Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
NK cells are part of the innate immune response Early response to injury and infection Natural Killer (NK) Cells Functions: 1. Cytolysis: killing infected or damaged cells 2. Cytokine production: IFN, GM-CSF, TNF Control of the switch from innate to adaptive immunity • interaction with dendritic cells Control of infection • particularly virus infections Reproduction • intrauterine NK cells • establishment of the placenta • tissue remodeling Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation • mediate graft rejection • mediate graft vs leukemia (GVL) • prevent graft vs host disease (GVHD) Action of NK Cells is Mediated by a Balance of Inhibitory and Activating Receptors Inhibitory Receptors Tolerance to self KIR2DL KIR3DL LIR/ILT NKG2A LAIR NKP-R1 Activating Receptors Responsiveness to pathogens KIR2DS KIR3DS LIR/ILT NKG2C/E NKG2D NKR-P1 NKp30 NKp44 NKp46 NKp80 2B4 Ligand Receptor HLA-Clys80 2DL1 HLA-Casn80 2DL2 HLA-Casn80 2DL3 HLA-Clys80 2DS1 2DS2 2DS3 2DS4 KIR 2DS5 HLA-G 2DL4 HLA-B 2DL5 3DL1 HLA-A 3DL2 3DL3 3DS1 HLA-E HLA-E CD94 NKG2A CD94 NKG2C NKG2E Lectin-like receptors Human KIR and CD94:NKG2A Receptors for HLA Class I KIR Haplotype Diversity 19q13.4 Group A Haplotypes 3DL3 2DL3 2DL1 2DL4 3DL1 2DS4 3DL2 2DL1 2DL4 3DS1 2DL5A 2DS5 2DS1 3DL2 2DL1 2DL4 3DS1 2DS1 3DL2 2DL4 3DL1 Group B Haplotypes 3DL3 2DL3 1 3DL3 2DL3 2DL5B 2DS3 2 3DL3 2DS2 2DL2 2DS4 3DL2 3 3DL3 2DS2 2DL2 2DL5B 2DS3 2DL1 2DL4 3DS1 2DL5A 2DS5 2DS1 3DL2 4 . . . Inhibitory KIR Activatory KIR KIR Genotype Variation in a Panel of Individuals Donor ethnicity Caucasian Caucasian Caucasian 3DL3 2DL3 2DS2 2DL2 2DL5 2DS3 2DL1 2DL4 3DL1 3DS1 2DS4 2DS5 2DS1 3DL2 African American East Asian Asian Indian Caucasian East Asian Caucasian Caucasian Caucasian Caucasian East Asian East Asian From ~1000 individuals: • 111 genotypes described Accumulated Frequency % 100 Japanese 50 n=105 Characterizng KIR Genotype Heterogeneity 10 Distribution patterns differ between populations 100 50 African n=62 23 100 50 North Indian Hindu . n=72 47 100 Caucasian 50 n=404 Total 51 Number of Genotypes Norman et al (2001): Immunogenetics 52 Norman et al (2002): Genes and Immunity 3 Rajalingam et al (2002): Immunogenetics 53 Uhrberg et al (2002): Immunogenetics 54 Yawata et al (2002): Immunogenetics 54 Toneva M et al (2001): Tissue Antigens 57 Limited Number of KIR Genotypes in Japanese Predominance of the Group A Haplotypes Genotype Assumed KIR genes 2DL Haplotypes # 1 1 A/A 2 A/B1 3 A/B2 4 A/B3 5 A/B4 6 A/B5 7 A/B6 8 A/B7 9 A/B8 10 B/B 2 3 3DL 4 5 1 2 2DS 3 1 2 3 3DS 2DP 3DP 4 5 1 1 % 1 60 17 9 6 3 2 1 1 1 1 (105 Japanese individuals) KIR Gene Content Differs Considerably between Population Groups Caucasian 32% Palestinian 23%North Indian Hindu Japanese 6% 60% Thai African 35% 35% Australian Aborigine <1% Norman et al (2001): Immunogenetics 52 Norman et al (2002): Genes and Immunty 3 Rajalingam et al (2002): Immunogenetics 53 Uhrberg et al (2002): Immunogenetics 54 Yawata et al (2002): Immunogenetics 54 Toneva M et al (2001): Tissue Antigens 57 Allelic Polymorphism Distinguishes 22 Group A Haplotypes Having Identical Gene Content KIR Gene 3DL3 2DL3 2DL1 2DL4 3DL1 2DS4 3DL2 H A P L O T Y P E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Shilling et al. 2002 J Immunol. 168:2307-15 Group A haplotype # alleles: 3DL3 2DL3 5 6 2DL1 6 > 800,000 possible combinations in the group A haplotypes 2DL4 3DL1 2DS4 3DL2 9 11 4 12 KIR3DL1 Allotypes Show Distinct Cell Surface Phenotypes in DX9 Antibody Binding 350 300 250 3DL1*001 MFI 200 3DL1*005 3DL1_007J 150 3DL1_JA 3DL1_JB 3DL1_JA+JB 100 3DL1_JA+001 50 0 0 10 20 30 Frequency 40 50 n=70 NK Cell Repertoire: NK Cells Express Different Numbers and Combinations of KIR and CD94:NKG2 Receptors ISR ISR ISR ISR ISR ISR ISR = Inhibitory Self Receptor ISR KIR Repertoire Comparisons in Sibling Pairs Reveal the Effects of KIR-type 5 KIR-identical 4 HLA-identical n=7 3 KIR-identical HLA-disparate n=19 2 1 Summed differences in expression level 0 5 KIR-disparate 4 HLA-identical n=14 3 KIR-disparate HLA-disparate n=44 Shilling et al. 2002 J Immunol. 169:239-47 2 1 0 0 2 4 6 0 2 4 6 Summed frequency differences KIR genotype is the primary determinant of KIR phenotype KIR Repertoire Comparisons in Sibling Pairs Reveal the Effects of HLA-type 2 Summed differences in expression 1 level KIR-identical HLA-identical HLA-disparate 0 0 1 2 3 Summed frequency differences HLA-type has a small influence on KIR phenotype Shilling et al. 2002 J Immunol. 169:239-47 KIR Incompatibility May Correlate with Better Clinical Outcome 6 5 4 Summed differences in MFI 1 1 3 1N 1 2 2 1 2 2 N 2 1 21 2 1 1 1 N12 1 1 1 N N 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Summed frequency differences NK Receptor Reconstitution Pattern 1 Group 1 (good recovery) 2 Group 2 (delayed recovery) N Non-group 1 or 2 (clinical complications) Gorilla Gorilla D0 D1 D2 STM CYT Human Human D0 D1 D2 STM CYT Chimpanzee Chimpanzee D0 D1 D2 STM CYT Bonobo Bonobo D0 D1 D2 STM CYT Orangutan Orangutan D0 D1 D2 STM CYT Rhesus Rhesus Monkey Monkey D0 D1 I II III IV V Species-specific divergence of KIR lineages D2 STM CYT Recombination in the KIR gene family More than 40 % of the dataset was removed after the recombination analysis Ultimate phylogenetic tree of the KIR gene family // // Mouse Bota-KIR2DL1 Pt-KIR3DL1/2 100:a KIR3DL1 89 100:a KIR3DS1 100 74:b 69:b KIR3DL1/2V * * KIR3DL2 82:b 100:a * Gg-KIR3DLa 83 Popy-KIR3DS 100:a 100 Popy-KIR3DLA Pt-KIR3DL5 100:a 99 Gg-KIR3DL7 98:a Pt-KIR3DS2 64 100:a Pt-KIR3DL4 100 100:a 95 100:a Pp-KIR3DL4 93 KIR2DS5 100:a KIR2DS1 84:a 100:a 87 67 97 KIR2DL1 KIR2DS2 100:a KIR2DL3 100 99:a KIR2DL2 80 100:a Gg-KIR2DLe 56 100:a 100:a 84 99:a Pt-KIR2DL6 89 88 Gg-KIR2DL6 Gg-KIR2DLd 98:b KIR2DS4 100:a 70 100 Pt-KIR2DS4 Popy-KIR2DSC2 100:a 98 Popy-KIR2DLB 100:a 99 Popy-KIR2DSD 100:a 99 Popy-KIR2DLA KIR2DL5 100:a Pt-KIR2DL5 100 74:b Gg-KIR2DL5 99:b 78 // 71:b 61 // 100:a 83 61 100:a 84 100:a 83 100:a 95 57:b * 95:a 61 85:b 55 96:b 72 Mm-KIR2DL4.1 Popy-KIR2DL4B KIR2DL4 Gg-KIR2DL4 Pt-KIR2DL4 Pp-KIR2DL4 Mm-KIR1D 97:b Mm-KIR3DH1 53 Mm-KIR3DH2 100:a Mm-KIR3DL18 79 100:a Mm-KIR3DH3 100:a 83 Mm-KIR3DL9 83 100:a 100 Mm-KIR3DL10 100:a Mm-KIR3DH4 100:a * 100:a 100 Mm-KIR3DL8 87 100:a 100 Mm-KIR3DL17 Mm-KIR3DL5 100:a Mm-KIR3DL1 100 Mm-KIR3DL3 88:a 100:a 60 100 Mm-KIR3DL4 II III I-A I-B IV Model for KIR lineage emergence in Primates KIR Diversity 1. Within a person, individual NK cells differ in the combination of KIR genes they express. This gives a repertoire of NK cell responsiveness. 2. Within a population, individual human beings have different combinations of KIR genes and KIR alleles. NK cell repertoires differ between individuals. 3. Within the human species, ethnic populations differ in the presence and frequency of KIR genes, alleles, haplotypes and genotypes. 4. Human KIR genes, alleles, haplotypes and genotypes markedly differ from those in other primate species. The KIR gene family evolves rapidly. Is KIR diversity the result of changing pressure from pathogens upon NK cell response? If so, what are the implications of KIR diversity for human health and the practice of medicine? NK cells are part of the innate immune response Early response to injury and infection Epistatic Interaction Between KIR3DS1 and HLA-B Delays the Progression to AIDS 1.0 no KIR3DS1 or Bw4-80Ile only KIR3DS1 0.8 only Bw4-80Ile KIR3DS1 + Bw4-80Ile Fraction of AIDS-free individuals 0.6 0.4 0.2 RH p 1.23 0.03 1.00 0.94 0.58 0.0005 KIR3DS1 Bw4-80Ile Both 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time since seroconversion (years) Martin et al 2002 Nat Genet 31:429-34 Missing Self–MHC Class I Mechanism of Target Cell Lysis inhibition Inhibitory receptor HLA-I Resistant Healthy cell NK cell Activating receptor Susceptible Target cell NK cell lysis