Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Fiscal Policy, Budget Deficits and Government Debt Week 9 SF Intermediate Economics Professor Dermot McAleese OUTLINE Counter-cyclical fiscal policy “Crowding-out” The limits of fiscal activism Public debt + “ageing” of population COUNTER-CYCLICAL FISCAL POLICY The Keynesian aggregate supply curve and fiscal policy Price level KAS E 1 E2 E* AD1 AD AD2 Y2 Y* Output CROWDING OUT Crowding out refers to the various ways by which changes in public spending impact negatively on private sector spending. (+)G (+) Budget Deficit borrowing (+) r (-) I, (-) C BD matched by (+) LM offsets crowding out effect r LM IS’ IS Y RICARDIAN EQUIVALENCE (-) T today (+) Budget Deficit today (+) Govt borrowing (+) T tomorrow (-) C today The stimulus to AD by budget deficit will be offset by a rise in private sector saving Financing by borrowing = increase in taxation Rational expectations FISCAL ACTIVISM: THE LIMITS Knowledge gaps and time lags Political interference Inefficiencies of the public sector Deterrent effects of public debt overhang Private sector response Empirical experience The Debt Penalty - Limits to Public Borrowing Public debt is sustainable when it remains constant proportion of GDP over time (see formula in Appendix) Effect on financial markets’ expectations: inflation to erode real value of fixed interest debt debt default, rescheduling or moratorium on interest payments New measures of indebtedness (public debt adjusted for net pensions liabilities) Openness of the financial markets fiscal conservatism Further reinforced by ageing EMPIRICAL EXPERIENCE Fiscal policy often pro-cyclical instead of counter-cyclical Private sector response not always positive Extreme Cases expansionary fiscal contraction (Ireland?) extreme incipient indebtedness (Japan) surplus for an ageing population (Norway) CONCLUSION Coarse-tuning instead of fine-tuning Effectiveness of fiscal policy depends on: initial position (public debt, size of public sector) political institutions (credibility) Table. 1 Industrial countries: fiscal balances (% GDP) 1990 1993 1996 2000 -3.6 -6.5 -4.5 -0.6 2.9 -2.5 -3.3 -1.6 -10.9 -1.2 -4.1 -1.4 -3.4 -3.3 -6.1 -9.6 -7.8 -7.3 -3.9 -1.3 -4.0 -4.0 -6.7 -4.4 -2.4 -8.4 1.0 -0.7 -1.5 -1.5 0.2 2.3 Spain -3.9 -7.5 -4.7 -0.8 Netherlands -5.1 -3.3 -3.1 0.8 Belgium Sweden -5.4 4.2 -6.6 -13.4 -3.2 -5.0 -0.5 2.0 Austria Denmark -2.2 -1.5 -4.1 -4.5 -4.5 -1.3 -1.7 2.0 5.3 -14.0 -8.0 -12.1 -2.9 -7.6 4.6 -1.5 Portugal Ireland Switz erland -5.4 -2.5 -2.1 -7.0 -2.7 -4.3 -4.0 -2.4 -2.7 -1.8 3.2 -1.2 Norway 4.2 -1.4 3.8 7.3 Iceland -3.3 -4.5 -2.4 0.8 Australia 0.4 -3.9 -0.1 0.3 New Zealand -2.3 -0.7 3.6 0.3 European Union Japan USA Germany France Italy UK Canada Finland Greece Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook (May 1996 and May 2000) Table. 1a Industrial countries: fiscal balances (% GDP) 1990 1993 1996 2000 European Union -3.6 -6.5 -4.5 -0.6 Japan USA 2.9 -2.5 -1.4 -3.4 -3.9 -1.3 -8.4 1.0 Italy -10.9 -9.6 -6.7 -1.5 Netherlands Greece Ireland -5.1 -14.0 -2.5 -3.3 -12.1 -2.7 -3.1 -7.6 -2.4 0.8 -1.5 3.2 4.2 -1.4 3.8 7.3 Norway Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook (May 1996 and May 2000) Table. 2 Fiscal policy stance, 1999-2000 1990 2000 Change 2.9 1.2 1.7 -8.4 -1.8 -6.6 -11.3 -3.0 -8.3 -3.6 -0.6 0.3 1.6 -0.4 -2.0 -5.2 -0.2 5.0 -2.7 1.0 3.7 1.1 0.5 -0.6 -3.8 0.5 4.3 Japan Total of which: Cyclical Structural European Union Total of which: Cyclical Structural United States Total of which: Cyclical Structural Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook (May 1996 and May 2000) Table. 3 Government spending (%GDP) Pre-WWII (about 1937) 1960 1970 1984 1990 2000 EUR 29.0 32.2 37.4 50.0 48.1 44.0 Japan US 25.4 8.6 17.1 27.0 19.4 31.6 32.9 35.6 32.3 36.8 31.8 33.4 France 29.0 34.6 38.9 52.5 50.6 47.7 Germany Netherlands Ireland Italy 42.4 19.0 … 24.5 32.5 33.7 28.0 30.1 38.5 42.4 39.6 34.2 47.6 59.6 51.3 49.4 45.3 55.0 40.0 53.2 44.0 42.1 29.5 44.2 UK 30.0 32.2 37.3 45.3 40.3 36.8 Source: European Economy, Annual Report No 59, 1995; European Economy, special Supplement, Spring 1995; OECD; pre-Second World War figures taken from Vito Tanzi and Ludger Schuknecht, ‘The Growth of Government and the Reform of the State in Industrial Countries’, IMF Working Paper, December 1995; European Economy No. 68, 1999. Table. 4 General government net debt (%GDP) 1978 1990 1995 2000 EU(15) 23.9 40.8 75.2 68.5 Japan US 11.3 21.3 9.5 31.5 76.2 74.5 112.8 60.2 Belgium Italy 57.2 62.4 124.9 103.7 129.8 123.1 109.8 112.9 Greece 29.4 89.0 108.7 103.8 Netherlands 40.2 75.6 75.5 56.5 Denmark 21.9 65.8 73.9 50.8 Portugal Germany France 37.6 30.1 31.0 65.3 42.0 39.5 65.9 59.1 59.3 58.8 63.5 63.9 Spain 14.4 48.5 68.4 65.7 UK 58.6 39.1 58.9 49.7 Ireland 65.7 92.6 80.8 42.9 Source: European Monetary Institute, First Annual Report, April 1995; OECD Economic Outlook,, various issues. Table. 5 Elderly dependency ratios 1960 2000 2050 US 9.2 12.4 21.2 Japan 6.1 16.5 30.4 EC15 10.6 16.1 27.6 Source: Eurostat Table. 6 Public sector debt and net public pensions liabilities, 1990 (% GDP) Public debt Net pensions liabilities Extended public debt US 56 43 99 Japan 70 200 270 Germany 44 160 204 France 47 216 263 Italy 101 233 334 UK 35 100 135 Source: Van Noord and Herd (1994)