Download Optimum Lymphadenectomy

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Journal meeting
1
Esophagus cancer
• Question : How extend
lymphadenectomy is enough for
esophagus cancer?
2
Background Data
• Increased number of regional lymph nodes containing
metastases predicts decreased survival following
esophagectomy for cancer, and increased extent of
lymphadenectomy is associated with improved
survival.
• Therefore, extend lymphadenectomy of some extent
is required.
• However, what constitutes optimum
lymphadenectomy to maximize survival is
controversial.
3
Lymphatic drainage of
esophagus
4
• Radical esophagectomy should encompass all lymph
node stations having a greater than 10% incidence of
metastases
• lymphatic metastasis cannot be diagnosed precisely
either by ultrasonography or CT imaging before
surgery.
• Therefore, radical surgery for cancer of the thoracic
esophagus requires complete
5
three-field lymph node
dissection.
• upper mediastinal lymph nodes (including the node
group of the recurrent laryngeal nerve chain)
6
• paratracheal lymph nodes on both sides , subcarinal,
right and left hilar lymph nodes, posterior mediastinal
lymph nodes adjacent to the descending aorta and left
pleura, and diaphragmatic lymph nodes are dissected.
7
• For the abdominal procedure, after an upper
midline laparotomy, en-bloc dissection of lymph
nodes is carried out along the cardia, lesser
curvature, left gastric artery, celiac axis,
common hepatic artery, and splenic artery
8
9
Method
• Deta base : Worldwide Esophageal Cancer
Collaboration data.
• The entire project was approved by the Case Cancer
Institutional Review Board of Case Western Reserve
University.
• Method : total of 4627 patients who had esophagectomy
alone for esophageal cancer. (no pre- or postoperative
adjuvant therapy) for esophageal cancer and had followup for all-cause mortality.)
• Risk-adjusted 5-year survival was averaged for each
number of lymph nodes resected.
10
Method
11
Result
pN0M0 Cancers
pTis cancers
regardless of histopathologic cell type, survival was
excellent and not associated with extent of
lymphadenectomy.
T1N0M0 cancers
G1 : survival was unrelated to extent of
lymphadenectomy
G2/G3 cancers : survival was increased with more
extensive lymphadenectomy
12
Result
pN0M0 Cancers
T2N0M0 and T3/T4N0M0 cancers
G1 : limited data , due to few case number
G2/G3 cancers : survival was increased with more
extensive lymphadenectomy
•.
13
Result
N+M0 Cancers
1 to 6 nodes positive (N1~2)
survival increased with extent of lymphadenectomy
for all T classifications
7 or more nodes positive
T2 and T3/T4 cancers : Survival increased, albeit
minimally, with extent of lymphadenectomy
T1 : very few case number to assessing the
survival value
14
Optimum Lymphadenectomy
 pTis
 no optimum extent of lymphadenectomy
 pT1 N0M0 cancers
 10 for adenocarcinomas
 12 for squamous cell carcinomas
 pT2 N0M0 cancers
 15 for adenocarcinomas
 22 for squamous cell carcinomas
 T3/T4N0M0 cancers
 31 for Adenocarcinomas
 42 for squamous cell carcinomas
Optimum number of
nodes resected was determined by the
value at which standardized
VIMP first dropped below 5%.
15
Optimum Lymphadenectomy
 T2 N1~2M0 cancers(1 to 6 nodes)
 15
 T2 N3M0 cancers(7 or more nodes positive)
 insufficient data were available
 T3/T4N1M0 cancers
 29
 T3/T4N2M0 cancers
 50
 T3/T4N3M0 cancers
 28
16
Discussion
 Extent of lymphadenectomy was either unassociated
with or minimally increased survival for patients with
extremes of esophageal cancer (TisN0M0 and
T2N3 lesion) and those with well-differentiated(G1)
pN0 cancer.
 pN+ cancers
improved survival!!
more accurate determination of number of positive
nodes (stage purification), or therapeutic effect of
removing micrometastases.
17
Limitation
 despite worldwide data, there was a paucity of cases
at the extremes, such as well-differentiated
(G1)pT3/T4N0 and pT2 N3.
 No morbidity information according to extent of
lymphadenectomy
 The main problem is that each institution has a
different method of counting the number of lymph
nodes resected.
18
Recommendations
 If there is uncertainty as to T and histopathologic
grade, it is recommended that 30 or more nodes be
resected to maximize 5-year survival.
It is recommended that to maximize 5-year
survival, a minimum of 10 nodes be resected for
T1 cancer, 20 nodes for T2 cancer, and 30 or more
nodes for T3/T4 cancers.
19
Thanks for your atten
20