Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chapter 13: Government Spending, Taxing, and National Debt Size of Government Government expenditures as a percentage of GDP have grown from 23% in 1960 to % in 199 Expenditures of Federal government have risen from 17% to % of the GDP between 1960 and 199 Components of Government Expenditures Government purchases of goods and services have remained stable at about 20% of the GDP in 1960-97 Transfer payments have grown from 6% to 1% of the GDP over this period Taxes Tax revenues as a percentage of the GDP increased from 26% in 1960 to 30% in 1999 Federal tax receipts rose from 18% to 20% of the GDP over this period Role of Government: Public Goods Non-rival in consumption: use by one person will not require loss of consumption by another person Non-exclusive: no one can be excluded from consumption once it is produced Free-rider problem: everyone uses regardless of tax payments Role of Government: Externalities Benefits and costs of one’s consumption and production to third parties Positive externalities require government subsidies (college education) Negative externalities require government taxes or regulations (pollution) Positive Externalities: MSB>MPB Price MPC=MSC B P’ P A MSB MPB Q Q’ Quantity Negative Externalities: MSC>MPC Price MSC MPC B P’ P A MSB=MPB Q’ Q Quantity Role of Government: Income Distribution Progressive taxation and transfer payments to bridge income gap between the rich & poor Horizontal equity: people with equal income pay equal amount of tax regardless the source of income Vertical equity: people with higher income pay larger taxes Incidence of Tax: Inelastic Demand Price D S’ P2 S Tax P1 Tax is paid by consumer: Forward shifting S’ S D Q1 Quantity Incidence of Tax: Elastic Demand Price S’ S P D D Tax P1 Tax paid by producer: Backward shifting S’ S Q1 Q Quantity Comparative Data U.S. tax share of the GDP is 31.5% It is the smallest among industrial nations The highest share belongs to Denmark, 60% Composition of Tax Receipts: 1950-2000 Individual income tax share rose from 39.9 to 47.8% Corporate income tax share fell from 26.5 to 10% Social security tax share rose from 11 to 33.8% Excise tax share fell from 19.1 to 3.7% Effective Federal Income Tax Rates, 1996 Income bracket, $ Tax rate, % Less than 10,000 8.0 10,000 – 20,000 8.8 20,000 – 30,000 13.3 30,000 – 50,000 17.5 50,000 – 70,000 19.5 70,000 – 100,000 21.1 100,000 – 200,000 22.0 More than 200,000 23.7 Federal Budget Account ($ billions) Year Receipts Spending Balance 1993 1,154 1,409 -255 1994 1,259 1,462 -201 1995 1,352 1,516 -114 1996 1,453 1,561 -108 1997 1,579 1,601 -22 1998 1,658 1,668 -10 1999 1,743 1,802 +69 Public Debt Government borrows money from investors through the issuance and sale of government securities or bonds Investors hold the bonds for a certain time period to make interest income Government Securities Non-marketable securities – U.S. Savings Bonds & Notes: redeemable in cash for the face value after maturity Marketable securities – Treasury bills (< 1 year; low interest rate) – Treasury notes (1-5 years) – Treasury bonds (> 5 years, high interest rate) National Debt Government borrowing to cover budget deficit Debt id owed to – – – – – Private investors Banks and financial institutions Insurance companies State & local governments Foreign governments and private investors Budget & Debt Year Budget Surplus National Debt Debt Repayment 1998 69 5,479 51 1999* 79 5,615 50 2000* 117 5,712 98 2001* 134 5,781 117 2002* 187 5,818 170 In $ billions * Estimates Economic Effects of Federal Debt Primary burden: opportunity cost of servicing the debt in terms of reduced public investment Inflationary effect: higher interest rates and prices Economic Effects of Federal Debt Income distribution effect: income transfer from government to high income investors Output effect: higher taxes and opportunity cost of productive investment