Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
DATA REVISIONS AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES Introduction • Real Time Data sets – Real-Time Data Set for Macroeconomists • Philadelphia Fed + University of Richmond – Need for good institutional support – Club good: non-rival but excludable Introduction • Data sets – Unrestricted access: • U.S.: Philadelphia Fed, St. Louis Fed, BEA • OECD • Bank of England (recently updated) – Restricted access: • EABCN – Fate unclear: • Canada – One-time research projects: • Many, most not continuously updated Introduction • Analysis of data revisions is not criticism of government statistical agencies! – May help agencies improve data production process – Revisions reflect limited resources devoted to data collection – Revised data usually superior to unrevised data (U.S. CPI vs. PCE price index) Introduction • Structure of data sets – The data matrix • Columns report vintages (dates on which data series are observed) • Rows report dates for which economic activity is measured • Moving across rows shows revisions • Main diagonal shows initial releases • Huge jumps in numbers indicate benchmark revisions with base year changes Vintage: Date 47Q1 47Q2 47Q3 . . . 65Q3 65Q4 66Q1 . . . 07Q1 07Q2 07Q3 07Q4 11/65 REAL OUTPUT 2/66 5/66 . . . 11/07 2/08 306.4 309.0 309.6 . . 306.4 309.0 309.6 . . 306.4 309.0 309.6 . . . . 1570.5 1568.7 1568.0 . . 1570.5 1568.7 1568.0 . . . . . . . 613.0 621.7 NA . . . NA NA NA NA 613.0 624.4 633.8 . . . NA NA NA NA 3214.1 3291.8 3372.3 . . . 11412.6 11520.1 11630.7 NA 3214.1 3291.8 3372.3 . . . 11412.6 11520.1 11658.9 11677.4 . 609.1 NA NA . . . NA NA NA NA ... ... ... ... ... ... . . . ... ... ... ... Data Revisions Data Revisions • • • • • What Do Data Revisions Look Like? Are They News or Noise? Is the Government Using Information Efficiently? Are Revisions Forecastable? How Should We Model Data Revisions? • Key issue: are data revisions large enough economically to worry about? Data Revisions • What Do Data Revisions Look Like? – Short Term (example) – Long Term (example) • What Do Different Types of Data Revisions Look Like? – Short run revisions based on additional source data – Benchmark revisions based on structural changes or updating base year Figure 1 Real Consumption Growth for 1973Q2 (as viewed from the perspective of 138 different vintages) 1.0 Percent 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 Vintage 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 Table 2 Average Growth Rates of Real Consumption Over Five Years Benchmark Vintages Annualized percentage points Vintage Year: Period 49Q4 to 54Q4 54Q4 to 59Q4 59Q4 to 64Q4 64Q4 to 69Q4 69Q4 to 74Q4 74Q4 to 79Q4 79Q4 to 84Q4 84Q4 to 89Q4 89Q4 to 94Q4 94Q4 to 99Q4 ‘75 ‘80 ‘85 ‘91 ‘95 ’99 ’03 ‘07 3.6 3.4 4.1 4.5 2.3 NA NA NA NA NA 3.3 3.3 3.8 4.3 2.6 4.4 NA NA NA NA 3.3 3.3 3.8 4.4 2.6 4.4 2.8 NA NA NA 3.7 3.3 3.7 4.4 2.5 3.9 2.5 3.2 NA NA 3.9 3.4 3.8 4.5 2.6 3.9 2.5 3.1 2.3 NA 3.8 3.5 4.0 4.8 2.8 4.1 2.6 3.4 2.1 NA 3.8 3.5 4.1 4.8 2.8 4.2 2.8 3.7 2.4 4.0 3.8 3.5 4.1 4.8 2.9 4.1 2.9 3.7 2.6 4.1 Data Revisions • Are Data Revisions News or Noise? – Data Revisions Add News: Data are optimal forecasts, so revisions are orthogonal to early data; revisions are not forecastable – Data Revisions Reduce Noise: Data are measured with error, so revisions are orthogonal to final data; revisions are forecastable Data Revisions • Are Data Revisions News or Noise? – Mankiw-Runkle-Shapiro (1984): Money data revisions reduce noise – Mankiw-Shapiro (1986): GDP data revisions contain news – Mork (1987): GMM results show “final” NIPA data contain news; other vintages are inefficient and neither noise nor noise – UK: Patterson-Heravi (1991): revisions to most components of GDP reduce noise Data Revisions • Is the Government Using Information Efficiently? • Theoretical Issue: Should the government report its sample information or project an unbiased estimate using extraneous information? Data Revisions • Is the Government Using Information Efficiently? • Key Issue: What is the trade-off the government faces between timeliness and accuracy? – Zarnowitz (1982): evaluates quality of different series – McNees (1989): found within-quarter estimate of GDP to be as accurate as estimate released 15 days after quarter end Data Revisions • Findings of bias and inefficiency of seasonally revised data – Kavajecz-Collins (1995) – Swanson-Ghysels-Callan (1999) • Revisions to seasonals may be larger than revisions to NSA data: Fixler-Grimm-Lee (2003) • Key question: Are seasonal revisions predictable? Who cares if that is an artifact of construction? Data Revisions • Key Issue: If early government data are projections, then state of business cycle may be related to later data revisions. – Dynan-Elmendorf (2001): GDP is misleading at turning points – Swanson-van Dijk (2004): volatility of revisions to industrial production and producer prices increases in recessions Data Revisions • Are Revisions Forecastable? – Conrad-Corrado (1979): use Kalman filter to improve government’s monthly data on retail sales – Aruoba (2008): revisions to many U.S. variables are forecastable Data Revisions • Are Revisions Forecastable? – Key Issue: can revisions be forecast in realtime (or just ex-post)? • Guerrero (1993): combines historical data with preliminary data on Mexican industrial production to get improved estimates of final data • Faust-Rogers-Wright (2005): Examines G-7 countries’ output forecasts; find Japan & U.K. output revisions forecastable in real time Forecasting Forecasting • Forecasts are only as good as the data behind them • Literature focuses on model development: trying to build a better forecasting model, especially comparing forecasts from a new model to other models or to forecasts made in real time • Details: Croushore (2006) Handbook of Economic Forecasting Forecasting • Does the fact that data are revised matter significantly (in an economic sense) for forecasts? Forecasting • EXAMPLE: THE INDEX OF LEADING INDICATORS • Leading indicators: seem to predict recessions quite well. • But did they do so in real time? The evidence suggests skepticism. • Diebold and Rudebusch (1991) investigated the issue, using real-time data • Their conclusion: The leading indicators do not lead and they do not indicate! • The use of revised data gives a misleading picture of the forecasting ability of the leading indicators. date 1974:08 1974:07 1974:06 1974:05 1974:04 1974:03 1974:02 1974:01 1973:12 1973:11 1973:10 1973:09 1973:08 1973:07 1973:06 1973:05 1973:04 1973:03 1973:02 1973:01 Value of Leading Index Leading Indicators, vintage Sept 1974 185 180 175 170 165 160 155 150 145 140 Forecasting • EXAMPLE: THE INDEX OF LEADING INDICATORS • Chart shows not much problem • But recession started in November 1973 • Subsequently, leading indicators were revised & ex-post they do much better date 1974:08 1974:07 1974:06 1974:05 1974:04 1974:03 1974:02 1974:01 1973:12 1973:11 1973:10 1973:09 1973:08 1973:07 1973:06 160 1973:05 1973:04 1973:03 1973:02 1973:01 Leading Index Leading Indicators, vintage Sept 1974 and Dec. 1989 185 100 180 98 Dec. 1989 vintage 175 96 170 94 165 92 Sept. 1974 vintage 90 155 88 150 86 145 84 140 82 Forecasting • Why Are Forecasts Affected by Data Revisions? – Change in data input into model – Change in estimated coefficients – Change in model itself (number of lags) – See experiments in Stark-Croushore (2002) Forecasting • What Do We Use as Actuals? – Answer: Depends on purpose – Best measures are probably latest-available data for “truth” (though perhaps not in fixedweighting era) – But forecasters would not anticipate redefinitions and generally forecast to be consistent with government data methods (example: pre-chain-weighting period; 2013 capitalization of R&D) Forecasting • What Do We Use as Actuals? – Real-Time Data Set: many choices • • • • first release (or second, or third) four quarters later (or eight or twelve) Date of annual revision (July for U.S. data) last benchmark (the last vintage before a benchmark revision) • latest available Forecasting • How Should Forecasts Be Made When Data Are Revised? – Key issue: temptation to cheat! • Try method; it doesn’t work; but that’s because of one outlier; dummy out that observation; the method works! • If data are not available, use a real-time proxy, don’t peak at future data • Cheating is inherent because you know the history already Forecasting • Forecasting with Real-Time versus LatestAvailable Data – Faust-Rogers-Wright (2003): research showing forecastability of exchange rates depended on a particular vintage of data; other vintages show no forecastability – Molodtsova (2007): combining real-time data with Taylor rule allows predictability of exchange rate – Moldtsova-Nikolsko-Rzhevskyy-Papell (2007): dollar/mark exchange rate predictable only with realtime data Forecasting • Summary: for forecasting, sometimes data vintage matters, other times it doesn’t Forecasting • Key Issue: What are the costs and benefits of dealing with real-time data issues versus other forecasting issues? Monetary Policy Monetary Policy: Data Revisions • How Much Does It Matter for Monetary Policy that Data Are Revised? • How Misleading Is Monetary Policy Analysis Based on Final Data Instead of Real-Time Data? • How Should Monetary Policymakers Handle Data Uncertainty? Monetary Policy: Data Revisions • How Much Does It Matter for Monetary Policy that Data Are Revised? – Example: Fed’s favorite inflation measure is the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index Excluding Food & Energy Prices (PCEPIXFE) – But it has been revised substantially Figure 1 Core PCE Inflation Rate from 1997Q1 to 2002Q1, Vintage May 2002 2.4 2.2 Inflation Rate 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 1997 1998 1999 2000 Date 2001 2002 Figure 3 Core PCE Inflation Rate from 1997Q1 to 2002Q1, Vintages May 2002, Dec. 2003, Aug. 2005 2.4 August 2005 2.2 Inflation Rate 2.0 Dec 2003 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 1997 May 2002 1998 1999 2000 Date 2001 2002 Monetary Policy: Data Revisions • How Much Does It Matter for Monetary Policy that Data Are Revised? – Croushore (2008): PCE revisions could mislead the Fed – Maravall-Pierce (1986): The Fed optimally signal extracts from the noise in money data, so data revisions would not significantly affect monetary policy – Kugler et al. (2005): Monetary policy shojuld be less aggressive because of data revisions Monetary Policy: Data Revisions • How Misleading Is Monetary Policy Analysis Based on Final Data Instead of Real-Time Data? – Croushore-Evans (2006): Data revisions do not significantly affect measures of monetary policy shocks in recursive systems, but they make identification of simultaneous systems problematic Monetary Policy: Data Revisions • How Should Monetary Policymakers Handle Data Uncertainty? – Coenen-Levin-Wieland (2001): use money as an indicator when GDP data are uncertain – Bernanke-Boivin (2003): use factor model to incorporate much data; results do not depend on using real-time data instead of revised data Monetary Policy: Analytical Revisions • What Happens When Economists or Policymakers Revise Conceptual Variables? – Output gap – Natural rate of unemployment – Equilibrium real interest rate • Concepts are never observed, but are centerpiece of macroeconomic theory Monetary Policy: Analytical Revisions • Orphanides (2001): Fed overreacted to perceived output gap in 1970s, causing Great Inflation; but output gap was mismeasured Output Gap Revisions • Most U.S. analysts look at CBO measure, but it is revised extensively over time • Problem is especially acute at the end of the sample Monetary Policy: Analytical Revisions • What Happens When Economists or Policymakers Revise Conceptual Variables? – Key issue: end-of-sample inference for forward-looking concepts (filters) – Key issue: optimal model of evolution of analytical concepts • Most work is statistical; perhaps a theoretical breakthrough is needed Macroeconomic Research Macroeconomic Research • How Is Macroeconomic Research Affected By Data Revisions? – Croushore-Stark (2003): how results from key macro studies are affected by alternative vintages – Boschen-Grossman (1982): testing neutrality of money under rational expectations: support for RE with revised data, but not with real-time data Macroeconomic Research • How Is Macroeconomic Research Affected By Data Revisions? – Amato-Swanson (2001): the predictive content of money for output is not clear in real time; only in revised data Macroeconomic Research • Should Macroeconomic Models Incorporate Data Revisions? – Aruoba (2004): business-cycle dynamics are captured better by a DSGE model that accounts for data revisions than one that does not – Edge, Laubach, Williams (2004): learning explains long-run productivity growth forecasts; helps explain cycles in employment, investment, long-term interest rates Macroeconomic Research • Do Data Revisions Affect Economic Activity? – Oh-Waldman (1990): false (positive) announcements increase economic activity with leading indicators and industrial production in real time – Bomfim (2001): improving the signal in data would exacerbate cyclical fluctuations if agents performed optimal signal extraction; but if agents ignore data revisions, then improving data quality would reduce cyclical fluctuations Macroeconomic Research • Overall: literature in its infancy: more work needed in all three areas (robustness of research results, incorporating data revisions into macro models, examining how or whether data revisions affect economic activity) Current Analysis • How Do Financial Markets React to Data Revisions? – Christoffersen-Ghysels-Swanson (2002): need real-time data to properly determine announcement effects in financial markets Current Analysis • How Is Business Cycle Dating Affected By Data Revisions? – Economists like to argue about the state of the business cycle . . . Current Analysis • How Is Business Cycle Dating Affected By Data Revisions? – Chauvet-Piger (2003, 2005): test algorithms to identify turning points in real time – Chauvet-Hamilton (2006): develop alternative recession indicators and forecasts in real time – Nalewaik (2007): using real-time gross domestic income helps forecast recessions better than just using GDP Current Analysis • Overall: much additional research needed in current analysis in real time Summary • Field of real-time data analysis offers many opportunities for new research • Most promising areas: – Macroeconomic research: incorporating data revisions into macro models – Current analysis of business and financial conditions – Other areas are more mature & need more sophisticated analysis