Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Industrial and Investment Development: Do statistics matter to Africa and Africans? PJ Lehohla Statistician-General 24 October 2008 1 Issues addressed • The nature and posture of statistics in state administration • Post-colonial Africa and its political forms • Economic performance and statistics in Africa • Political strife and statistics in Africa • Post 1995 economy and statistical development in Africa • Crisis in financial markets and collapse of economies • International comparisons programme: Can industry and investment benefit from it? 2 Crisis in financial markets and collapse of economies 1929, 1980’s, 1997, 2008 • Do Africans know anything about these? • Can Africans do anything about it? • Do these have an impact on Africans? • Are Africans capable of measuring the impact of these? • What is Africa’s and African industrial and investment strategy in dealing with the past and current crisis and for certain future ones? 3 Environment for statistical practice Emerging gaps Core Competency Collection Processing Reputation Intellectual Technological Logistics Political Administrativ e 14 4 Your reference Nature and posture of statistics in state administrations up to recent past • • • • • • • • • Policy in Africa is driven by impulse and not evidence Statistics law do not exist or are outdated in Africa Statistics are of service to the ministry and not state Statistics poorly funded At best known as a census office Dependent on aid Skewed priorities Staff capacity very poor Political profile non-existent 5 Building statistical infrastructure in postcolonial Africa • • • • Establishment of a statistics office Establishment of training institutions Developing a work programme Economic Commission for Africa and its role 6 Post-colonial Africa and its political forms • Influenced by bipolar world of West and East • Embroiled in military coups and counter coups • for example – Ghana Nigeria in 60’s – Uganda Liberia 70’s – Lesotho Somalia Ethiopia 80’s • Onset of democracy post collapse of Berlin wall • Unipolar world • Resource rich economies and rapid economic growth 7 Economic performance and statistics in Africa • Poor economic performance • Debt • Structural adjustment prescriptions • Destruction of health and education infrastructure • Low investment • High unemloyment • No statistics 8 Post 1995 statistical development in Africa • • • • • • • • Birth of democracy Broad based initiatives PARIS21 comes on the scene 1998 Catalytic role of censuses for democracy in post 1995 Africa Mozambique and international funding agencies 1997 International Comparisons Programme Africa (ICP Africa) and Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) 2005 The General Data Dissemination Standards (GDDS) and the Special Data Dissemination Standards (GDDS and SDDS) 1999 The making of the Africa Symposia for Statistical Development (ASSD) 2006 • Better Growth 6% • The Current Financial Crisis. Can Africa handle it? 9 The future • • • • • • • • • With democracy there is better prospect for statistical development in Africa Statistics in Africa are better positioned to date Paris Declaration for aid effectiveness sets the tone for statistical development All African countries are to run a census with the exception of Somalia The adoption of evidence linked Poverty Reduction Strategies The adoption of GDDS and SDDS have helped states to see the value of statistics Strong leadership from countries have raised hope Politcal support International comparison Programme 10 What is the International Comparison Programme (ICP)? The ICP is a programme that seeks to produce national/country and or regional output net of exchange rate effects. It uses purchasing power parity (PPP). 11 ICP 2005 What are PPPs? Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) convert values in local currency prices to “real” values in a common currency. They are based on multilateral comparisons of prices between countries. They permit the comparisons of real levels of output or income between countries, just as price deflators or a consumer price index allow real comparisons over time. 12 The ICP Governance ICP under auspices of the UN Statistical Commission ICP Executive Board Global Office World Bank Technical Advisory Group Africa Asia CIS LAC West Asia (48 countries) (23 countries) (10 countries) (10 countries) (11 countries) Note: Egypt and Russia participated in two regional comparisons. 13 Eurostat/ OECD (46 countries) Who are some of the key users of ICP? Global Development economists and media analysts (poverty analysis, understanding development strategies, investment analysis) International organisations (IMF, World Bank, EU) International and national donors (analyzing policy effectiveness, funds allocations) National Policy makers (investment policy, fiscal policy) Central Banks (monetary policy to the extent that CBs can influence exchange rates) Businesses (use of comparative price levels to assess business opportunities, setting compensation) 14 Compare PPP GDP with volume measures –other • Carbon emissions per unit of GDP economic variables • Energy use per unit of GDP • GDP per number of workers • GDP per hour worked • PPP measures of financial Aid • PPP measures of remittances • Per capita comparisons for health, education 15 Applications of PPPs System of National Accounts calls for real comparisons between countries to be done using PPPs UNDP includes GNI measured at PPP in the Human Development Index. World Bank uses PPPs to establish international poverty lines—1 $ per day poverty line IMF measures size of economy and aggregate growth rates in PPP terms EU allocates Structural Funds to member states 16 Other Applications of PPPs—national level PPPs differ from sector to sector allowing price levels for components of GDP to be compared across countries Use comparative ratios of consumption goods vs investment to GDP and relationship with economic growth Evaluate living standards using PPP per capita expenditures for food, clothing, housing, etc. Identify areas of competitive advantage 17 Historical Global ICP Participation Number of countries participating 146 2005 ICP requirements for participation Each country must provide: 1. National annual average prices for a set of well defined goods and services; and 2. Estimates of its GDP compiled in line with the framework described in SNA93 18 Economies in the ICP 2005 East Asia and Pacific Australia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Fiji Hong Kong, China Indonesia Japan Korea, Rep. Lao PDR Macao, China Malaysia Mongolia New Zealand Philippines Singapore Taiwan, China Thailand Vietnam American Samoa French Polynesia Guam Kiribati Korea, Dem. Rep. Marshall Islands Micronesia, Fed. Sts. Myanmar New Caledonia Northern Mariana Islands Palau Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Timor-Leste Tonga Vanuatu South Asia Bangladesh Bhutan India Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka Afghanistan Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo, Dem. Rep. Congo, Rep. Cote d'Ivoire Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia, The Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone South Africa Sudan Swaziland Tanzania Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Eritrea Mayotte Somalia Europe and Central Asia Albania Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Kazakhstan Kyrgyz Republic Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Macedonia, FYR Moldova Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Serbia and Montenegro Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Tajikistan Turkey Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom Andorra Channel Islands Faeroe Islands Greenland Isle of Man Liechtenstein Monaco San Marino Uzbekistan 19 Latin America & Carribeans Argentina Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Ecuador Mexico Paraguay Peru Uruguay Venezuela, RB Antigua and Barbuda Aruba Bahamas, The Barbados Belize Cayman Islands Costa Rica Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic El Salvador Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Puerto Rico St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad and Tobago Virgin Islands (U.S.) North America Canada United States Bermuda Middle East & North Africa Bahrain Djibouti Egypt, Arab Rep. Iraq Iran, Islamic Rep. Israel Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Malta Morocco Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Yemen, Rep. Algeria Libya United Arab Emirates West Bank and Gaza Legend Countries Participating in ICP Countries NOT Participating in ICP Summary No. Countries Participating in ICP 147 Total No. Countries in the World 209 Regional Results - By Stages Each region worked in parallel with Economies National Accounts Prices 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Prepare specification for products to be priced Determine survey framework Collect prices Data validation Compute PPPs within region 1. Ensure consistency with SNA 93 2. Allocate expenditures on GDP to the 155 ICP basic headings To produce regional results 20 Diversity of regions required different methods Africa Five regions (plus Eurostat-OECD) Asia CIS Have different: South America • Economies (size, structure) • Statistical capacity Western Asia Eurostat-OECD • Methodologies 21 A snapshot of the world in 2005 Purchasing Power Parities Size of the world Economic well being Relative living costs 22 New view of world economy World Share of GDP World Share GDP Based on Market Exchange Rates Based on PPP Low-income economies, 7% Low-income economies, 2% Middle-income economies, 19% Middle-income economies, 32% High-income economies, 78% High-income economies, 61% 23 The size of the world economy ICP 2005 GDP @PPP Previous GDP @PPP GDP @ Market exchange rates World---146 countries 54,975 59,712 44,306 High income: OECD 31,422 31,726 33,342 964 1,264 486 10,971 16,367 4,221 CIS 2,269 2,171 970 South America* 2,698 2,911 1,411 * Excludes exporting countries. West Asia 1,158 932 588 GDP 2005 ($ billions) Africa* Asia and Pacific* Note: Regional totals do not include all ICP participants. 24 Reasons new PPPs differ from previous data in the WDI • More countries included in the 2005 ICP Round • • • • • – China first time — India first time since 1985 – More African countries. New methodology for housing, government, linking regions Data quality improved due to better statistical capacity of countries. Products priced differed from 1993 to 2005 ICP Rounds. System of National Account (SNA) changed from SNA 68 to SNA 93 in many countries. Previously extrapolated data were at GDP level, while new PPPs are computed at individual product/basic heading level. 25 People and their spending 70 60 50 World Population (%) 40 30 20 World PPP GDP (%) 10 0 Low Middle High 26 The largest dozen Twelve economies account for two-thirds of world expenditures. The five largest are US, China, Japan, Germany, and India. Seven are high income economies: US, Japan, Germany, the UK, France, Italy, and Spain. And five are low- or middle-income economies: China, India, Russia, Brazil, and Mexico. 27 Economic well being – PPP consumption per capita PPP- Based Actual Individual Consumption per capita, $ 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Eurostat/OECD CIS South America 28 Western Asia Asia/Pacific Africa GDP and its main components by regions GDP, AIC, GG, GFCF (per capita, PPP-based, world=100%) 350% 300% 250% 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% Africa Asia/Pacific CIS OECD-Eurostat GDP per capita General Government per capita South America Actual Individual Consumption Gross Fixed Capital Formation 29 West Asia Comparing price levels Price level indexes are the ratio of an economy’s PPP to its exchange rate with another economy Measure cost of living or cost of doing business Or simply the most expensive or cheapest places to travel 30 Prices higher in rich countries 200 Iceland Denmark Switzerland Norway Price level index (World=100) 180 160 Japan 140 United States 120 Fiji 100 80 Brazil 60 Congo, D.R. China 40 India 20 Bolivia 0 GDP per capita 31 Price level index, GDP components by regions Price Level Index, World=100% 160% 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Africa GDP Asia/Pacific Actual Individual Consumption CIS OECD-Eurostat General Government 32 South America West Asia Gross Fixed Capital Formation Introduction ICP-Africa: • Undertaken in 48 African countries • Capacity building dimension in addition to main outputs • Implementation of the program in a collaborative mode involving a broad range of partners • Integration of ICP into the usual activities of African NSOs: publication of PPPs yearly from 2006 up to the next round in 2011 33 34 ICP Africa 2005 Household Final Expenditure: Price level and expenditure share: Africans live to eat C h ar t 3. : P r ic e L e ve l In d ic e s : T h e T e n Hig h e s t an d T e n L o w e s t Chart 4. Africa Real Expenditure Shares (%) Food & Non-Alcoholic Beverages 43.9 Eq. G uinea Transport Furnishings, Household Equipment & Routine Household Namibia C omoros Clothing and Footw ear 10.9 7.1 7.0 S outh A fric a Housing, Water, Electricity, Gas & Other Fuels S ão T. & Princ ipe Health 4.9 Tanz ania Miscellaneous Goods & Services including Net 4.6 G ambia Alcoholic Beverages, Tobacco & Narcotics 6.0 4.0 Restaurants & Hotels 3.3 Recreation & Culture 3.3 B urundi Madagas c ar Education 2.8 Ethiopia Communication 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 35 2.2 Real GDP Shares (Africa = 100%) 21% 36 Ranking by Nominal and Real Per Capita Income Levels South Africa Nominal 5 Top Ranked Countries 5 Top Ranked Countries Mauritius South Africa Botswana Gabon Equatorial Guinea Mauritius Equatorial Guinea Botswana Gabon 37 Real Ranking by Nominal and Real Per Capita Income Levels Burundi Ethiopia Liberia Congo, Democratic Republic Nominal 5 Lowest Ranked Countries 5 Lowest Ranked Countries Congo, Democratic Republic Liberia Burundi Zimbabwe Guinea-Bissau Gambia, The 38 Real Real Individual Consumption Expenditure Shares (Africa = 100%) Sudan 5% Nigeria 13% Other countries 41% Egypt 20% South Africa 21% 39 Real Investment Expenditure Shares (Africa = 100%) Nigeria 9% Morocco 10% Other countries 44% Egypt 14% South Africa 23% 40 Price Level Indices for Selected African Countries (At GDP Level) Price Level Indices: The five Lowest Price Level Indices: The five Highest Zimbabwe Madagascar Cape Verde Burundi Namibia Egypt South Africa Gambia Comoros Ethiopia 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 2.5 41 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Price Level Indices for Investment Expenditure in Selected Price Level Indices: The five Highest Price Level Indices: The five Lowest Cote d'Ivoire Burundi Congo DRC Equatorial Guinea Egypt Lesotho Ethiopia Zimbabwe Malawi 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0 42 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Per Capita Actual Household Consumption in Selected Actual Per Capita HH consumption: The five Highest Actual HH Per Capita consumption: The five Lowest Mauritius Guinea-Bissau South Africa Zimbabwe Tunisia Burundi Egypt Liberia Gabon DRC 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 0 43 50 100 150 200 250 ICP 2005 And the poorest economies GDP per capita Consumption per capita Congo Dem Rep Congo Dem Rep Liberia Liberia Zimbabwe Zimbabwe Guinea Bissau Guinea Bissau Ethopia Ethopia 44 ICP 2005 Average PPP consumption across all PPP consumption per capita (US$) 35,000 20,000 5,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 World Average 6,096 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 45 1,000 0 DRC Burundi Liberia Ethiopia Guinea-Bissau Niger Malawi Gambia Central african republic Zimbabwe Sierra Leone Mozambique Rwanda Guinea Uganda Togo Madagascar Mali Burkina Faso Lesotho Ghana Comoros Tanzania Kenya Zambia Benin Mauritania Cote d'Ivoire Chad Nigeria Senegal Djibouti Cameroon Sudan São T. & Principe Congo Angola Cape Verde Morocco Namibia Swaziland Egypt Tunisia South Africa Mauritius Gabon Equatorial Guinea Botswana ICP Africa 2005 GDP Per Capita (in “Afric”/PPP) 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 46 ICP Africa 2005 Nominal Vs Real Measures – GDP per capita 7000 6000 5000 Nominal ($ US ) 4000 R eal (AF R IC ) 3000 2000 1000 47 E quatorial G uinea G abon S outh A fric a Namibia Djibouti C omoros Madagas c ar Uganda R wanda G ambia E thiopia 0 ICP Africa 2005 African GDP vs Price levels GDP Price Level Indexes, World = 100 100% Cape Verde Zimbabwe (180%) 90% Namibia 80% South Africa 70% 60% 50% 40% Burundi The Gambia 30% Ethiopia 20% GDP per capita 48 th S ou ah ar an A fri ca E qu A fri ca S w at azi la or n ia lG d ui C ne ap a e S V ão er d To m Le e é an sot ho d P rin ci pe N ig er ia K en C ôt ya e d' Iv C on oir go e ,R ep . C ha d C om B o ur ro ki na s Fa Ta s o nz an ia C en M tra al lA i A fr i ca n g ol n a R ep G ub am lic bi a, Th e M al aw i N ig Zi er m ba bw e Li be ria -S S ub ICP Africa 2005 Gross fixed capital formation Gross Fixed Capital Formation 140.0% 120.0% 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 49 Questions ? 50