Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
IATTO FORUM – EXPORT SUMMIT II A survey on national promotion strategies SEVE’s 3 year Export Business Plan for the Greek Economy Dr. Tasos Alexandridis SEVE, Executive Member of BoD Ms. Maria Kechagia Economic Analyst of Institute of Export Research & Studies 25 September 2013 1 Section A. Greek Export Performance Section B. Export specialization B.1 Markets B.2 Sectors B.3 Export Specialization Ratio (RCAsp) Section C. RCAsp results Section D. Discussion 2 Section A. Greek export performance Current account and trade balance trends GREECE Source: NBG 3 Section A. Greek export performance Exports of goods as % GDP EZ-17 (2012) Source: Eurostat Even though Greece still lags far behind the Eurozone average in export performance, 14% contribution of exports of goods to the Greek GDP is a historical record for Greece (taking however into consideration the Greek recession and significant fall of the GDP) 4 Section A. Greek export performance Greek export composition per sector Food Drinks & Tobacco Non metalic products Chemicals & Plastics Oils and Fuels Wood & Paper Textiles & Clothing Basic metals Machinery & equiment Transport Other Exports as a share of total Greek exports (2012) Exports as a share of industry production (2009) Average Annual trend (2003/12) 14,7 2,4 2,8 10,4 38,9 1,2 6,5 10,7 6,8 1,7 4,0 12,1 28,2 11,7 39,8 14,8 9,4 46,9 44,0 39,2 43,4 - 6,8 0,3 2,8 5,9 30,3 4,4 -5,8 10,8 3,8 4,5 10,3 Source: Eurostat •Best performing merchandise non oil export sectors are basic metals, food and chemicals & plastics •Further improvements in cost competitiveness are essential to transform the productive landscape of the economy 5 Section A. Greek export performance Greek export composition per geographic region Source: Eurostat •Until 2010: EU preserves a constant high share of Greek exports •2011-2012: The geographical diversification of exports of goods begins, due to the proximity (eg. Turkey), combined with the rising wealth of the emerging economies 6 Section B. Export specialization B.1 Markets We focus our analysis on 6+2 markets 6 developing economies Brazil China India South Korea Russia Turkey +2 developed economies USA Japan 7 Section B. Export specialization B.1 Markets Economic Analysis of trade flows. Greek exports to key target markets in 2003 and 2012 Source: Eurostat •Increasing importance of the target markets, as within 10 years, from 2003 to 2012, Greek exports to the 6 developing economies grew from 7% to 15% •Looking solely on 2012, Greek exports to Brazil rose by 101% (!), in South Korea by 71% and in Japan by 44%, from the previous year 8 Section B. Export specialization B.1 Markets Development of Greek exports between 2003-2012 to 6+2 target markets, the EU-27 and the rest of the world Source: Eurostat •The big rise from 2010 and onwards to the 6 developing target economies is mostly due to mineral fuels in Turkey. However, still the trend is on the strong rise 9 Section B. Export specialization B.1 Markets Why Brazil? •7th strongest economy in the world (GDP $ 2,3 trillion) •GDP per capita raised almost 50% from 2004 ($ 8.100) till now ($ 12.000) •In 2010, the industrial production was increased by 11,5% and in 2011 remained stable •22th bigger import economy (more than $ 220 billion) Why China? •The 2nd strongest economy in the world (GDP $ 11,5 trillion) •Real GDP growth 2012: 9.4% •1st place in foreign reserves in the world ($ 3,2 trillion) •1st place in FDI inflow •Industrial production growth of 13.9% •The 2nd largest importing economy in the world.In 2012 China’s imports were$ 1,75 trillion 10 Section B. Export specialization B.1 Markets Why India? •The 3rd largest economy in the world (GDP $ 4.5 trillion) •Low unemployment rate: 9.8% •14th place in FDI inflow •One of the major importing economies. In 2012 India’s imports were $ 488 billion Why South Korea? •12th strongest economy in the world (GDP $ 1,57 trillion) •GDP per capita almost doubled in last 10 years (from $ 19.000 in 2002, to $33.000 in 2012) •Industrial production raised by 12.1% in 2010 and 3.8% in 2011 11 Section B. Export specialization B.1 Markets Why Russia? •The 6th largest economy in the world (GDP $ 2.4 trillion) •4th place in reserve assets: $ 500 billion •One of the major importing economies. Russia’s imports in 2012 were $ 315 billion Why Turkey? •16th largest economy in the world (GDP $ 1 trillion) •Real GDP growth in 2012 was estimated at 8.5% •Industrial production growth: 9.2% 12 Section B. Export specialization B.1 Markets Why USA? •The strongest economy in the world (GDP $ 15.3 trillion) •One of the highest per capita GDP in the world ($ 49,000) •The country obtains $ 148 billion in foreign reserves •The biggest importer in the world. In 2012, USA’s imports were $ 2.2 trillion •10th place in economic freedom index Why Japan? •4th largest economy in the world (GDP $ 4.5 trillion) •2nd place in foreign reserves in the world ($ 1.26 trillion) •4th largest import economy imports. In 2012, Japan’s imports were $ 885 billion •The country obtains the 3rd higher life expectancy rate in the world (84 years) 13 Section B. Export specialization B.2 Sectors Building on the EXPORT SUMMIT I presentation, we focus our analysis on 10 Greek sectors & products, which have RCA>1 for the period 2003-2012, when compared to the OECD countries. RCA>1 means that for the certain period, this sector/ product has comparative advantage in international markets to another market (s) Source: Eurostat, author’s calculations 14 Section B. Export specialization B.3 Export Specialization Ratio (RCAsp) Very often the RCA index can be also be interpreted as the export specialization ratio. This, a light modification of the simple RCA index is made to allow us to focus on a particular market (s). RCAsp is calculated as follows: Similar to the RCA, RCAsp>1 reveals a comparative advantage of product j in market k, while if RCAsp<1 reveals comparative disadvantage in market k. 15 Section B. Export specialization B.3 Export Specialization Ratio (RCAsp) Data •We used export data for Greece and import data for the 6+2 target economies •The analysis employed sectoral data under the HS2 classification •Data source: International Trade Center (ITC) Relative EU import share for Greece = share of target market’s imports from Greece/ share of target market’s imports from the EU Note. The analysis of every sector included only the products with RCA>1 during the period 2003-12 internationally. The rest of the products with RCA<1 were left behind. 16 Section C. RCAsp results C.1 Non processed leather, leather & fur RCA (2003-12) = 10,80 RCAsp (2003-12) Brazil China India S.Korea Russia Turkey USA Japan 27,42 2,88 10,34 5,63 16,50 4,31 29,98 21,44 Source: ITC, author’s calculations Average annual RCAsp trend (2003-12) % 27,3 1,2 5,2 3,4 -13,6 5,7 0,8 2,9 Average annual import trend (2003-12) % -14,5 6,6 7,9 0,0 28,5 -0,4 -2,8 -2,0 exports as a share of total Greek exports to the country (2012) % 0,0 4,1 0,0 1,4 29,0 8,8 0,8 0,1 Relative EU import share for Greece (2012) % 0,0 0,6 0,0 3,9 28,1 10,0 0,9 0,5 •Greek non processed leather, leather & fur have comparative advantage in all target markets •However, in Brazil, USA and Japan RCAsp is very high, but Greek exports too small in size •Russia, China and India are growing markets in this sector. Greece up today has only exploited its comparative advantage in fur only in the Russian market. The rest remain unexploited 17 Section C. RCAsp results C.2 Animal or vegetable fats & oils RCA (2003-12) = 7,30 Brazil China India S.Korea Russia Turkey USA Japan RCAsp (2003-12) Average annual RCAsp trend (2003-12) % Average annual import trend (2003-12) % exports as a share of total Greek exports to the country (2012) % Relative EU import share for Greece (2012) % 5,71 3,16 1,24 8,88 3,51 3,24 11,59 11,52 -8,7 -6,2 -1,3 -8,5 4,4 -6,7 -13,4 -6,3 20,7 16,4 16,4 14,4 7,6 14,2 14,5 8,9 0,3 2,2 0,2 0,1 1,6 0,7 3,2 0,6 0,6 5,0 0,8 0,5 2,3 6,1 2,1 1,3 Source: ITC, author’s calculations •Greek animal/ vegetable fats and oils enjoy comparative advantage in all target markets • All target markets show growing demand in animal fats & oils during the last decade. Brazil displays the highest annual import increase (20,7%). However, Greece exports only 0,3% of its production in animal fats & oils in Brazil 18 •Except for Russia, there is a falling trend in Greece comparative advantage in every market over the decade Section C. RCAsp results C.3 Prepared food, beverages, tobacco RCA (2003-12) = 3,38 Brazil China India S.Korea Russia Turkey USA Japan RCAsp (2003-12) Average annual RCAsp trend (2003-12) % Average annual import trend (2003-12) % exports as a share of total Greek exports to the country (2012) % Relative EU import share for Greece (2012) % 11,33 25,44 44,85 8,84 2,20 14,24 4,74 3,25 -5,8 -10,6 -7,8 -2,3 5,2 -2,6 -4,5 -2,4 19,1 24,3 26,9 9,0 8,7 11,4 5,7 6,4 0,1 0,2 0,1 0,4 2,8 1,0 6,6 0,7 0,3 0,2 0,3 1,1 1,3 0,7 1,2 0,4 Source: ITC, author’s calculations •Very high RCAsp are recorded in India, China, Turkey and Brazil, much higher than the average RCA (3,38). Greek exports of prepared food, beverages & tobacco are nearly zero in these markets, while demand over the decade is steadily growing •Preparations of fruit & vegetables and tobacco are the products that record the higher RCAsp in India 19 at a product level Section C. RCAsp results C.4 Clothing RCA (2003-12) = 2,46 Brazil China India S.Korea Russia Turkey USA Japan RCAsp (2003-12) Average annual RCAsp trend (2003-12) % Average annual import trend (2003-12) % exports as a share of total Greek exports to the country (2012) % Relative EU import share for Greece (2012) % 5,90 5,09 12,86 5,12 4,08 2,49 2,02 2,13 -17,3 -8,9 -4,9 -10,8 -17,8 -10,3 -10,8 -11,5 21,2 9,1 10,0 6,8 24,5 8,1 1,2 4,9 0,0 4,8 0,0 0,1 1,1 14,6 1,2 1,5 0,1 4,6 0,1 0,6 0,9 17,4 0,5 1,1 Source: ITC, author’s calculations •Except for China and Turkey, Greek clothing exports to the other target markets are very little in 2012 •At a product level, cotton and articles of knitted apparel show high RCAsp. Cotton in the USA, India and 20 Japan and knitted apparel in India and China Section C. RCAsp results C.5 Non metallic minerals RCA (2003-12) = 2,02 Brazil China India S.Korea Russia Turkey USA Japan RCAsp (2003-12) Average annual RCAsp trend (2003-12) % Average annual import trend (2003-12) % exports as a share of total Greek exports to the country (2012) % Relative EU import share for Greece (2012) % 4,01 6,43 3,90 4,72 3,36 6,16 5,29 5,18 -3,9 -5,0 -6,4 0,3 -4,5 -3,4 -0,4 0,4 17,0 17,2 25,3 6,5 20,1 12,5 1,6 3,6 2,1 17,0 0,7 0,4 1,5 3,0 8,6 0,3 3,8 8,7 1,8 2,4 1,7 5,6 4,9 1,1 Source: ITC, author’s calculations •Greece is very active in marble-cement-suphur etc exports in China, taking advantage of its comparative advantage in the market. The same occurs for the USA 21 •Still there are a lot of glowing market opportunities in all target economies to develop Section C. RCAsp results C.6 Mineral fuels RCA (2003-12) = 1,90 Brazil China India S.Korea Russia Turkey USA Japan RCAsp (2003-12) Average annual RCAsp trend (2003-12) % Average annual import trend (2003-12) % exports as a share of total Greek exports to the country (2012) % Relative EU import share for Greece (2012) % 0,83 1,14 0,43 0,50 10,18 0,70 0,82 0,50 19,2 9,4 18,1 14,6 28,6 15,7 16,0 15,0 18,9 28,2 25,1 17,4 12,4 18,4 9,9 14,1 0,4 0,8 0,0 1,0 0,0 20,3 3,3 0,0 0,0 0,2 0,2 3,9 0,0 33,1 0,2 4,9 Source: ITC, author’s calculations •Apart from Russia, Greece has no comparative advantage in the rest of the target countries. However, we export 20,3% of our mineral fuels to Turkey. 22 Section C. RCAsp results C.7 Live animals, animal products RCA (2003-12) = 1,71 Brazil China India S.Korea Russia Turkey USA Japan RCAsp (2003-12) Average annual RCAsp trend (2003-12) % Average annual import trend (2003-12) % exports as a share of total Greek exports to the country (2012) % Relative EU import share for Greece (2012) % 6,17 8,51 122,80 4,84 2,40 31,43 5,78 1,95 -2,9 0,5 4,6 3,7 -0,2 -0,4 2,0 5,7 20,0 14,8 16,2 6,7 19,0 13,1 2,8 2,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1 1,7 0,1 3,9 0,4 0,0 0,1 0,3 0,8 1,1 1,6 4,6 1,0 Source: ITC, author’s calculations •A very high RCAsp is estimated for Greek exports of fisheries in the market of India (122,80), but in 2012 Greece exports 0,0% of fisheries in this market •We are doing well in the USA, in fisheries and dairy products, having achieved a higher relative share in 23 the market, compared to the EU average. Nevertheless, there are still many opportunities hidden in the emerging markets Section C. RCAsp results C.8 Vegetables & fresh fruits RCA (2003-12) = 1,65 Brazil China India S.Korea Russia Turkey USA Japan RCAsp (2003-12) Average annual RCAsp trend (2003-12) % Average annual import trend (2003-12) % exports as a share of total Greek exports to the country (2012) % Relative EU import share for Greece (2012) % 2,01 2,60 4,48 3,28 1,43 3,48 5,04 1,93 6,4% -6,9% 4,3% -0,8% -0,4% -0,1% -5,2% 1,8% 8,2 22,6 15,2 10,2 17,9 11,5 9,3 4,8 0,0 0,1 0,1 0,1 9,6 3,4 0,6 0,1 0,0 0,5 0,7 0,5 7,4 7,3 0,6 0,1 Source: ITC, author’s calculations •Growing demand is estimated in all the target economies during the past decade •Greece has comparative advantage in all markets exporting vegetables & fresh fruits 24 •There is a higher relative EU import share for Greece in Russia and Turkey, which consist traditional markets for the Greek fresh vegetables & fruits Section C. RCAsp results C.9 Basic metals RCA (2003-12) = 1,24 Brazil China India S.Korea Russia Turkey USA Japan RCAsp (2003-12) Average annual RCAsp trend (2003-12) % Average annual import trend (2003-12) % exports as a share of total Greek exports to the country (2012) % Relative EU import share for Greece (2012) % 2,88 2,51 4,45 2,52 3,12 2,57 3,50 4,17 -4,8 -4,6 -4,1 -4,2 -1,9 -4,9 -4,4 -0,6 20,0 18,6 24,3 13,3 18,8 16,2 7,6 6,5 0,2 2,4 0,9 0,1 0,9 5,7 7,7 0,1 0,2 0,6 1,1 0,2 0,7 4,8 2,3 0,5 Source: ITC, author’s calculations •Aluminum is the product with the highest RCAsp in the sector, especially in Brazil and China •Greece is active in the US, Turkey and China, while in the rest of the markets, Greek exports have25 just started to grow Section C. RCAsp results C.10 Chemicals & Plastics RCA (2003-12) = 1,19 Brazil China India S.Korea Russia Turkey USA Japan RCAsp (2003-12) Average annual RCAsp trend (2003-12) % Average annual import trend (2003-12) % exports as a share of total Greek exports to the country (2012) % Relative EU import share for Greece (2012) % 1,10 2,09 3,02 3,27 1,22 1,31 2,37 2,99 -3,0 -1,1 -6,1 -3,4 -3,2 -2,0 -5,1 -5,9 16,5 13,2 25,6 11,1 19,1 11,5 7,1 11,3 0,1 0,4 0,1 0,1 1,5 8,1 0,8 0,1 0,0 0,1 0,1 0,0 0,6 2,1 0,1 0,1 Source: ITC, author’s calculations •As in the former sectors, there is growing demand, falling trend in the RCAsp through the decade •Greece enjoys comparative advantage in all the target economies, while the country is yet active only 26 in Turkey and Russia Section D. Discussion Opportunities for the internationalization of European SMEs (2011) European Commission Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry Figure: Co-ordination of internationalization support for SMEs 27 Section D. Discussion Overall recommendations: internationalization support at an EU level •Raising the profile of support for internationalization is required within the context established by Europe 2020. The overall policy should be practically supported and built on what already exists, at some point •To support the internationalization of Greek SMEs and achieve a sustainable export driven growth, Greek exporters need a National Moderator, from the private sector, to maximize the relevance and optimize the coordination of all national attempts for extroversion support 28 Section D. Discussion SEVE’s proposal to: -Task Force -Ministry of Development and Competitiveness -Regions of Macedonia and Thrace -Greek banks -Greek Business Associations -Greek enterprises 29 Thank you for your attention 30