Download Slide 1

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
New Perspectives in Cancer
Therapy
Óren Smaletz
Programa de Oncologia
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of
Interest
• Honoraria: Pfizer, Merck KGaA
• Research Funding: Pfizer
• Scientific Funding: Merck KGaA, Roche
CFM Resolution nº 1.595/2000
SBOC/SBC oct/2007
A 72-year-old man presented for evaluation of progressive dyspnea and cough
McMullan D and Cohen G. N Engl J Med 2006;354:397
Change in the US Death Rates* by Cause,
1950 & 2002
Rate Per 100,000
600
586.8
1950
500
2002
400
300
240.1
200
193.9
180.7
193.4
100
56.0
48.1
22.5
0
Heart
Diseases
Cerebrovascular
Diseases
Pneumonia/
Influenza
Cancer
* Age-adjusted to 2000 US standard population.
Sources: 1950 Mortality Data - CDC/NCHS, NVSS, Mortality Revised.
2002 Mortality Data: US Mortality Public Use Data Tape, 2002, NCHS, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 2004
Fight Against Cancer
• Surgery
• Radiotherapy
• Chemotherapy
• Targeted Therapy Agents
FDA Approved New Molecules for
Solid Tumor Use per Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
0
1
T argeted T herapy Agent
2
Cy totox ic Agent
3
Schrag, D., New Engl J Med 2004
Hanahan D, Cell 2000
The EGFR (erbB) Family and
Ligands
EGF
TGFa
Amphiregulin
b-cellulin
HB-EGF
Epiregulin
Heregulins
NRG2
NRG3
Heregulins
b-cellulin
100
44
36
48
100
82
59
79
100
33
24
28
HER1
EGFR
ErbB-1
HER2/neu
ErbB-2
HER3
ErbB-3
HER4
ErbB-4
Cysteine-rich
domains
Tyrosine kinase
domain
C-terminus
Família EGFR (Her)
Hudis NEJM 2007
Trastuzumab – mecanismo de ação
Hudis NEJM 2007
Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer
Trastuzumab – metastatic breast
cancer
Slamon, NEJM 2001
Trastuzumab – metastatic breast
cancer
Slamon, NEJM 2001
Trastuzumab – adjuvant treatment
Trastuzumab – adjuvant treatment
EGFR Signaling Pathways
R
R
R R
R
R
Extracellular
Membrane
pY
pY
pY
pY
K
K
K
K
K
Intracellular
Substract
K
Substract
pY
pY
pY
Cellular effects
Signaling
Molecules
+
+
+
proliferation
apoptosis
angiogenesis
metastasis
EGFR Expression in Human Cancer
Tumors
Overexpression
associated with:
•
•
•
•
•
Invasion
Metastasis
Advanced disease
Poor outcome
Resistance to
chemotherapy,
hormonotherapy
radiotherapy
Expression (%)*
NSCLC
50-90
Colorectal
45-80
Gastric
30-60
Pancreatic
30-50
Ovarian
35-60
Prostate
40-70
Breast
14-91
Head and Neck
70-100
Kidney
80-100
*lowest to highest published range of expression
Disease-free Survival and EGFR and
TGF-a Levels in Head and Neck Cancer
EGFR
TGFa
Proportion Surviving
1.0
low
low
medium
medium
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
high
high
p=.0001
p=.0001
0.0
0
1
2
3
4
Years after surgery
5
6/0
1
2
3
4
Years after surgery
Rubin Grandis J et al. JNCI 1998; 90: 824–832.
5
6
EGFR Mab Currently Approved
Clinical
activity
randomized
trials
Cetuximab
FDA ANVISA
Dosage
Head & Neck
Colon/Rectal
Y
Y
Y
Y
400 mg/m2 i.v.
initial dose
followed by 250
mg/m2 weekly
Panitumumab Colon/Rectal
Y
N
6 mg/kg i.v.
every 14 days
Cetuximab (Erbitux®)
• IgG1 (chimerized antibody)
• Exclusive for EGFR and its
heterodimers
• Prevents ligand binding to
EGFR
• High affinity. Kd = 0.39 nM
(M-225 Kd = 1 nM)
• 1 log > natural ligand
• Stimulates receptor
internalization
• Blocks receptor dimerization,
tyrosine kinase
phosphorylation, signal
transduction
Panitumumab (Vectibix®)
• fully human IgG2κ mAb
• high affinity (Kd ~ 0.05 nM)
• Upon binding, internalized and donwregulates
EGFR
• Prevents
– receptor dimerization
– EGFR-tyrosine autophosphorylation
– activation of downstream signaling molecules
Mechanism of Action of anti-EGFR
Monoclonal Antibodies
Membrane
Cancer Cell
X
Cell proliferation
Apoptosis
X
Metastasis
X
Angiogenesis
Nucleus
X
Cetuximab in Colorectal Cancer
(“Bond Trial”)
• Eligibility criteria
 Pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer with irinotecan
 All patients had to be EGF-R positive
Primary end-point
 Tumor response
Cetuximab in Colorectal Cancer
(“Bond Trial”)
Cetuximab and Irinotecan
218 patients
Irinotecan pretreated
Metastatic CRC
EGFR positive
Cetuximab
111 patients
Cetuximab in Colorectal Cancer
(“Bond Trial”)
N
OR (%)
TTP
(months)
Survival
(months)
C225 and
Irinotecan
218
22.9
4.1
8.6
C225
111
10.8
1.5
6.9
p = 0.007
Cunningham et al., New Engl J Med 2004
Cunningham et al., New Engl J Med 2004
Panitumumab in Colon/Rectal Cancer
Panitumumab + BSC
463 EGFR +, M1
Colon/Rectal Cancer,
POD on standard
chemoRX
BSC
Primary Endpoint: PFS
Minimum f/u 12 months
Van Cutsem et al., J Clin Oncol 2007
Panitumumab vs. BSC
Van Cutsem st al. J Clin Oncol 2007
Van Cutsem st al. J Clin Oncol 2007
Panitumumab vs. BSC
EGFR and K-RAS
• K-RAS mutation present
in 40-45% patients
• When K-ras gene is
mutated, K-ras protein
(p21 ras) is active
independently of EGFR
activation
Khambata-Ford et al. JCO 2007
K-RAS mutation detection
• PCR test for mutation in codons 12 and 13 kras
Chen et al. Clin Chem 2004
pre-treated
Metastatic
CRC (no
other option
available)
Cetuximab + BSC
287 patients
BSC
285 patients
Karapetis et al. New Engl J Med 2008
Take Home Message
• Moleculat Targeted Therapy – showtime
• Benefit is evident – as well as costs
• Who should receive? – Clinical oncology os
meeting science
Thank you
[email protected]
Related documents