Download June 2003 presentation to FDA advocates by Nancy Roach, MNCF

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
SUMMIT ON CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS - V
Dilimmas and Complexities of Compassionate Use
What is Compassionate Access?
• Expanded Access Protocols and Single Patient
Treatment INDs.
• Expectation of Benefit vs. False Hope
• Is There a Conflict with Clinical Trials?
• When Should Compassionate Access Be
Granted and Who Decides?
What is Compassionate Access?
• Expanded Access Protocol – A treatment
regimen for a predefined group of patients
• Single Patient Treatment IND – A treatment plan
for an individual who does not meet the eligibility
requirements of the clinical trial protocol
When is Expanded Access
Appropriate?
• Expanded access protocols should be
based on a realistic possibility of
therapeutic benefit
• Protocol should be designed so that it
does not conflict with Phase III trial
enrollment
When is Single Patient Treatment
Appropriate?
• Experimental agent has not been (and
may never be) tested for efficacy in a
particular patient’s type of cancer or
specific medical condition and the
patient is not eligible for a clinical trial
• Treatment use of an investigational drug
may be the only opportunity for an
extension of life
What is the probability of benefit
from prescription drugs?
• Commonly prescribed drugs have limited
efficacy/response
–
–
–
–
–
ACE-1
beta-blockers
SSRIs
tricyclic AD
statins
10-30%
15-35%
10-25%
20-50%
10-60%
• Significant occurrence of adverse reactions
– 2.1 million people hospitalized annually due to
adverse drug reaction
– Of those, 106,000 end in fatality
What is the probability of benefit
from an experimental cancer drug?
• Unknown in the best of circumstances
• Improbable in the typical context of
compassionate access
• Example: C225 produced a 22% partial
response of ~ 186 day duration
Reasons for Publicity About Treatment
Advances
• Peer-reviewed results are of clinical practice
significance
• Peer-reviewed results are
preliminary/speculative and interesting
• Political agenda (NCI, HHS looking for funding
from Congress
More Reasons for Publicity About
Treatment Advances
• Announcement designed to promote a
product or a company
• Announcement mandated by government for
nonmedical reason (SEC compliance)
• Inadvertent misrepresentation of science by
the press
• Fraud
Optimism About Experimental
Drugs
• With currently approved drugs: Hope is for
high probability of benefit with possibility of
harm; Reality is certainty of harm with
possibility of benefit.
• Is risk – benefit consideration an individual
decision or a group decision?
Notes from ODAC: Reasons to Deny
Compassionate Access
• “Unbridled treatment use of
investigational drugs may interfere with
enrollment in clinical trials to evaluate the
safety and effectiveness of new drugs.”
• “Sponsors and FDA may be concerned
that patients may refuse to enroll in a
randomized trial designed to compare
standard treatment to experimental
treatment if the experimental treatment is
available outside of trials.”
Does Compassionate Access Interfere
With or Complement Clinical Trials?
• Policies regarding eligibility for clinical
trials and compassionate access
• Compassionate access and accelerated
enrollment in pivotal trials
• Insights into broader uses of
experimental drug?
Compassionate Access and
Crossover Design
• A crossover design can speed accrual
• If the experimental agent is a winner,
crossover will not obscure effectiveness
• If the experimental agent is a winner,
compassionate access helps individuals
and adds to understanding safety
Notes from ODAC: Reasons to Deny
Compassionate Access
• “Sponsors may not have sufficient drug
supply to support widespread treatment
use.”
• Investment required to supply a new drug
during trials and after FDA approval
• Fairness in rationing
– No policy
– Lottery
– Sickest patient first
– Most likely to benefit first
Notes from ODAC: Reasons to Deny
Compassionate Access
• “Sponsors may worry that adverse events
from treatment use reported in patients
who have a poor performance will have
an adverse impact on drug development.”
• Are insights into safety resulting from
compassionate access important?
• Policy and “the greater good.”
Treatment Use During Clinical
Research: Is There Conflict?
• Realistic Expectation of Benefit versus
False Hope
• Faster or Slower to Market
• What is Fair and to Whom?
• Who Decides and How?
Thank you
• Questions via e-mail?
• [email protected]