Download Document

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Automatic Multi-Region
Segmentation Applied to Gene
Expression Image from Mouse Brain
Yen Le
Computation Biomedicine Lab
Advisor: Dr. Kakadiaris
1
Problem Statement
• Problem Statement: Segmentation anatomical regions
of mouse brain gene expression images (in 2D or 3D)
• Data: In Situ Hybridization (ISH) images
• Motivation:
– Identify and associate the location and extent of expression of a
gene in mouse brain image
– Understand how genes regulate the biological process at cellular
and molecular levels
2
Challenges
• Large variations in boundary shape
3
Challenges (2)
• Large variations in the shape of the anatomical regions
4
Challenges (3)
• Large variations in intensity
5
Accomplishments to-date
• 2D
– Geometric model to image fitting methods
– Image-to-image registration method
• 3D
– Descriptors for 3D landmark detection
6
3D Dense Local Point Descriptors
• Motivation
– Need for anatomical landmarks
– Need 3D local point descriptors which can:
• Be computed fast at densely sampled points
• Result in accurate landmark point detection
7
3D Dense Local Point Descriptors (2)
• DAISY3D and DAISYDO
– Extended from DAISY descriptor
– Faster than SIFT-3D, n-SIFT at densely sampled points
– Good for landmark detection on gene expression images
• DAISY3D vs. DAISYDO
– DAISYDO requires less memory than DAISY3D
– DAISYDO is faster
– Comparable performance
8
3D Dense Local Point Descriptors (3)
DAISY’s configuration
Forming DAISY feature vector
Configuration
Forming DAISYDO feature vector
9
Computational Time
All methods are implemented in C++ and run in single core 1.86 GHz CPU
10
Memory Requirement
Memory requirements for a sample volume of size 100x100x100
11
Performance Evaluation
• Detected landmarks: voxels having the minimum distance between its descriptor and the descriptor of
referenced landmark
Mean error (in voxels) for landmark detection in gene expression image
12
Publications
Refereed Journal Articles
Yen H. Le, U. Kurkure, I. A. Kakadiaris, “Dense Local Point Descriptors for 3D Images,”
Pattern Recognition (Submitted).
U. Kurkure, Yen H. Le, N. Paragios, J. Carson, T. Ju, I. A. Kakadiaris, “LandmarkConstrained Deformable Image Registration of Gene Expression Images for Atlas
Mapping,” NeuroImage, Elsevier Science (Submitted).
Refereed Conference Articles
Yen H. Le, U. Kurkure, N. Paragios, J. P. Carson, T. Ju, and I. A. Kakadiaris, “Similaritybased appearance prior for fitting subdivision mesh in gene expression image,” IEEE
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2012 (Submitted).
U. Kurkure, Y. H. Le, N. Paragios, J. P. Carson, T. Ju, and I. A. Kakadiaris.
“Landmark/image-based deformable registration of gene expression data,” In Proc.
IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1089–1096, Colorado Springs,
CO, Jun. 21-23 2011.
U. Kurkure, Y. H. Le, N. Paragios, J. Carson, T. Ju, and I. A. Kakadiaris, Nov. 6-13
2011, “Markov random field-based fitting of a subdivision-based geometric atlas,” In:
Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Barcelona, Spain, pp. 2540–
2547.
13
Thank You for your attention!
14
Related documents