Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy Olivier Blanchard Giovanni Dell’Ariccia Paolo Mauro Stockholm, November 21st , 2011 The views in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF Pre-Crisis Consensus One target for monetary policy: Low and stable inflation One main monetary policy instrument: The policy interest rate A limited role for fiscal policy No cyclical role for prudential regulation The proof of the pudding: The Great Moderation Caveat: Differences between and among academics, central banks, politicians 2 Monetary Policy: One Target/One Instrument Stable inflation (backed by theory and politics) Low inflation (low prob. of Zero bound, but Japan…) Connected markets and arbitrage (one rate does it all) Expectation channel: Rule based policy Financial intermediation largely ignored (with exceptions) 3 Benign Neglect Approach to Boom/Busts Asset prices a concern only through their impact on GDP and inflation Bubbles difficult to identify Ex-post policies effective and costs of clean up limited Better clean up than prevent Financial Regulation Not a Cyclical Tool Macro dimension of regulation largely ignored: Focus on soundness of individual institutions Some exceptions in EMs Cyclical use of prudential policies discouraged: Seen as mingling with proper market functioning Little thought given to cyclical rules on capital ratios, LTV ratios (exceptions: Spain, Colombia) The Great Moderation Steady decrease in the variability of output and inflation in advanced countries Sources? Luck, structural changes, improved monetary policy? Successful responses to the financial scares. 1987 stock market crash, LTCM, Tech bubble burst 6 Then the Crisis Came … Bust had enormous consequences Standard policies rapidly hit their limits Limited effectiveness of less traditional policies Large fiscal and output costs Reflections on the Crisis Stable inflation: Necessary but not sufficient Limits of very low inflation Reconsider “benign neglect” Financial intermediation is macro relevant 8 Before Crisis Inflation and Growth Looked OK United States Euro area Average of other economies1 Core CPI Inflation 4.0 Output Gap2 2 3.5 1 3.0 2.5 0 2.0 -1 1.5 1.0 -2 0.5 0.0 2000 1 Japan 2 02 04 06 08: Q4 2000 omitted. Estimate of output gap using rolling Hodrick-Prescott filter. 02 04 06 08: Q4 -3 But Houses Prices Were Rising Rapidly 80 Change in real house prices (2001:Q4-2006:Q3) Real house price falls from recent peak 60 40 20 0 -20 ESP NZL IRL FRA GBR DEN SWE CAN AUS FIN NOR ITA USA GRC NLD CHE PRT AUT DEU JPN -40 Note: Real house price falls from recent peaks not shown for Germany and Japan as real price declined through the 2001:Q4-2006:Q3 period. And Credit Booms Fueled Vulnerabilities 0.2 IRL R2 = 0.60 NOR ESP NLD SWE USA CAN FRA GRC 0.05 GBR ITA BEL CHE JPN 0.1 FIN PRT AUT 0.15 DEN 0 DEU -0.05 -5 0 5 10 Average annual percentage point change in household quick ratio (liabilities/liquid assets) Growth Rate of Nominal Credit relative to GDP and Household Quick Ratio (percent) 15 Average growth rate of nominal credit relative to GDP (2002:1-2006:3) 11 Limited Monetary Policy Room (policy rates in percent) 7 United States 6 United Kingdom Euro area 5 4 3 2 1 0 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jun-09 12 Financial Intermediation Matters When normal investors exit, markets become segmented Arbitrage fails, and prices can deviate far from fundamentals Policy rate no longer a sufficient instrument for policy Credit easing and quantitative easing can affect rates and asset prices, given policy rate 13 What We Should Explore Going Forward If low/stable inflation not enough, what should monetary policy target? If benign neglect is dead, then what? More targets means more tools: what role for macroprudential policies? 14 Monetary Policy Many targets: Inflation/output gap Exchange rate Asset prices: Housing, stocks, etc But also many instruments: Policy interest rate Reserve accumulation Macro prudential instruments Cyclical capital/liquidity ratios Loan to value ratios, margin requirements 15 Benign neglect approach may be dead, but… Problems and trade offs with more interventionist strategy remain: Bubbles difficult to detect in real time (China real estate) Risks with pricking bubbles (including for policy makers) Traditional policies may be ineffective (speculative demand)) And have large costs Booms in Housing Markets Are Particularly Dangerous Not all asset-price booms should be target of policy But how to choose? Some consensus emerging that culprit is leverage (Nasdaq crash was fine) Housing markets are special: Leverage (link to crises) Large storage of wealth Major supply-side effects Network externalities Boom, Leverage, and Defaults Real Effects of House Busts Figure 2. House Price Run-Up and Severity of Crisis Cumulative decline in GDP f rom start to end of recession 10 IND 0 AUS CHN NZL CAN FRA GRC CHE CYP PRT AUT USA KOR NLD CZE HRV HUN DNK SWE BGR FIN SVN -10 ZAF ESP GBR NOR ITA POL y = -0.0416x - 4.1152 R² = 0.1496 IRL ISL UKR EST -20 Bubble size shows the change in bank credit from 2000 to 2006. LTU LVA -30 -20 0 20 40 Source: Claessens et al (2010). 60 80 100 120 140 160 Change in house prices from 2000 to 2006 180 200 220 240 The Policy Rate and House Price Bubbles Make borrowing more expensive and may limit leverage and risk taking But: Too blunt: costly for the entire economy (unless in context of general overheating) Issues for small open economies Effect on speculative component may be limited Panel VAR suggests impact on house prices at considerable cost to GDP growth 100 basis points reduce house price appreciation by 1 but also lead to a decline of 0.3 in GDP growth Macro-Prudential Tools Most ‘experiments’ in emerging markets, particularly Asia Common tools: Maximum LTV/DTI limits Differentiated risk weights on high-LTV loans Dynamic provisioning Discretion rather than rule-based Mixed evidence on effectiveness Hong Kong: Limited Effectiveness of LTV Limits 160 New loans approved Prices 170 150 150 140 130 110 90 70 2009 - Mar 2009 - May August 2010: LTV for properties over HK$12 million lowered to 60 percent, applications for mortgage insurance exceeding 90% LTV and 50% DTI suspended, maximum loan size for mortgage insurance eligibility if LTV>90%. October 2009: Maximum LTV for properties over HK$20 million lowered to 60 percent, maximum loan size for mortgage insurance eligibility reduced and non-owner-occupied properties disqualified. 130 120 110 2009 - Jul 2009 - Sep 2009 - Nov 2010 - Jan 2010 - Mar 2010 - May 2010 - Jul Korea: Effective LTV Limits, but Difficult Calibration? 6% 6 Month-on-month house price changes in 'speculation zones' (LHS) 5% Policy rate (RHS) 5 September 2002: Introduced LTV limits 4% 4 3% 2% September 2009: Tightened DTI October 2003: Lowered LTV in speculative areas 1% 3 February 2007: Tightened DTI 2 0% June 2003: Lowered LTV in speculative areas -1% -2% 2000 - Jan July 2009: Lowered LTV in non-speculative areas August 2005: Introduced DTI limits 1 0 2001 - Apr 2002 - Jul 2003 - Oct 2005 - Jan 2006 - Apr 2007 - Jul 2008 - Oct 2010 - Jan Macro-prudential policy still in its infancy Pragmatic and discretionary, mobilized within existing institutional frameworks, targeted at specific markets Some evidence of temporary cooling effect on markets and building of buffers for bad times Too early to judge impact on aggregate cycles and interaction with other policies Tentative Policy Taxonomy for Real-Estate Booms Macro-prudential tools first line of defense Target leverage Strengthen balance sheets Monetary policy definitely to be involved when there are other signs of overheating But may have to come into play anyway if macroprudential tools are ineffective Important Open Questions Who does what? Relationship among policies? Where should macro-prudential authority reside? To what extent are these independent tools? Rules versus discretion? Far away from IT standards Risks associated with excessively interventionist policy Conclusions: An evolution, not a revolution Low (but how low?) and stable inflation still essential Low deficits and fiscal room even more needed than before Monetary policy: Many targets and instruments New macroprudential tools/ Coordination with monetary policy Important questions of institutional design 27 Thank You 28 Widespread Declines in Output Volatility 7 3.5 Emerging Markets and Developing Countries Selected Advanced Economies 6.5 US 6 3 Africa and the Middle East 5.5 5 2.5 Latin America 4.5 4 2 EU15 3.5 3 1.5 2.5 Asia 2 1 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 29