Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Conference “Competitiveness of the South Eastern European Countries and Challenges on the Road to EU “ REAL EXCHANGE RATE DYNAMICS IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA: OLD WISDOMS AND NEW INSIGHTS Sultanija Bojceva Terzijan, MSc. National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia 30.05.2008, Skopje Outline: Republic of Macedonia road to EU Real convergence Nominal convergence Competitiveness and real exchange rate dynamics in RM Estimation of the equilibrium real exchange rate (REER) for Macedonian Denar Republic of Macedonia road to EU Stabilization and Association Agreement with EU, April 2001 Interim Agreement on Trade and Trade Issues -into force from June 1st 2001 Submission of the membership application , March 2004 Submitted Questionnaire to the Government of RM, October 1st 2004 Positive opinion from European Commission for RM candidacy, November 2005 RM was granted candidate status, December 17th 2005 Real Convergence GDP per capita PPP - EU15 Slow real convergence Absence of FDI, new technology and know-how Negative external and domestic shocks Intensified in 2007 Real GDP growth rate of 5,1% 2007 47 50 45 37 40 31 35 30 25 15 12 24 21 19 20 1997 26 13 10 5 0 Albania Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia Macedonia Serbia Real Convergence – continues Contribution of the production factors to GDP growth Total factor productivity dominates as in all SEE countries Contribution to GDP growth (average 1996-2006) Sectoral productivity growth (average 2002-2007) 2 2 10 5.2 1.5 5 5.7 4.2 3.4 2.9 0.4 1 0.5 9.1 0 0.4 0.1 -5 0 capital labor Source: IMF Article IV, 2005 TFP -3.8 Nominal Convergence Stylized fact: the absolute price level of less developed countries is bellow the euro area average Macedonia fits this pattern as well Lower absolute levels of price parities towards Germany, Italy, Slovenia PP level (Goods) 120 100 80 61 68 63 68 104 104 75 78 60 40 20 0 Germany Italy Slovenia Serbia 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 PP level (Services) 127 111 Nov.05 66 62 41 45 Germany 47 46 Italy Oct.06 Slovenia Serbia Nominal Convergence - continues Price level convergence (EU 27=100) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 2003 30 2006 20 10 0 Potential sources of upward inflation pressures Balassa-Samuelson effect from the supply side Adjustment in regulated prices Cost-push factors from non-tradable intermediates (distribution sector, business services sector, rents) Higher quality and reputation of domestically produced goods Real exchange rate dynamics in RM Analysis based on a paper “Real exchange rate dynamics in Macedonia: Old wisdoms and new insights” Motivation: Explain reason for depreciation of MK REER Inflation and REER developments 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 Try to link it to productivity developments – the B-S effect CPI 0.8 0.7 0.6 1997Q1 1997Q3 1998Q1 1998Q3 1999Q1 1999Q3 2000Q1 2000Q3 2001Q1 2001Q3 2002Q1 2002Q3 2003Q1 2003Q3 2004Q1 2004Q3 2005Q1 2005Q3 2006Q1 2006Q3 2007Q1 2007Q3 REER 0.9 Balassa-Samuelson effect in Macedonia Domestic productivity Starting point: productivity differential bears a link to the relative prices – domestic concept 1.4 prod1 1.3 1.2 prod2 1.1 prod3 1.0 0.9 prod4 0.8 2007q03 2006q04 2006q01 2005q02 2004q03 2003q04 2003q01 2002q02 2001q03 2000q04 2000q01 1999q02 1998q03 prices since 2000 0.6 1997q04 change in administrative prod5 0.7 1997q01 Prices increased due to other factors than the B-S effect Rel B-S effect in Macedonia – continues 45 If potentially there is a link from productivity to relative prices the share of non-tradables in the CPI basket is crucial (Engel’s law) 40 35 30 25 Weights of selected categories in CPI, 2007 (%) Food including alcohol and tobacco Energy 20 15 10 5 0 Services B-S effect in Macedonia – continues Fairly limited contribution to total CPI The steady rise of services from 2000 have negligible influence on the CPI Tradable, non-tradable and overall price inflation in Macedonia 140 130 120 CPI1 TI NTI 110 100 QI.07 QI.06 QI.05 QI.04 QI.03 QI.02 QI.01 QI.00 QI.99 90 QI.98 The CPI index has strong co-movement with goods price inflation QI.97 B-S effect in Macedonia – continues Balassa-Samuelson effect bleeds from two wounds: Rises in service prices were not connected to developments in the productivity differential in Macedonia from 1997 to 2005 Service price inflation has potentially little impact on headline inflation - modest weight of services in final household expenditures Empirical evidence indicates non existence of domestic B-S effect Real exchange rate dynamics in RM “Composition puzzle” solved and new REER series were constructed Low goods price inflation and high service price inflation in foreign benchmark overestimates the depreciation of REER 1.09 1.06 1.03 1.00 0.97 0.94 0.91 0.88 0.85 0.82 0.79 0.76 0.73 0.70 Different CPI based REER REER REER1_EU5 REER2_EU5 1997Q1 1997Q3 1998Q1 1998Q3 1999Q1 1999Q3 2000Q1 2000Q3 2001Q1 2001Q3 2002Q1 2002Q3 2003Q1 2003Q3 2004Q1 2004Q3 2005Q1 2005Q3 2006Q1 2006Q3 2007Q1 2007Q3 REER - official series; REER1_EU5 - with MK CPI weights, REER2_EU5 - with average EU 5 CPI weights Real exchange rate dynamics in RM 0.9 proddiff1 0.8 proddiff2 proddiff3 0.7 proddiff4 0.6 2007q01 2006q01 2005q01 2004q01 2003q01 2002q01 2001q01 2000q01 0.5 1999q01 Slow catching-up process, contrary to the most transition countries – increase of productivity gap relative to abroad 1.0 1998q01 Continual decline of the MK productivity relative to the foreign trade partners 1997q01 Domestic vs foreign productivity – prod. differentials 1.1 Real exchange rate dynamics in RM Co-movement of the new REER series and the productivity differentials Co-movement of REER and prod.differentials 1.09 1.03 0.97 0.91 Possible explanations: 0.85 0.79 0.73 REER1_EU5 0.67 proddiff3 0.61 2007Q3 2007Q1 2006Q1 2006Q3 2005Q3 2005Q1 2004Q3 2004Q1 2003Q3 2003Q1 2002Q3 2002Q1 2001Q3 2001Q1 2000Q3 1999Q1 1998Q3 1998Q1 1997Q1 Non-tradable component of tradable prices 0.55 1997Q3 REER 2000Q1 The (inverse) quality effect 1999Q3 Estimation of a behavioral equilibrium exchange rate The productivity variable has a positive sign Increases in public expenditures lead to real appreciation through the relative price of tradable goods. Rise/fall in openness is reflected in real exchange rate appreciation /depreciation (a surprising finding) Method: OLS, E-G Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 1 -0.5** -0.47** -0.47** -0.23** -4.86** -6.48** -7.29** -4.24** 4.70** -0.43** 0.37 -3.06** ARDL Model 2 -0.30** -4.21** 5.59** -0.15** DOLS Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 -0.30** -0.46** -0.46** -4.31** -5.44** -5.45** 5.89** -1.96** 0.02 -0.01 0.12** 0.14** ECT UR F-test Const proddiff1 proddiff2 0.18** 0.41** proddiff3 0.19 0.63** proddiff4 0.09* 0.25** gcon_diff 0.06** 0.14** 0.07* 0.12** 0.25** 0.09** open 0.04 -0.04 0.29** 0.18** nfa -0.02** 0.04** rel.prices 0.14** 0.13** Notes: * and ** indicate statistical significance at the 10% and 5% levels, respectively Productivity, government consumption and the openness variables - fairly robust both in terms of sign and size Misalignment of Macedonian REER 0.2 Missalignment, Model 1 0.15 Missalignment, Model 2 Missalignment, Model 3 0.1 2007Q4 2007Q1 2006Q2 2005Q3 2004Q4 2004Q1 2003Q2 2002Q3 2001Q4 2001Q1 2000Q2 1999Q3 1998Q4 -0.05 1998Q1 0 1997Q2 0.05 -0.1 According to the three models, there is not significant misalignment of MK Denar Conclusion Macedonia in process of catching up growth Real convergence might induce risk for meeting nominal criteria B-S effect has a very limited role in the Macedonian case The (inverse) quality effect, or the non-tradable component of tradable prices - two possible explanations REER in line with its fundamentals, absence of significant misalignment of MK Denar Thank you for your attention References 1. Bogoev, J., Bojceva, T. S., Egert, B. and Petrovska M. (2007), "Real exchange rate dynamics in Macedonia: Old wisdoms and new insights, The Open-Access, Open-Assesment E-Journal, Vol. 2, 2008-12. 2. DeBroeck, M. and T. Slok (2006), "Interpreting real exchange rate movements in transition economies", Journal of International Economics, 68(2), pp. 368-383. 3. Égert, B. and K. Lommatzsch (2004), " Equilibrium Exchange Rates in the Transition: The Tradable Price-Based Real Appreciation and Estimation Uncertainty", William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 676. 4. Égert, B., Halpern, L. and R. MacDonald (2006) Equilibrium exchange rates in transition economies: Taking stock of the issues, Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(2), 253-324. 5. Gutierrez, E. (2006), "Export Performance and External Competitiveness in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", IMF Working Paper No. 261. 6. Loko, B. and A. Tuladhar (2005), "Labor Productivity and Real Exchange Rate: The Balassa-Samuelson Disconnect in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", IMF Working Paper No. 113. 7. Mihaljek, D. and M. Klau (2004), "The Balassa-Samuelson Effect in Central Europe: A Disaggregated Analysis", Comparative Economic Studies, 46(1), 63-94.