Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Understanding the McGuinty wage freeze Profits and wages, corporations and workers, politicians and voters Randy Robinson, A/Political Economist Ontario Public Service Employees Union September 2010 Dwight Duncan’s story Under the Liberals (elected in October 2003), wage increases in the public sector were higher than in the private sector 55 per cent of the budget – more than $50 billion – goes to pay public employees Ontario has a big budget deficit. Government must cut wages to save jobs and public services. “Protecting jobs and services while eliminating the deficit must remain our highest priority.” “Ontario families have done their part…. It’s time for us to do our part.” Dwight Duncan’s story (simplified) 1. The money saved from the wage freeze will allow Ontario to save jobs, protect public services, and pay down the deficit; and 2. Public employees should be the ones who pay because (the Liberals say) they get paid too much anyway. Chart from Ontario government presentation Aug. 9, 2010 Chart from Ontario government presentation Aug. 9, 2010 Another version Public employees DO NOT get paid too much. These wage cuts are permanent…. Income loss to inflation from a two-year wage freeze 51000 50000 49000 48000 47000 1 2 3 4 5 6 Income with wage increases equal to inflation Income with two-year wage freeze followed by wage increases equal to inflation These wage cuts are permanent…. Income loss to inflation from a two-year wage freeze, over five years 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 1 2 3 Wage loss to inflation per year 4 5 Total wage loss to inflation 6 Wage loss calculation Year Income Income with without freeze freeze 0 $50,000 $50,000 Income loss $0 1 $50,000 $49,020 $980 2 $50,000 $48,058 $1,942 3 $50,000 $48,058 $1,942 4 $50,000 $48,058 $1,942 5 $50,000 $48,058 $1,942 Another version (2) Public employees DO NOT get paid too much. The money saved from the wage freeze will NOT save jobs, protect public services, OR pay down the deficit Another version (3) Public employees DO NOT get paid too much. The money saved from the wage freeze will NOT save jobs, protect public services, OR pay down the deficit The wage freeze has NOTHING TO DO with saving jobs, protecting services, or paying off the deficit Government Voters Corporations What corporations have been up to Trends in wages and profits since 1980 Rich get richer, poor get poorer Between 1980 and 2005, the top 20 per cent of full-time full-year earners in Canada saw their incomes rise by 16.4%. The bottom 20 per cent saw their incomes fall by 20.6%. Those in the middle saw their incomes rise by $53, from $41,348 in 1980 to $41,401 in 2005 (in 2005 dollars) The real numbers are even worse The stats include only full-time, full-year jobs More and more jobs are part-time, temporary, or temporary agency jobs Between 1980 and 2005, median earnings for families went up by 9.3 per cent. This was mostly caused by families working longer hours. Compared to 30 years ago, families are putting in much longer hours just to stay in the same place. Why is income distribution changing? It’s not because Canadian workers are less productive – they’re actually more productive How much money is missing? If real wages had risen in proportion to the increase in productivity between 1991 and 2005, average workers’ incomes would have been $200 higher each week in 2005 (in 2005 dollars) Canadians who work full-time for a full year would have been receiving at least $10,000 more in average real pay in 2005 Why is income distribution changing? If the economy is way bigger and productivity has increased, why are wages stagnating? Why are so many people falling behind? Why are so many people working so much harder just to stay in the same place? Why is income distribution changing? Because productivity gains have not gone to wages, they have gone to PROFITS For 30 years, government and business have worked together to shape public policy so this keeps on happening. The transfer of wealth The transfer of wealth from workers to owners is the most significant trend affecting the incomes of most Canadians – and people all around the world So how does it work? The transfer of wealth Business promotes a set of policies aimed at moving money from workers to owners, but today in Ontario, two major policies are 1) wage freezes for public employees, and 2) tax cuts for corporations. These wage cuts are permanent…. Income lost to the wage freeze for an OPSEU member earning $45,000 a year 50000 49000 48000 47000 46000 45000 1 2 3 4 5 Wage increases at rate of inflation Two-year wage freeze followed by wage increases at the rate of inflation What Dalton and Dwight are up to… Cost savings from non-union workers from a two-year wage “freeze” that will save the government $750 million over two years Year Total 1 2 3 $250 m $250 m $250 m $250 m $250 m $500 m $500 m $250 m What Dalton and Dwight are up to… Cost savings from OPSEU members from a two-year wage “freeze” (with inflation at two per cent, phased in over five years) Year 1 2 3 Total $32 m $96 m $160 m 4 5 $221 m $250 m What Dalton and Dwight are up to… Cost savings from all Ontario provincial employees from a two-year wage “freeze” (phased in over five years) Year 1 2 $285 m $770 m 3 4 5 $1.2 b $1.6 b $1.835 b Left hand, meet the right hand… Corporate income tax giveaways, phased in over four years Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 $1.2 b $1.2 b $1.2 b $1.2 b $300 m $300 m $300 m $300 m $300 m $600 m Total $1.2 b $1.5 b $1.8 b $2.4 b There’s a hole in the bucket…. Wage “freeze” Corporate income tax cuts Annual savings to government when fully implemented Annual cost to government when fully implemented + $1.8 BILLION - $2.4 BILLION How do corporations get government to do this? Constant lobbying How do corporations get government to do this? Constant lobbying Campaign financing at $950-a-plate How do corporations get government to do this? Constant lobbying Campaign financing at $950-a-plate The promise of future employment after politics How do corporations get government to do this? Constant lobbying Campaign financing at $950-a-plate The promise of future employment after politics Constant bombardment of the public with procorporate messages Corporate tax cuts won’t create jobs Corporate tax cuts won’t create jobs In terms of job creation, public spending creates five times more jobs per dollar than corporate income tax cuts Bang for your buck Table 1 Expenditure and Tax Multipliers Infrastructure investment measures Housing investment measures Other spending measures Measures for low-income households and the unemployed EI premiums Personal income tax measures Corporate income tax measures 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.7 0.6 1.0 0.3 Corporate tax cuts won’t create jobs In terms of job creation, public spending creates five times more jobs per dollar than corporate income tax cuts When fully implemented, the wage freeze will reduce Ontario’s GDP by $3.4 billion, wipe out 20,000 jobs per year, and lower tax revenue by about $600 million Corporate tax cuts won’t create jobs Canada (and Ontario) already have lower taxes than competing jurisdictions KPMG Total Tax Index for 2010 200 150 100 50 0 MEX CAN NED AUS UK US GER ITA JPN FRA Corporate tax cuts won’t create jobs Tax rates make up a very small part of investment decisions KPMG says taxes only account for up to 14 per cent of location-sensitive investment costs This means other factors (wages, public health care, skilled work force) become key to investment decisions Where do voters fit in all this? Spin and public opinion What Liberals are telling voters Dwight Duncan says the wage freeze is necessary to preserve public services in the face of a $19.7 billion deficit. He suggests strongly that public employees are overpaid Assessing Liberal spin The Liberals feel they have a good strategy While most members of the public don’t know about the wage freeze, many think it is a good idea There has been a strong media campaign to portray public sector workers as overpaid The public is not interested in significant cuts to public services – people want them – so if people can’t get the same services at a lower cost, they’re content. Assessing Liberal spin Could work on public opinion, but only if public employees go along it Liberals will play on workers’ fear of a Tim Hudak government The political landscape Liberals are in trouble Tories have overtaken Liberals in some polls Between 68% and 73% per cent of Ontarians say the province is on the “wrong track” Liberals far behind in many ridings Hudak more popular than McGuinty The political landscape (2) Hudak is cut from the same cloth as Mike Harris – a Hudak government would be a disaster for public services Hudak is largely unknown to voters He has never fought an election as leader He will be subject to attack The political landscape (3) The Liberals are most concerned about their right flank Based on their track record, they will try to show the public that they can be as right wing as necessary while still trying to hold on to their centre and centre-left supporters Questions for OPSEU members What are our options for campaigning around the wage freeze? 1. 2. What are our options for campaigning against it? What are the implications for the provincial election? Campaigning against the wage freeze: building our message What arguments will persuade our members and the public to support a strategy (either centrally or locally) that builds our ability to defeat the wage freeze or mitigate the negative fallout? The following slides evaluate seven possible union messages Evaluating arguments against the freeze 1. “The deficit is not our fault” Evaluating arguments against the freeze 1. 2. “The deficit is not our fault” “We are not overpaid” Evaluating arguments against the freeze 1. 2. 3. “The deficit is not our fault” “We are not overpaid” “It’s not fair” “It’s not fair” A four per cent wage cut is a big hit for low-income workers The wage freeze will hit women more than men; the public sector workforce is 60 per cent female (67 per cent in education, 82 per cent in health and social services) Women already earn less than men; the wage freeze just make this worse Evaluating arguments against the freeze 1. 2. 3. 4. “The deficit is not our fault” “We are not overpaid” “It’s not fair” “It will hurt jobs and the economy” Evaluating arguments against the freeze 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. “The deficit is not our fault” “We are not overpaid” “It’s not fair” “It will hurt jobs and the economy” “It will not strengthen public services” Evaluating arguments against the freeze 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. “The deficit is not our fault” “We are not overpaid” “It’s not fair” “It will hurt jobs and the economy” “It will not strengthen public services” “It will not help pay down the deficit” Evaluating arguments against the freeze 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. “The deficit is not our fault” “We are not overpaid” “It’s not fair” “It will hurt jobs and the economy” “It will not strengthen public services” “It will not help pay down the deficit” The wage freeze will not protect public services, save jobs, or pay down the deficit. Every dollar saved through the wage freeze will be a direct donation to corporate profits. A “sea change” 76 per cent agree that existing corporate income tax cuts should be postponed 81 per cent of Ontarians support higher taxes on corporations to pay down the deficit 75 per cent say CEOs should make sacrifices to pay down the deficit 75 per cent support a 10 per cent surtax on those earning $300,000 a year or more The time is ripe… Canada’s Big Six banks paid out $8 billion in bonuses in 2009 and are on track for $9 billion this year Big Six profits were more than $14 billion last year The union message… “We are always ready to talk about ways to protect public services and save jobs, but why should our families make a donation to corporate profits?” The union message… This approach goes after the Liberals where it hurts – their relationship with corporations on the one hand and their need for public employees’ votes on the other It will resonate with the public It is in line with what we have been saying all along It challenges the long-term trend that is moving money from wages to profits It provides no comfort to Tim Hudak It lays the groundwork for a public conversation about the influence of corporations on our democracy It lays the groundwork for an agenda in support of good jobs, good services, and fair taxation A union campaign Even a campaign that only reached public employees would be huge The Liberals need our votes A serious lobbying effort, combined with other tactics, could create significant leverage for OPSEU members and other workers