Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Role of the State in Broadband Policy for Rural Areas: A Comparative Analysis of Canada and the United States Rural Telecon – October 23, 2006 Penn State Rural Telecommunications Working Group Sheila S. Sager, Theodore R. Alter & William C. Shuffstall Presented by Sheila S. Sager Objectives Role of the State in broadband provision for the rural United States Comparative analysis of government policy in the rural US and Canada Open access Human and organizational capacity Demand aggregation Implications and conclusions Canada US Population 33,098,932 298,44,215 Land Area 9,093,057 sq km 9,161,923 sq km Rural 22% (6.4 million) 17% (49 million) GDP per capita $34,000 $41,800 Population below 15.9% poverty Broadband Subscribers 21.9 per 100 inhabitants 12% Investment in 0.493 Telecommunications as percent of GDP 0.169 16.8 Source : OECD Ic e lan d Ne Kor the ea rl a n De ds Sw nma i tz r er k l an d Fin la No nd rw a Ca y na Sw da ed e Be n l gi um Un J a i t pa Un ed S n ta i te d K te s i ng do m Fr Lu a n x e ce mb ou r Au g s tr Au ia s tr a Ge li a rm an y Ita ly Sp a in P Ne ort w uga Ze al a l nd Cz e c Irela hR n ep d ub li c Sl Hu ng ov ak a Re r y pu b li c Po l an Me d x ic Tu o rke Gr y ee ce Broadband Penetration & Population Densities OECD broadband penetration and population densities Broadband penetration 30 25 600 Broadband penetration (subscribers per 100 inhabitants, 2005) Population density (inhab/km2, 2004) 500 Simple correlation = 0.265 20 400 15 300 10 200 5 100 0 0 Federal Broadband Policies & Programs United States Universal Service Funds, 1996 Rural Health Care Support Mechanism Schools and Libraries Program Canada E-rate Rural Broadband Access Loans, 2002 Connecting Canadians, 1998 National Broadband Taskforce, 2001 Broadband for Rural and Northern Development (BRAND), 2002 Rural and Remote Broadband Access Program (RRBA), 2002 National Satellite Initiative (NSI), 2003 Open Access United States Abolished open access in August 2005 Canada Supports and encourages open access Human and Organizational Capacity United States Canada National Broadband Taskforce identifies ways to build capacity National Satellite Initiative Demand Aggregation United States Decided at the local level No federal support Not eligible for e-rate Canada Aggregation is one of the two key strategies identified by the National Broadband Taskforce Comparative Analysis Canada US Role of the State Comprehensive Limited Policy goal Serve all Serve all Type of policy Comprehensive Market driven Effect Serve all Serve some Broadband policy Leverages all Isolates sectors of society Focus Access and Access capacity building Implications & Conclusions Assumption – Access and use of broadband is a necessary condition for economic and social development. The lack of accessibility and capacity in rural areas will hinder their development. Compared to Canada, US broadband policy is not designed to enhance accessibility and capacity for those people living in rural areas. Implications & Conclusions Assumption – Economic and social well being and quality of life in rural places is important Relative to Canadian policy, US policy does not appear to serve this social value and goal Assumption – Development, enfranchisement and quality of life of rural people and places is a strongly held value US policy needs to be radically reformed to incorporate a larger role of the State where the market does not provide adequate access Implications & Conclusions Rewrite of the United States Telecommunications Act of 1996 Carrier class services need to be the focus of policy, in addition to residential services Provides an opportunity to recast policy that is more supportive of rural populations and places Rural Telecommunications Working Group (RTWG) A multidisciplinary team of researchers, educators and practitioners, at Penn State, are focusing on the adoption and impact of digital technologies on the economic, political and social development of rural communities RTWG Members Ted Alter Jeff Bridger Sheila Sager Kai Schafft Jorge Schement Bill Shuffstall Marsha Tate Comments, Questions, Suggestions The Role of the State in Broadband Policy for Rural Areas: A Comparative Analysis of Canada and the United States Presented by Sheila S. Sager [email protected] 814-863-6816