Download No Slide Title

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
FDLI Introduction to Medical
Device Law and Regulation
Other Postmarket Controls
Philip Katz
(202) 624-2660
[email protected]
October 29, 2002
Washington, D.C.
Device Tracking



FDCA § 519(e)
21 CFR Part 821 (amended effective May 9, 2002)
“Guidance on Medical Device Tracking” (Jan. 2000)
2
FDCA § 519(e)

Class II or III device



Failure likely to have serious adverse health consequences
Intended to be implanted for more than one year
Life sustaining/supporting device used outside device
user facility
3
Additional Factors



Likelihood of sudden, catastrophic failure
Likelihood of significant adverse clinical outcome
Need for prompt professional intervention
4
Device Tracking


To ensure that device can be traced from
manufacturing facility to patient
Must be able to locate device quickly


Three days for undistributed device
Ten days for device distributed to patient
5
Device Tracking



Separate order issued with PMA approval or 510(k)
clearance
Methods may vary, but must have written SOPs
Can use outside contractor
6
Device Tracking


Must audit system, to verify that it works and
the information is accurate
Must maintain records as long as device is in
distribution or use
7
Device Tracking



Distributors (such as hospitals and other user
facilities) must track and provide information
to the manufacturer
Obligations start/stop at water’s edge
Patient can refuse identifying information
8
Postmarket Surveillance



FDCA § 522
21 CFR Part 822 (effective July 8, 2002)
“Guidance on Criteria and Approaches for
Postmarket Surveillance” (Nov. 1998)
9
FDCA § 522

Class II or III device



Failure likely to have serious adverse health consequences
Intended to be implanted for more than one year
Life sustaining/supporting device used outside device
user facility
10
Other Criteria




Important unanswered surveillance question
Availability of other postmarket mechanisms
Practicality of surveillance strategies
Magnitude of risk
11
Postmarket Surveillance


Limitations of premarket data
Shortcomings of MDRs
12
Postmarket Surveillance



Required by FDA order, not necessarily at time of
review/clearance
Manufacturer must submit plan in 30 days
FDA has 60 days to judge plan’s adequacy
13
Range of Methods



Literature review
Secondary data sets, registries
Studies (clinical, non-clinical)
14
Postmarket Surveillance




Can last up to three years
Applies to foreign manufacturers
Does not apply to devices for export only
Informed consent and IRB requirements apply
15
Postmarket Surveillance




Interim and final reports
Retain records for two years
Produce records within three days
Records subject to inspection/review
16
Device Promotion

Advertising


Not defined, but see drug regulations
Labeling

Label and “all other written, printed or graphic
matter . . . accompanying” the device
17
Device Promotion

Misleading


FDCA § 201(n)
Not just representations made or suggested, but also
material omissions
18
FDCA § 502 – Misbranding

All devices



False or misleading labeling (FDCA § 502(a))
Adequate directions for use, adequate warnings
(FDCA § 502(f))
Registration, listing, 510(f) notice/information
(FDCA § 502(o))
19
FDCA § 502 – Misbranding

Restricted devices


False or misleading advertising (FDCA § 502(q))
Advertising or “other descriptive matter” lacks side
effects, contraindications (FDCA § 502(r))
20
Device Promotion


Unapproved uses
False or misleading statements
21
Unapproved Uses



Promotion of device that is not approved or cleared
Promotion of cleared/approved device for use that
is not cleared or approved
Not limited to advertising/labeling
22
False or Misleading Statements

Shared jurisdiction



FDA – all labeling, restricted device ads
FTC – all other device ads
Sort of
23
False or Misleading Statements

Jurisdiction makes a difference



Different outlooks
Different processes
Different results
24
False or Misleading Statements

FDA



No clear standard
Can look to drug ad regulations
Can look to FTC
25
False or Misleading Statements

FTC


Identifying the representation
Determine whether it’s true and substantiated
26
FTC

Identify the representation



Express and implied claims
Intent irrelevant
Reasonable interpretation by target audience
27
FTC

Is the claim true and substantiated?



Implied presence of substantiation
“Establishment” claims
True + false = false
28
Other Issues


Internet
First Amendment
29
FDLI Introduction to Medical
Device Law and Regulation
Other Postmarket Controls
Philip Katz
(202) 624-2660
[email protected]
October 29, 2002
Washington, D.C.