Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Financing in the Canadian Power Sector Michael Badham, Partner September 20, 2004 The Canadian Economy Profile Key Economic Indicators / Drivers Real GDP Ontario GDP by Industry, 2003 (in $1997) 1,200,000 5.11% 1.90% 1,000,000 ($ millions) Primary 5.10% Manufacturing 21.12% 5.37% 800,000 Construction Utilities 4.17% Transportation & Warehousing 600,000 Information & Culture 7.62% 400,000 4.94% Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 200,000 2.30% 3.79% 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 C anada Quebec Ontario Health Care & Social Services Ontario Economy Real growth, 2003 Nominal GDP, 2003 ($ millions) % of Canada Personal Income ($ millions) % of Canada Personal Income Per Capital ($) Ontario Canada CPI Inflation 2003 Unemployment Rate 2003 Ontario Total Trade 2003 ($ millions) Exports Imports Trade Balance Source: Government of Ontario Financing in the Canadian Power Sector Public Administration BC /Alberta 12.25% Source: Statistics Canada Professional & Administrative Services Education 4.38% 21.95% 2 Wholesale & Retail Trade Other Services Source: Government of Ontario 1.3% 493,416 40.6 381,005 41.1 31,133 29,341 2.7% 7.0% Canadian Inflation 15% 12% 9% 6% 3% 308,903 269,745 39,158 TARGET LEVEL 0% 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 Source: Statistics Canada © 2004 Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. Opportunity in the Power Supply Market • By 2014 demand could reach 32,000 MW. Energy Production in Ontario By Fuel Type Gas, 7% • Total capacity connected to the grid is 30,501 MW. C oal, 22% • Accessible capacity is 27,500 MW. Typical demand is 25,000 MW. Ontario Opportunity Through 2014 32,000 Demand 2,000 MW 11,600 MW 24,000 16,000 Nuclear Hydro Gas Non-Hydro Renewable 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 0 2008 8,000 2007 • Need: To met demand and replace coal, 11,600 MW in new generation capacity by 2014. Source: IMO 2006 • Target: By 2010, 10% (+2,000 MW) of power will come from renewable, nonhydro sources. Hydro, 24% 2005 • Commitment: Eliminate coal generated electivity by 2007. Nuclear, 46% (Capacity - MW) • Goal: Refurbish, rebuild, or conserve 25,000 MW of generating capacity by 2020. Other, 1% New Renewable Coal Source: IMO 3 Financing in the Canadian Power Sector © 2004 Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. Opportunities Bruce Nuclear Plant Government Supply Objective: Start-up Units A 3&4 Objective: To build non-hydro renewable energy of over 2000 MW by 2010 Capacity: 750 MW X 2 Cost: $1.5 b - $2.0 b Capacity: RFI for 2,500 MW recently released Government Supply Opportunity: Niagara Falls Hydro Plant Objective: To provide +300 MW of nonhydro renewable energy Objective: Additional Diversion Tunnel Capacity: 100 – 200 MW Capacity: RFP (Closed August 2004) Cost: +$300 mm 4 Financing in the Canadian Power Sector © 2004 Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. The Value Environment Public Partner Government of Ontario Financing Partner Dundee Project Engineering Partner Aecon Advisory Partner Deloitte / FMC 5 Financing in the Canadian Power Sector © 2004 Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. The Trend Towards Private Public Partnerships Degree of Risk Transfer to Private Sector Low Privatization Hwy 407 High Design/Build/ Finance/Operate Confederation Bridge Sea to Sky Hwy Private Debt/Equity Design/Build/ Operate Contract Out Bruce Power LP Design/Build NAV Canada Special Operating Agency GTAA Crown Corporation Ministry/ Department 1996 1997 1998 ... 2003 2004 Source: The Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships 6 Financing in the Canadian Power Sector © 2004 Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. The Deal Maker – Risk Transfer Form Optimal Structures Ministry / Department Crown Corporation Design / Build Contract Out Design/Build/ Design/Build/ Privatization Operate Finance/Operate Risk Transfer (Government to Private Sector) High Incrementally Assumed Risks Low Policy Risk & Approval Risk Regulatory Risk Revenue Risk Credit Risk General Market & Economic Risk Total Project Finance Risk 7 Financing in the Canadian Power Sector © 2004 Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. Determining the Investment Opportunity Revenue Inflow • User / Service Fees • Ancillary Charges Bidder ROI Private Sector Funding Technical Inputs • • • • • Construction Development Advisory Engineering Other • Debt Service • Equity Return • IRR Target • • • • Operating Costs Capital Costs Financing Costs Taxation Costs Cash Outflows 8 Financing in the Canadian Power Sector Financing Public Sector Funding Government Risk Transfer © 2004 Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. Considering Public Sector Value for Money Cost • • • • • 9 Opportunity Cost Risk Efficiency Risk Credit Rating Risk Quality Risk Rate Setting Financing in the Canadian Power Sector Costs under private delivery must be less to warrant use of private financing Risks Competitive Neutrality Risks and Efficiencies Raw Costs/Revenues Raw Costs/Revenues Retained Cost/ Revenues Retained Cost/ Revenues Public Delivery Private Delivery • Higher Financing Costs • Rate of Return © 2004 Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. Opportunity Assessment Public Sector Considerations Go / No Go Decision Transaction Process Contract Execution Implementation Private Sector Considerations Bid / No Bid Decision Bid Development Contract Negotiations Project Planning Bid Assessment Post Transaction Development Success Factors • Implementation of any procurement process must consider public sector issues around • Transparency and fairness of process • Public opinion / mood • ‘Bidabilty’ and bid costs • Requirements and realities of capital markets 10 Financing in the Canadian Power Sector • Private sector wants opportunities that: • Have a clearly articulated need • Commitment from public sector to work with private sector and a strong ‘champion’ of the project • Credible processes in place • Clear performance standards © 2004 Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. An Action Plan for Canadian P3 Opportunities Establish Canadian presence to monitor developments in key market places Ontario BC Alberta Quebec Assess needs in comparison to skill sets and capabilities – i.e. determine partnering needs Engineering Finance Advisory Supply Present opportunities to selected provincial governments in areas of need Confirms interest Leads to ‘front-end’ policy development Be proactive – do not wait for the opportunities to come to you. 11 Financing in the Canadian Power Sector © 2004 Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. Deloitte, Canada's leading professional services firm, provides audit, tax, financial advisory services and consulting through more than 6,100 people in more than 47 offices. Deloitte & Touche LLP, operates in Québec as Samson Bélair/Deloitte & Touche s.e.n.c.r.l. The firm is dedicated to helping its clients and its people excel. Deloitte is the only professional services firm to be named to the Globe and Mail's Report on Business magazine annual ranking of Canada's top employers for two consecutive years: 35 Best Companies to Work for in Canada in 2001 and 50 Best Companies to Work for in Canada in 2002. "Deloitte" refers to Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. Deloitte is the Canadian member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu is a Swiss Verein (association), and, as such, neither Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu nor any of its member firms has any liability for each other's acts or omissions. Each of the member firms is a separate and independent legal entity operating under the name "Deloitte", "Deloitte & Touche", "Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu" or other related names. The services described herein are provided by the Canadian member firm and not by the Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Verein. © 2004 Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu