Download Slide 1

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Modern Breast Cancer Treatment:
With an Emphasis on Breast Ca
Susceptibility Genes BRCA1,2
and the 5 Molecular Subtypes of Breast Ca
Mark Graham MD
Waverly Hematology-Oncology
Cary, NC
At Lafayette College
Easton, PA
October 20, 2011
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Founder Mutations
in the Ashkenazi Jewish Population
An estimated 1 in 40 Ashkenazi Jews
carries a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation
BRCA1
187 del AG
Prevalence = ~1%
5382 ins C
Prevalence = ~0.15%
BRCA2
BRCA2 Icelandic
founder mutation
999 del 5
6174 del T
Prevalence = ~1.5%
Roa BB et al. Nat Genet 14:185, 1996
Oddoux C et al. Nat Genet 14:188, 1996
Struewing JP. N Engl J Med 336:1401, 1997
Patient WP
- Sister w/ Bilateral
breast Ca at ages
44, 47
- Prompted BRCA1,2
testing: + for two
base pair deletion in
BRCA2: frame shift,
“1006 del GA”
T
++
+
+
- In turn, prompted
family testing 2009,
including proband
WP: patient’s two
children and WP +,
niece -.
Bilateral Br Ca: 44, 47
T
_
+
+ +
+
2
-Oct 2009:
Recommend
heightened
screening and
eventual BPM, BSO
for trhe Proband
Patient WP
- Negative
Mammography 4/09,
physical exam 10/09
- Pt palpated Right
superior peri-areolar
mass, April 2010
- D. Eddleman: Core
Bx + for up to 0.8 cm
ILCA, no LVI or DCIS
_
- ER+, PgR+, HER2-
New ILCA,
April 2010, age 52
++
- Pt elected Bilateral
Mastectomies w/ gene
mutation
+
+
Bilateral Br Ca: 44, 47
_ _
+
+
++
- Additional Family
members tested, incl.
Proband’s mother
- Paternal
transmission proven
Rotterdam Study of 139 BRCA 1, 2 Carriers:
“Self-Randomization” to Surveillance or
Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (BPM)
63 (45%) chose Close Surveillance
76 (55%) chose BPM
• 3.0 years mean F/U
• 8 / 63 developed Breast
Ca
• Actuarial BrCa incidence
17% at 5 years
• Annual rate of 2.5%
BrCa
• 2.9 years mean F/U
• 0 / 76 with Breast Ca
• p = 0.003 vs. the
Close Surveillance
Group
Meijers-Heijboer H, et al. N Engl J Med 2001;345:159 -164
Patient TS
- Prostate, Breast, Ca
Unknown Primary in the
previous generation
- Sister w/ Br Ca at age
40, two paternal 1st
cousins w/ Br Ca at 45
and 40
- Prompted BRCA1,2
sequencing in Pt’s sister,
one Paternal 1st cousin:
Both Negative for
deleterious mutation
_
Male Br Ca: 49, living at 53
_
?
Sister,
Pat. 1st Cousin:
“Negative
BRCA1,2
Testing”
?
?
?
- 2006: Pt developed
male Breast Ca, at 49:
2 LN+, Grade 3,
ER+, PgR-, HER2-.
- Right MRM, W. Cannon;
Adjuvant TAC x 4 fol. By
Taxol x 4; Tamoxifen to
the present.
Patient TS
- 2010: Dr. Wm Dunlap
Referred TS for
reconsideration of “any
further genetic testing
that might prove
beneficial”.
- Prompted
BRCA1,2Associated
Rearrangement
or “BART”
- Showed large deletion
in BRCA2, including all
of Exons 1 and 2
Male Br Ca: 49, living at 53
_
_?
?
?
++
Sister,
Pat. 1st Cousin:
“Negative
BRCA1,2
Sequencing”
+
+
?
?
?
?
Testing,
?
Patient:
Tested for
“BART”:
Positive for
BRCA2 2-Exon
Deletion
- Sisters, Cousins,
Brother, Daughters can
now have correct
assignment of risk
1st of 3 daughters has
now tested and carries
the deleterious mutation
Mayo Clinic Study of Well Women Undergoing
Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (BPM)
Group
N
Breast
Cancers (%)
High-risk women
with mastectomy
214
E: 83 (38.7%)
O: 3 (1.4%)
Their full sisters w/
no mastectomy
403
O: 156 (38.7%)
96% reduction in BrCa
Hartmann et al. N Engl J Med 1999;340:77-84.
Patient LA
- Pt 44 palpated on the left a
high Tail of Spence nodule.
Previous basal cell of scalp, 23.
- Family Hx Br Ca in Paternal GM
at 38, father w/ multiple basal
cells in 50’s.
- Core Bx, Excision with Sentinel
LN by G. Paschal removed
1.1 cm Grade 3 Triple Negative
_
Triple Negative Br Ca: 44
- Prompted BRCA1,2
sequencing with “Reflex to
BART”.
- Negative for any deleterious
mutation.
BRCA1,2 Neg.: Sequencing and “BART”
- Continued with adjuvant
chemoRx; Radiation
(Not Quite)
Getting to 100% in BRCA 1,2 testing
Another 5-6 %
discovered
by BART
90-92% of mutations found by sequencing
The last 4-5 % appear
not to be discoverable
by current methods.
3 Breast Cancer “Events”
that might affect me in the future,
if I do not carry a mutation in
BRCA1/2
1. Same Breast or Regional Recurrence
2. New Second Primary Breast Cancer in the
Opposite Breast, or elsewhere in the Same
breast
– 30% lifetime risk at age 35 (7 / 1000 / year)
– Cut in half by hormonal therapy in ER+ Breast Ca
*3. Life-threatening Bone, Lung, Liver
Recurrences
3 Breast Cancer “Events”
that might affect me in the future –
and a 4th if I do carry a mutation in BRCA1/2
1. Same Breast Recurrence
2. New 2nd Primary Breast Ca in the Opposite
Breast
– 60% at age 35 vs. 30% if no mutation
*3. Life-threatening Bone, Lung, Liver Recurrences
4. Increased Lifetime Risk for Ovarian Ca
– 50 % if BRCA1 +;
30 % if BRCA2 +; vs.
– 1 – 1.5 % in the General Population
I have a more favorable type of breast cancer
in that my underarm LN’s are negative.
Higher-Risk for
recurrence and death
Lower-Risk for
recurrence and death
LN’s
Positive
LN’s
Negative
Locally
Advanced
Tumor in the
Breast
Spread to Bone,
Lung or Liver
At Time of
Presentation
*
My tumor
5/23/2017
In the modern era, we recognize
5 distinct subtypes of Breast Cancer
HER2/neu +
*
ER-,
PgR-,
HER2/neu +
HER2/neu “Basal”
ER-,
PgR-,
HER2/neu -
ER-
*
ER+,
PgR +/-,
HER2/neu +
HER2/neu + Breast Ca
5/23/2017
“Luminal A:”
ER+,
PgR +,
HER2/neu -
“Luminal B:”
ER+,
PgR +/-,
HER2/neu -
ER+
Standard Adjuvant Rx for HER2+ Breast Ca:
Carbo/Taxotere x 6 q 3 wk + Herceptin 52 wk;
Radiation and Hormonal Rx, as indicated
Carboplatin / Taxotere
6 cycles, every 3 wks
1st 18 wks
XRT
Herceptin 52 wks,
Given IV every 3 wks
Multiple yr. daily oral hormonal Rx
In the modern era, we recognize
5 distinct subtypes of Breast Cancer
HER2/neu +
ER-,
PgR-,
HER2/neu +
HER2/neu “Basal”
ER-,
PgR-,
HER2/neu -
* Triple Negative
ER-
ER+,
PgR +/-,
HER2/neu +
5/23/2017
“Luminal A:”
ER+,
PgR +,
HER2/neu -
“Luminal B:”
ER+,
PgR +/-,
HER2/neu -
ER+
Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Common in younger African American
women
Associated with mutations in Breast-Ovarian Ca
susceptibility gene BRCA1, but not BRCA2
Treated with good success with modern
ChemoRx
20% are resistant and have no good treatments,
an area of intense investigation
Standard Adjuvant Rx for HER2- Breast Cancer:
Adriamycin/Cytoxan (AC) x 4 every 2 or 3 weeks
followed by Weekly Taxol for 12 weeks.
Radiation and Hormonal Rx, if indicated
Adria / Cytoxan
4 cycles,
every 2 or 3 wks
Taxol every week for
12 weeks
XRT (if indicated)
Oral hormonal Rx
(If indicated)
In the modern era, ER+ and HER2-, LNBreast Cancer is specially studied
HER2/neu +
ER-,
PgR-,
HER2/neu +
HER2/neu “Basal”
ER-,
PgR-,
HER2/neu -
ER-
ER+,
PgR +/-,
HER2/neu +
“Luminal B:”
ER+,
PgR +/-,
HER2/neu -
“Luminal A:”
ER+,
PgR +,
HER2/neu -
*
5/23/2017
ER+
I have one of two types of hormoneresponsive ER+, HER2- breast cancer
Potential
Treatments
Hormonal
Therapy
Only
(HT only)
“Luminal A:”
ER+,
PgR +,
HER2/neu -
*
5/23/2017
Hormonal
Therapy
after
ChemoTherapy
(CT →HT)
“Luminal B:”
ER+,
PgR +/-,
HER2/neu -
*
ER+
OncotypeDx in 2011:
A tool to help us think about
the biologic risk of your
ER+, LN- Breast Cancer,
and to assign the correct treatment
(HT only vs. HT after CT)
without subjecting you
to unnecessary or ineffective treatments.
The 16 gene Oncotype Dx assay:
Stored tumors from B-14 and B-20 were used
to select genes predictive of outcome
w/ no treatment, with HT and with HT + CT
Recurrence Score (RS) = the sum of the scores
assigned to each of the 16 selected genes,
weighted so that for each gene, a lower score
represents a more favorable outcome and
greater response to HT.
Group 1: RS 1 to 17
Group 2: RS 18 to 30
Group 3: RS 31 and up
RS and Breast Cancer Death in
NSABP B-14 and B-20
Low Risk (RS < 18)
Intermediate Risk (RS 18 - 30)
HIgh Risk (RS > 31)
NO SYSTEMIC RX
B14
No Tam
B14 No Tam
HORMONAL RX
B-14 Tam
B-20 Tam
B14 Tam
B20 Tam
HORM + CHEMO
B-20
Tam + CT
B20 Tam + CT
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
10 Yr Absolute Risk BC Death (%) (95% CI)
68
Largest Tamoxifen Benefit Observed in Low- and
Intermediate-Risk Recurrence Score Groups
Low Risk (RS < 18)
Intermediate Risk (RS 18 - 30)
HIgh Risk (RS > 31)
NO SYSTEMIC RX
B14
No Tam
B14 No Tam
TAMOXIFEN
BENEFIT
HORMONAL RX
B-14 Tam
B-20 Tam
B14 Tam
B20 Tam
HORM + CHEMO
B-20
Tam + CT
B20 Tam + CT
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
10 Yr Absolute Risk BC Death (%) (95% CI)
40
69
Largest Chemotherapy Benefit Observed in
High-Risk Recurrence Score Group
Low Risk (RS < 18)
Intermediate Risk (RS 18 - 30)
HIgh Risk (RS > 31)
NO SYSTEMIC RX
B14
No Tam
B14 No Tam
HORMONAL RX
B-14 Tam
B-20 Tam
B14 Tam
B20 Tam
HORM + CHEMO
B-20
Tam + CT
CHEMOTHERAPY
BENEFIT
B20 Tam + CT
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
10 Yr Absolute Risk BC Death (%) (95% CI)
70
Thanks very much for your
attention, and thanks to all of the
science teachers at Lafayette
A firm grounding
in the scientific method
is the underpinning of all progress in
scientific and medical research
Related documents