Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Figure 3 Effects of various kinase inhibitors on the expression of c-Myc induced by thapsigargin Wild-type MEFs were pretreated with kinase inhibitors for 30 min and then incubated with 1 μM of Tg for 1 hr. (A) is a representative of RT-PCR analysis. (B), Quantitative data showing the average fold change at mRNA levels after Tg treatment obtained from three independent experiments. PD98059, ERK kinase inhibitor; U73122, phospholipase C inhibitor; KT5720, protein kinase A inhibitor; LY294002, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor; SB203580, p38 MAPK inhibitor. KO WT KO KO WT KO KO WT KO WT WT KO WT KO Fed Fasted Tubulin ? LAP Alb-Cre mouse liver 3mo old Ave WT KO Fasted Fed 0.242092 0.2384 0.304234 0.133067 Lip/Lap in Alb-Cre live r 3m o old m ice 0.35 0.3 lip-lap/Tubulin Lip/Lap/Tubulin WT Fast 0.237405 KO Fast 0.449906 WT Fast 0.213841 KO Fast 0.166527 WT Fast 0.27503 KO Fast 0.590061 KO Fast 0.010443 WT Fed 0.267081 KO Fed 0.172589 WT Fed 0.336391 KO Fed 0.06439 WT Fed 0.111728 KO Fed 0.188072 KO Fed 0.107217 0.25 0.2 WT 0.15 KO 0.1 0.05 0 Fasted Fed Nutritional s tatus Amino Acid Deprivation Induces the Transcription Rate of the Human Asparagine Synthetase Gene through a Timed Program of Expression and Promoter Binding of Nutrient-responsive Basic Region/Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors as Well as Localized Histone Acetylation* Hong Chen‡, Yuan-Xiang Pan‡, Elizabeth E. Dudenhausen, and Michael S. Kilberg§ From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Genetics Institute, and Shands Cancer Center, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610 Expression of human asparagine synthetase (ASNS), which catalyzes asparagine and glutamate biosynthesis, is transcriptionally induced following amino acid deprivation. Previous overexpression and electrophoresis mobility shift analysis showed the involvement of the transcription factors ATF4, C/EBP , and ATF3-FL through the nutrient-sensing response element-1 (NSRE-1) within the ASNS promoter. Amino acid deprivation caused an elevated mRNA level for ATF4, C/EBP , and ATF3-FL, and the present study established that the nuclear protein content for ATF4 and ATF3-FL were increased during amino acid limitation, whereas C/EBP -LIP declined slightly. The total amount of C/EBP -LAP protein was unchanged, but changes in the distribution among multiple C/EBP LAP forms were observed. Overexpression studies established that ATF4, ATF3-FL, and C/EBP -LAP could coordinately modulate the transcription from the human ASNS promoter. Chromatin immunoprecipitation demonstrated that amino acid deprivation increased ATF3-FL, ATF4, and C/EBP binding to the ASNS promoter and enhanced promoter association of RNA polymerase II, TATA-binding protein, and TFIIB of the general transcription machinery. A time course revealed a markedly different temporal order of interaction between these transcription factors and the ASNS promoter. During the initial 2 h, there was a 20-fold increase in ATF4 binding and a rapid increase in histone H3 and H4 acetylation, which closely paralleled the increased transcription rate of the ASNS gene, whereas the increase in ATF3-FL and C/EBP binding was considerably slower and more closely correlated with the decline in transcription rate between 2 and 6 h. The data suggest that ATF3-FL and C/EBP act as transcriptional suppressors for the ASNS gene to counterbalance the transcription rate A). Overexpression of a cDNA encoding C/EBP -LAP and -LIP was used to identify the migration of these two isoforms (not shown). C/EBP -LAP migrated as three primary bands, as described under “Results,” so each band was quantified separately. A and C shows representative autoradiograms, whereas the graphs in B and D are the summary of three independent experiments, from which the data are depicted as the averages S.D. UT2 1.20580783 1 CPA1 1.22264028 CPA2 1.48452357 22 alone 1 1.75321144 22 alone 2 1.41421356 43 alone 1 1.3707828 43 alone 2 1.68179283 CPA +22 1 1.74110113 CPA +22 2 1.36131412 CPA +43 1 1.24401165 CPA +43 2 1.59107297 UT1 1.28788163 UT2 C-myc 1.43395525 CPA2 5.65685425 22 alone 1 1.89211529 22 alone 2 1.8403753 43 alone 1 3.01049349 43 alone 2 3.16016525 CPA +22 1 2.44528056 CPA +22 2 3.01049349 CPA +43 1 6.08391501 CPA +43 2 5.54043787 cmcy egr1 1.10290391 1.14394081 1.35358192 3.54540475 1.5837125 1.8662453 1.52628782 3.08532937 1.55120762 2.72788703 1.41754231 2.72788703 5.65685425 WT MEFs treated with CPA and PLC inhibitors 1 CPA1 Ave UT CPA 22 alone 43 alone CPA +22 CPA +43 Egr-1 CPA normalized to tubuliin (Power) UT1 4 3.5 3 2.5 c-myc egr-1 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 UT CPA 22 alone 43 alone Treatment CPA +22 CPA +43