Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Panel 14: The International Economy and National Economic Development Friday, April 21st (10:30-11:45am) 13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Panel 14: The International Economy and National Economic Development Dollarization and its Impact on Ecuador Ellen Bishop Dollarization and Its impact on Ecuador Facts about Ecuador • • • • Population: 13,547,510 (est. July 2006) Capital: Quito Government Type: Republic GDP (adjusted for Purchasing Power Parity): $52.77 billion (est. 2005) • GDP per capita (PPP): $3,900 • Poverty Rate: 41% (est. 2003) What Is Dollarization? • Dollarization is the most extreme form of a fixed exchange rate regime, where a country replaces their domestic currency with the currency of another country Advantages and Disadvantages to Dollarization Advantages • Dollarization can bring price stability to an economy that has high inflation by anchoring to another country’s currency • Can reestablish investor confidence investment in financial systems and give needed capital for development Disadvantages • Lose autonomous monetary policy because no longer able to print currency • May lose competitiveness depending on currency movements of the Dollar in markets • Could be unsustainable due being unable to maintain reserves Pre-Dollarization Ecuador • Growth Patterns in Ecuador have been very volatile over the past three decades due mainly to: – Economic mismanagement – High dependency on oil export revenues – Political Instability Financial Crisis in Ecuador: Primary Causes • Irresponsible fiscal and monetary management – Unsuccessful adjustment economic reforms and periods of relaxation-loss of credibility – Large increases in public expenditure in 2nd half of 1990s in public sector and debt payments – Central Bank was unable to control inflation – Liberalization of financial sector without proper supervision & control • Dependency on oil export revenues to finance government deficits – Decline in oil prices led to high government deficit • Effects from El Nino 1998-1999-destroyed many rural areas on costal region as well affecting costal employment • Political and Institution Instability – Five different presidents between 1988 and end of 1999 Precursors to Financial Crisis Financial Crisis to Dollarization • After Inflation levels had reached high levels and with the banking and financial system in ruins, (former) President Jamil Mahuad called for the currency to be dollarized, however he was thrown out of office in a military coup before the realization of his plan • His successor, Vice President Gustavo Naboa implemented Dollarization in order to realize economic stability and control inflation • After implementation, Dollarization was successful bringing inflation from over 50% in 1999 to single digits in the first part of the year (1.3% in May) Financial Crisis, Dollarization & Poverty • As a result of the financial crisis, poverty levels increased significantly all over the country, although the urban areas have been hit the hardest. As a result of the financial and banking crisis, many of the middle class saw their savings disappear to massive devaluation of the Sucre and bank runs and failures • Non-monetary poverty also decreased – Deterioration of quality of education – Deterioration of health services and increased cost for medicines and vaccines – Nutrition suffered as a result of decreased food production and income-female headed household hit the worst. Dollarization’s Impact on Poverty • Aside from stabilizing the price level in the country, Dollarization appears to have had a positive impact on reducing the relative price level of many goods • Average cost of consumer goods has fallen 16% since 2000. The majority of the decline was directly after implementation of Dollarization Dollarization’s Impact on Consumer Prices Dollarization’s Impact on Poverty • However, the relative gains of lower prices have benefited non-poor households more than poor households. The relative household basket has declined by almost 20%, while poor household basket has only declined by 2%. • The majority of this difference can be accounted for by decline in the price of durable goods, as non-poor households consume more than non-poor households What are medium to long term effects of Dollarization? • Although the short term effect of Dollarization appear positive, the long term effects of Dollarization are not yet clear, as Ecuador remains susceptible to external shocks, which could have an extremely negative impact as the government has limited policy options to exercise under Dollarization, which could make the situation unsustainable, as was the case in Argentina • The competitiveness of Ecuadorian products remains unpredictable as movements are tied to the US Dollar’s movement. If the currency appreciates, Ecuador must rely more on productivity in order to increase growth and reduce poverty throughout the country. Conclusions • The financial crisis in Ecuador was caused by primarily by fiscal and economic mismanagement, political instability and falling oil prices, which adversely affected government revenues and El Nino • The financial crisis affected all areas in the country, however the urban areas were the hardest hit, where many lost their life savings through the banking and financial crisis • Dollarization in the short term has proved to be positive for the country by restoring price stability and reducing the cost of the average consumption basket • The relative decline in prices has mostly benefited non-poor households as a result of the large decline in the cost of durable goods • The medium to long term effects of Dollarization appear less certain since the country remains susceptible to external shocks which may make the regime unsustainable 13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Panel 14: The International Economy and National Economic Development Foreign Direct Investment in Macedonia Slavica Taseva Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Macedonia Slavica Taseva Spring Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs April 21, 2006 Content: Macedonia – country facts Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – theory and practice FDI in Macedonia – policy status and recommendations Macedonia – country facts 25,713 sq km 2.1 mil people GDP per capita 6,800 (PPP US$) Landlocked Transition country Independence Sep 8, 1991 EU candidate country FDI – theory and practice Via Transnational corporations (TNCs) Types: - Resource-seeking - Market-seeking - Efficiency-seeking Growing in volume worldwide FDI – theory and practice Motives: TNCs – maximize profit and competitiveness Host countries – spur development TNCs provide: - Capital - Technology - Skills and management - Market access Host countries provide: - Skills - Infrastructure - Services - Supply networks - Institutions Adapted from Lall, Sanjaya. (2002) Host country policies on FDI Goal: attract high volume and quality FDI Policies: - Reduce transaction costs (one-stop-shop for investors) - Investment promotion (image building and investor targeting) - Provide skilled and productive labor, services and infrastructure (not relying on incentives and cheap labor) Adapted from Lall, Sanjaya. (2002) Current FDI policies in Macedonia Investment promotion agency established at the beginning of 2005 One-stop-shop for registering businesses established at the beginning of 2006 Integration in European market (free trade agreements) FDI incentives Recommended future FDI policies Create industrial strategy Target sources of FDI (countries, industries, corporations) Develop infrastructure Establish industrial parks Align educational system with the needs of targeted investors for skilled labor Enhance capacity of government institutions and judiciary 13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Panel 14: The International Economy and National Economic Development Economic Growth in China Jessica Elmassian Economic Development in China By: Jessica Elmassian Historical Perspective Silk Road World Imperialism Cultural Attributes Role of Government Human Capital Ideology + Economic Policy= Disaster Technological Improvement & Structural Change Economic Reform and Open door policy Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Chinese Communist Party Central Committee in December 1978, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) The Third Plenum of the Fourteenth Party Congress in 1993 enacted the “Decision on Issues Concerning the Establishment of a Socialist Market Economic Structure,” which stated the Government’s plan to transform China into a “socialist market economy.” Trade as a Growth Engine Between 1978 and 1996 China’s GDP grew at nearly 10% a year Trade, including exports and imports, expanded 17% a year China’s GDP has quadrupled since 1978. In 2005 GDP growth was estimated at 9.3% and reached $1.833 trillion. Measured on PPP basis, in 2005, China was the second-largest economy in the world after the U.S. In 2005, China was the world’s tenth largest exporter Exports reaching $752.2 billion and imports totaling $631.8 billion. Trade in goods and services increased 61%between 1994 and 1995; and trade in goods increased 79% Capital Accumulation – FDI Between 1985-1996, FDI in China increased at 36% a year China is currently the second largest recipient of FDI, after the United States. In 2004, China’s contracted FDI reached $153.5 billion. In 2004 44.2% of total GDP came from gross fixed investment Trade Agreements Increase in Regional Trade Agreements 0 in 1948 and was up to 181 in 2002. The WTO Deals with the rules of trade between nations, and plays vital role in the negotiations and signings of international trade agreements. Consists of 149, and China became a member in 2001. Pros: It liberalized trading barriers, strengthened intellectual property laws, by demanding full implementation of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), lowered import barriers, reduced industrial tariffs from 25perent in 1997 to 8.9 percent in 2005; cut agricultural tariffs from 31 percent to 14 percent in 2005; opened up the market to direct sales and distribution; and no longer required production in China as a requisite to sell there. Cons: SOEs can’t compete; an abundance of labor; no more iron rice bowl Fragile Financial System Monetary Policy & Exchange Rate Banking System Non-performing loans (SOEs) Securities Market Growth Sustainability Exports of goods & services 2004: RMB 2,595.7 billion 2005: RMB 3,126.6 billion, 2006: RMB 3,596.1 billion (forecast by EIU) Imports of goods and services 2004: RMB -2,723.6 2005: RMB -3,115.0 2006: -3,621 (forecast by EIU) In 2005, exports added to GDP growth in the beginning half of the year, but in the last half, import growth undermined the effect of exports while investment and retail spending provided for continued growth. Since imports will increase and export growth will lessen, overall GDP growth is expect to slow in 2006. China reported a more than threefold increase in its trade surplus in 2005. China’s trade surplus in 2005 was US$102 billion. Customs data indicate export growth has actually slowed down since the middle of last year, while import growth has increased. Policy Considerations Balance of growth and distribution Rural and urban disparities Strengthening financial sector Expanding legal institutions (IPR) 13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Panel 14: The International Economy and National Economic Development Developing Stable and Secure Neighbors: EU Economic Foreign Policy in Mediterranean Dawn M. Hunter Developing Stable and Secure Neighbors The European Union’s Economic Foreign Policy in the Mediterranean The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership Understand the underlying rationale and imperatives in drawing up the EuroMediterranean Partnership by analyzing the main factors driving the Euro-Mediterranean relationship Analyze how the instruments created through the Barcelona Process have impacted Mediterranean politics, security, economics and culture through tools such as: Human Development Index Foreign Direct Investment Official Development Assistance European Imperatives in the Region Democracy Peace and Security Commercial Interests Political and Security Partnership Seeks to establish a common area of peace and stability through: Political dialogue at bilateral and regional level Partnership-building measures Charter for Peace and Stability Poverty Literacy Education Life Expectancy Comparison of HDI in Mediterranean Countries 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2002 High Human Development 22. Israel 0.794 0.818 0.839 0.857 0.880 0.907 0.908 30. Cyprus .. 0.791 0.812 0.835 0.855 0.880 0.883 31. Malta 0.726 0.763 0.789 0.824 0.850 0.873 0.875 Medium Human Development 80. Lebanon .. .. .. 0.673 0.732 0.752 0.758 88. Turkey 0.590 0.614 0.651 0.683 0.713 .. 0.751 90. Jordan .. 0.639 0.663 0.682 0.707 0.741 0.750 92. Tunisia 0.516 0.574 0.623 0.656 0.696 0.734 0.745 102. Palestinian Authority .. .. .. .. .. .. 0.726 106. Syria 0.534 0.576 0.611 0.635 0.663 0.683 0.710 108. Algeria 0.504 0.554 0.603 0.642 0.664 0.693 0.704 120. Egypt 0.438 0.487 0.539 0.577 0.608 .. 0.653 125. Morocco 0.429 0.474 0.510 0.542 0.571 0.603 0.620 Economic and Financial Partnership Seeks to transform the Mediterranean into a zone of peace and stability through improving the socioeconomic situation of each of the countries involved through: conduct a dialogue on the alignment of sectoral economic policies to foster cooperation between non-governmental entities such as chambers of commerce, economic institutes and trade promotion bodies to carry out regional projects which usefully complement bilateral measures OFA and FDI in MEDA Participant Countries 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 1643 1575 1989 2458 2085 2364 1799 575 3697 4005 1146 2816 Official Development Aid Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia 1665 1972 1870 Foreign Direct Investment Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia 382 638 960 Social, Cultural and Human Partnership The aim of the third basket is to bring people on both sides of the Mediterranean basin closer to promote better mutual understanding to improve their perception of each other. Overall, the goal is to create a framework whereby the Mediterranean can follow a similar path as Europe, “an area in which a number of fundamental treaties such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Convention on Chemical Weapons, and the Convention on Biological Weapons, are part of the shared heritage of all the coastal states.” Developing Stable and Secure Neighbors “As one looks at the future of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership, surely the incentives for inclusion vice exclusion, mutual involvement rather than mutual disregard, seem more compelling now than ever.” 13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Panel 14: The International Economy and National Economic Development Friday, April 21st (10:30-11:45am) Ellen Bishop Dollarization and its Impact on Ecuador Slavica Taseva Foreign Direct Investment in Macedonia Jessica Elmassian Economic Growth in China Dawn M. Hunter Developing Stable and Secure Neighbors: EU Economic Foreign Policy in the Mediterranean