Download Document

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Bad Pharma wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Electronic prescribing wikipedia , lookup

Bilastine wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacist wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacy wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Dexmedetomidine (Precedex®)
Haley Gill, BSP
VCH-PHC Pharmacy Resident 2009-2010
Pharmacy Services
Outline
• Current indications
• Differences & possible advantages over
current sedation agents
• Pharmacology
• Dosing
• Cost
• Review of Literature
Pharmacy Services
Health Canada
• Precedex®
• NOC issued December 2009
• Dexmedetomidine (DXM) 100mcg/ml
solution
• Continuous IV infusion
Pharmacy Services
Health Canada - Approved Indications
• ICU Sedation:
– post-surgical mechanically ventilated patients
– Infusion must NOT exceed 24 hours
– Not necessary to D/C prior to extubation
– ↓ dose by 50% after extubation
• Conscious Sedation (non-intubated
patients):
– Monitored Anesthesia Care
– Awake Fiberoptic Intubation
Pharmacy Services
DXM vs. Other ICU Sedation Agents
• Minimal respiratory depression
• Thought to induce less delirium – does not
bind to GABA receptors
• Analgesic sparing
• Does not provide adequate & reliable
amnesia
Pharmacy Services
Pharmacology
• MOA
– highly selective α2-adrenoreceptor agonist
– Similar to clonidine but 8 X more selective for α2
α2-adrenoreceptors
Pharmacy Services
Pancreatic β-cells
↓ insulin secretion
Platelets
Aggregation
Nerve Terminals
↓ release of NE
Vascular Smooth muscle
Contraction
Pharmacology
Pharmacy Services
Pharmacology
Onset of Action
5-10 min
Peak effect: 15-30 min
Duration of Action
60-120 min
Metabolism
Hepatic via N-glucuronidation,
N-methylation, & CYP2A6
Elimination t1/2
~ 6 min
Terminal: ~2 hrs
Urine 95%
Feces 4%
Excretion
Pharmacy Services
Drug Interactions
Enzyme
CYP 2A6
Action
substrate
CYP 1A2,
2C9, 3A4
weak inhibitor
CYP 2D6
strong inhibitor
Drugs
amiodarone
isoniazid
ketoconazole
warfarin
Simvastatin
codeine
**theoretical interactions – likely of little clinical significance**
Pharmacy Services
Drug Interactions
• Beta-blockers: rebound hypertensive effect
when the α2-agonist is abruptly withdrawn
• Mirtazapine: α2-antagonist (opposing
effects)
Pharmacy Services
Dosing
• ICU sedation
– Load: 1 mcg/kg IV over 10 minutes
– Maintenance: 0.2-0.7 mcg/kg/hr IV (0.2-1.4 mcg/kg/hr
reported in RCT’s)
– titration no more frequently than every 30 minutes may
↓ the incidence of hypotension
• Procedural sedation
– Load: 0.5 – 1 mcg/kg over 10 minutes
– Maintenance: 0.6 mcg/kg/hr (usual range: 0.2-1
mcg/kg/hr)
Pharmacy Services
Dosing
• No specific recommendations for renal or
hepatic dysfunction
Pharmacy Services
Adverse Effects
• Hypotension (2454%)
• Bradycardia (5-14%)
• Respiratory
depression (37%;
placebo 32%)
• Atrial fibrillation (4-5%)
• Hypovolemia (3%)
Pharmacy Services
•
•
•
•
•
•
↓ urine output
Pleural effusion
Hypocalcemia (1%)
Nausea (3-9%)
Xerostomia (3-4%)
Hyperglycemia
Cost
Drug
Unit Cost
Cost/day for 70 kg pt
DXM 100mcg/ml
2 ml vial = $63
$105.84 - $370.44
(0.2 – 0.7mcg/kg/hr)
Propofol 10mg/ml
100 ml bottle = $8.78
$14.75 – $88.50
(1 – 6mg/kg/hr)
Midazolam 5mg/ml
10 ml vial = $12.25
$29.40 – $58.80
(5 – 10mg/hr)
Pharmacy Services
Effect of Sedation with Dexmedetomidine vs Lorazepam on Acute
Brain Dysfunction in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
(MENDS)
Pandharipande P, et al
JAMA 2007;298(22):2644-2653
Pharmacy Services
MENDS
Objective
To determine whether DXM reduces the duration of delirium and coma in
mechanically ventilated ICU patients while providing adequate sedation as
compared to lorazepam
Design
P-MC-DB-RCT
Patients
n = 106 medical/surgical ICU patients requiring ventilation for >24 hrs
Treatment
DXM 0.15 – 1.5 mcg/kg/hr vs lorazepam 1 – 10 mg/hr
Results
Delirium-free & coma-free days: DXM 7 vs. loraz 3 (p=0.01)
Prevalence of delirium or coma: DXM 87% vs. loraz 98% (p=0.03)
Time @ target sedation (RASS): 80% vs. 67% (p=0.04)
Ventilator-free days: DXM 22 vs. loraz 18 (p=0.22)
Length of ICU stay (days): DXM 7.5 vs. loraz 9 (p=0.92)
Pharmacy Services
MENDS
Results
28-day mortality:
DXM 17% vs. loraz 27% (p=0.18)
Open-label fentanyl use (median dose/day):
DXM 575 mcg vs. loraz 150 mcg (p=0.006)
Bradycardia:
DXM 17% vs. loraz 4% (p=0.03)
Atrial Fibrillation:
DXM 6% vs. loraz 0% (p=0.08)
Conclusion DXM patients had more days alive without coma or delirium
↑ bradycardia with DXM
↑ fentanyl use with DXM
Max duration of DXM = 120 hr
Average dose DXM = 0.74mcg/kg/h
Pharmacy Services
Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation of
Critically Ill Patients
(SEDCOM)
Riker R, et al
JAMA 2009;31(5):489-499
Pharmacy Services
SEDCOM
Objective
To compare efficacy & safety of prolonged sedation with DXM vs.
midazolam for mechanically ventilated patients
Design
P-MC-DB-RCT
Patients
n = 366 medical/surgical ICU patients with expected ventilation for >24 hrs
Treatment
DXM 0.2 – 1.4 mcg/kg/hr vs midazolam 0.02 – 0.1 mg/kg/hr
Results
Time @ target sedation (RASS): DXM 77.3% vs. midaz 75.1% (p=0.18)
Duration of study drug treatment (days): DXM 3.5 vs. midaz 4.1 (p=0.01)
Time to extubation (days): DXM 3.7 vs. midaz 5.6 (p=0.01)
Length of ICU stay (days): DXM 5.9 vs. midaz 7.6 (p=0.24)
Delirium: DXM 54% vs. midaz 76.6% (p<0.001)
Pharmacy Services
SEDCOM
Results
Mean delirium-free days: DXM 2.5 vs. midaz 1.7 (p=0.002)
Open-label midazolam use: DXM 63% vs. midaz 49% (p=0.02)
Fentanyl use: DXM 73.8% vs. midaz 97% (p=0.25)
30 day mortality: DXM 22.5% vs. midaz 25.4% (p=0.6)
Bradycardia: DXM 42.2% vs. midaz 18.9% (p<0.01)
Hyperglycemia: DXM 56.6% vs. midaz 42.6% (p=0.02)
Conclusion No difference in time at target sedation level
↓ time to extubation & ↓ delirium in DXM group
↑ use of midazolam in DXM group
↑ bradycardia & ↑ hyperglycemia in DXM group
Average dose DXM = 0.83 mcg/kg/h
Pharmacy Services
Dexmedetomidine versus
propofol/midazolam for long-term sedation
during mechanical ventilation
Ruokonen E, et al
Intensive Care Med 2009;35:282-290
Pharmacy Services
Ruokonen E, et al
Objective
To compare DXM with standard care (SC) (propofol or midazolam) for
long-term sedation in terms of maintaining target sedation and length of
ICU stay
Design
P-MC-DB-DD-RCT
Patients
n = 85 ICU patients with need for sedation >24 hrs
Treatment
DXM ≤1.4 mcg/kg/hr vs propofol or midazolam
Results
Time @ target sedation RASS: DXM 64% vs. SC 63% NSS
•RASS -4: DXM 42% vs. SC 62%
•RASS 0 to -3: DXM 74% vs. 64%
Length of ICU stay (days): DXM 6.6 vs. SC 6.8 [HR 0.766 (p=0.275)]
Duration of ventilation: DXM 77.2 h vs. SC 110.6 h (p=0.109)
Delirium: DXM 43.5% vs. SC 25% (p=0.035)
Pharmacy Services
Ruokonen E, et al
Results
Serious Adverse Events:
DXM 100% (3 bradycardia, 1 arrest) vs. SC 95.5%
Conclusion
DXM comparable to standard sedation when light sedation target
DXM less effective when deep sedation target (RASS -4)
↑ delirium in DXM group but more CAM-ICU assessments in this group
Average DEX dose 0.8mcg/kg/hr
Average duration 40 h (Max duration 14 days)
Pharmacy Services
The effect of dexmedetomidine on agitation
during weaning of mechanical ventilation in
critically ill patients
Shehabi Y, et al
Anaesth Intensive Care 2010;38:82-90
Pharmacy Services
Shehabi Y, et al
Objective
To evaluate the effects of DXM on resolution of agitation during weaning
from mechanical ventilation of critically ill patients who failed conventional
therapy
Design
P-OL-O
Patients
n = 28 ICU patients who developed agitation and/or delirium upon weaning
from sedation
Treatment
DXM 0.4 mcg/kg/hr for 2 hours, titrated up by 0.2 mcg/kg/hr every 30 min
to max dose of 1 mcg/kg/hr
Results
• baseline: 77% of patients outside of target MAAS, 23% within target
• 6 h: 93% within target (p<0.001)
•12 h: 87% within target (p<0.001)
73.3% of patients were extubated
Median ventilation time after DXM infusion = 70 h
Conclusion
DXM provided resolution of agitation and facilitated extubation
Median infusion time of DXM = 62 h
Pharmacy Services
Summary of Evidence
• DXM effective at achieving target sedation
• DXM not as effective when deep sedation
required
– ↑ use of additional sedation agents in DXM group
• Higher doses of DXM appear safe
– No withdrawal/rebound effects seen
– loading dose often not used
•
•
•
•
Duration > 24 hr appears safe
Appears safe in non-surgical population
May ↓ delirium
Main AE’s: bradycardia, hyperglycemia, AF
Pharmacy Services
Place in Therapy
• Light sedation
• Medical or surgical patients
• Patients who may be at increased risk for
delirium
• Patients who are unable to be weaned due
to agitation
• Limited data in dialysis patients, severe
liver disease, HR <50
Pharmacy Services
Pharmacy Services