Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chemical Modification • Variety – Oxidation – Nitrosylation – Dissociation • Effects – Folding • Controls – Enviromental – Reactive Protein structure - function • AA sequence – O-N pairing of backbone – Ionic/hydrophobic interaction of side chains • Chemical environment – Ionic strength – pH – ie: H+ ions • Reactive – Side chain modification Chemistry • A + B AB – AB increases with either A or B – Equilibrium constant Ka=[AB]/([A][B]) • With total A constant – A/AB switch – A/AB indicator • Complex chemistry alters sensitivity Multiple modifications • For fixed “A” the amount of product is • One “B”: AB – AB K [ B] =Q= A+AB 1 + K [ B] • Two “B”: AB+AB2 – K [ B] K '[ B ] 2 Q=l + (1 - l ) 1 + K [ B] 1 + K '[ B ] 2 • More K n [ B ]n Q = an 1 + K n [ B ]n xn – Hill equation: Q = Kd + xn • n: cooperativity • Kd: apparent dissociation constant Chemical sensors 2-3 log dynamic range Decreasing Kd increasing affinity, increases sensitivity Increasing cooperativity increases gain pH • Charged amino acid side chains • H+ movement can dramatically alter molecular folding [B-][H+] • pK=-log( [HB] ) Bicarbonate buffers • CO2 solubility ~0.03mM/Torr • CO2 Hydration – Carbonic anhydrase – • Henderson-Hasselbalch equation [HCO3-][H+] K= [CO2] [HCO3-][H+] pK= -log( ) [CO2] [HCO3 ] pK = pH – log( [CO ] ) 2 [HCO ] pH = pK + log( [CO 3] ); 2 pK=6.1 Bicarbonate buffers -][H+] Ka = [HCO3 [CO2] pH 2 pH 7.2 5% CO2 pH 7.4 pH 12 pH 7.6 Open vs Closed Buffer Systems • Bicarbonate 3 [ HCO ] pH = pK + log [CO2 ] [ HCO3- ] 7.5 = 6.1 + log [CO2 ] [ HCO3 ] = 25 [CO2 ] • Physiological – pCO2 = 40 mmHg – [CO2] = 1.2 mM – [CO2]+[HCO3]=31 mM • HEPES - [ HEPES ] pH = pK + log [ HEPES ] [ HEPES - ] 7.5 = 7.55 + log [ HEPES ] [ HEPES - ] = 0.9 [ HEPES ] • Equivalent Buffer – [HEPES]+[HEPES-]=31 mM – [HEPES-]=14.7 – [HEPES]=16.3 Open vs Closed Buffers • Bicarb • HEPES – Add 10 mM HCl + 3 [ H ][ HCO ] pK = - log [CO2 ] (0.01 - d )(0.030 - d ) 6.1 = - log (0.0012 + d ) • Immediate – [HCO3]=20 mM – [CO2]=11 mM – pH = 6.4 (400 nM) – Add 10 mM HCl [ H + ][ HEPES - ] pK = - log [ HEPES ] (0.01 - d )(0.0147 - d ) 7.55 = - log (0.0163 + d ) • Immediate – [HEPES-]=4.7 mM – [HEPES]=26 mM – pH=7.2 (63 nM) • Much better pH control near pKa Open vs Closed Buffer System • Bicarb + 3 [ H ][ HCO ] pK = - log [CO2 ] [4e - 7][0.02] pK = - log [0.011] • CO2 solubility 1.2 mM 6.1 = - log -7 (4 10 - d 2 )(0.020 - d 2 ) (0.0012 + d 2 ) – [HCO3]=20 mM-350 nM – [CO2] = 1.2mM+350 nM – pH=7.3 (50 nM) • Much better than 6.4 w/o exchange • HEPES [ H + ][ HEPES - ] pK = - log [ HEPES ] [6e - 8][0.005] pK = - log [0.026] • No mass exchange – pH =7.2 Could do bicarb in one step: 6.1 = - log (0.01 - d )(0.030 - d ) (0.0012) pH Control • Cell membranes impermeable to H+ • Compartmentalization of pH – Cytoplasm 7.15 – Nucleus 7.2 – Mitochondria 8.0 – Golgi ~6.3 – Lysosome 5.5 • Transporters – H+/K+ – HCO3-/Cl- Dissociation of amino acid side chains [base][ H + ] pK = - log [acid ] [base] log = pH - pK [acid ] In cytoplasm, pH=7.15, so 80% of histidine is in base form (uncharged). 0.1% of lysine is in its base form. In Golgi, pH=6.3, and 40% of histidine is in base form. Reactive modification • NO S-nitrosylation -S-H -S-N=O – Cysteines in hydrophobic acid/base pockets – Hemoglobin • S-NO forms in oxidative environment • Allows NO release in low oxygen • Targets vasodilating NO to oxygen starved tissue Reactive oxidation • Part reduced oxygen: O2·, H2O2, OH· • Protein modification – Cys, His, Phe, Tyr, Met • Sulfur • Ring structures – Chain break – Cross-linking – Chain reaction • DNA/Lipid modification Reactive modification Thymine Thymine glycol •Amino acid modification changes local polarity •Crosslinking •Strand break Thymine glycol distorts DNA structure Kung & Bolton 1997 Electrochemistry Inorganic – Zn + CuSO4Cu + ZnSO4 – Zn + Cu2+Cu + Zn2+ – Zn Zn2+ + 2e- and Cu2+ + 2e- Cu Biological • Redox reactions describe electron transfer – 2 GSH + H2O2 GSSG + 2H2O – 2 GSH GSSG + 2e- + 2H+ and H2O2 + 2e- + 2H+ 2H2O Electrochemistry-free energy • Electrical – DG = -nFDE – Faraday constant 9.65 104 C/mol • Concentration – DG = RT ln( Q) – Gas constant 8.31 J/K/mol • Whole reaction – DG = DG0 + RT ln(QProd) – RT ln(Qreac) – -nFDE = -nFDE0 + RT ln(Qprod/Qreac) – DE = DE0 - RT/nF ln(Qprod/Qreac) • Nernst Equation for redox reaction • Equilibrium at DG= DE = 0 Electrochemistry-half cells • Standard Reduction Potential E0 • Metals (Daniell cell) – Zn Zn2+ + 2eZn2+ + 2e- Zn E0=-0.76V – Cu2+ + 2e- Cu E0=+0.34V – DE0=0.34-(-0.76) = 1.1V • Biological (glutathione) – 2 GSH GSSG + 2e- + 2H+ GSSG + 2e- + 2H+ 2 GSH E0=+0.18 – H2O2 + 2e- + 2H+ 2H2O E0=+1.78 – DE0=1.78-(0.18) = 1.6V Cellular Redox State • Biological – 2 GSH + H2O2 GSSG + 2H2O – DE0= 1.6V – DG = -nF (1.6V) + RT ln( GSSG ) GSH2 H2O2 – DE = 1.6V – RT/nF ln( GSSG ) 2 • Steady state trend GSH H2O2 GSSG – 0 = 1.6 –(8.31*310)/(2*9.6e4) ln( GSH ) 2H O 2 2 GSSG 52 – GSH2 H O = 10 2 2 • ie: Not a lot of free peroxide in a cell • Still needs a catalyst • Real cells have many potential half-cells GSH:GSSG redox buffer • GSH is abundant reducing agent • GSSG + 2e- + 2H+ 2 GSH E0=+0.18 GSH2 – DE = 0.18 – RT/nF ln( GSSG H2 ) 2 GSH – DE = 0.18 – 0.03 log( ) 2 GSSG H • GSH:GSSG ratio as marker of redox state – More GSH, more negative DE, more reducing • GSSG reduction appears as negative in whole reaction • Whole reaction more favorable with positive DE – More H+, more positive DE, more oxidizing • Neutral [H+]2 ~ 10-14 • Many biological oxidations include H+ Cellular redox cascade • Oxygen radicals are not equivalent • ROS generation – Mitochondria – Photons (UV & ionizing radiation) – Inflammatory cells (NADPH oxidase) • Radical scavengers – O2•-H2O2 superoxide dismutase – H2O2H2O Catalase – H2O2 + GSH GSSG glutathione peroxidase – OH• hydroxyl (uncharged OH-) Redox state • Intracellular reductive – Low free oxygen, relatively negative • Extracellular oxidative – High O2, relatively positive Extracellular signals that promote oxidative stress Cytoplasmic oxidants Extracellular antioxidants Cytoplasmic antioxidants