Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Public Finances and services for children at local level Eva Jespersen [email protected] 4 April 2008 Ability to collect revenue: Levels of public expenditures in CEE/CIS in ’93/94 and ’03/04; high levels, less divergence to 20-30 % for low-come and EU standard of 40-50 for CEE. government expenditure as a % of GDP 60 50 40 30 Central Europe 1993-1994 Baltic States 1993-94 20 South Eastern Europe 1993-1994 Western CIS 1993-1994 10 Caucasus 1993-1994 Central Asia 1993-1994 0 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 GDP per capita in 1993, PPP $ (constant 2000) government expenditure as a % of GDP 60 50 40 30 Central Europe 2004-2005 20 Baltic States 2004-2005 South Eastern Europe 2004-2005 Western CIS 2004-2005 10 Caucasus 2004-2005 Central Asia 2004-2005 2 0 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 GDP per capita in 2005, PPP $ (constant 2000) 25000 Public revenue and expenditures • Revenue •Taxes and levies: indirect and direct • Acc to C Gov & Loc Govt •Social contributions •Revenue of ‘national wealth funds’ ODA and other aid Borrowing/domestic & foreign Expenditures Extra budgetary items Statutory exp: pensions Interest on borrowing C Govt budget incl allocation to L Govts Capital expenditures Recurrent expenditures 3 0% Share of indirect taxes Share of direct taxes United States Canada United States United Kingdom Sweden Portugal Norway Netherlands Italy Germany France Denmark Belgium Tajikistan Kazakhstan Georgia Ukraine Russia Russia Moldova Belarus Serbia & Montenegro Croatia Romania Bulgaria Lithuania Latvia Estonia Slovenia Slovak Republic Slovak Republic Poland Hungary Czech Republic % of tax revenues Tax composition (last available year) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Share of other taxes 4 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 Social protection Health and education Other social expenditure Economic affairs General public services Public order and defense Ukraine Poland Slovenia Bulgaria Moldova Hungary Lithuania Czech Republic Belarus Latvia Georgia 0.00 Romania 0.20 Kazakhstan Share of total public expenditure Structure of public expenditure 5 Taxes and benefits over the life course, DK and Greece 6 Issues in analysing allocations for social services Central Government Budget norms - unit of service or unit of beneficiary – differentiated by conditions Equalizing funds Division of sector responsibilities: tertiary services // basic services Local Government Local revenue generation – local taxes/VAT, user fees Allocation from C Govt Procuring services from C Govt Vertical gaps – unfunded mandates (exp> revenue) Horizontal imbalances (mismatch between pop and revenue) 7 Making the best use of public spending • Costing of new mandates • Expenditure tracking • Effectiveness in spending: Incentives to spend effectively flexibility (combined w accountability) allocations based on burden/outcomes not past spending Transparency / accountability • SOCIAL/PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING 8 Right to extensive level of health and education services and child/family allowances, but … • Poorer countries don’t have the means to fund entitlements adequately • Changes in provision - less linkage between labour force participation and access to social services for the family (particularly in health, child care) – erosion of pre school in LICs. Still strong preference for hospital-based services • More choice for the rich and in richer countries •increasing private provision, tuition based tertiary services. • Erosion of value of transfers to families/children lessening ability to purchase services in the market 9 an Be l ar u Slo s ven Uk i a rai Mo ne ldo v Hu a ng ary La tvi Es a ton Li t i a Tu huan rkm ia eni sta n Po lan d Cr Cz o e ch at Re ia pu bl i Bu c Ky lga ri rgy a zst an Slo vak ia Ru ss Ro i a m Az a nia erb a ij an FY Al R M ban ac e i a do Ta nia jik i st an Ge org Ar ia m Ka eni a za k hst an i st Uz bek per cent of GDP Cross country analysis may encourage experience sharing/lessons learning Public expenditures on education as % of GDP (year), all levels? 7.0 6.3 6.0 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.0 4.0 3.0 5.1 4.9 4.6 4.4 4.3 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.0 1.0 0.0 10 Public expenditure on basic education per student, in PPP $ 6000 5413 PPP $ per student in basic education 1990 5000 4710 2000 2003-05 4000 2751 3000 2480 2000 1758 1554 1276 1317 890 1000 634 581 64 135 0 Czech Republic Slovenia Bulgaria Romania Tajikistan 11 250 Czech Republic - -real public expenditure on education 200 Bulgaria -real public expenditure on education 150 Uzbekistan - real public expenditure on education 100 Czech Republic - real public expenditure on education per person aged 3-18 Bulgaria - real public expenditure on education per person aged 3-18 50 Uzbekistan - real public expenditure on education per person aged 3-18 20 04 20 02 20 00 19 98 19 96 19 94 19 92 19 90 0 12 Thank you