Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The role of the Center in the development of public-private partnership in Ukraine: the first results of activities and tasks for the future I.V. Zapatrina, The Center’s Chairman of the Board The most widespread definitions of PPP Innovative, contractual agreement between the public and private sectors in the provision of public services and rebuilding the infrastructure, which melds within itself all the best from both sectors; resources of the private sector, its qualified opportunities, technologies and potential of the public sector with respect to economic regulation and the protection of public interest. (Economic Committee of the UN in Europe (UNECE) Attracting private businesses (competitions, capital) for more effective execution of tasks, which are the responsibility of the state, with conditions to allocate risks and rewards for the achieved results; Instrument of long-term, successive politics of development, in accordance with which, investors receive a certain security; The development of public-private partnership in the World PPP 1997 PPP 2007 Info of the Polish PPP Center * * * Х Х Х Х * Х * * * Х * * Х Х * Х Х Х * * Х Х * Х Х * * Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Х * Х Х * Х * Х Х Х Х Х * Х Х * Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Х * Х * * Х * Х Х Х Х Х * Х Х * Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Water supply and sanitation * Х Х * * Sport Education Х * * Х Х Roads * Х Х Х * * * Ports * Health Х Railway Х * * Х Prisons Germany Poland Romania Slovakia Scotland Hungary Great Britain Italy Housing sector Х Х Х Х Х Х Defense Austria France Spain Netherlands Ireland Northern Ireland Airports Administrative services Countries/sectors Informational technologies Public-Private Partnership in Europe in sectors, 2009 Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Х Х * Х Х Conclusions from the results of PPP’s analysis of Latin-American countries 1. Positive features (activated development of infrastructure, increases quality and efficiency of services providing, including public services, attracts financial resources, increases employment, promotes economic growth) 2. Problem issues: Over- expectations of the public authority High level of renegotiated contracts (in all -30%, water supply and sanitation – 74,4%) and a short period of time till renegotiation of the contracts (in all – 2.2 yrs., water supply and sanitation – 1.6 yrs.) The annulment of several signed contracts, which leads to society’s non-acceptance of PPP’s ideology in general. Main reasons why the effective application of PPP mechanisms is hindered Imperfect regulatory politics (taxation, prices, authorization/licensing system, organ of control, non-transparency, et al. Excessive regulation of the PPP projects from the public government sphere. The lack of corresponding institutional infrastructure (preparation, controlled selection, monitoring PPP) Insufficient professionalism of the public government (government support system, selection criteria for projects, evaluation of suggestions, non-developed mechanisms and basis for agreements) Political instability, lack of succession Negative attitude of the public authority and the population toward the private sector and its participation in infrastructure projects Portion of government sector in GDP, % 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Ukraine Canada, England, Italy USA Poland Info of the institute of economy and forecasting of NAS of Ukraine Some characteristics of Ukraine’s regulatory system Simplicity of carrying a business – 142nd place out of 183 countries of the world; Efficiency of the tax system – 181st place out of 183 countries of the world; Fiscal load on businesses – level of GDP redistribution through the budget for 2009 – 42.4% Відповідно до Програми економічних реформ Management of public/communal property 1.State enterprises - 500 out of 4000 of Ukraine’s enterprises, where 50% or more belongs to the state, are currently in bankruptcy status 2. Communal enterprises - receivables in sector of housing and communal services (heat supply, water supply, sanitation, city electric transport) has reached 12 million UAH - technical condition of the branch (part of the networks of the water/heat supply system, and sanitation, which are in distressing conditions, is more than 30%) According to the Program of economic reforms Low quality of public services Public Services – services offered by the state authority, local governments, enterprises, institutions, organizations managed by them. State services – services offered by the state authority (mainly the executive branch) and by state enterprises, institutions, organizations, as well as, by local authorities in accordance with the powers delegated by the state, at the expense of the state budget. Municipal services – services offered by local authorities, as well as members of executive power and institutions, enterprises, and organizations, in accordance with the powers delegated by the local government, at the expense of the local budget. Clarifications of the Ministry of Justice dated 18.12.2009 No.967-0-2-09-22 Services provided by the public sector, as well as the private sector, with the public power responsible for it and at the expense of the public funds. Potential spheres of using PPP in Ukraine • Construction and modernization of infrastructure objects • Organization of state support of scientific and innovation activity • Integration of national cultural heritage in public life and socially-economic development of territories • Provision of public services Weak Points in the development of PPP in Ukraine: The lack of partner relations on the axis: “government – local self- government - private business” The population’s distrust of the ‘private partner’ Weakly developed legislative regulation system in the PPP sphere, lack of methodology and knowledge of preparation and realization of such projects; Non-sufficient qualification and knowledge of public and business representative in the PPP sphere; The lack of standards for service production and a developed system of monitoring quality; TASKS: CREATION OF INSTITUTIONS – CENTERS OF COMPETITION IN PPP’S SPHERE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC, INSTITUTIONAL, METHODOLOGICAL SUPPORT OF PPP IMPLEMENTATION OF PILOT PROJECTS DEVELOPMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY OF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY The role of science in the development of PPP in Ukraine Forms ideology and methodology of development of public-private partnership Qualified expert on issues of public-private partnership (financial economic, ecological, technical, and legal expertise) Participant of PPP projects, which have innovative direction and are implemented in the form of PPP. Why a non-government PPP Center? Institutional potential Avoidance of political influence and populism Long period of formation and implementation of PPP projects PPP Center – Stability in uncertain conditions Strategic Council Supervisory Board Executive Board Founder Direction of activity of the PPP Center 1 • Scientific-methodological support • Development of normative base 2 • Trainings, increasing of qualification • Public dialog 3 4 • Formation and support of PPP projects • Attraction of credit resources for pool of infrastructure projects Achievements PARTNERS: •Regional government administration of Donetsk, •City Council of Mykolayiv, •School of senior civil service of Ukraine •Government service on issues of cultural heritage of Ukraine •Kazakhstanian Center of government-private partnership •Polish Center of public-private partnership •Kiev regional representation of the cities of Ukraine association •Scientific institutions, consulting companies, and Ukraine’s public organization PRACTICAL ACTIVITY: Support of the activity of an interdepartmental work group on issues of development of a state partnership in Ukraineunder the Ukrainian Ministry of Economy (2 conferences) Achievements 1. International round table “Public-Private Partnership in Ukraine: possibilities and risks” Kiev, May 2010 2. Participation in international conferences: “Prospects of development of the water branch until 2000" Moscow, June 2010; "Conference of DPP Centers of the world", Astana, July 2010; Rishel'yevskiye academic hearings, September 2010 3. Training on issues of the public-private partnership in the school of senior civil service of Ukraine, October 4-5, 2010. 4. Launch of the Center’s website: www.ukrppp.com Tasks for year 2010-2011 1. Active participation of the Center in the development of the normativelegal environment of PPP (review of the framing laws and improvement of particular legislation in this sphere, development of basis for agreements, systems of analysis of efficiency of PPP, state support in the sphere of PPP) 2. Conducting a few scientific researches on problematic issues of development of PPP in Ukraine with participation of institutions of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine. Widespread dissemination of the results. 3. Developing the mechanisms of introducing PPP into the scientifictechnical community. 4. Development and scientific-methodological support of pilot projects in form of PPP (on the basis of Donetsk and Mykolayiv) 5. Development of international collaboration, analysis, generalization, and dissemination of experiences. Holding seminars, conferences, and round tables. 6. Organizing the education of the local government powers and the private sector in the sphere of PPP (training, including online) Thank you for you attention www.ukrppp.com