile and non sterile soil and frond debris (FD). Colonised wheat grains were used as inoculum source. a: Mycelial grown in FD after 4 days. b: Extension in FD after 10 days. c: Growth in soil after 4 days. d: Hyphal extension in soil after 10 days Cooper, R. (2011) in Sustainable Agriculture: An Insight into Ganoderma 2nd App Assessment on field application is currently on going. Data collection due mid Nov 2012 Courtesy of Martin Kong, One Good Earth Population density of microorganisms in all soil samples collected from oil palm plantation of Sapi Nangoh, Sandakan. Sample S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19 S20 Growth medium NA(Bacteria) 3.2 x 103 5.1 x 103 7.0 x 102 7.2 x 104 3.8 x 103 3.0 x 106 4.0 x 103 2.4 x 107 1.6 x 103 3.6 x 103 7.0 x 102 5.0 x 106 1.2 x 106 4.6 x 103 6.7 x 105 1.7 x 103 5.7 x 103 3.2 x 103 3.2 x 103 PDA (Fungi) 5.0 x 102 1.0 x 102 3.0 x 102 3.0 x 102 9.0 x 102 1.0 x 102 1.0 x 102 1.0 x 102 1.0 x 102 MEA (Yeast) 2.8 x 102 1.3 x 104 1.5 x 104 4.7 x 104 7.4 x 103 5.3 x 103 1.5 x 103 4.8 x 103 1.1 x 103 2.0 x 106 3.6 x 106 4.2 x 104 1.9 x 103 7.9 x 103 6.4 x 104 7.2 x 104 6.3 x 102 4.7 x 104 3.1 x 103 4.7 x 103 Cont….. Sample S21 S22 S23 S24 S25 S26 S27 S28 S29 S30 S31 S32 S33 S34 S35 NA(Bacteria) 2.0 x 103 2.0 x 105 1.3 x 103 3.2 x 103 2.2 x 104 3.1 x 104 3.3 x 104 3.1 x 104 1.9 x 104 3.6 x 103 1.6 x 103 7.3 x 103 5.6 x 104 1.5 x 103 1.2 x 103 Growth medium PDA (Fungi) 1.0 x 102 3.0 x 102 1.0 x 102 3.0 x 102 1.0 x 102 1.0 x 102 8.0 x 102 2.0 x 102 - MEA (Yeast) 1.8 x 103 9.6 x 103 1.6 x 103 1.1 x 103 8.0 x 102 1.6 x 103 7.6 x 103 2.4 x 103 4.8 x 103 2.0 x 103 2.5 x 103 2.7 x 103 4.7 x 103 4.0 x 102 4.9 x 103 Identification using Biolog technique Microrganisms Bacteria Genus Species Bacillus B. thuringiensis B. pumilus B. humi B. lichenformis B. albus B. pseudomycoides B. amyloliquefaciens A. woluwensis A. globiformis K. sedentarius R. picketii C. boris C. mycetoides B. epidermis R. fascians R. minuta R. graminis R. pustula G. selenospora F. neoformansbacillisporus F. fuzhouensis S. johnsonii B. albus C. albidus P. solitumwestling P. neoechinulatum C. herbarum F. tricinctum A. kiliense Arthobacter Actinomycetes Kytococous Ralstonia Corynebacterium Yeast Brevibacterium Rhodotococcus Rhodotorula Fungi Guilliermondella Filobasidiella Fellomyces Sporidiobolus Bulleromyces Cryptococcus Penicilium Cladosporium Fusarium Acremonium Microbes Identification based on Biolog technique GEN III microplate (left) showed purple colour -change pattern due to the carbon utilization by the bacteria after 24 hr of incubation. Based on the colour changes, bacteria was identified as Bacillus pumilus (squared in red) with the probability of 1.0 and 0.764 similarity. Bacterial culture (left) isolated from soil sample which identified as B.pumilus based on Biolog identification technique. Observation of B. pumilus (right) under light microscope using 40x magnification power. Bar=100µm Oil Palm Bacterial population: 102 to 107 cfu/g of soil Forest Bacterial populations: 105 to 108 cfu/g of soil No growth was observed from soil sample of S6 on NA. Fungal population: only 102cfu/g of soil. Fungal population: 105 to 106 cfu/g of soil No growth was observed on PDA from soil of S3, S4, S7, S8, S13, S14, S15, S16, S18, S19, S27, S28, S29, S30, S31, S34 and S35. All soil samples (S1-S35) showed the presence of yeasts Yeasts population: 102 to 106 cfu/g of soil Yeasts population: 103 cfu/g of soil Conclusion • Soil microbial ecosystem is complex but combinations of microbes have the ability to enhance Oil Palm nutrient uptake, increase availability of nutrient to Oil Palm and suppress pathogens attack especially Ganoderma • Ganoderma is weak competitor with many other microorganisms. We are the one who provides suitable soil condition for them to become the champion! • Is extensive use of agrochemicals lead to depletion of microbial population in oil palm soil? Need further investigation • More funding is required to accelerate research related to potential indigenous microbes for the betterment/enrichment of agriculture/plantation soil for the future. One Good Earth (M) Sdn Bhd All my Postgraduates & Co-researchers