Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES An International Open Free Access, Peer Reviewed Research Journal www.compmath-journal.org ISSN 0976-5727 (Print) ISSN 2319-8133 (Online) Abbr:J.Comp.&Math.Sci. 2014, Vol.5(6): Pg.490-499 On α Regular ω-Open Sets in Topological Spaces R. S. Wali1 and Prabhavati S. Mandalgeri2 1 Department of Mathematics, Bhandari Rathi College, Guledagud, Karnataka State, INDIA. 2 Department of Mathematics, K.L.E’S , S.K. Arts College & H.S.K. Science Institute, Hubli, Karnataka State, INDIA. (Received on: November 15, 2014) ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to introduce & study the αrωopen sets in topological space and obtain some of their properties. Also we introduce αrω-interior , αrω-neighbourhood, αrω –limits points in topological spaces., Applying αrω-closed sets we introduce αrω-closure and discuss some basic properties of thiese. Keywords: Topological spaces, αrω-closed sets, αrω-open sets. 1. INTRODUCTION Regular open sets and rw-open sets have been introduced and investigated by Stone11 and Benchalli and Wali2 respectively. Levine6, Nagaveni9, Pushpalatha10 introduced and investigated semi open sets, generalized closed sets, weakly generalized closed sets, respectively. Maki et al.7 introduced and studied generalized α-closed sets and αgeneralized closed sets. S. S. Benchalli et al.3 studied ωα-closed sets in topological spaces. R.S.Wali and P S. Mandalgeri13 introduced and studied αrω-closed sets. We introduce and study the αrωopen sets in topological space and obtain some of their properties. Also we introduce αrω-interior, αrω-neighbourhood, αrω–limits points in topological space. 2. PRELIMINARIES Throughout this paper space (X, ) and (,Y, σ) (or simply X and Y) always denote topological space on which no separation axioms are assumed unless explicitly stated. For a subset A of a space X, Cl(A), Int(A) and Ac denote the Closure of A, Interior of A and Compliment of A in X respectively. Definition 2.1 -A subset A of a topological space (X, ) is called. (1) a regular open set [11] if A = int(clA)) Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 5, Issue 6, 31 December, 2014 491 R. S. Wali, et al., J. Comp. & Math. Sci. Vol.5 (6), 490-499 (2014) and a regular closed set if A = cl(int(A)). (2) Regular semi open set [4] if there is a regular open set U such that U ⊆ A ⊆ cl(U). Definition 2.2 Let (X, ߬) be topological space and A ⊆X The intersection of all semi closed (resp pre-closed, α-closed and semi-preclosed ) subsets of space X containing A is called the Semi closure (resp pre-closure , α-closure and Semi-pre-closure) of A and denoted by sCl(A) (resp pCl(A),αCl(A), spCl(A) Definition 2.4 A subset A of a topological space (X, ߬ ) is called 1) a generalized semi-closed set(briefly gsclosed)[1] if scl(A) ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is open in X. 2) an α-generalized closed set(briefly αg closed)[7] if αcl(A)⊆U whenever A⊆U and U is open in X. 3) a generalized semi pre regular closed (briefly gspr-closed) set [10] if spcl(A ) ⊆ U whenever A⊆ U and U is regular open in X. 4) generalized pre regular closed set(briefly gpr-closed)[2] if pcl(A) ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is regular open in X. 5) a weakely generalized closed set (briefly, wg-closed)[9] if cl(int(A))⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is open in X. 6) a regular weakly generalized closed set (briefly, rwg-closed)[9] if cl(int(A))⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is regular open in X. 7) an α-generalized regular closed (briefly αgr-closed) set [12] if αcl(A)⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is regularopen in X. 8) ωα-closed set [3] if αcl(A) ⊆ U whenever A⊆ U and U is ω-open in X. 9) regular ω- closed (briefly rω -closed) set [2] if cl(A)⊆ U whenever A⊆ U and U is regular semi- open in X. 10) generalized pre closed (briefly gpclosed) set [8] if pcl(A)⊆U whenever A⊆U and U is open in X. The compliment of the above mentioned closed sets are their open sets respectively. 3. α Regular ω-CLOSED SETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACE Definition : 3.1 [13] A subset A of topological space (X, ߬) is called a α regular ω-closed set (briefly αrω-closed set) if αCl(A)⊆U whenever A ⊆ U and U is rωopen in (X, ߬). Results3.2 : From [13] 1) Every closed set is αrω-closed set in X 2) Every α-closed set in X is αrω-closed set 3) Every regular closed set is αrω-closed set in X. 4) Every αrω-closed set is αg-closed(also αgr-closed, ωα-closed, gs-closed, gsprclosed, rwg-, closed, gp-closed, wgclosed, gpr-closed ) set in X 5) The Union of two αrω -closed subsets of X is αrω – closed set. 4. α REGULAR ω-OPEN SETS In this section, we define αrω-open sets in topological spaces and obtain some of their properties. Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 5, Issue 6, 31 December, 2014 R. S. Wali, et al., J. Comp. & Math. Sci. Vol.5 (6), 490-499 (2014) 492 Definition 4.1 A subset A of a topological space (X , ߬) is called α regular ω-open (briefly αrω-open) set in X if Ac is αrωclosed in X X A ⊆ X U and X U is rω-open set of (X, ߬). This implies that αcl(X A) ⊆ X U. But αcl(X A)=X αint(A). Thus X αint(A) ⊆ X U, so U ⊆ αint (A) The following theorem is the analogue of results 3.2 ( 1) to (4) Conversely Theorem 4.2 For any topological spaces (X, ߬) we have the following (i) Every open (resp α-open ,regular-open) set is αrω-open. (ii) Every αrω-open set is αg –open set. (iii) Every αrω-open set is αgr-open ( resp ωα-open gs-open,gspr-open , ωg-open, rωgopen,gp-open and gpr-open) set. Theorem 4.3 If A and B are αrω-open sets in space X, then A∩B is also an αrω-open in X. Suppose U ⊆ αint (A) whenever U is rωclosed and U A. To prove that A is αrωopen set. Let F be rω-open set of (X, ߬) s.t X A ⊆ F. Then X F ⊆ A. Now X F is rωclosed set containing A, So X F ⊆ αint(A) , X − αint(A) ⊆ F but αcl(X A)= X − αintሺAሻ ⊆ F. Thus αcl(X A)⊆ F i.e X A is αrω-closed set & hence A is αrω-open set. Theorem4.7 If αint(A) ⊆ B ⊆ A and A is αrω-open set, then B is αrω-open set. Proof: Let A and B be two αrω-open sets in X. Then Ac and Bc are αrω-closed sets in X by Results 3.2 (5), Ac ∪ Bc is also αrω-closed set in X. that is Ac ∪ Bc =(A∩B)c is αrω-closed set in X. Therefore A∩B is an αrω-open set in X. Proof: Let αint(A) ⊆ B ⊆A , Thus X A ⊆ X B⊆ X αint(A) , i.e X A X B ⊆ cl(X A), Since X A is αrω-closed set, by Theorem3.20 X B is αrω-closed set. Therefore B in αrω-open set. Remark 4.4 The union of αrω-open set in X is generally not an αrω-open set in X. Theorem 4.8 If A X is αrω-closed then αcl(A) −A is αrω-open set Example 4.5 Let X={a,b,c,d}, ߬ ={X,ϕ,{a}, {c,d},{a,c,d}} If A={c} B={a} Then A & B are αrω-open set in X but A ⋃ B={a,c} is not an αrω-open set in X. Proof: Let A be αrω-closed. Let F ⊆ αcl(A) −A, where F is rω-closed by Theorem 3.17 F=ϕ Therefore F ⊆ αint (αcl(A) −A) and Theorem4.6 αcl(A) −A is αrω-open set. Theorem 4.6 A subset of A of a topological space X is αrω-open iff U ⊆ αint(A), whenever U is rω-closed and U ⊆ A Proof: Assume that A is αrω-open set in X and U is rω-closed set of (X, ߬) s.t U ⊆ A. Then X-A is a αrω-closed set in (X, ߬). Also The reverse implication does not hold good Example 4.9:Let X={a,b,c,d}, ߬ ={X,ϕ,{a}, {c,d},{a,c,d}} A={b,c} αcl(A)={b,c,d} αcl(A) –A={d} which is αrω-open set in X, but A is not αrω-closed. Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 5, Issue 6, 31 December, 2014 493 R. S. Wali, et al., J. Comp. & Math. Sci. Vol.5 (6), 490-499 (2014) Theorem 4.10 A set A is αrω-open set in (X, ߬) if and only if U=X whenever U is rω-open and αint(A) (X A) ⊆ U. Proof: Suppose that A is αrω-open set in X. Let U be rω-open and αint(A) ∪ (X-A) ⊆ U Uc ⊆ (αint(A) ∪Ac)c = (αint(A))c ∩ A i.e Uc ⊆ (αint(A))c Ac (because A B = A∩Bc) Thus Uc ⊆ αcl(Ac)–Ac (because (αint(A))c = αcl(Ac)) Now Ac is also αrω-closed and Uc is rωclosed then by Theorem--- it follows Uc=ϕ then U=X Conversely: Suppose F is αrω-closed and F⊆A. Then αint(A) ∪ (X-A) ⊆ αint(A) ∪ (X-F). It follows that αint(A) ∪ (X) –F)=X Theorem 4.11 If A and B be subsets of space (X, ߬). If B is αrω-open and αint(B)⊆A then A∩B is αrω-open. Proof: Let B is αrω-open in X. αint(B) ⊆ A and αint(B) ⊆ B is always then αint(B) ⊆ A∩B also αint(B) ⊆ A∩B ⊆ B and B is αrω-open set by Theorem 4.7 , A∩B is also is αrω-open set in X. 5. αrω-CLOSURE AND αrω-INTERIOR In this section the notation of αrωclosure and αrω-Interior is defined and some of its basic properties are studied. Definition 5.1 For a subset A of (X, ߬), αrωclosure of A is denoted by αrωcl(A) and defined as αrωcl(A)= ∩{G : A⊆G, G is αrω– closed in (X, ߬) } or ∩{G : A⊆G, G ߳ αRωC(X)} Theorem 5.2 If A and B are subsets of space (X, ߬) then i) αrωcl (X) = X , αrωcl(ϕ)=ϕ ii) A ⊆ αrωcl(A) iii) If B is any αrω-closed set containing A, then αrωcl(A) ⊆ B iv) If A ⊆ B then αrωcl(A) ⊆ αrωcl(B) v) αrωcl(A)= αrωcl (αrωcl (A)) vi) αrωcl(A B) = αrωcl (A) ∪ αrωcl (B) Proof: i) By definition of αrω=closure, X is only αrω-closed set containing X. therefore αrωcl(X) = Intersection of all the αrωclosed set containing X =∩{X} =X therefore αrωcl (X) = X and again by definition of αrω-closure αrωcl(ϕ) = Intersection of all αrω-closed sets containing ϕ = ϕ ∩ any αrω-closed set containing ϕ = ϕ Therefore αrωcl(ϕ)=ϕ ii) By definition of αrω-closure of A, it is obvious that A ⊆ αrωcl(A) iii) Let B be any αrω-closed set containing A. Since αrωcl(A) is the intersection of all αrω-closed set containing A , αrωcl(A) is contained in every αrωclosed set containing A. Hence in particular αrωcl(A)⊆B iv) Let A and B be subsets of (X, ߬) such that A⊆B by definition αrω-closure , αrωcl(B)=∩{F : B ⊆F ߳ αRωC(X)} If B ⊆ F ߳ αRωC(X) , then αrωcl(B) F. since A ⊆ B , A ⊆ B ⊆F ߳ αRωC(X), we have αrωcl(A) ⊆F , αrωcl(A) ⊆∩{F : B ⊆F ߳ αRωC(X)} = αrωcl(B) Therefore αrωcl(A) ⊆ αrωcl(B) Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 5, Issue 6, 31 December, 2014 R. S. Wali, et al., J. Comp. & Math. Sci. Vol.5 (6), 490-499 (2014) v) Let A be any subset of X by definition of αrω-closure , αrωcl(A)= ∩{F : A ⊆F ߳ αRωC(X)} vi) If A ⊆ F ϵ αRωC(X) then αrωcl(A) F , since F is αrω-closed set containing αrωcl(A) by (iii) αrωcl(αrωcl(A)) F Hence αrωcl(αrωcl(A)) = ∩{F : A ⊆F ߳ αRωC(X)} = αrωcl(A). Therefore αrωcl(αrωcl(A)) = αrωcl(A) Let A and B be subsets of X , Clearly A⊆A B, B⊆A B from (iv) αrωcl(A) ⊆ αrωcl(A B)αrωcl(B) ⊆ αrωcl(A B) hence αrωcl(A) ∪αrωcl(B) ⊆ αrωcl(A B) (1) Now we have to prove that αrωcl(A B) ⊆ αrωcl(A) ∪αrωcl(B) Suppose x ∉ αrωcl(A) ∪αrωcl(B) then αrω-closed set A1 and B1 with AcA1 , B⊆B1 and x ∉ A1 B1 We have A B ⊆A1 B1 and A1 B1 is the αrω-closed set by theorem --- such that x ∉ A1 B1 Thus x αrωcl(A B) hence αrωcl(A B) ⊆ αrωcl(A) ∪αrωcl(B) (2) From (1) and (2) we have αrωcl(A B) = αrωcl(A) ∪αrωcl(B) Theorem 5.3 If A ⊆ X is αrω-closed set then αrωcl(A) =A Proof : Let A be αrω-closed subset of X. we know that A ⊆ αrωcl(A) –(1) Also A⊆A and A is αrω-closed set by theorem5.2 (iii) αrωcl(A) ⊆A –(2) Hence αrωcl(A) =A The Converse of the above need not be true as seen from the following example. 494 Example5.4 Let X={a,b,c,d}, ߬ ={X,ϕ,{a}, {c,d},{a,c,d}} A={b,c} αrωcl(A)={b,c}=A then A is not αrω-closed set. Theorem 5.5 If A and B are subsets of ⊆ space X then αrωcl(A B) αrωcl(A) ∩αrωcl(B) Proof: Let A and B be subsets of X, Clearly A B⊆A , A B⊆B by theorem5.2(iv ) αrωcl(A B) ⊆ αrωcl(A), αrωcl(A B) ⊆ αrωcl(B) hence αrωcl(A B) ⊆ αrωcl(A) ∩αrωcl(B) Remark5.6 In general αrωcl(A) ∩αrωcl(B) αrωcl(A B) as seen from the following example. Example5.7 Consider X={a,b,c,d}, ߬ ={X,ϕ, {a},{b},{a,b},{a,b,c}} , A={b,c} , B={c,d} , A∩B={c} αrωcl(A)={b,c,d} αrωcl(B)={c,d} αrωcl(A∩B)={c} and αrωcl(A) ∩αrωcl(B)={c,d} therefore αrωcl(A) ∩αrωcl(B) αrωcl(A B). Theorem 5.8 For an x ߳ X, x ߳ αrωcl(A) if and if A V ≠ ϕ for every αrω-open set V containing x. Proof: Let x ߳ αrωcl(A) To prove A V ≠ ϕ for every αrω-open set V containing x by contradiction. Suppose αrω-open set V containing x s.t A V = ϕ then A ⊆ X-V , X-V is αrω-closed set , αrωcl(A) ⊆ X-V This shows that x ∉ αrωcl(A) which is contradiction . Hence A V ≠ ϕ for every αrω-open set V containing x. Conversely: Let A V ≠ ϕ for every αrω-open set V containing x. To prove x αrωcl(A). we Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 5, Issue 6, 31 December, 2014 495 R. S. Wali, et al., J. Comp. & Math. Sci. Vol.5 (6), 490-499 (2014) prove the result by contradiction. Suppose x αrωcl(A) then there exist a αrω-closed subset F containing A s.t x F. Then x X-F is αrω-open. Also (X-F) A=ϕ which is contradiction. Hence x αrωcl(A). αRωC(X)} If A⊆F αRωC(X) then A⊆F GPRC(X), because every αrω-closed is gprclosed i.e gprcl(A) ⊆F therefore gprcl(A) ⊆∩{F : A ⊆F αRωC(X)}= αrωcl(A). Hence gprcl(A) ⊆ αrωcl(A) Theorem 5.9 If Ais subset of space X then (i) αrωcl(A) ⊆ cl(A) (ii) αrωcl(A) ⊆ αcl(A) Theorem 5.12 αrω-closure is a Kuratowski closure operator on a space X. Proof: Let A and B be the subsets space X. i) αrωcl (X) = X , αrωcl(ϕ)=ϕ ii) A ⊆ αrωcl(A) iii) αrωcl(A)= αrωcl (αrωcl (A)) iv) αrωcl(A B) = αrωcl (A) αrωcl (B) by theorem 5.2 Hence αrω-closure is a Kuratowski closure operator on a space X. Proof: (i) Let A be subset of space X by definition of Closure Cl(A)= ⊆∩{F : A ⊆F C(X)} C(X) then A⊆F αRωC(X) If A⊆ F because every closed set is αrω-closed that is αrωcl(A)⊆F therefore αrωcl(A) ⊆∩{F : A⊆F C(X)}=cl(A) Hence αrωcl(A) ⊆ cl(A) (ii) Let A be subset of space X by definition of α-closure αcl(A)= ⊆∩{F : A ⊆F αC(X)} If A⊆ F αC(X) then A⊆F αRωC(X) because every α-closed set is αrω-closed that is αrωcl(A)⊆F therefore αrωcl(A) ⊆∩{F : A⊆F αC(X)} = αcl(A) Hence αrωcl(A) ⊆ αcl(A) Remark 5.10 Containment relation in the above theorem5.9 may be proper as seen from following example. Example 5.11 Let X={a,b,c,d}, ={X,ϕ, {a},{b},{a,b},{a,b,c}}, A={a} cl(A)={a,c,d} αrωcl(A)={a,d}, αcl(A)={a,c,d} It follows that αrωcl(A) cl(A) and αrωcl(A) αcl(A) Theorem 5.12 If A is subset of space X then gprcl(A)⊆αrωcl(A) where gprcl(A)= ⊆∩{F : A ⊆F GPRC(X)} Proof: Let A be a subset of X by definition of αrω-closure, αrωcl(A)=∩{F : A ⊆F Definition 5.13: For a subset A of (X, ) , αrω-interior of A is denoted by αrωint(A) and defined as αrωint(A)= {G: G⊆A and G is αrω-open in X} or {G: G⊆A and G αRωO(X)} i.e αrωint(A) is the union of all αrω-open set contained in A. Theorem 5.14 Let A and B be subset of space X then i) αrωint(X) = X , αrωint(ϕ)=ϕ ii) αrωint(A) ⊆ A iii) If B is any αrω-open set contained in A, then B ⊆ αrωint(A) iv) If A ⊆ B then αrωint(A) ⊆ αrωint(B) v) αrωint(A)= αrωint(αrωint(A)) vi) αrωint(A∩B) = αrωint(A) αrωint(B) Proof: i) and ii) by definition of αrω-interior of A, it is obvious iii) Let B be any αrω-open set s.t B ⊆ A. Let x B , B is an αrω-open set contained in A, x is an αrω-interior of A i.e. x αrωint(A). Hence B ⊆ αrωint(A). Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 5, Issue 6, 31 December, 2014 R. S. Wali, et al., J. Comp. & Math. Sci. Vol.5 (6), 490-499 (2014) iv) ,v), vi) similar proof as theorem5.2 and definition of αrω-interior Theorem 5.15 If a subset A of X is αrωopen then αrωint(A) = A Proof: Let A be αrω-open subset of X. We know that αrωint(A) ⊆ A –(1) Also A is αrω-open set contained in A from Theorem 5.14 iii) A ⊆ αrωint(A) --(2) Hence From (1) and (2) αrωint(A) = A Theorem 5.16 If A and B are subsets of space X then αrωint(A) αrωint(B) ⊆ αrωint(A B) Proof: We know that A ⊆ A B and B⊆A B, We have Theorem 5.14 iv) αrωint(A)⊆ αrωint(A B) and αrωint(B)⊆ αrωint(A B). This implies that αrωint(A) αrωint(B) ⊆ A B Remark 5.17: The converse of the above theorem need not be true as seen from the following example. Example 5.18: Let X={a,b,c,d} ={X,ϕ, {a},{b},{a,b},{a,b,c}}, A={b,c}, B={a,d}, A B ={a,b,c,d} αrωint(A)={b,c} αrωint(B) ={a}, αrωint(A B)=X, {αrωint(A) αrωint(B)={a,b,c}, therefore αrωint(A B) αrωint(A) αrωint(B) Theorem 5.19 If A is a subset of X then i) int(A) ⊆ αrωint(A) ii) αint(A) ⊆ αrωint(A) Proof: i) Let A be a subset of a space X. Let x int(A) => x {G : G is open , G ⊆ A} => an open set G s.t. x G ⊆ A => an αrω-open set G s.t. x G ⊆ A, as every open set is an αrω-open set in X=> x {G : G is 496 αrω-open set in X}=> x αrωint(A). Thus x int(A) => x αrωint(A) Hence int(A) ⊆ αrωint(A). ii) Let A be a subset of a space X. Let x int(A) => x {G : G is α-open , G ⊆ A} => an α-open set G s.t. x G ⊆ A => an αrω-open set G s.t. x G ⊆ A, as every αopen set is an αrω-open set in X=> x {G : G is αrω-open set in X}=> x αrωint(A). Thus x α-int(A) => x αrωint(A). Hence αint(A) ⊆ αrωint(A). Remark 5.20: Containment relation in the above theorem may be proper as seen from the following example Example 5.21 Let X={a,b,c,d} ={X,ϕ,{a}, {b},{a,b},{a,b,c}} A={b,c} , Int(A)={b}, αint(A)={b}, αrωint(A)={b,c} therefore int(A) ⊂ αrωint(A) and αint(A) ⊂ αrωint(A) Theorem 5.22: If A is subset of X, then αrωint(A) ⊆ gpr-int(A), where gpr-int(A) is given by gpr-int(A) = {G ⊆ X : G is gpr-open , G ⊆ A} Proof: Let A be a subset of a space X. Let x int(A) => x {G : G is αrω-open , G ⊆ A} => an αrω-open set G s.t. x G ⊆ A, as every αrω-open set is an gpr-open set in X=> x {G : G is gpr-open , G ⊆ A }=> x gprint(A). Thus x αrω int(A) => x gprint(A) Hence αrωint(A) ⊆ gpr-int(A). Theorem 5.23: For any subset A of X (i) X – αrωint(A) = αrωcl(X – A) Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 5, Issue 6, 31 December, 2014 497 R. S. Wali, et al., J. Comp. & Math. Sci. Vol.5 (6), 490-499 (2014) (ii) X – αrωcl(A) = αrωint(X – A) Proof: x ∈ X-αrω int(A) , then x is not in αrωint(A) , i.e. every αrω-open set G containing x s.t. G ⊆ A . This implies every αrω-open set G containing x intersects (X – A) i.e. G ∩ (X − A) ≠ φ . Then by theorem 5.8 x ∈ αrωcl(X − A) ∴ X − αrω int(A) ⊆ αrωcl(X − A) (1) and Let x ∈ αrωcl(X − A) , then every x ∈ αrω-open set G containing x intersects X – A i.e. G ∩ (X − A) ≠ φ , i.e. every αrω-open set G containing x s.t. G ⊆ A . Then by definition 5.13, x is not in αrω int(A) , i.e. x ∈ X − αrω int(A) and so αrωcl(X − A) ⊆ X − αrω int(A) (2) Thus X − αrω int(A) = αrωcl(X − A) 6. αrω-NEIGHBOURHOOD AND αrωLIMITS POINTS In this section we define the notation of αrω-neighbourhood , αrω-limits points and αrω derived sets and show of their basic properties and analogous to those for open sets. Defintion 6.1 Let (X, τ) be a topological space and Let x ∈ X , A subset of N of X is said to be αrω-neighbourhood of x if there exists an αrω-open set G s.t. x ∈ G ⊆ N . Defintion 6.2 i) Let (X, τ) be a topological space and A be a subset of X, A subset of N of X is said to be αrω-neighbourhood of A if there exists an αrω-open set G s.t. A⊆G⊆N. ii) The collection of all αrω-neighbourhood of x ∈ X is called αrω-neighbourhood system at x and shall be denoted by αrω-N(x) Definition 6.3 Let (X, τ) be a topological space and A be a subset of X, then a point x ∈ X is called a αrω- limit point of A iff every αrω-neighbourhood of x contains a point of A distinct from x i.e. ( N − {x}) ∩ A ≠ φ for each αrω-neighbourhood N of x. Also equivalently iff, every αrω-open set G containing x contains a point of A other than x. The set of all αrω limit points of the set A is called derived set A and is denoted by αrωd(A) Theorem 6.4 : Every neighbourhood N of x ∈ X is a αrω-neighbourhood of X Proof: Let N be neighbourhood of point x ∈ X . To prove that N is a αrωneighbourhood of x by definition of neighbourhood, ∃ an open set G s.t. x ∈ G ⊂ N . Hence N is αrω-neighbourhood of x Remark 6.5 In general, a αrω-nbhd N of x ϕ X need not be a nbhd of x in X, as seen from the following example. Example 6.6 Let X = {a, b, c, d} with topology τ = {X, φ, {a} , {b} , {a, b} , {a, b, c}}. Then αRrωO (X) = {X, φ, {a} , {b} , {c} , {a, b} , {b,c} , {a, c} , {a, b, c}}. The set {c,d} is αrω-nbhd of the point c, since the αrω-open sets {c} is such that c ϕ {c} ϕ {c,d}. Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 5, Issue 6, 31 December, 2014 R. S. Wali, et al., J. Comp. & Math. Sci. Vol.5 (6), 490-499 (2014) However, the set {c,d} is not a nbhd of the point c, since no open set G exists such that c ϕ G ϕ {c,d}. Theorem 6.7. If a subset N of a space X is αrω-open, then N is a αrω-nbhd of each of its points. Proof: Suppose N is αrω-open. Let x ϕ N. We claim that N is αrω-nbhd of x. For N is a αrω-open set such that x ϕ N ϕ N. Since x is an arbitrary point of N, it follows that N is a αrω-nbhd of each of its points. Remark 6.8 The converse of the above theorem is not true in general as seen from the following example. Example 6.9. Let X = {a, b, c, d} with topology τ = {X, φ, {a} , {c,d} , {a, c,d}}. Then αRωO (X) = {X, φ, {a} , {b} , {c} , {c, d}, {a, c, d}}. The set {a, b} is a αrω-nbhd of the point a, since the αrω-open set {a} is such that a ϕ {a} ϕ {a,b}. Also the set {a, b} is a αrω-nbhd of the point {b}, Since the αrω-open set {b} is such that b ϕ {b} ϕ {a, b}. That is {a, b} is a αrω-nbhd of each of its points. However the set {a, b} is not a αrω-open set in X. Theorem 6.10. Let X be a topological space. If F is a αrω-closed subset of X, and x ϕ Fc. Prove that there exists a αrω-nbhd N of x such that N∩F = φ. Proof: Let F be αrω-closed subset of X and x ϕ Fc. Then Fc is αrω-open set of X. So by theorem 6.7 Fc contains a αrω-nbhd of each of its points. Hence there exists a αrω-nbhd N of x such that N ϕ Fc. That is N ∩ F = φ. Theorem 6.11. Let X be a topological space and for each x ϕ X, Let αrω-N (x) be the 498 collection of all αrω-nbhds of x. Then we have the following results. (i) ∀ x ∈ X, αrω-N (x) _≠ φ. (ii) N ϕ αrω-N (x) ⇒ x ∈ N. (iii) N ϕ αrω-N (x), M ⊃ N ⇒ M ∈ αrω-N (x). (iv) N ϕ αrω-N (x),M ϕ αrω-N (x) ⇒ N ∩M ϕ αrω-N (x). (v) N ϕ αrω-N (x) ⇒ there exists M∈ αrωN(x) such that M ϕ N and M ϕ αrω-N (y) for every y ϕ M. Proof. (i) Since X is a αrω-open set, it is a αrω-nbhd of every x ϕ X. Hence there exists at least one αrω-nbhd (namely - X) for each x ϕ X. Hence αrω-N (x) ≠ ϕ for every x ϕ X. (ii) If N ϕ αrω-N (x), then N is a αrω-nbhd of x. So by definition of αrω-nbhd, x ϕ N. (iii) Let N ϕ αrω-N (x) and M ϕ N. Then there is a αrω-open set G such that x ϕ G ϕ N. Since N ϕ M, x ϕ G ϕ M and so M is αrωnbhd of x. Hence M ϕ αrω-N (x). (iv) Let N ϕ αrω-N (x) and M ϕ αrω-N (x). Then by definition of αrω-nbhd there exists αrω-open sets G1 and G2 such that x ϕ G1 ϕ N and x ϕ G2 ϕ M. Hence x ∈ G1 ∩ G2 ⊂ N ∩M → (1). Since G1 ∩ G2 is a αrω-open set, (being the intersection of two αrω-open sets), it follows from (1) that N ∩ M is a αrω-nbhd of x. Hence N ∩M ∈ αrω-N (x). (v) If N ϕ αrω-N (x), then there exists a αrωopen set M such that x ϕ M ϕ N. Since M is a αrω-open set, it is αrω-nbhd of each of its points. Therefore M ϕ αrω-N (y) for every y ϕ M. Theorem 6.12. Let X be a nonempty set, and for each x ϕ X, let αrω-N (x) be a nonempty collection of subsets of X satisfying following conditions. (i) N ϕ αrω-N (x) ⇒ x ϕ N Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 5, Issue 6, 31 December, 2014 499 R. S. Wali, et al., J. Comp. & Math. Sci. Vol.5 (6), 490-499 (2014) (ii) N ϕ αrω-N (x),M ϕ αrω-N (x) ⇒ N ∩M ϕ αrω-N (x). Let τ consists of the empty set and all those non-empty subsets of G of X having the property that x ϕ G implies that there exists an N ϕ αrω-N (x) such that x ϕ N ϕ G, Then τ is a topology for X. Proof: (i) φ ϕ τ by definition. We now show that x ϕ τ . Let x be any arbitrary element of X. Since αrω-N (x) is nonempty, there is an N ϕ αrω-N (x) and so x ϕ N by (i). Since N is a subset of X, we have x ϕ N ϕ X. Hence Xϕτ. (ii) Let G1 V τ and G2 ∈ τ. If x ∈ G1 ∩ G2 then x ϕ G1 and x ϕ G2. Since G1 ϕ τ and G2 ϕ τ , there exists N ϕ αrω-N (x) and M ϕ αrω-N (x), such that x ϕ N ϕ G1 and x ϕ M ⊂ G2. Then x ∈ N ∩ M ⊂ G1 ∩ G2. But N ∩M ∈ αrω-N (x) by (2). Hence G1 ∩ G2 ∈ τ. (iii) Let Gλ ∈ τ for every λ ∈ ∧ . If x ∈ ∪ {Gλ : λ ∈ ∧ }, then x ∈ Gλx for some λx V ∧ . Since Gλx V τ , there exists an N V αrω-N (x) such that x ϕ N ϕ Gλx and consequently x ∈ N ⊂ ∪ {Gλ : λ ∈ ∧ }. Hence ∪ {Gλ : λ ∈ ∧ } ∈ τ. It follows that τ is topology for X. REFERENCES 1. S. P. Arya and T.M. Nour, Chatcterizations of s-normal spaces, Indian J. Pure Appl, Math 21, 717-719 (1990). 2. S. S. Benchalli and R.S Wali on rωClosed sets is Topological Spaces, Bull, Malays, Math, Sci, Soc.30, 99-110 (2007). 3. S. S. Benchalli, P. G. Patil and T. D. Rayanagaudar, ωα-Closed sets is Topological Spaces, The Global. J. Appl. Math. and Math. Sci, 2,53-63 (2009). 4. D.E. Cameron, Properties of s-closed spaces, Prac Amer Math, soc 72,581586 (1978). 5. Y. Gnanambal, On generalized pre regular closed sets in topological spaces, Indian J. Pure. Appl. Math., 28(3), 351360 (1997). 6. N. Levine, Semi-open sets and semicontinuity in topological spaces, 70, 3641 (1963). 7. H. Maki, R. Devi and K. Balachandran, Associated topologies of generalized αclosed sets and α-generalized closed sets, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kochi Univ. Ser.A. Math., 15, 51-63 (1994). 8. H. Maki, J.Umehara and T. Noiri, Every Topological space is pre T½ Mem Fac Sci, Kochi univ, Math, 17,33-42 (1996). 9. N. Nagaveni, Studies on Generalizations of Homeomorphisms in Topological Spaces, Ph.D. Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, (1999). 10. A. Pushpalatha, Studies on generalizetions of mapping in topological spaces, Ph.D. Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore , (2000). 11. M. Stone, Application of the theory of Boolean rings to general topology, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.41,374-481 (1937). 12. M.K.R.S. Veerakumar, O, N αgeneralized regular closed sets, Indian J. of Math , 44(2),165-181 (2002). N. V. Velicko, H-closed topological spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.78. 13. R S Wali and Prabhavati S Mandalgeri, On α regular ω-closed sets in Topological spaces, Int J. of Math Archive (accepted paper and ref no: 5449). Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Vol. 5, Issue 6, 31 December, 2014