Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Public Finance in Germany Prof. Horst Zimmermann Public Finance in Germany: Warnings and Lessons for Ukraine? Lecture to the students in the degree program „Master of Public Administration“ of the National Academy of Public Administration Kiev, December 13, 2007 Prof. Horst Zimmermann University of Marburg GTZ-Project „Administrative Reform in Ukraine“ Email: [email protected] Kiev, December 13. 2007 Slide 1 Public Finance in Germany Prof. Horst Zimmermann Public Finance in Germany: Warnings and Lessons for Ukraine? Contents of the lecture A. Public finance in Germany: An overview B. Germany – a country with three levels of government C. Selected problems and derived lessons I. Let the share of government in GDP grow? II. Debt financing – the sweet poison III. Unstoppable centralization? IV. Raise the quality of public finances Kiev, December 13. 2007 Slide 2 Public Finance in Germany Prof. Horst Zimmermann A. Public finance in Germany: An overview Share of government in GDP (incl. social security systems) Total 2006 46% without social security systems 28% of this: Central government 11% Middle level 11% Local level 6% 2008 Central government expenditure : Labor, social affairs 46% Interest payments 15% Defense 9% Kiev, December 13. 2007 taxes VAT 33% PIT 22% Energy 12% Slide 3 Public Finance in Germany Prof. Horst Zimmermann B. Germany – a country with three levels of government Often heard: „Germany is a federation and thus not comparable to Ukraine!“ The true element: Oblasts are no Laender. The false one: Middle-level functions in both countries! Land functions: esp. education, including universities Local functions: esp. welfare payments, schools, utilities Interbudgetary relations: Many shared taxes (85% for all levels together) some with decentral tax rate setting Equalization transfers: Central:Land and Land:local Kiev, December 13. 2007 Slide 4 Public Finance in Germany Prof. Horst Zimmermann C. Selected problems and derived lessons I. Let the share of government in GDP grow? Share in GDP (including social security systems): 1950 (beginning of „transformation“) about 30% 1970 39% and 1980 48% = growth of the welfare state! 1990 45%, 2002 49%, 2006 46% =rather stable and high. Ukraine recently 40%, so try to stay near that. The lessons: To let it grow is easy, goodies for everybody. If it can no longer be financed, reduction is painful: French uproar, German reform rollback, Italy Ukraine: long Soviet tradition of emphasizing equity Warning: Let it not rise now, growth first Kiev, December 13. 2007 Slide 5 Public Finance in Germany Prof. Horst Zimmermann cont‘d: C. Selected problems and derived lessons II. Debt financing – the sweet poison Accumulated debt in % GDP for all OECD-countries: 1970: 35% 1990: 58% =growth of welfare state Germany 2006: 68% Maastricht criteria: 60%, annual deficit 3% Cause: annual deficit, why so tempting? Debt illusion! Counter measures: absolute limit in Gryvnia? As% GDP? Tied to investment? 2/3 parliamentary majority? In Europe general discomfort! General warning! Kiev, December 13. 2007 Slide 6 Public Finance in Germany Prof. Horst Zimmermann cont‘d: C. Selected problems and derived lessons III. Unstoppable centralization? In Germany after 1945 deliberate decentralization Since then tendency towards centralization e. g. 1969 3 Land functions became common functions 2006 Federalism Commission I: disconnect federal-Land 2008 second FC: disentangle fiscal relations??? Ukraine: highly centralized Soviet heritage currently promising decentralization draft laws important: insert guarantees against re-centralization Kiev, December 13. 2007 Slide 7 Public Finance in Germany Prof. Horst Zimmermann cont‘d: Selected problems and derived lessons IV. Raise the quality of public finances New theoretical and political issue, MinFin discusses it. Example for the tax side of budget: Move from direct to indirect taxes Theory: high tax rates = excess burden Expenditure side of budget: Share of investments = orientation towards the future. Incentives to innovation/growth, quality education You see: much to be done in Germany! And in Ukraine? Thank you for your attention! Kiev, December 13. 2007 Slide 8