Download Electronic Government Procurement

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Workshop on Implementing
Electronic Government Procurement (e-GP)
Delhi, India – May 18, 2006
The Role of e-GP in Improving
Public Procurement Performance
Knut Leipold
The World Bank
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
1
Voice of the Pros
• “E-Procurement can protect life!”
• “You loose some USD 450,000 every day!”
• “It allows for increased competition and less fraud.”
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
2
Voice of the Cons
• “Look at this! Not only that we have to use
this E-Procurement system, we even have
to pay USD 12,000 for it this year!”
• “We prefer the offline procurement process.”
• “We don’t like the e-Procurement system as
it increases our workload.”
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
3
Objectives
• Opportunities & Challenges of
•
e for GP
e is a tool to improve GP
• Encourage to use
May 18, 2006
e for GP
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
4
Agenda
May 18, 2006
1.
Opportunities
2.
Challenges
3.
Lessons Learned
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
5
Agenda
May 18, 2006
1.
Opportunities
2.
Challenges
3.
Lessons Learned
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
6
Benefits of e-GP
• Transparency
• Efficiency
• Economic Development
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
7
Transparency
• Information on public procurement function
• Information on procurement transactions
• Compliance
• Reduced corruption
• Audit trails & institutional memory
• Improved quality of public procurement
reporting, monitoring, and management
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
8
Efficiency
 Price decrease
• Increased price transparency
• Increased competition (!)
• Aggregated demand
• Lower transaction costs for suppliers
• e-Reverse Auctions
 Reduced transaction costs
• staff, material, workflow
• online vs. offline publication
 Time is money!
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
9
Economic Development
Public
Procurement
• Government = single largest
purchaser in a national economy
• Value of public procurement:
10-15% of GDP
• Redistribution of taxpayers’
money
GDP
• Private business activation
• Infrastructure development
• Capacity building
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
10
Beneficiaries of e-GP
• Transparency
Government
• Efficiency
• Economic Development
Taxpayers
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
11
What is the Problem?
Objectives of GP:
Benefits of e-GP:
• Open & fair competition
• Open & fair competition
• Efficiency
• Transparency
• Improved quality
• Efficiency
• Transparency
• Improved quality
E-GP does not replace GP. It is a tool that can improve and
reform GP. The challenge is successful e-GP implementation,
as it addresses far more than just HW & SW.
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
12
Agenda
May 18, 2006
1.
Opportunities
2.
Challenges
3.
Lessons Learned
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
13
e-GP Implementation
Understanding
Understanding
Techno-Technology
logy
Standards
Standards
May 18, 2006
ManageManagement
ment
e-GP
Infrastructure
Infra-
Policy
Policy
LegisLegislation
lation
Buyer &
Supplier
Activation
structure
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
Buyer &
Supplier
Activation
14
Successful e-GP Adoption
Understanding
Management
Policy
• Think Big, Start Small
• Learn from Others
• Assess the Current Situation
Technology
e-GP
Legislation
• Develop a Strategy
• Implement the Strategy
Standards
May 18, 2006
Infrastructure
Buyer &
Supplier
Activation
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
15
Agenda
May 18, 2006
1.
Opportunities
2.
Challenges
3.
Lessons Learned
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
16
Lessons Learned: Dos (I)
• Have a vision and strategy
• Get a Champion on high political level
• Get stakeholder buy-in
• Develop appropriate legal framework
• Establish a Lead Agency
• Run an awareness raising campaign
• Build capacity
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
17
Lessons Learned: Dos (II)
• Review procurement regulation and processes
• Follow international standards
• Phased implementation
• Select a sustainable business model
• Integration (link with other systems)
• Strengthen international dialogue
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
18
Lessons Learned: Don’ts
• There is no reason to wait!
• E-GP is far more than technology!
• E-GP does not solve all public procurement issues!
• Decentralized public procurement does not require
decentralized e-GP systems
• Don’t mix digital with electronic signature!
• Don’t forget the private sector!
• Don’t set unnecessary barriers to the use of e-GP!
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
19
For More Information
www.mdb-egp.org
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
20
Thank You!
[email protected]
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
21
Back-up slides
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
22
Time Savings
Activity
Paper-based
Web-based
500 A4 pages mailed to 9 suppliers
4.500 pages
1.4 Mb disk
space
Preparation of tender
12 hours
0.5 hour
Data capturing – 10 fields per
record at avg. 5 characters per field
at 0.5 second per character for
2.000 items and 9 suppliers
125 hours
1 hour
Evaluation and what-if scenarios on
18.000 records
40 hours
1 hour
Contract preparation and other
documents
8 hours
0.5 hour
Total
185 hours
3 hours
Source: Intenda Ltd., Pretoria, South Africa, 2003
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
23
Fighting Corruption with e-GP (I)
Reducing fraud and corruption in public procurement:
• online disclosure of procurement notices
• online disclosure of awarded contracts
• open and fair competition
• increased compliance with procurement policy
• less opportunity for corruptive, collusive, fraudulent, and
coercive practices
Potential for fraud and corruption:
• inappropriate application of technology
• e-Corruption
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
24
Fighting Corruption with e-GP (II)
E-Procurement can reduce opportunity of fraud and
corruption in the context of government procurement if
• driven by political will
• implemented appropriately.
High level of transparency can be achieved at low
costs and no need of major changes of the existing
legal framework.
May 18, 2006
Workshop on Implementing e-GP
25