Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Sampling from Continuum Extremes Cardiovascular Padmanabhan S et al. PLoS Genet 2011 Sampling from Continuum Extremes Cardiovascular Padmanabhan S et al. PLoS Genet 2011 UMOD Gene Cardiovascular Continuum Padmanabhan S et al. PLoS Genet 2011 UMOD: a Novel Hypertension Candidate Gene Cardiovascular Continuum Padmanabhan S et al. PLoS Genet 2011 Monogenic UMOD Gene Traits Köttgen A et al. Nat Genet 2009 Uromodulin Monogenic and Blood Traits Pressure Padmanabhan S et al. Hypertension 2014 Blood Pressure inMonogenic Umod+/+ (WT) Traits and Umod−/− (KO) Graham LA et al. Hypertension 2014 Salt Sensitivity inMonogenic Umod+/+ (WT) Traits and Umod−/− (KO) Umod+/+ Umod-/- Graham LA et al. Hypertension 2014 Pressure Monogenic Natriuresis Traits Curves Graham LA et al. Hypertension 2014 Monogenic Traits What have we learned from GWAS? What HaveMonogenic we LearnedTraits from GWAS? New Targets? Published Genome-Wide Associations through 12/2012 Published GWA at p≤5X10-8 for 17 trait categories NHGRI GWA Catalog www.genome.gov/GWAStudies www.ebi.ac.uk/fgpt/gwas/ Monogenic Uromodulin? Traits Padmanabhan S et al. Hypertension 2014 What HaveMonogenic we LearnedTraits from GWAS? Risk Prediction/Stratification? Risk Monogenic Prediction? Traits Padmanabhan S et al. Trends Genet 2012 What HaveMonogenic we LearnedTraits from GWAS? No direct genetic links between CKD and Hypertension (Exception: UMOD) Monogenic Traits Current and future strategies Monogenic Forms of Hypertension Thomas SR 2009 Detection of Rare/Private Mutations Cardiovascular Continuum Lifton RP et al. Nat Genet 2008 Detection of rare/private mutations Cardiovascular Continuum Lifton RP et al. Nat Genet 2008 "Missing Heritability" Rare (private) mutations could explain the "missing heritability", i.e. heritability that is not explained by common genetic variants. Systems Biology and "Omics" DNA Genomics mRNA miRNAs Transcriptomics Protein Proteomics Metabolites small molecules Metabolomics Monogenic Traits Epigenetics DNA Methylation Histone Modification Non-coding RNAs, microRNAs Friso S et al. Translat Res 2014 Cardiovascular Cardiovascular Continuum Continuum Tissue injury (MI, stroke, renal insufficiency, peripheral arterial insufficiency) Atherothrombosis and progressive CV disease Pathological remodeling Altered gene expression Early tissue dysfunction Altered protein expression Target organ damage End-organ failure (CHF, ESRD) Oxidative and mechanical stress Inflammation Genome Risk factors Death Dzau V et al. Circulation 2006 BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre CAD Score: Survival Analysis in ASCOT < Mean > Mean Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) P=0.021 Brown C et al. SCF 2013 Collagen alpha-1(II) chain 250 200 150 100 50 0 10 100 1000 ID:35339 10000 100000 Collagen alpha-1(III) chain 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1 10 100 1000 ID:156878 10000 100000 1000000 Prediction of Diabetic Nephropathy Normo Micro Micro Macro Roscioni SS et al. Diabetologia 2013 Prediction of Diabetic Nephropathy Normo Normo Normo Micro Micro Micro Micro Macro Roscioni SS et al. Diabetologia 2013 WTCCC Why did WTCCC find "hits" for many diseases, but not for hypertension? Cases and Controls in WTCCC Collection No Samples % Male / %Female Eastern E&WRidings London Midlands Northern North Midlands Northwestern Southeastern Southern Southwestern Scotland Wales 58C 1480 50/50 UKBS 1458 48/52 BD 1868 37/63 CAD 1926 79/21 CD 1748 39/61 HT 1952 40/60 RA 1860 25/75 T1D 1963 51/49 T2D 1924 58/42 11 9 8 9 8 7 12 6 5 12 10 3 3 1 7 24 9 6 10 26 2 6 10 15 25 0 22 1 20 1 16 1 18 4 3 13 20 10 2 16 3 8 17 10 4 6 8 7 26 0 10 1 15 5 11 7 8 8 10 5 11 11 8 9 9 5 3 5 6 6 10 21 8 4 4 6 5 5 1 1 14 1 14 0 3 8 5 3 24 1 19 2 12 1 3 1 11 3 8 9 10 7 3 2 18 19 0 1 WTCCC. Nature 2007 "Caseness" of Controls If 5% of controls would meet the definition of cases, then loss of power of the GWAS is approximately the same as that due to the reduction of sample size by 10%. WTCCC. Nature 2007 Challenges • • • • Possible caseness of controls Accurate definition of the phenotype Precise assessment of the phenotype Multiple pathways, multiple genes What can be done? Increasing the Sample Size Cardiovascular Continuum OR=1.5 CHARGE Consortium Levy D et al. Nat Genet 2009 CHARGE Consortium: 29,136 Subjects Levy D et al. Nat Genet 2009