Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Development pathways towards tight carbon constraints Jean Charles Hourcade [email protected] Christophe Cassen [email protected] Cired’s program with EPE/IDDRI, the Chair modeling prospective for sustainable development Paristech, in collaboration with the Coppe (Brazil) and the University of Ahmenabad (India) What are the concrete objectives of the program ? To scrutinize the world emissions pathways to stabilize atmospheric CO2 concentration at 450 ppm by the end of the century To understand how some specific sectors would react to this strong carbon constraint : energy, sheet glass, steel, cement, aluminum beyond competitiveness issues To understand how economies would react to this strong carbon constraint To explore if different development options (regarding construction, infrastructure, energy, transportation, territory planning) would lead to the same result with a reduced constraint What means of exploration ? An innovative modelling platform : Macroeconomic model IMACLIM-R Productivity International Trade Financial Flows Demography Growth engine Development styles Industrial sectors Infrastructures Car fleets Energy assumptions Equipment stocks Technology costs Technical progress Fossil fuels inventories Sectoral Energy, food ,technology, land-use and urban model s + an iterative dialogue between researchers and industrials (Renaud Crassous, Scenarios for transition towards a low-carbon world in 2050 : What’s at stake for heavy industries? With FONDDRI/EPE, 2008) Example of a Business As Usual scenario REF ‘Ingredients’ of the scenario: – Large economic catch-up in emerging and developing countries – Together with a rapid expansion of infrastructures and equipments – Median assumptions for energy and technical change Results – From 2010 to 2050 • World GDP x3.2 (OECD x2, China x4, India x6.5) • Total primary energy x2 • Raw Material Demand x2 to x3 • Road Transportation x2.6 • 57 Gtons of CO2 emissions (Renaud Crassous, Scenarios for transition towards a low-carbon world in 2050 : What’s at stake for heavy industries? With FONDDRI/EPE, 2008) What Lessons of this rather conventional exercice? ST1 • A steeply increasing carbon value (up to 220 €/tCO2 in 2030, 430 €/tCO2 in 2050) • Not so much choice about the future technology portfolio • A tricky transition for energy-intensive countries (no regret is not no pain…) • A critical momentum to avoid carbon-intensive lock-ins • Risks due to a weak control on some upstream drivers of emissions (localization patterns, infrastructures, urban forms) – One must secure the transition and the long-run (Renaud Crassous, Scenarios for transition towards a low-carbon world in 2050 : What’s at stake for heavy industries? With FONDDRI/EPE, 2008) What Lessons of this rather conventional exercice? ST1 • A steeply increasing carbon value (up to 220 €/tCO2 in 2030, 430 €/tCO2 in 2050) • Not so much choice about the future technology portfolio • A tricky transition for energy-intensive countries (no regret is not no pain…) • A critical momentum to avoid carbon-intensive lock-ins • Risks due to a weak control on some upstream drivers of emissions (localization patterns, infrastructures, urban forms) – One must secure the transition and the long-run (Renaud Crassous, Scenarios for transition towards a low-carbon world in 2050 : What’s at stake for heavy industries? With FONDDRI/EPE, 2008) GDP variation w.r.t. reference scenario (%) A carbon price only scenario: mind the transition …. and the end point 2010 0% 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 -2% -4% -6% -8% Annex I -10% -12% non Annex I -14% World -16% (450ppm CO2 stabilisation scenarios) Source: Crassous, Sassi, 2008 2090 2100 In search of bifurcations towards alternative pathways ST2 • The same carbon constraint : a CO2 stabilization at 450 ppm by the end of the century • New policy framework: • internalize broader set of sustainability constraints including local pollution and poverty • Play on early action on transportation and building infrastructures, in relation with changes in the localization of activities and consumption patterns including mobility, • Play on a broader set of policy instruments in a ‘second best world’ (decentralized emission trading scheme, carbon taxes, land pricing, early upfront investments on infrastructures) (Scenarios for transition towards a low-carbon world in 2050 : What’s at stake for heavy industries? With FONDDRI/EPE, 2008) Urban planning: a key challenge to lower the transition Two ‘polar cases’ may be possible for a climate friendly development: ST2 - a dispersed city paradigm, with very decentralized energy production units, mostly renewables, - a dense city paradigm, with a centralized and optimized energy production system Spread Development Urban surface 1500 inhab/km2 Dense Development 100% Individual houses 0% 10000 inhab/km2 100 700 Nb vehicles / 1000 inhab (Renaud Crassous, Scenarios for transition towards a low-carbon world in 2050 : What’s at stake for heavy industries? With FONDDRI/EPE, 2008) In search of bifurcations towards alternative pathways ST2 General results • A slightly reduced carbon constraint (- 12%) • A significant reduction in the transition cost for some countries • Better long-run control of emissions from transportation • More renewables in the decentralized paradigm • Less renewables in some centralized area (Scenarios for transition towards a low-carbon world in 2050 : What’s at stake for heavy industries? With FONDDRI/EPE, 2008) An example : towards a low carbon mobility ST2 MOTORISATION Motors DU PARC En2001 2001 En2050 2050 100 80 60 40 20 0 2001 2001 REF REF Conventional Conventionnelle ST 1 ST 2 STAB 1 STAB 2 Other (Elec, Hyb, H2) Autre (Renaud Crassous, Scenarios for transition towards a low-carbon world in 2050 : What’s at stake for heavy industries? With FONDDRI/EPE, 2008) GDP variation w.r.t. reference scenario (%) Early Action on Infrastructures: reassuring end-points … and still transition problems 2010 6% 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 4% 2% 0% -2% -4% -6% -8% -10% -12% Annex I non Annex I -14% -16% (450ppm CO2 stabilisation scenarios) Source: Crassous, Sassi, 2008 World 2090 2100 Key messages (1/2) A climate impasse with the Business As Usual scenario. An increasing carbon value and a strong political engagement necessary to set in motion the necessary mutations. Different development options for transport infrastructures and urban planning : reduces the transition cost and produces higher economic growth opportunities in the long term. A leading role for the materials producers, in a context of increased demand together with a decarbonization of their production. A significant increase in energy efficiency necessary, as well as massive and rapid deployment of new technologies : very-low energy buildings and vehicles, CCS, nuclear and renewables. Without the CCS option, an increased role for nuclear and renewable energy (Renaud Crassous, Scenarios for transition towards a low-carbon world in 2050 : What’s at stake for heavy industries? With FONDDRI/EPE, 2008,) Key messages (2/2) Policies are beneficial over the long run towards but uniform carbon prices (only) policies are squeezed: -They hurt emerging economies over the short run (when the carbon prices are low, relatively low!!!) - Without preventing risks of lock-in in carbon intensive development pathways Transtion towars a low carbon society needs strong climate policies with both a carbon price and change in development styles (urban planning, type of infrastructures…) In the absence of fully fledged carbon market, need to articulate financial support to infrastructure projects and Namas More information: http://www.imaclim.centre-cired.fr/