Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
2° Infectivology today Paestum 18-20 maggio 2006 Etiopatogenesi e profilassi dell’infezione post-operatoria Pierluigi Viale Clinica di Malattie Infettive Università degli Studi di Udine Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive Impact of SSI’s Infected Uninfected Mortality 7.8% 3.5% ICU Adm 29% 18% LOS 11d 6d Re-admission 41% 7% Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive Prevention of SSI’s Perioperative antimicrobial prevention measures Maintain normal blood sugar levels Hyper-oxygenation Maintain normal body temperature Hair removal immediately prior to operation using electric clippers Hand washing Good surgical technique Control of host-related risk factors Antibiotics Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive NRC Wound Classification •Clean Surgical Procedures atbATB prophylaxis indicated * * Two well recognized indications not for such clean operations are: •Clean Contimated Procedures 1. Any intravascular prosthetic material or prosthetic joint will be inserted prophylaxis indicated •Contaminated Procedures 2. Any operation in which an incisional or organ space SSI would pose catastrophic risk therapy indicated Cardiac surgery •Dirty Procedures Neurosurgical Operations Prosthetic arterial grafts therapy indicated Revascularization of lower extremity Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Surgical AMP refers to a very brief course of an antimicrobial agent initiated just before an operation begins. AMP is not an attempt to sterilize tissues, but a critically timed adjunct used to reduce the microbial burden of intra-operative contamination to a level that cannot overwhelm host defenses. Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive THE EQUATION OF THE INFECTIOUS RISK + DRUG RESISTANCE BACTERIAL LOAD x VIRULENCE HOST IMMUNITY HOST = INFECTIOUS RISK = INFECTIOUS RISK IMMUNITY + ANTIBIOTICS Every Operation is an Experiment in Bacteriology … Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive THE FIVE MAIN TOPIC OF SURGICAL ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYAXIS • INDICATION • TIMING OF ADMINISTRATION • TIME OF ADMINISTRATION (single vs multiple dose) • DRUG CHOICE • DRUG DOSAGE Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopedics. An epidemiological survey in Italy J Chemother 2000; 12 (supppl 2):28-38 136,312 procedures 24.4% arthroscopy 57.1% prophylaxis Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive Surgical site infection after groin hernia repair British J Surgery 2004; 91: 105–111 Site: Scotland Sample : 2665 pts Follow up: 30 days Method: on call n. Infections : 140 Infection rate: 5.3 % ATB prophylaxis: 4.2% NO prophylaxis 7.6% P = 0·002 Risk factors for wound infection : multivariate analysis Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive The role of antibiotic prophylaxis on wound infection after mesh hernia repair under local anesthesia on an ambulatory basis Hernia 2004;8:20-2 Randomized choice : CEFAZOLIN single dose (50 pts) vs PLACEBO (49 pts) Infection rates : CEFAZOLIN 0 PLACEBO 8.1% P = .059 Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive A prospective randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 2003; 17:1716-8 Randomized choice : CEFOTAXIME 2 g single dose (49 pts) vs PLACEBO (43 pts) Follow up: 30 days Infection rates : CEFOTAXIME 2.04% PLACEBO 2.32% Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive PIPERACILLIN TO PREVENT CHOLANGITIS AFTER ERCP. A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL Ann Intern Med 1996; 125:442-7 PIPERACILLIN (single dose) vs PLACEBO 551 consecutive pts enrolled atb ACUTE CHOLANGITIS RATE placebo 6% 4.4% RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.36-1.51) Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive Biliary tract infections: a guide to drug treatment Drugs 1999; 57: 81-91 “ antibacterial prophylaxis before ERCP should be reserved for patients with obstructive jaundice, since the risk of infectious complications seems to be strongly associated with this clinical condition… … failure to achieve a full biliary drainage is the most important factor predicting bacteremia, and antimicrobial treatment should be prolonged until the bile duct is obstructed” Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Endoscopic Therapy Prevents Rebleeding in Acute Variceal Hemorrhage: A Randomized Trial Hepatology 2004;39:746–753 Actuarial probability of remaining free of rebleeding P .0029 Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive THE FIVE MAIN TOPIC OF SURGICAL ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYAXIS • INDICATION • TIMING OF ADMINISTRATION • TIME OF ADMINISTRATION (single vs multiple dose) • DRUG CHOICE • DRUG DOSAGE Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive CINETICA di CRESCITA BATTERICA dopo CONTAMINAZIONE INTRA-OPERATORIA PROCEDURA CHIRURGICA Popolazione batterica UFC/mL colonizzazione INFEZIONE contaminazione TEMPO 2 -6 ore 3 -5 giorni BASI TEORICHE della PROFILASSI CHIRURGICA Popolazione batterica e concentrazione dell’antibiotico in siero, trombi, ematomi e coaguli ANTIBIOTICO (mg/L) PROCEDURA CHIRURGICA Pop. Batterica conc. Sieriche dell’antibiotico conc. dell’antib. in trombi, ematomi, coaguli MIC UFC/mL SOMMINISTRAZIONE ANTIBIOTICO TEMPO TIMING 100 Incisione cutanea Siero Interstizio tessuti 10 C>MIC per tutto l’intervento Periodo vulnerabile MIC 1 Troppo precoce Timing corretto Troppo tardiva The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. Classen DC et Al, N Engl J Med 1992 TIMING INCIDENCE OF INFECTIONS • > 2 h pre-incision 3,8% • < 2 h pre-incision 0,6% • < 3 h post-incision 1,5% • > 3 h post-incision 3,3% Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive BASI TEORICHE della PROFILASSI CHIRURGICA ANTIBIOTICO (mg/L) Pop. Batterica conc. Sieriche dell’antibiotico conc. dell’antib. in trombi, ematomi, coaguli PROCEDURA CHIRURGICA MIC UFC/mL UFC/mL 1^ SOMMINISTRAZIONE ANTIBIOTICO 2^ SOMMINISTRAZIONE ANTIBIOTICO TEMPO Intraoperative Redosing of Cefazolin and Risk for Surgical Site Infection in Cardiac Surgery Zanetti et al, Emerging Infectious Diseases 2001 FARMACOCINETICA DEGLI ANTIBIOTICI IMPIEGATI IN PROFILASSI CHIRURGICA Antibiotico % legame pr. t1/2 eliminazione Dose intraop. dopo ore Cefazolina 70-85 1.4-1.5 3.5 Cefamandolo 65-85 0.6-0.8 1.5 Cefuroxima 33-50 1-2 3.5 Cefoxitina 70 0.7-1 1.5 Clindamicina 92-94 2-3 3.5 Gentamicina 5 2-3 3.5 Amoxic./ac. Clav 18-25 1-1.5 2.5 Ampic./sulbactam 15-25 1-15 2.5 THE FIVE MAIN TOPIC OF SURGICAL ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYAXIS • INDICATION • TIMING OF ADMINISTRATION • TIME OF ADMINISTRATION (single vs multiple dose) • DRUG CHOICE • DRUG DOSAGE Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive Ideal Prophylactic Agent Excellent in vitro activity vs Staphylococci and Streptococci Relatively long serum half-life Good tissue penetration Relatively non-toxic and well handling Inexpensive With low ability to collateral damage (selective pressure) Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive SURGICAL-SITE INFECTION RATES AND RISK FACTOR ANALYSIS IN CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT SURGERY Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:472-476 4,474 patients undergoing CABG surgery aggregate SSI rate : 7.8 infections per 100 procedures ( CI 95 7.0–8.5) Mixed flora No growth Enterobacteriaceae 13 8 56% 18 S. aureus 5 CoNS Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive S. aureus colonization and disease Intranasal Mupirocin to prevent post-operative S. aureus infections Perl et al, N Engl J Med, 2002 Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial 3864 patients included in the ITT analysis (891 S. aureus carriers) 7,7 p = .002 Mupirocin 4 2,3 Placebo 2,4 overall S. aureus carriers Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive Base-case analysis: clinical outcomes and costs for a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery Zanetti et al, Emerging Infectious Diseases 2001 Clinical, microbiological, and economic benefit of a change in antibiotic prophylaxis for cardiac surgery. Spelman D et al, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:402 infections per 100 procedures from CEFAZOLIN to … VANCOMYCIN + RIFAMPICIN 10.5 (95% CI 8.2-13.3) 4.9 (95% CI 3.2-7.1) CEF VANCO+RIFA An estimated $576,655 (Australian) was saved between two 12-month periods Glycopeptides Are No More Effective than b-Lactam Agents for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection after Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysis Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:1357–63 Summary of the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after receipt of glycopeptide or b-lactam prophylaxis for the outcome of SSIs cefazolin Glycopeptide Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive THE FIVE MAIN TOPIC OF SURGICAL ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYAXIS • INDICATION • TIMING OF ADMINISTRATION • TIME OF ADMINISTRATION (single vs multiple dose) • DRUG CHOICE • DRUG DOSAGE Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic aspects of antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin in patients undergoing major vascular surgery Pea F, Furlanut M, Stellini R, Signorini L,Pavan F, Giulini SM, Viale P, Carosi G, Int J Antimicrob Ag, 2005 Type of study: prospective two-arms Goal: assessing plasma exposure to teicoplanin with two different prophylactic regimens [Group A (n = 23), 800 mg pre-operatively vs Group B (n = 24), 400 mg pre-operatively plus two doses of 200 mg 24 h apart)] Setting: patients undergoing major vascular surgery. Pts N: 47 Università degli Studi di Udine – Clinica di Malattie Infettive Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic aspects of antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin in patients undergoing major vascular surgery Pea F, Furlanut M, Stellini R, Signorini L,Pavan F, Giulini SM, Viale P, Carosi G, Int J Antimicrob Ag, 2005 Teicoplanin concentration (mg/L) 30 800 mg 400 mg 20 10 8 7 6 5 4 r = 0.32 3 r = 0.56 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time of wound closure (h) Clinic of Infectious Diseases & Institute of Clinical Pharmacology – University of Udine