Download Slide 1

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Figure S4. Overexpression of MYC in pre-cancerous thymocytes does not lead to repression
of genes methylated in lymphomas
(A) Real-time RT-PCR analysis of MYC and nucleolin (nuc) expression in unsorted (gray bars),
EGFP-positive (black bars) and EGFP-negative (white bars) cell populations sorted from
thymocytes of 31 days old EμSR-tTA;Teto-MYC;Teto-Cre;Rosa26LOXPEGFP mouse as described
in Figure 2B. Expression data are presented as fold-increase relative to the EGFP-negative
population. Representative example from three independent experiments is shown.
(B) Expression of genes near the RLGS fragments as determined by Real-time RT-PCR analysis
of EGFP-negative (white bars) and EGFP-positive (black bars) cell populations sorted from
thymocytes of 31 days old EμSR-tTA;Teto-MYC;Teto-Cre;Rosa26LOXPEGFP mouse as described
in S4A. Expression of each gene in EGFP-positive population is presented as fold-decrease
relative to the expression of the same gene in EGFP-negative population. Representative
example from three independent experiments is shown.
(C) FACS profiles on unsorted, GFP-negative and GFP-positive thymocytes isolated from 42
days old EμSR-tTA;Teto-MYC;Teto-Cre;Rosa26LOXPEGFP mouse showing almost identical
expression of CD4 and CD8 markers. The percentage of cells that are in each quadrant of the
FACS profile is indicated.
(D) Real-time RT-PCR analysis of MYC and nucleolin (nuc) expression in thymocytes isolated
from 42 days old EμSR-tTA;Teto-MYC;Teto-Cre;Rosa26LOXPEGFP mouse. Analysis was
perfomed as in A part of this Figure.
(E) The same set of genes as in B part of this Figure was analyzed in thymocytes isolated from
from 42 days old EμSR-tTA;Teto-MYC;Teto-Cre;Rosa26LOXPEGFP mouse.
Figure S4
A
B
MYC
15.00
15
3
Fold reduction in expression
5
10
10.00
4
3
5
5.00
2
1
0
-
+
Unsort.
0
0.00
31 day-old
nuc
7
6
Unsort.
Fold induction in gene expression
31 day-old
EGFP
sorted
C
-
2
1
0
+
EGFP
sorted
Gene loci associated with RLGS fragment
EGFP negative
unsorted
EGFP positive
77
5
77
5
76
2
16
2
16
2
17
CD8
5
CD4
D
E
MYC
nuc
7
6
25
5
20
4
15
3
10
2
5
1
EGFP
sorted
+
0
Unsort.
0
42 day-old
Fold reduction in gene expression
30
Unsort.
Fold induction in gene expression
42 day-old
EGFP
sorted
+
3
2
1
0
Gene loci associated with RLGS fragment
Figure S4
Related documents