Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Macroeconomic Impacts of EU Climate Policy in 2008-2012 AIECE November 5, 2008 Olavi Rantala - Paavo Suni The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy ETLA 1 Macroeconomic baseline scenario Financial crisis dampens strongly world economic growth in 2008-2012 - United States falls into recession, Japanese growth is slow - Developing countries, esp. China hit hard, but continue growing relatively rapidly - Commodity producers’ surpluses diminish, which lags their investments EU countries face a severe slowdown - Many EU countries going into recession as EU as a whole Growth getting stronger in the course of 2010, but slowly - Previous 5-year period was especially strong After the current turmoil growth rates recover back to potential but below the recent record strong growth 2 World economic growth by region, % Share of total, % 2005 2002 2007 2007* 2008f 2009f World 100.0 4.6 4.5 3.3 2.4 3.4 Asia 29.0 9.6 3.7 2.9 24.4 22.4 8.2 23.5 5.7 China Middle East Africa North America United States Latin America EU (baseline scenario) 2009 – 2012f 7.6 7.5 6.1 5.4 11.0 11.9 10.0 9.0 8.6 5.9 5.8 2.8 5.9 6.3 1.8 6.2 5.5 1.3 5.5 5.5 0.0 5.6 5.8 1.5 2.8 1.7 1.3 -0.1 1.4 5.1 2.7 5.6 2.9 4.5 1.4 3.0 0.4 3.8 1.7 3 World economic growth 2002-2012 2002-2007 2008f 2009f 2009-2012f 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 % 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 World Asia China Middle East Africa Norh America United States Latin America EU (baseline scenario) 4 Primary energy prices Energy prices have peaked in 2008 at record levels - Oil: peaked at close to 150 USD/b, by mid-October below 70 USD/b - Coal: fiscal year prices doubled in case of steam oil - Gas: prices follow oil and oil product price decline with a lag In the longer term, the availability of energy is one of the key risks for global growth 5 World market prices of oil and coal and gas price in Europe Oil (Brent, € / barrel, lhs.) Coal (Australia, € / ton, lhs.) Gas (import price in EU, € / Mbtu, rhs.) 100 10 90 9 80 8 70 7 60 6 50 5 40 4 30 3 20 2 10 1 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008f 2010f 2012f Year 6 The baseline scenario of CO2 emissions In the forecasting model the baseline scenario of CO2 emissions is based on energy demand in four sectors: industry, transport, households and the rest of the economy CO2 emissions reflect electricity supply generated by fossil fuels and other consumption of fossil fuels CO2 emissions of electricity generation are increased by the demand for electricity in the four sectors and decreased by the clean electricity generated by means of renewable energy sources and nuclear power Recent Eurostat data indicates a rebound in electricity consumption and estimated CO2 emissions in the EU in spring 2008 7 CO2 emissions in baseline scenario Output by sector Electricity consumption Temperature Heat consumption Industrial processes Clean electricity generation Rainfall Transport Energy produced by fossil fuels CO2 emissions 8 Increase of CO2 emissions in the EU baseline scenario Electricity generation Other consumption of fossil fuels CO2 emissions 150 100 Million tonnes 50 0 -50 -100 -150 -200 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008f 2010f 2012f Year 9 Recent increase of CO2 emissions in EU Changes from corresponding month of prevous year Emissions Oil consumption -15 % 4 -15 20 08 /1 -10 10 -10 7 -5 4 -5 20 07 /1 0 10 0 7 5 4 5 20 06 /1 10 10 10 7 15 4 15 20 05 /1 % Consumption of fossil fuels Electricity produced by fossil fuels Year / month 10 Climate policy and the electricity market The cornerstone of EU climate policy is the reduction of CO2 emissions in electricity generation and industry under the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) CO2 emissions result largely from electricity generation More than 50 % of electricity is produced by fossil fuels in the EU There are hardly any substitutes for fossil fuels in electricity production in the short run The price of emission allowances creates an extra marginal cost in electricity production Increases in the price of emission allowances are largely passed through to the price of electricity 11 Supply and demand for electricity in EU 140 Demand curve Price including taxes Variable production costs and price 120 Producer price 100 Price of emission allowance 80 Price of emission allowance 60 40 20 Coal Gas Nuclear power Hydro and w ind pow er 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Output 2006, TWh 12 Channels to macroeconomic developments The price of emission allowances has become an important determinant of the price of electricity The price of electricity is the main channel of the impacts of climate policy on macroeconomic developments The price elasticity of the demand for electricity is rather low (-0.1 for industry and -0.2 for households) The downward adjustment of the demand for electricity and CO2 emissions may necessitate a large increase in the price of emission allowances and in the the price of electricity This leads to increasing costs in industry, higher consumer prices for households and decreasing macroeconomic activity The macroeconomic adjustment finally leads to lower demand for energy and reductions in CO2 emissions 13 Macroeconomic adjustment to climate policy World economic growth (+) EU economic growth (–) (–) (+) Domestic demand Energy consumption (–) Exports (–) (+) Household real income CO2 emissions (–) Emission allowances (–) (+) Consumer prices (–) Price of emission allowances Industry production costs (+) (+) (+) (+) Price of electricity 14 Baseline scenario of CO2 emissions in EU ETS CO2 emissions in the EU emission trading sector under the EU ETS grew by about 4 per cent in 2007 According to our baseline scenario the emissions will decrease in 2008-2012 CO2 emissions will exceed the emission allowances on average by about 100 million tonnes annually in 2008-2012 Uncertainties in the baseline EU ETS emission scenario: - macroeconomic developments and energy demand - clean electricity supply 15 Baseline scenario of CO2 emissions in the EU emission trading sector Emissions Baseline scenario Emission allowances Million tonnes 2300 2200 2100 2000 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008f 2010f 2012f Year 16 Primary energy sources of EU electricity generation Nuclear power Hydro power Wind Biomass Clean electricity Fossil fuels 2000 1500 TWh 1000 500 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008f 2010f 2012f Year 17 Assumptions in policy scenarios Emission allowances for the Kyoto period 2008-2012 have been cut by some 10 percent as compared to the first emission trading period 2005-2007 Our most stringent policy scenario - “maximum impact policy scenario” assumes that the CO2 emissions of EU ETS must be reduced to the allowed cap in 2008-2012 Emission trading and other Kyoto mechanisms (Clean Development Mechanism, CDM, and Joint Implementation, JI) allow flexibility in the adjustment of the CO2 emissions The other extreme policy scenario - “minimum impact policy scenario” assumes a perfectly elastic supply of emission reduction units (Certified Emission Reductions, CER) from developing countries at the minimum price of 10 €/t (roughly the minimum price set by China) Our forecast for the emissions of the EU emission trading sector in 2012 lies in the middle of the two extreme scenarios 18 Adjustment of CO2 emissions in the EU emission trading sector Possible adjustment paths Forecast Emission allowances 2300 Million tonnes 2200 2100 2000 1900 1800 2005 2006 2007 2008f 2009f 2010f 2011f 2012f Year 19 Emission allowance price and electricity prices The increase in emission allowance price will be gradually passed on to electricity prices In the minimum impact policy scenario the emission allowance price is assumed to be only 10 €/t and the impact on electricity prices is rather small The maximum impact policy scenario implies a sharp rise in emission allowance price and electricity prices 20 Price of emission allowances Possible adjustment paths Forecast 200 €/t 150 100 50 0 2005 2006 2007 2008f 2009f 2010f 2011f 2012f Year 21 Electricity price for European industry Possible adjustment paths Forecast 400 € / MWh 300 200 100 0 2005 2006 2007 2008f 2009f 2010f 2011f 2012f Year 22 Electricity price for European households Possible adjustment paths Forecast 800 € / MWh 600 400 200 0 2005 2006 2007 2008f 2009f 2010f 2011f 2012f Year 23 Macroeconomic impacts of EU climate policy The increase in emission allowance and electricity prices will weaken export competitiveness and export performance especially in export markets outside the EU area Rising electricity prices will also raise consumer prices and slow down household real income and consumption growth The negative impact on exports and domestic demand will be reflected on GDP and employment Macroeconomic impacts may be stronger in the small open energy-intensive EU countries than in the major EU countries 24 Macroeconomic impacts of climate policy in the EU area in 2012 as compared to the baseline scenario, % Baseline scenario in 2012, Policy impact in 2012, % Maximum Forecast Minimum impact impact 2007=100 Industry: Price of electricity Output costs 153 120 20 0.5 75 2.3 157 5.1 Households: Price of electricity Consumer prices 172 113 20 0.3 75 1.0 157 1.8 Macro economy: Exports Industrial production Domestic demand GDP 117 109 110 108 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.8 -0.7 -0.5 -0.6 -1.5 -1.3 -0.8 -1.0 Employment 104 -0.1 -0.3 -0.5 25 Differences in the macroeconomic impacts between countries Exports in relation to GDP, especially exports outside EU Energy-intensity of industry Impact of temperature on energy demand 26 Sl o xe vak m ia bo Sw urg ed B en el gi u N Fin m et he lan r la d C nd ze ch Ir e s Re lan pu d U ni S bli te lo c d ve K in nia gd o A m us H tri un a g D ar en y m a Es r k to B nia ul ga Po r ia la C nd yp ru Fr s L i an c th e u G an i er a m an La y tv ia M al ta Po EU rt R uga om l an ia Ita l Sp y ai G n re ec e Lu Exports / GDP in 2005 Exports outside EU Exports to EU 160 140 120 100 % 80 60 40 20 0 27 bo ur Fi g nl a Sw nd ed en La tv Es ia to Po nia rt ug A al us Li tri th a ua Sl nia ov ak ia Sp U B ain ni te elg d K ium in gd om N et he EU rla nd Fr s an c Po e l G and er m an C y ze ch I R taly ep u D blic en m ar k Lu xe m MWh / mill. € Manufacturing industry electricity consumption / output volume in 2005 500 400 300 200 100 0 28 Household electricity consumption and temperature in EU countries 1990-2000 5 Annual consumption per capita, MWh Sweden 4 Finland 3 Belgium Denmark 2 France Austria Germany Italy 1 Estonia Spain Latvia Greece Malta Cyprus Portugal Romania 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Annual mean temperature, oC 29 Greenhouse gas developments in EU EU total greenhouse gas emissions meet the Kyoto commitment target in 2008-2012 according to our baseline scenario Emissions will fall clearly below the Kyoto target according to our policy scenario EU climate policy seems to be unnecessarily stringent in 2008-2012 30 Greenhouse gas emissions in EU Emissions Baseline scenario Forecast Kyoto Protocol target 5800 Million tonnes 5600 5400 5200 5000 4800 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008f 2010f 2012f Year 31 Conclusions EU climate policy dampens the medium-term economic growth in the EU area EU climate policy seems to be unnecessarily stringent in 2008-2012 in terms of the Kyoto commitment target on greenhouse gas reductions Uncertainties in the scenarios: - The baseline macroeconomic scenario - The flexibility in CO2 emissions allowed by the Kyoto mechanisms, especially the supply of clean development (CDM) credits from China and other developing countries 32