Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
UN ECLAC’s methodology on disaster impact assessment An area of inter-regional cooperation that has sparked interested in countries, regional and international institutions. Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 1 ECLAC’s substantive actions Update the methodology for socioeconomic and environmental damage assessment, publishing an expanded handbook that includes new cross-cutting analyses such as environmental impact and the gender perspective. Extend the analytical capacity to prospective analysis and the cumulative implications of disasters on growth path and development. Use mathematical and econometric models, develop scenarios on the projected impact of damage Keep a proactive advocacy for disaster reduction and mitigation, focusing on decision makers in the economic and financial sectors as well as the private sector Maintain technical assistance to governments both • in terms of damage appraisal after disasters, when required, and • training in the use of the methodology Maintain and encourage interagency, inter-institutional, multidisciplinary and inter-regional cooperation and joint actions with relevant organizations both within the United Nations system and at the regional and subregional level Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 2 Basic premise and ECLAC’s vision and mission: Economic valuation reduces vulnerability The vision • Development is a systemic process, integrated and global, based on some structural pillars: 1. Competitiveness (in a globalized environment) • Equitable (in terms of opportunities and access as a means to reduce poverty) • Governance (in terms of addressing economic, social and political exclusions) • Sustainable and sound (in terms of global change, environmental responsible management, preserving inter-temporal equilibriums and a smooth growth path) • Resilience (in terms of addressing vulnerabilities both to external shocks, natural events and increasing the community’s (stakeholders) response) Ricardo Zapata The Mission Follow-up and analyze economic, social and environmental as well as political development processes in the LAC region Provide assistance to governments in formulating development policies Contribute to the debate on development processes and models in the region Promote exchange of experiences (lessons learned, good practices, etc.) by comparative and monographic studies Promote dialogue within the region and with other development countries on development issues ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 3 General considerations Formalize the systemic nature of the concepts of risk, vulnerability and mitigation Given the recurrence of disasters promote proactive policies that establish the difference between disaster and risk management. Promote the use of disaster valuation as a tool for reconstruction, mitigation and the use of planning as a cross-cutting tool for a more resilient development process. Given the usefulness of historical records both in terms of probability of recurrence and damages incurred and expected, promote studies to expand these. Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 4 Sensibility Response Capability Ricardo Zapata Probability of occurrence Type Magnitude Intensity Speed and velocity Persistence Recurrence ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 5 Vicious circle: Man, Environment, Disasters Human actions progressively deteriorate the environment Natural phenomena affect the environment (positively / negatively) Impact of disasters tends to increase Ricardo Zapata NATURAL PHENOMENA HUMAN ACTIONS ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop ENVIRONMENT 6 Or the link between disasters, poverty and development RESOURCE Policy strategies DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT Risk Assessment Poverty reduction Millennium Development Goals Economic assessment IMF commitments Macroeconomic equilibria MOBILIZATION National planning Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 7 The images we see The figures we determine Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 8 The importance of scientific research and information Have reliable information on the type of event Build prediction scenarios Know the evolution of successive, cumulative events Allow early warning, prevention, mitigation and reduction Make information available and understandable by affected or exposed population Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 9 TYPE OF HAZARDS IN DEVELOPING LATIN AMERICA: VOLCANIC , SISMIC STORMS AND HURRICANES Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 10 The importance of economic assessment of damage and needs Have a record on damage caused by past events Establish link between level of damage and magnitude or strength of a certain category of event Value losses to quantify needs for rehabilitation and reconstruction Put in evidence the benefits of mitigation and reduction Make information available to potentially affected or exposed communities (stakeholders) Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 11 Dynamic global effects Macroeconomic effects Repercussions on the economic performance of national or regional economy affected by the disaster May persist for a number of years after the disaster, depending on the characeristics and magnitude Is reflected in • • • • Ricardo Zapata Gross Domestic Product growth Performance of the external sector Evolution of public finance Increases of prices and inflation ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 12 Relative importance of magnitude Total damage as % of GDP Hurricane Mitch, Central America 15 13.2 10 1.4 5 3.3 3.6 El Niño, Andean region, 1997/1998 0.4 Venezuela Floods, 1999, Mexico City Earthquake, 1985 Hurricane Andrew 0 Daño total versus PIB Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 13 Eastern Caribbean: GDP at factor costs 4 3.8 3.5 Annual Percentage Change 3 3.1 3 2.7 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.7 0.5 0 1994 Source: Statistical Offices, OECS and ECCB Ricardo Zapata 1995 1996 Year ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 1997 1998 14 GDP GROWTH RATE 7 6 5 4 % 3 2 1 0 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -2 -3 Before the disaster Ricardo Zapata After the disaster ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 15 EL SALVADOR: POSSIBLE RECONSTRUCTION SCENARIOS, 2001-2003 6.0 5.0 5.0 GDP growth rates 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.1 3.2 3.5 3.4 3.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 scenario 2.0 probable 1.0 scenario 0.0 1999 Ricardo Zapata 2000 2001 ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 2002 2003 16 Some figures on the impact of disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean Deaths (1972-2003) Directly affected population (primary) (thousands) Total affected population (‘000) Total Damage (millions of dollars) 110,000 0.02% a/ 15,000 2.68% a/ 160,000 28.57% a/ 65,000 Yearly average amount (millions of dollars) 2,300 As percentage of exports of goods and services 0.55% As percentage of foreign direct investment 7.92% Source: ECLAC a/ as percentage of total Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 17 Impact of major recent disasters PERIOD TOTAL DAMAGE (millions of dollars de 2000) TOTAL 1998-1999 2000-2001 2002-2003 TOTAL Ricardo Zapata 31,845 3,614 1,529 36,988 DIRECT 14,922 2,210 864 17,996 ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop INDIRECT 16,923 1,478 665 19,067 Effects External sector 8,677 866 366 9,909 18 Algunas cifras sobre el impacto en el Caribe Disaster Impact on the Relative economy (as Relative damage to Relative damage to damage to percentage of GDP) total f iscal income total public debt total exports Earthquake in Antigua and Barbuda (8 October 1974) Hurricanes Davi8d and Federico, Dominican Republic (August September 1979) Hurricane David in Dominica (August 1979) Huricane Luis in Anguilla (1995) 2.3 56.6 72.0 13.2 16.0 296.5 94.0 115.4 1020.5 75.5 120.0 705.9 Hurricanes Luis and Marilyn in Sint Maarten (Septemver 1995) 223.7 1672.7 Hurricane Georges in Saint Kitts and Nevis (September 1998) 193.3 Hurricane Georges in Dominican Republic (September 1998) 14.0 Hurricane Lenny in Anguilla (November 1999) 146.2 Hurricane Keith in Belize (November 1999) 45.7 Hurricane Iris in Belize (October 2001) 38.5 Hurricane Michelle in Jamaica (October 2001) 8.0 Floods in Jamaica (May-June 2002) 0.7 Average 89.9 Source: ECLAC estimates on the basis of evaluations made at the request of Governments Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 691.2 94.7 62.0 1819.4 43.7 669.8 78.8 65.0 201.1 4.0 339.0 2.8 522.0 19 Source: Overview of Hydro-meteorological Disasters in Asia, Ti Le-Huu, Water Resources Section, Environment and Sustainable Development Division, UNESCAP Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 20 Disasters' impact in Asia China Bangladesh Cambodia As percentage of GDP (yearly average) 3 to 6% persons affected (yearly average) 25 to 50 million 30 million .5 to 1 million 5 to 10% .5 million Indonesia Laos Philippines Pakistan Vietnam Average for the region (ECLAC estimate) 10 to 15% 80 to 100 million Source: National papers presented at ESCAP Regional Workshop, May 2004 Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop Major type of dysaster Floods, earthquakes and fires Floods and drought Floods Floods, typhoons, drought and fires Floods, landslides, river bank erosion, drought and fires Typhoons, floods and landsildes Floods and drought Floods, typhoons and storm surges (flash floods) Floods, typhoons, landslides, drought and fires 21 Break disaster’s vicious cycle Adaptado de Mora, “El impacto de los desastres, aspectos sociales, polítifcos económicos, ambientales y su relación con el desarrollo de nuestros países (BID, 1999) Level of damage is reduced (lower vulnerability) Improvisation is avoided NEW DISASTER * Tragic experience is not forgotten to keep mitigation effort as ongoing Ricardo Zapata Planning focuses on vulnerability reduction ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop Postdisaster phase Stabilization recuperation Experience is recorded and valued (lessons learned) 22 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF CONFLICT AND RESUMING THE PATH OF DEVELOPMENT Conflict Prevention and Reconstruction SECURITY (Reduced Vulnerability) * SOCIAL STABILITY GOOD GOVERNANCE ECONOMIC RECOVERY Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 23 Source: Overview of Hydro-meteorological Disasters in Asia, Ti Le-Huu, Water Resources Section, Environment and Sustainable Development Division, UNESCAP Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 24 Source: Overview of Hydro-meteorological Disasters in Asia, Ti Le-Huu, Water Resources Section, Environment and Sustainable Development Division, UNESCAP Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 25 Exposure to risk and level of development: UNDP’s Disaster Risk Index Source: United Nations Development Programme, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, presentation at ESCAP Regional Workshop, May 2004 Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 26 WHAT IS THE ECLAC METHODOLOGY A tool for the socio-economic and environmental assessment of disasters Multi-sectoral and multidisciplinary damage evaluation and quantification method for disaster affected sectors Standard sectoral procedures that allows comparability of results Instrument for the decision making process and for policy formulation as it identifies more severely affected sectors, geographical areas and vulnerable groups Conceptual improvement for measuring aspects not included in national accounting and assessing specific vulnerability (of social groups, such as women and the environment) Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 27 Some things are easier to measure than others IT IS DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE • The value of lives lost or affected • The opportunity cost, cost-benefit or investment / profitability. This is associated with the lack of adequate base lines that assess the level, quality and efficiency / efficacy of health services provided • The value and quality of services provided (both curative and preventive) • The duration of the transition / emergency phase (when field hospitals and evacuation processes are operational) IT IS EASIER TO DETERMINE • The amount of investment required for reinforcement vs. The potential losses in equipment and inventories • The cost of reinforcement as compared to the reposition cost of affected infrastructure • The alternative cost of providing services when infrastructures collapse Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 28 WHAT IT DOES: Allows projecting future performance of the affected economy in the short and medium term, and implement the necessary corrective economic policy measures Allows to determine the State’s capacity to face reconstruction tasks and determine needs for cooperation and international financing Facilitates training in damage valuation and formulation of mitigation strategies Involves affected population with relevant authorities and aid providers Puts in evidence the systemic character of the development process and the interaction among sectors and stakeholders Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 29 Main Concepts Direct damages Impact on assets Indirect Damages • Infrastructure • Capital • Stocks Occur immediately during or after the phenomenon that caused the disaster Ricardo Zapata Effects on flows • Production • Reduced income and increased expenses Are perceived after the phenomenon, for a time-period that can last from weeks to months, till recuperation occurs ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 30 Measuring the damage “delta” or damage gap Pre-existing conditions (ex ante) The measure Of direct and indirect damages Upon the pre-existing situation (sector by sector baselines) is aggregated into the national accounts and determines the resulting disastercaused scenario, as the gap over the expected performance prior to the event. Several scenarios may be outlined, based on the assumptions made for the Expected Disaster impact reconstruction process performance (without (ex post) Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop disaster) 3-5 years 3-5 years 31 SECTOR BY SECTOR VALUATION METHODOLOGY Social Sectors • Housing • Health • Education, culture, sports Infrastructure • Transport and communications • Energy • Water and sewerage Ricardo Zapata Productive sectors • Goods: agriculture, industry • Services: commerce, tourism, etc. Global impact • On the environment • Gender perspective • Employment and social conditions • Macroeconomic assessment 32 ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop Summary table SECTOR DIRECT Physical PRODUCTIVE SECTORS Agriculture (includes cattle raising, fisheries and forestry) Industry Commerce Services - Financial and banking - Tourism - Personal and other INFRASTRUCTURE Water (drinking, irrigation, drainage, sanitation and sewerage) Energy (generation, transmission, distribution) - Electricity - Other (petroleum, gas, etc.) Transport and communications SOCIAL ASPECTS Education Health Housing Cultural heritage Social fabric ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS TOTAL GOVERNMENT SECTOR IMPLICATIONS Zapata - Ricardo Revenues - Expenditures INDIRECT PUBLIC PRIVATE TOTAL EXTERNAL IMPACT Monetary estimate ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 33 Summary of global impact Ex-ante situation (current III. MACRO / GLOBAL IMPACT (current value) period) Ex-post situation Short/medium (present term projections period) (scenarios) Scenario 1 (Below trend) 1. GDP External Balance (A+B) - Exports - Imports A - TRADE BALANCE B - CURRENT AND CAPITAL ACCOUNT BALANCE - Net loans (considering service and repayment) - Net donations - Net transfers (private) - Other net incoming resources (insurance and reinsurance payments) 2. FISCAL BALANCE - Revenues - Expenditures 3. CAPITAL ACCOUNT - Gross capital formation - domestic investment Ricardo Zapata - foreign direct investment ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop Scenario 2 (Average or Scenario 3 trend) ("Optimistic") 34 ORGANIZATION OR PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF ASSESSMENT EXERCISES Composition of team: multisectoral, interdisciplinary, interinstitutional Timeliness: within the “window of opportunity”, not interfering with emergency actions Ensure full coverage and avoid duplication The need for “judgment calls” or the educated guessing of experts Difference between emergency needs and rapid assessment of need for reconstruction Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 35 ECLAC’s additional tools Through the use of REDATAM (a software developed to geo-reference information of household surveys) it has been possible to visualize the changing map of poverty and welfare reduction caused by disasters (as exemplified in the El Salvador earthquakes of 2002) Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 36 Geographical distribution of damages: Geo-referencing and impact on poverty and welfare levels in the case of El Salvador, both quakes (millions of dollars) Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 37 ECLAC’s current activities in the field of an interregional nature IDB-ECLAC project on disaster indicators and national studies: In this two part project ECLAC is executing a component that, through a modified, dynamic version of the methodology will look at the cumulative impact of disasters in selected countries World Bank/Disaster Management Facility (DMF)-ECLAC work programmes first allowed the publication in English and Spanish of the methodology and the presentation of it beyond Latin America and the Caribbean by participating and / or organizing workshops at the World Bank Headquarters (two since 2001) and with the Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC) in Bangkok (2001) with a regional nature and Manila (2004) at the national level with the civil defense authority. World Bank Institute (WBI)-ECLAC collaboration in WBI regional courses by introducing in urban planning and development the disaster valuation module (in Panama, 2003, and Guatemala, 2004). Currently completed such module for a distance learning course that will be launched in a training for trainers seminar at the world level (Moscow, June 2004) Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 38 In other regions ECLAC-ADPC, through a memorandum of understanding in the process of being signed, support ADPC’s activities in adapting the ECLAC methodology to Asian countries. Currently providing technical expertise to a project in Gujarat, India ECLAC-ESCAP, at the invitation and with the funding of ESCAP/UNDP (Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Reduction, BCPR) participated in a Regional Workshop on Methodologies of Assessment and their Application for Poverty Eradication and Economic Development (Bangkok, 18 - 20 May 2004) ECLAC-ISDR, ongoing collaboration with the secretariat both at the regional level with its Latin American and Caribbean office in Costa Rica and headquarters in Geneva, which allowed in the past the translation to French of the methodology, and now preparing collaboration for the participation in the 2nd. World Conference on Disaster Reduction (to be held in Kobe, Japan, January 2005) Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 39 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Lessons from past events and changing conditions associated with climate variability and change Move from “forensic” appraisal of disasters as done for over 30 years to “preventive medicine” where valuation is a tool for disaster reduction Improvement and expansion of methodology in social and environmental aspects Combine the existing methodology of ECLAC with econometric modeling and prospective analysis and forecasting Train national local authorities to gather relevant baseline data and government officials in the economic planning and financial ministries Promote mitigation policies and risk management beyond response to prevention Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 40 The images we do not want to see Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 41 Where do we want to be in the future? (in the medium and long term) Changed emphasis from relief and damage valuation after the event to use of risk management instruments and cooperation for disaster reduction Have increasingly in place policies that include: • Economic instruments (from the public sector) • Financial products (public and private, including such as Cat Bonds, etc.) • Public and private assessment of risk and auditing of risk management strategies, including questions of accountability and liability Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 42 Concrete proposals for the short term ECLAC – ESCAP cooperation in methodological development and adaptation Joint project to be undertaken with the support and cooperation of Asian countries and UNDP (BCPR) Contribute to the development of UNDP’s Disaster Risk Index, which is based on lives lost and requires increase weight of socioeconomic impact Participation in the 2nd. Conference on Disaster Reduction (Kobe, January 2005) Partnership with ISDR Secretariat Partnership with the World Bank and the Provention Consortium Explore possibilities for cooperation activities with ECA and the other regional commissions for example in the valuation of droughts and watershed management (as part of the Water Decade) Expand the analysis of the linkage and systemic relation between disasters, poverty and the achievement of the MDGs Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 43 Thank you www.eclac.cl www.eclac.cl/mexico Ricardo Zapata ECLAC / ESCAP Workshop 44