Download Gender, Employment and Recession: Trends and Impacts Nata Duvvury

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Transformation in economics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Gender, Employment and
Recession: Trends and Impacts
Nata Duvvury
Research Symposium Employment and Crisis
Trinity College
11 March 2011
The Irish Crisis
Main features
Severe banking crisis – 2008 credit freeze, failure
of Anglo Irish
Reputational crisis – increasing difficulty for
borrowing on international bond markets
Sovereign Debt crisis – with bank guarantee and
the slowing down of the global economy from
2008, fiscal deficit sharply increased
EU/IMF bailout was agreed in November 2010
• In terms of the public discourse attention has
been focused on
– Unemployment and emigration, particularly that of
young men
– Need for fiscal discipline, largely expenditure cuts
– Need to send signals to international markets that
Ireland is still in business, holding the line on
corporate tax rate
– Culture of overspend, the ‘hangover’ and the need to
‘sacrifice’ ‘buckle-up’
– Bloated public sector
• Absent however is what are the gender
impacts of the crisis
• Some attention to the impacts of welfare cuts
on women, particularly those in vulnerable
groups such as lone parents, older
women, etc.
• Less attention to trends in female work
participation – which is fundamental to
strategies by families to manage the crisis
• Focus on two questions
• How has the crisis impacted women’s
employment/unemployment?
• What are the implications for gender relations
in households?
• In the literature on gender impacts of economic
or financial crisis two possible effects for
women’s employment are noted
• Added worker effect – women’s participation in
labour force increases
• Resultant of households increasing female labor
participation as a strategy for coping with
declining income on one hand
• Employers preferring women workers as a way
cutting costs – substitution
• Discouraged worker effect – women’s
participation declines
• Resultant of opportunity cost rising for
women working with wage gap, discrimination
in benefits and social costs of childcare on one
hand and employers perceiving women
workers as unreliable, unavailable and
requiring additional costs – women a flexible
buffer
Unemployment Rate and GDP Growth
• One trend noted in the literature is that
women’s employment is protected in the
initial stages as they are often in sectors less
prone to cyclical fluctuations
• However as the crisis spreads and deepens
then more likely that women lose jobs at a
faster rate
• What has happened in the present crisis
Change in Employment by Quarter
6.00
4.00
2.00
(change on year basis)
0.00
-2.00
-4.00
Male
Female
-6.00
-8.00
-10.00
-12.00
-14.00
Q1 2008
Q2 2008
Q3 2008
Q4 2008
Q1 2009
Q2 2009
Q3 2009
Q4 2009
Q1 2010
Q2 2010
Change in Employment by Sector
Change in Employment by
Occupation
Trend in Employees, 1998 to 2010
1,000.0
900.0
800.0
700.0
600.0
500.0
Women
400.0
300.0
200.0
100.0
0.0
Men
Increase in Part-time Employment
Rising Vulnerable Employment
• The more intriguing story was how these
shifts in limited employment opportunities
over the crisis period actually affected
household negotiations in the labour market
and their long-term implications
Crisis has differential impact
• Age is a significant factor – unemployment is
highest for young men, followed by young
women
• Education as proxy for socio-economic status –
higher unemployment rates among those with
primary education, followed by HS and then
tertiary. Women with tertiary education have
the lowest unemployment rates and slowest
increase as crisis spread
• Among families with children, women lone
parents have the highest
unemployment, followed by married men and
then married women
• Unemployment rates are highest for young
families with children below 15
• What is happening then in terms of household
strategies?
• Is there an added worker effect or discouraged
worker effect over all?
LFPR by Age, Men
LFPR by Age, Women
LFPR of Older Women
1998 to 2010
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
55-59
60-64
20.0
10.0
0.0
Who is leaving?
• The exit of younger women with children has
grave implications
– Reproducing the interrupted work history of their
mothers
– Not the marriage bar but the crisis that will
undermine their pension provision in the future
• Entry of older women at low wages and
minimal pension provision means that
households will oscillate around poverty rate
and even fall into deeper poverty