* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Document
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
A Lecture Presentation in PowerPoint to accompany Exploring Economics Second Edition by Robert L. Sexton Copyright © 2002 Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning™ is a trademark used herein under license. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Instructors of classes adopting EXPLORING ECONOMICS, Second Edition by Robert L. Sexton as an assigned textbook may reproduce material from this publication for classroom use or in a secure electronic network environment that prevents downloading or reproducing the copyrighted material. Otherwise, no part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including, but not limited to, photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution, information networks, or information storage and retrieval systems—without the written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0030342333 Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 25 Issues in Macroeconomic Theory and Policy Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.1 The Phillips Curve Periods of high unemployment still occur despite legislation committing the federal government to the goal of full employment and the development of macroeconomic theory purporting to show that full employment can be achieved by manipulating aggregate demand. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.1 The Phillips Curve Similarly, price stability, which had been achieved for long periods before the 1930s, has not been consistently observed since that time. In every year in the lifetimes of most students enrolled in this course, the general level of prices has risen. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.1 The Phillips Curve We usually think of inflation as an evil. But some economists believe that inflation could actually help eliminate unemployment in the short run. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.1 The Phillips Curve If output prices rise but money wages do not go up as quickly or as much, real wages fall. At the lower real wage, unemployment is less because the lower wage makes it profitable to hire more, now cheaper, employees than before. Hence, with increased inflation, one might expect lower unemployment in the short run. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.1 The Phillips Curve An inverse relationship between the rate of unemployment and the changing level of prices has been observed in many periods and places in history. Credit for identifying this relationship generally goes to British economist A.H. Phillips In the late 1950s he published a paper setting forth what has since been called the Phillips curve. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.1 The Phillips Curve Phillips, and many others since, have suggested that at higher rates of inflation, the rate of unemployment is lower, while during periods of relatively or falling stable prices, there is substantial unemployment. The cost of lower unemployment appears to be greater inflation, and the cost of greater price stability appears to be higher unemployment. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.1 The Phillips Curve The actual inflation-unemployment relationship for the United States for the 1960s is shown in the next slide. U.S. Phillips curve The curved line is the smooth line that best “fits” the data points. It shows an inverse relationship between the rate of unemployment and the rate of inflation. The Phillips curve is steeper at higher rates of inflation and lower levels of unemployment. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. The Phillips Curve Relationship, United States, 1960s Inflation Rate (percent per year) 6 69 5 68 4 67 66 3 2 65 1 0 1 Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 64 60 63 61 62 2 3 4 5 6 Unemployment Rate (percent per year) 7 25.1 The Phillips Curve This suggests that once the economy has relatively low unemployment rates, further reductions in the unemployment rate can occur only by accepting larger increases in the inflation rate. Once unemployment is low, it takes larger and larger doses of inflation to eliminate a given quantity of unemployment. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.1 The Phillips Curve Presumably, at lower unemployment rates, an increased part of the economy is already operating at or near full capacity, and further fiscal or monetary stimulus primarily triggers inflationary pressures in sectors already at capacity, while eliminating decreasing amounts of unemployment in those sectors where some excess capacity and unemployment still exist. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.1 The Phillips Curve The relationship between AS and AD analysis and the Phillips curve Increased annual inflation lowering unemployment is a move up along the Phillips curve. We can see the same relationship in AD/AS model, as a result of an AD shift. Increasing AD, moving up along an upward-sloping, short-run AS curve, increases the price level and real output. To increase real output, firms employ more workers, so employment increases and unemployment falls. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. The Phillips Curve and the AD/AS Curves AS B 4 Phillips curve 3 A 2 Price Level Inflation Rate 5 B PL1 PL0 1 0 1 AD1 A AD0 2 3 4 5 Unemployment Rate 0 RGDP0 (5 percent unemployment) RGDP1 (4 percent unemployment) RGDP (trillions of dollars) Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time In the 1960s it became widely accepted that policy makers merely had to decide on the combination of unemployment and inflation they wanted from the Phillips curve and then simply pursue the appropriate economic policies. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. The Phillips Curve, United States, 1960–2000 14 PC3 1974–82 80 13 12 79 74 (percent per year) Inflation Rate 11 81 10 75 9 8 PC2 1983–1993 PC1 7 1960–69; 6 1994-2000 5 4 3 2 1 1 Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 78 77 73 70 90 76 69 8971 91 84 68 88 72 87 85 67 00 95 93 92 66 97 99 96 94 65 64 60 86 63 98 62 61 82 83 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Unemployment Rate (percent per year) 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time A reduction in the rate of unemployment came at a cost (more inflation) as did a reduction in the amount of inflation (more unemployment). Nonetheless, policy makers believed they could influence economic activity in a manner in which some goal could be met, though with a trade-off in terms of other macroeconomic goals. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time At first the empirical evidence on prices and unemployment fit the Phillips curve approach so beautifully that it is not surprising that it was embraced so rapidly and completely. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time Economists like Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps, who questioned the long-term validity of the Phillips curve, were largely ignored in the 1960s. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time These economists believed there might be a short-term trade-off between unemployment and inflation, but not a permanent trade-off. According to Friedman, the short-run trade-off comes from unanticipated inflation. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time In the 1970s (and 1980s and 1990s), economists recognized that macroeconomic decision making was not as simple as picking a point on the Phillips curve. The data from the 1970s showed the Phillips curve started to break down. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time From 1970 to 1996, every data point was to the right of the 1960s Phillips curve, meaning a worsening trade-off between inflation and unemployment. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time The 1970s experienced more of both inflation and unemployment than existed in the 1960s. However, in the 1980s, the Fed followed a very tight monetary policy to combat high inflation rates. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time People altered their expectations of inflation downward. In the mid-1990s, when lower inflation was achieved and expected, the Phillips curve shifted inward, back to the level of the 1960s. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time The long-run Phillips curve shows the relationship between the inflation rate and the unemployment rate when the actual and expected inflation rates are the same. The long-run Phillips curve is vertical at the natural rate of unemployment. This is equivalent to the vertical longrun AS curve. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time Along the long-run Phillips curve we see that the natural rate of unemployment can occur at any rate of inflation. That is, regardless of fiscal and monetary stimulus, output and employment will be at their natural rate in the long run. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. The Long-Run Phillips Curve Inflation Rate LRPC B A 0 Natural Rate of Employment Unemployment Rate Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time Starting from the natural rate of unemployment, suppose that the growth rate of the money supply increases. If it is unanticipated, it will stimulate aggregate demand. In the short-run, the increase in aggregate demand will increase output and decrease unemployment below the natural rate as the economy moves up along the short-run Phillips curve, increasing the actual inflation rate. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time However, over time, people adjust to the new inflation rate and the short-run Phillips curve shifts to the right. If the higher inflation rate continues, the adjustment of expectations will move the economy to where the expected and actual inflation rates are equal at the natural level of output and the natural rate of unemployment. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time This reveals that there is no trade-off between the inflation rate and the unemployment rate in the long run. The policy implication is that the use of fiscal or monetary policy to alter real output from the natural level of real output or unemployment from the natural rate of unemployment is ineffective in the long run. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time Say there was a decrease in the rate of growth in the money supply. If unanticipated, it would reduce aggregate demand. In the short-run, the decrease in aggregate demand moves the economy down along the short-run Phillips curve, where the actual inflation rate has decreased and the unemployment rate has risen above the natural rate. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time The decrease in aggregate demand has led to lower production and to a fall in employment. When people recognize that prices are not rising as rapidly as before, they adjust their expectations to reflect that fact, and the short-run Phillips curve shifts downward. The inflation rate is now lower and unemployment and output have returned to their natural rates. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time In this scenario, the economy’s road to lower inflation rates has come at the expense of higher unemployment in the short run, until people’s expectations adapt to the new lower inflation rate in the long run. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. The Short-Run and Long-Run Phillips Curve b. reduction in the growth of the money supply a. increase in the growth of the money supply 6 LRPC C B SRPC´ (High inflation of 6%) A 3 SRPC (Low inflation of 3%) 0 3 5 Natural Rate of Unemployment Unemployment Rate Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. Inflation Rate Inflation Rate LRPC C 6 3 D E SRPC (High inflation of 6%) SRPC´ (Low inflation of 3%) 0 5 7 Natural Rate of Unemployment Unemployment Rate 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time Changes in the expected inflation rate can shift the short-run Phillips curve. So can supply shocks. An adverse supply shock, such as higher energy prices, causes a leftward shift in the SRAS curve, with a higher price level and lower RGDP stagflation. But the higher inflation rate and higher unemployment rate that result shift the short-run Phillips curve to the right. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. Adverse Supply Shock PL1 SRAS0 B A PL0 AD 0 Price Level Price Level SRAS1 B A SRAS1 0 SRAS0 RGDP1 RGDP0 RGDP Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. Unemployment Rate 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time A favorable supply shock, causes a rightward shift in the SRAS curve with a lower price level and higher RGDP. example: lower energy prices But the lower inflation rate and lower unemployment rate that result shift the short-run Phillips curve to the left. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. Favorable Supply Shock PL0 SRAS1 A B PL1 AD 0 A Price Level Price Level SRAS0 B SRAS0 SRAS1 0 RGDP0 RGDP1 RGDP Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. Unemployment Rate 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time The impact of adverse or favorable shocks depend on expectations. If people expect the changes to be permanent, then the shifted Phillips curve will stay in the new position until something else happens. If the shock is expected to be temporary, the Phillips curve will soon shift back to its original position. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.2 The Phillips Curve Over Time If economic fluctuations are expected to be permanent and are caused primarily by supply-side shifts, then there may be a positive relationship between the inflation rate and the unemployment rate—a shifting Phillips curve. Higher rates of inflation will be coupled with higher rates of unemployment and lower rates of inflation will be coupled with lower rates of unemployment. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations Is it possible that people can anticipate the plans of policy makers and alter their behavior quickly, to neutralize the intended impact of government action? For example, if workers see that the government is allowing the money supply to expand rapidly, they may quickly demand higher money wages in order to offset the anticipated inflation. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations In the extreme form, if people could instantly recognize and respond to government policy changes, it might be impossible to alter real output or unemployment levels through policy actions unless they can surprise consumers and businesses. An increasing number of economists believe that there is at least some truth to this point of view. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations At a minimum, most economists accept the notion that real output and the unemployment rate cannot be altered with the ease that was earlier believed; some believe that the unemployment rate can seldom be influenced by fiscal and monetary policies. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations The relatively new extension of economic theory that leads to this rather pessimistic conclusion regarding macroeconomic policy’s ability to achieve our economic goals is called the theory of rational expectations. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations The notion that expectations or anticipations of future events are relevant to economic theory is not new; for decades economists have incorporated expectations into models analyzing many forms of economic behavior. Only in the recent past, however, has a theory evolved that tries to incorporate expectations as a central factor in the analysis of the entire economy. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations Rational expectation economists believe that wages and prices are flexible, and that workers and consumers incorporate the likely consequences of government policy changes quickly into their expectations. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations In addition, rational expectation economists believe that the economy is inherently stable after macroeconomic shocks, and that tinkering with fiscal and monetary policy cannot have the desired effect unless consumers and workers are caught off-guard (and catching them off-guard gets harder the more you try to do it). Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations Rational expectations theory suggests that government economic policies designed to alter aggregate demand to meet macroeconomic goals are of very limited effectiveness. When policy targets become public, it is argued, people will alter their own behavior from what it would otherwise have been, and, in so doing, they largely negate the intended impact of policy changes. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations If government policy seems tilted towards permitting more inflation in order to try to reduce unemployment, people start spending their money faster than before, become more adamant in their wage and other input price demands, and so on. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations In the process of quickly altering their behavior to reflect the likely consequences of policy changes, they make it more difficult (costly) for government authorities to meet their macroeconomic objectives. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations Rather than fooling people into changing real wages, and therefore unemployment, with inflation “surprises,” changes in inflation are quickly reflected into expectations with little or no effect on unemployment or real output even in the short run. As a consequence, policies intended to reduce unemployment through stimulating aggregate demand will often fail to have the intended effect. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations Fiscal and monetary policy, according to this view, will work only if the people are caught off-guard or fooled by policies so that they do not modify their behavior in a way that reduces policy effectiveness. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations In the case of an expansionary monetary policy, AD will shift to the right. As a result of anticipating the predictable inflationary consequences of that expansionary policy, the price level will immediately adjust to a new higher price level. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations Consumers, producers, workers, and lenders who have anticipated the effects of the expansionary policy simply built the higher inflation rates into their product prices, wages, and interest rates because they realize that expansionary monetary policy can cause inflation if the economy is working close to capacity. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations Consequently, in an effort to protect themselves from the higher anticipated inflation, workers ask for higher wages, suppliers increase input prices, and producers raise their product prices. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations Because wages, prices, and interest rates are assumed to be flexible, the adjustments take place immediately. This increase in input costs for wages, interest, and raw materials causes the aggregate supply curve to also shift up or leftward. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations So the desired policy effect of greater real output and reduced unemployment from a shift in the aggregate demand curve is offset by an upward or leftward shift in the aggregate supply curve caused by an increase in input costs. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. Rational Expectations and the AD/AS Model LRAS AS1 AS0 PL1 AD1 PL0 AD0 0 Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. RGDPNR RGDP 25.3 Rational Expectations An unanticipated increase in AD as a result of an expansionary monetary policy stimulates output and employment in the short run. The output is beyond the full employment level, and so is not sustainable in the long run. The price level ends up higher than workers and other input owners expected. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations However, when they eventually realize that the price level has changed, they will require higher input prices, shifting SRAS left to a new long-run equilibrium at full employment and a higher price level. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations In the short run, the policy expands output and employment, but only increases the price level inflation in the long run. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations A correctly anticipated increase in AD from expansionary monetary or fiscal policy will not change real output or unemployment even in the short run. The only effect is an immediate change in the price level. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations The only way that monetary or fiscal policy can change output in the rational expectations model is with a surprise— an unanticipated change. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. An Expansionary Policy That Is Unanticipated Price Level LRAS SRAS1 SRAS0 PL2 C B PL1 PL0 A AD1 (Unanticipated) AD0 RGDPNR RGDP1 RGDP Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations In the rational expectations model, when people expect a larger increase in AD than actually results from a policy change (say, from a smaller increase in the money supply than expected), it leads to a higher price level and a lower level of RGDP—a recession. A policy designed to increase output may actually reduce output if prices and wages are flexible and the expansionary effect is less than people anticipated. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. An Actual Expansionary Policy That Is Less Than the Anticipated Policy Price Level LRAS SRAS1 SRAS0 C PL2 PL1 B A PL0 AD2 (Anticipated) AD1 (Actual) AD0 RGDP1 RGDPNR RGDP Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations Rational expectations theory does have its critics. Critics want to know if consumers and producers are completely informed about the impact that say, an increase in money supply will have on the economy. In general, not all citizens will be completely informed, but key players like corporations, financial institutions, and labor organizations may well be informed about the impact of these policy changes. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations Are wages and other input prices really that flexible? Even if decision makers could anticipate the eventual effect of policy changes on prices, prices may still be slow to adapt (e.g., what if you had just signed a three-year labor or supply contract when the new policy is implemented?). Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations Many economists reject the extreme rational expectations model of complete wage and price flexibility. Most still believe there is a short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.3 Rational Expectations The reason is that some input prices are slow to adjust to changes in the price level. In the long run, the expected inflation rate adjusts to changes in the actual inflation rate at the natural rate of unemployment. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing If monetary and fiscal policy are ineffective or counterproductive, what policies are left to control inflation? It is possible that the federal government could set up a comprehensive program over wages and prices—often called incomes policy. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing We have imposed such controls three times in modern American history, during World War II, during the Korean War, and in 1971 near the end of the Vietnam War. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Wage and price controls involve either a complete freeze on wages and prices at pre-control levels or some rigid limits as to the increases in wages and prices that will be permitted. One or more government agencies are created to monitor the program. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Sometimes voluntary guidelines or guideposts are established to avoid forcing companies and unions to limit their price and wage levels. This approach avoids the expense and political acrimony associated with establishing a control bureaucracy. Sometimes the “jawboning” gets pretty intense. Such guidelines can come close to being mandatory controls. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing There are two justifications given for wage and price controls. By limiting price increases by law, the government directly reduces the rate of inflation legally allowed. Especially with respect to wage controls, it is argued that wage and price controls lower the inflationary expectations of workers and their unions, reducing the “inflation psychology” that contributes to cost-push inflation. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Wage and price controls have several major disadvantages, which are very likely to be viewed as greater than the advantages, except possibly during wartime situations when aggregate demand is growing very rapidly. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing There is the problem of enforcing the controls. Black markets (illegal sales) often develop. These problems are often very hard to solve. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Another, even more fundamental problem with wage and price controls is that they lead to shortages of goods, services, and workers Inflationary pressures are not eradicated but rather disguised, manifesting themselves not in price increases but in the lack of desired goods or human resources. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Severe and prolonged controls can lead to a very serious misallocation of resources, as a result. Straightforward supply and demand analysis indicates the misallocation of resources due to wage and price controls. At the legal price ceiling, the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied and shortages arise. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. Price of Refrigerators The Impact of Price Controls S P1 PCEILING P0 PCEILING Shortage D0 D1 0 Quantity of Refrigerators Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Problems with price controls are illustrated by the 1973 Arab oil boycott, when the federal government imposed price ceilings on gasoline that prevented gas prices from rising as they normally would have in response to reduced supply. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing At the ceiling price, quantity demanded exceeded quantity supplied; gas stations ran out of gas, were often closed, or placed a limit on the amount of gas they would sell. When drivers were able to buy gas, they often not only filled their tanks but also several containers they carried along to reduce the risk of being unable to buy gas when they needed it. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing In the former Soviet Union, where pricecontrol-related shortages were commonplace, citizens typically carried briefcases or even suitcases and large quantities of cash, in case they were able to purchase a normally unavailable good. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Rather than just buy the product for themselves, they would buy several items for their friends and relatives as well, to keep them from having to stand in line for hours, often in vain, trying to buy it. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing In the case of prolonged wage controls, shortages of personnel can occur. Wages serve as market signals. Rising wages in an occupation increases an occupation's attractiveness, leading to new entrants of workers. If the government decrees that salaries in that field could not rise enough, the increase in the quantity of new workers supplied will not occur and a shortage will arise. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Whether the gains from wage and price controls in the form of reduced inflation outweigh the costs in the form of shortages and inefficient resource allocation is debatable. This is a normative issue where honest, informed people can differ in their perceptions of costs and benefits. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing An example was the debate over the removal of price controls on natural gas. One side argued that controls should be removed to end shortages and enhance long-term supply. The other side argued that removing controls would lead to inflated prices for gas and inflated profits for gas producers, while causing hardships to lower income users of gas. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing The attempt to control prices politically can take another form. The presence of monopolistic elements in an industry can lead to higher prices for that industry’s products than would be the case for a more competitive industry. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing By stimulating price competition among private firms, the government may be able to help in reducing inflationary pressures. However, there has been relatively little actual use of antitrust laws to try to reduce inflation pressures. Moreover, monopoly power can also be artificially created by government regulations. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Another approach to some of the problems posed by inflation is indexing. Inflation poses substantial equity and distributional problems only when it is unanticipated or unexpected. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing One means of protecting parties against unanticipated price increases is to write contracts that automatically change prices of goods or services whenever the overall price level changes, effectively rewriting agreements in terms of dollars of constant purchasing power. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing By making as many contracts as possible payable in dollars of constant purchasing power, those involved can protect themselves against unanticipated changes in inflation. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Indexing seems to eliminate most of the wealth transfers associated with unexpected inflation. Why then is it not more commonly used? One main argument against indexing is that it could worsen inflation. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing As prices go up, wages and certain other contractual obligations would also automatically increase. e.g., rents This immediate and comprehensive reaction to price increases will lead to greater inflationary pressures. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing If inflation gets bad enough, it may become almost impossible administratively to maintain the indexing scheme. There are other inefficiencies, as well. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing During the German hyperinflation of the early 1920s, prices at one point rose so rapidly that workers demanded to be paid twice a day, at noon and at the end of work. During their lunch hour, workers would rush money home to their wives, who would then run out and buy real goods before price increases further eroded purchasing power. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Indexing also reduces the ability for relative price changes to allocate resources where they are more valuable. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. 25.4 Wage and Price Controls and Indexing Not everything can be indexed, so indexing would cause wealth redistribution plus the cost of negotiating cost of living (COLA) clauses. Excessive inflation leads to great inefficiency, as well as a loss of confidence in the issuer of money, namely the government. Copyright © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc.