* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Keynesian Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Chapter 11 Keynesian Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics Slides to Accompany “Economics: Public and Private Choice 9th ed.” James Gwartney, Richard Stroup, and Russell Sobel Next page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. “ I believe myself to be writing a book on economic theory which will largely revolutionize—not, I suppose, at once but in the course of the next ten years— the way the world thinks about economic problems. ” -- John Maynard Keynes Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. 1. Keynesian Explanations of the Great Depression Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Keynesian Explanations of the Great Depression Keynesian economics developed during the Great Depression (1930s). Keynesian theory provided an explanation for the severe and prolonged unemployment of the 1930s. Keynes argued that wages and prices were highly inflexible, particularly in a downward direction. Thus, he did not think changes in prices and interest rates would direct the economy back to full employment. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Keynesian Explanations of the Great Depression Keynesian View of Spending and Output: -- Keynes argued that spending induced business firms to supply goods & services. Thus, if total spending fell, then business firms would respond by cutting back production. Less spending would thus lead to less output. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. 2. The Basic Keynesian Model Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. The Basic Keynesian Model Aggregate Expenditures = Planned Consumption + Planned Investment + Planned Government Expenditures + Planned Net Exports In the Keynesian model as income expands, consumption increases, but by a lesser amount than the increase in income, both planned investment and government expenditures are independent of income, and, planned net exports decline as income increases. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Aggregate Consumption Function Planned Consumption Expenditures (trillions of dollars) 45º Line 12 Saving C 9 6 Dis-saving 3 45º 3 6 9 12 Real Disposable Income (trillions of dollars) The Keynesian model assumes that there is a positive relationship between consumption and income. However, as income increases, consumption increases by a smaller amount. Thus, the slope of the consumption function (line C) is less than 1 (less than the slope of the 45° line). Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Income and Net Exports Total Output Planned Exports Planned Imports Planned Net Exports (Real GDP In Billions) (Billions) (Billions) (Billions) $850 850 850 850 850 $650 700 750 800 850 $200 150 100 50 0 $7,600 7,900 8,200 8,500 8,800 Because exports are determined by income abroad, they are constant at $850 billion. Imports increase as domestic income expands. Thus, planned net exports fall as domestic income increases. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. 3. Keynesian Equilibrium Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Keynesian Equilibrium In the Keynesian view, equilibrium occurs when: Planned Aggregate Expenditures = Current Output When this is the case: businesses are able to sell the total amount of goods & services that they produce, and, there are no unexpected changes in inventories, so, producers have no reason to either expand or contract their output during the next period. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Keynesian Equilibrium When Total Aggregate Expenditures < Current Output business firms will accumulate unplanned additions to inventories that will cause them to cut back on future output and employment. When Total Aggregate Expenditures > Current Output inventories will fall and businesses will respond with an expansion in output in an effort to restore inventories to their normal levels. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Keynesian Equilibrium Keynesian equilibrium can occur at less than full employment. When it does, the high rate of unemployment will persist into the future. Aggregate Demand is key to the Keynesian model. Keynes believed that weak aggregate demand was the cause of the Great Depression. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. An Example of Keynesian Macroeconomic Equilibrium Planned Investment + Planned Government Expenditures Net Exports Total Output (Real GDP) Planned Aggregate Expenditures Planned Consumption (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) $7,900 8,050 8,200 8,350 8,500 $6,000 6,200 6,400 6,600 6,800 $1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 $200 150 100 50 0 Expand Expand Equilibrium Contract Contract $7,600 7,900 8,200 8,500 8,800 < < = > > Tendency Of Output Recall that Planned Aggregate Expenditures equals the sum of Planned Consumption, Planned Investment, Planned Government Expenditures, and Planned Net Exports. In the Keynesian system, when total output is less than planned aggregate expenditures, purchases exceed output and inventories are depleted. Firms expand their output to rebuild their inventories to regular levels. When actual output is more than planned aggregate expenditures, output exceeds purchases, and inventories accumulate. Firms reduce their output to slow the accumulation of further inventory. When planned aggregate expenditures equal Total Output, there is Keynesian macroeconomic equilibrium. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Aggregate Expenditures (AE) Planned Aggregate Expenditures Equilibrium (trillions of dollars) (AE = GDP) 8.5 7.9 Output 45º 7.9 8.5 (Real GDP -trillions of $) Aggregate expenditures will be equal to total output for all points along the 45° line from the origin. The 45° line maps out potential equilibrium levels of output for the Keynesian model. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Aggregate Expenditures and Keynesian Equilibrium Planned Aggregate Expenditures Equilibrium (trillions of dollars) (AE = GDP) Unplanned Increase in Inventories Now the previously presented Planned Aggregate Expenditures data is introduced. 8.5 8.35 Unplanned Reduction in Inventories AE = C + I + G + NX 8.05 7.9 Output 45º 7.9 8.5 (Real GDP -trillions of $) At output levels below $8.2 trillion (for example 7.9) AE is above the 45° line – expenditures exceed output and thus businesses sell more than they currently produce, diminishing inventories. Businesses expand output. At output levels above $8.2 trillion (for example 8.5) AE is below the 45° line – output exceeds expenditures and thus businesses sell less than they currently produce, increasing inventories. Businesses expand output. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Aggregate Expenditures and Keynesian Equilibrium Planned Aggregate Expenditures Equilibrium (trillions of dollars) (AE = GDP) AE = C + I + G + NX 8.5 8.35 8.2 Keynesian Equilibrium 8.05 7.9 Full Employment (Potential Output) Output 45º 7.9 8.2 8.5 (Real GDP -trillions of $) At that level of income where planned expenditures just equal actual output, the Keynesian equilibrium exists. Here that equilibrium exists at $8.2 trillion. Note that full-employment for this example exists at $8.5 trillion. In the Keynesian model equilibrium does not necessarily coincide with full-employment. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Shifts in Aggregate Expenditures and Changes in Equilibrium Output Equilibrium Planned Aggregate Expenditures (AE = GDP) AS (trillions of dollars) 8.8 AE3 AE2 AE1 8.5 8.2 7.9 Full Employment (Potential Output) Output 45º 8.2 8.2 8.5 (Real GDP -trillions of $) When equilibrium output is less than the economy’s capacity only an increase in expenditures (a shift in AE) will lead to full employment output. If consumers, investors, governments, or foreigners would spend more and thereby shift AE to AE2, output would reach its full employment potential. Once full employment is reached, further increases in AE, such as to AE3, lead only to higher prices (nominal output expands along the dotted segment of AE, real output will not). Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. 4. The Keynesian View Can be Illustrated Within the AD/AS Framework Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. The Keynesian View Illustrated within the AD/AS Framework When output is less the fullemployment, the primary impact of an increase in aggregate demand will be an increase in output. When output is at or beyond the fullemployment level, the primary impact of an increase in demand will be higher prices. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Keynesian Aggregate Supply Curve Price Level SRAS LRAS Keynesian Range P1 Full Employment (Potential Output) YF Goods & Services (real GDP) The Keynesian model implies a 90°, angle-shaped SRAS curve that is flat for outputs less than potential GDP (YF) -- because of downward wage and price inflexibility. This flat range is often referred to as the Keynesian range. Output here is entirely dependent on the level of aggregate demand. As the Keynesian model implies that real output rates beyond full employment are unattainable, both the SRAS and LRAS curve are vertical at potential output. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. AD / AS Presentation of the Keynesian Model Price Level SRAS e3 P3 P1 , P2 LRAS e1 e2 AD3 AD1 Y1 YF AD2 Goods & Services (real GDP) The diagram above illustrates the Polar implications of the Keynesian model. When output is less than capacity (for example Y1), an increase in Aggregate Demand such as illustrated by the shift from AD1 to AD2 will expand output without increasing the price level (P2 = P1). But, increases in demand beyond AD2, such as a shift to AD3, lead only to a higher price level (P3). Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. AD / AS Presentation of the Keynesian Model Price Level LRAS SRAS P3 P2 P1 e3 e2 e1 AD2 AD1 Y1 YF Y3 AD3 Goods & Services (real GDP) The diagram above relaxes the assumptions of the model regarding complete price and short-run output inflexibility beyond YF. The SRAS curve now turns from horizontal to vertical more gradually. Now an unanticipated increase in AD would lead: Primarily to increases in output when output is below capacity (for example beginning at AD1 with output Y1). Primarily to increases in the price level when strong demand pushes output beyond capacity (for example demand greater than AD2). Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Questions for Thought: 1. What determines the equilibrium rate of output in the Keynesian model? What did Keynes think had happened during the prolonged, high level of unemployment of the Great Depression? 2. In the Keynesian model, what is the major factor that causes the level of output and employment to change? Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. 5. The Multiplier Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. The Multiplier The Multiplier: -- The view that a change in autonomous expenditures (e.g. investment) leads to an even larger change in aggregate income. An increase in spending by one party increases the income of others. Thus, an increase in spending can expand output by a much larger amount. The multiplier is the number by which the initial change in spending is multiplied to obtain the total amplified increase in income. The size of the multiplier increases with the marginal propensity to consume (MPC). Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. The Multiplier In evaluating the importance of the multiplier, one should remember: taxes and spending on imports will dampen the size of the multiplier; it takes time for the multiplier to work; and, the amplified effect on real output will be valid only when the additional spending brings idle resources into production without price changes. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. The Multiplier Principle Additional Income Additional Consumption (Dollars) (Dollars) Marginal Propensity To Consume Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8 Round 9 Round 10 All Others 1,000,000 750,000 562,500 421,875 316,406 237,305 177,979 133,484 100,113 75,085 225,253 750,000 562,500 421,875 316,406 237,305 177,979 133,484 100,113 75,085 56,314 168,939 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 Total 4,000,000 3,000,000 3/4 Expenditure Stage For simplicity (here) it is assumed that all additions to income are either spent domestically or saved. The multiplier concept is fundamentally based upon the proportion of additional income that households choose to spend on consumption: the marginal propensity to consume (here assumed to be 75% 3/4). Here, a $1,000,000 injection is spent, received as payment, saved and spent, received as payment, saved and spent … etc. … until . . . effectively, $4 million is spent in the economy. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. A Higher MPC Means a Larger Multiplier SIZE OF MPC 9/10 4/5 3/4 2/3 1/2 1/3 MULTIPLIER 10.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.5 As the MPC increases more and more money of every injection is spent (and so received as payment and then spent again, received as payment and spent again, etc.). The effect is that for higher MPCs, higher multipliers result, specifically the relationship follows this equation: 1 M = 1 - MPC Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. 6. The Keynesian view of the Business Cycle Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Keynesian View of the Business Cycle Keynesians argue that a market economy, if left to its own devices, is unstable and likely to experience prolonged periods of recession. According to the Keynesian view of the business cycle, upswings and downswings tend to feed on themselves. During a downturn, business pessimism, declining investment, and the multiplier principle combine to plunge the economy further toward recession. During an economic upswing, business and consumer optimism and expanding investment interact with the multiplier principle to propel the economy to an inflationary boom. The theory suggests that a market-directed economy, left to its own devices, will tend to fluctuate between economic recession and inflationary boom. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Keynesian View of the Business Cycle Regulation of aggregate expenditures is the crux of sound macroeconomic policy according to the Keynesian view. If we could assure aggregate expenditures large enough to achieve capacity output, but not so large as to result in inflation, the Keynesian view implies that maximum output, full employment, and price stability would be attained. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. 7. Evolution of Modern Macroeconomics Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Evolution of Modern Macroeconomics Major Insights of Keynesian Economics: Changes in output, as well as in prices, play a role in the macroeconomic adjustment process, particularly in the short run. The responsiveness of aggregate supply to changes in demand will be directly related to the availability of unemployed resources. Fluctuations in aggregate demand are an important potential source of business instability. Modern macroeconomics is a hybrid, reflecting elements of both classical and Keynesian analysis as well as some insights drawn from other areas of economics. Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. Questions for Thought: 1. What is the multiplier principle? What determines the size of the multiplier? Does the multiplier principle make it more or less difficult to stabilize the economy? Explain. 2. Widespread acceptance of the Keynesian aggregate expenditure (AE) model took place during and immediately following the Great Depression. Can you explain why? The aggregate expenditure model declined in popularity when many economies experienced both high rates of unemployment and inflation during the 1970s. Was this surprising? Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved. End Chapter 11 Jump to first page Copyright (c) 2000 by Harcourt Inc. All rights reserved.