Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
E Q U I P M E N T L E A S I N G & F I N A N C E F O U N D AT I O N State of the Equipment Finance Industry Review and Economic Outlook for 2014-15 Prepared for: Equipment Leasing & Finance Foundation Prepared by: Robert F. Wescott, Ph.D. President, Keybridge Presented: San Diego October 20, 2014 Agenda I. Snapshot of our 2013 Report on Equipment Finance Activity II. U.S. Macroeconomic Outlook 2014-15, including geopolitical risks III. Trends in Equipment Investment 2 I. 2013 equipment finance report: First the good news--low interest rates and an expanding economy increased propensity to finance. Propensity to Finance Index Index, 2005.Q4 = 100 180 151 160 134 140 120 112 100 80 60 2006.Q2 2007.Q2 2008.Q2 2009.Q2 2010.Q2 2011.Q2 2012.Q2 2013.Q2 2014.Q2 Source: ELFF 2014 Survey of Equipment Finance Activity 3 More good news: Portfolio performance strengthened in 2013, as delinquencies and charge-offs dropped to very low levels. Portfolio Quality Weighted Average 6% Charge-Offs Non-Accruals Delinquencies 90+ Days 5% 4% 1.6% 3% 2% 1.5% 1.9% 0.4% 1.2% 1% 1.4% 0.8% 0.7% 0.3% 0.5% 0.7% 2010 2011 2012 0% 2009 0.9% 0.2% 0.4% 0.3% 2013 Source: ELFF 2014 Survey of Equipment Finance Activity 4 Pretty good news: New business volume increased solidly in 2013, but not by the double-digit rates of the previous two years. New Business Volume Annual Percent Change 16.5% 20% 16.4% 9.3% 10% 0% 3.9% -2.2% Share of 2013 New Business Volume 14% Banks -10% -20% -30.3% 33% 54% Captives Independents -30% -40% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: ELFF 2014 Survey of Equipment Finance Activity 5 Bad news: Abundant liquidity and intense competition meant the cost of funds, spreads, and yields further declined. Yield Composition Weighted Average 8% 7.2% 7% 6.1% 6% 5% 5.1% 3.9% 4.5% 4.4% 3.1% 3.0% 1.8% 1.4% 1.4% 2011 2012 2013 3.6% 4% 3.3% 3% 2% Pre-Tax Yield Pre-Tax Spread Cost of Funds 3.3% 1% 2.5% 0% 2009 2010 Source: ELFF 2014 Survey of Equipment Finance Activity 6 Bottom line for the industry: Financial performance remained strong in 2013, but profitability dipped. The result: a huge focus on productivity. Profitability Ratios Median 18% 16.3% 16% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 14.7% 13.0% 14% 12% 9.5% 10% 8% 6% 4.3% 4% 1.0% 2% 1.5% 2.2% 2.1% 1.9% 0% Return on Equity Return on Assets Source: ELFF 2014 Survey of Equipment Finance Activity 7 II. U.S. Macroeconomic Outlook 2014-15—finally achieving escape velocity? Source: The Economist 8 On balance, bright spots in the U.S. economy are outweighing negative factors. 2013-14 have brought a lot of healing. Headwinds: Slowing World Economy Geopolitical Risks Bright Spots: Improving Labor Market Credit Flowing Again Fiscal Healing 9 First reason for optimism: The U.S. labor market is rapidly healing. Adding 3 million workers in a year is boosting income. Unemployment Rate Initial Jobless Claims Percent Thousands, 4-week Moving Average 12% 700 Unemployment Rate 10% 600 500 8% 400 6% 300 Initial Claims 4% 200 2% 0% 2007.10 100 2008.10 2009.10 2010.10 2011.10 2012.10 2013.10 0 2014.10 Source: Macrobond Financial 10 Second reason: Credit is flowing again. Bank lending to businesses is up notably. Credit is finally flowing again to consumers as well. Commercial/Corporate Bank Loans, 2014.Q1 Percent Change, Y/Y Citigroup 11.0% U.S. Bancorp 9.7% PNC 9.5% Bank of America 8.3% J.P. Morgan Wells Fargo 6.6% 5.9% Source: Forbes, “A Look at the Loan Portfolios of the Largest US Banks”, 6/14/14 11 Third reason: Sharp U.S. fiscal contractions/spending cuts are largely finished. And state spending is finally rebounding. Federal Government Contribution to GDP Growth Percent 2% Obama Stimulus Package Spending cuts are winding down 1% 1% 0% -1% -1% -2% 2006.Q2 Fiscal Contraction 2007.Q2 2008.Q2 2009.Q2 2010.Q2 2011.Q2 2012.Q2 2013.Q2 2014.Q2 Source: Macrobond Financial 12 Still mending: Business capital spending. Business confidence needs a boost. Capacity utilization hitting 80% would help. Real Nonresidential Investment: Equipment Percent Change Y/Y Capacity Utilization Percent 30% 100% 80% capacity utilizationthreshold for firm expansion 20% 95% 90% 10% 85% 0% 80% 75% -10% 70% -20% -30% 1990.Q2 65% 1996.Q2 2002.Q2 2008.Q2 60% 2014.Q2 Source: Macrobond Financial 13 Housing is also still disappointing. Despite improved fundamentals, the housing recovery remains subpar. NAHB Builder Housing Market Index New Housing Starts Index Thousands 100 2500 80 New Housing Starts 2000 60 1500 40 1000 20 0 1990.09 500 NAHB Builder Index 1994.09 1998.09 2002.09 2006.09 2010.09 0 2014.09 Source: Macrobond Financial 14 Two wild cards for 2015: Slumping world growth and lower oil prices. World Growth • U.S. exports added 0.5 percent to GDP growth in the past 4 quarters • Stronger dollar and slow foreign growth could subtract 0.3 to 0.4% off GDP in 2015. Oil • Oil prices are down to their lowest level in 4 years (down from $108 to $82/barrel). • A further drop to $70/barrel could boost GDP growth in 2015 by 0.5 to 0.8% 15 Bottom line: Compared to the rest of the developed world, the U.S. should be the growth leader. Expect growth of 3 to 3-1/2% in 2015. Projected 2015 G-8 Growth Rate Y/Y % Change 4% 3.1% 3% 2.4% 2% 1% 2.7% 1.5% 0.5% 0.8% 0.8% Italy Japan 1.0% 0% Russia France Germany Canada UK US Source: IMF, “World Economic Outlook, October 2014” 16 The brewing battle at Yellen’s Fed. The fight between the doves and new “financial imbalances” hawks is heating up. TRADITIONAL DOVES “FINANCIAL IMBALANCES” HAWKS VS. Janet Yellen, Fed Chair Richard Fisher, Dallas Fed "Too many Americans still can't find a job or are forced “There is a tipping point where monetary accommodation comes to be viewed not as a pleasant stimulus…but instead becomes an agent of financial recklessness.” to work part-time…I promise to do all that I can, working with my fellow policymakers, to achieve the very important goals Congress has assigned to the Federal Reserve.” Source: The Federal Reserve; The Economic Club of New York 17 What should the Fed be doing if it followed its own historical experience? Taylor rules help to show this. Taylor Rule Using PCE Inflation and Output Gap Percent 10 Actual FFR 5 0 Taylor Rule -5 1986.07 1990.07 1994.07 1998.07 2002.07 2006.07 2010.07 2014.07 Source: Macrobond Financial, Keybridge 18 Crisis: QE was a logical policy choice, because of the difficulty of negative rates. Taylor Rule Using PCE Inflation and Output Gap Percent 10 Actual FFR 5 0 Taylor Rule -5 1986.07 1990.07 1994.07 1998.07 2002.07 2006.07 2010.07 2014.07 Source: Macrobond Financial, Keybridge 19 However, today, Taylor rules would suggest that the long period of zero rates should be ending. Might the Fed be behind the curve? Taylor Rule Using PCE Inflation and Output Gap Percent 10 Actual FFR 5 0 Taylor Rule -5 1986.07 1990.07 1994.07 1998.07 2002.07 2006.07 2010.07 2014.07 Source: Macrobond Financial, Keybridge 20 Larry Summers’ worry – are rich countries doomed to “secular stagnation”? “We may be in a period of secular stagnation in which sluggish growth, output, and employment at levels well below potential, and problematically low real interest rates might coincide for quite some time to come.” Source: The Atlantic; Reuters 21 Might rich countries have permanently lower economic growth? The Secular Stagnation Debate Factors that could indicate “secular stagnation”: • • • • • • Aging population Interest rates at their zero bound Lack of productive investments Inflation that is “too low” Increased inequality Lack of innovation 22 Are we stuck in a 2% growth world? This is too pessimistic. U.S. potential GDP growth = %CH (labor force) + %CH (productivity). Civilian Non-institutional Population, Ages 20-64 Y/Y % Change 3% 2% 1.8% 1.2% 1.2% 1% 0.8% 0.9% 2004 2014 0% 1974 1984 1994 Source: Census Bureau 23 And productivity is not as bad as pessimists say. It should average 1.6% a year over the next decade. Potential growth can be 2.4% to 2.7%. Nonfarm Business Sector Labor Productivity, Output per Hour Y/Y % Change 10% 1974 - 1984: 1.5% 5% 1994 - 2004: 2.8% 1984 - 1994: 1.7% 2004 - 2014: 1.5% 0% -5% 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 Source: Macrobond Financial 24 Where will growth come from? A strong construction rebound offers the best short-run hope. Source: World Property Channel 25 Possible sources of longer-term growth—high-growth, high-reward industries. Unconventional Oil Exploration Nanotechnology By 2020, forecast to: • Create 2 million jobs in US • Build $1 trillion final products market • Boost productivity in energy, medicine, and electronics industries By 2020, forecast to: • Save $5.8b/year on consumer fuel costs • Add 300,000 jobs • Add $38.1 billion to GDP in 2020 Advanced Medical Technology Currently generates: • 1.9 million jobs • $381 billion in US economic output • For every 1 billion in industry revenues, estimated $1.69 billion added to GDP Industrial Automation Currently generates: • 300,000 jobs directly • $17.1b market, cost has fallen 50% since 1990 • Boosts manufacturing productivity Source: National Science Foundation, AdvaMed, International Federation of Robotics 26 Geopolitical risks that keep me awake at night. Russia-Ukraine Libya Syria/Iraq/ISIS Ebola Outbreak China Growth Slowdown 27 How do geopolitical risks affect global financial markets? Transmission Mechanisms Global Oil Prices Regional Contagion Effects Business & Investor Confidence Risk of Expropriation Capital Outflows & Safe Haven Effects Flows of People & Goods 28 Putin’s aggression seems driven by Russia’s “inferiority complex” after losing the cold war. Economic problems have contributed. “First and foremost it is worth acknowledging that the demise of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century.” -Putin, 2005 Source: The Guardian, The Washington Post, “Russia is re-making itself as the leader of the anti-Western world” 03/30/14, NBC 29 My Russian concerns: • Crimea or economic growth? Putin will take Crimea. • Sanctions are biting—maybe a little too tough? If oil prices drop further, how will Russia endure the pain? • Impact on business confidence in the EU (and Germany) has been worse than expected • Natural gas games this winter? • Geopolitical accidents? (Russia playing games in Sweden, Lithuanian, etc., doing trial incursions, submarine probes, Cold War tricks) 30 China: Construction slowdown is well-entrenched. How much will it slow the overall Chinese economy? (and the world economy)? 31 Xi Jinping’s balancing act: Sustaining growth and social cohesion as construction slows. Can consumption pick up the ball? In the first seven months of 2014: 22.4% -15% Vacancy Rate in 2013 Drop in sales price in large and mediumsized cities from Jan-Aug 2014 -17.0% -73.3% Drop in housing rent Decline in Y/Y change of total floor space under construction Source: Mingtiandi, “China Housing Sales Drop 10.5% in 2014 as Credit Dries Up”, 8/14/14; Macrobond 32 Ebola: Low probability but high impact risk. Africa is largely disconnected from the world economy, but… Source: Wired 33 III. Equipment investment has clawed its way back to a reasonably normal share of GDP. Further growth requires a breakout of demand. Equipment & Software Investment Share of Real GDP 9% 8 years 8% 6 years Software Investment 7% 6% Equipment Investment 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 1999.Q2 2002.Q2 2005.Q2 2008.Q2 2011.Q2 2014.Q2 Source: Macrobond Financial, Keybridge 34 Illustrating the need for a new investment breakout is the fact that new leasing business volume in 2014 is roughly flat with 2013 levels. Annualized rate through August 2014. Down 0.7% from 2013. MLFI-25 New Business Volume Billion Dollars $100 $82.9 $90 $87.0 $80 $70 $60 $80.2 $56.6 $84.4 $87.3 $86.7 2012 2013 2014* $74.0 $54.6 $59.3 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 *Projected Source: ELFA MLFI-25, 2014 projection from Keybridge 35 Most likely source of a breakout? Capacity utilization rising above 80% would likely support a new wave of capex spending. Capacity Utilization, August 2014 Percent of Capacity 100% 80% Threshold Indicates Expansion 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Source: Macrobond Financial 36 Meanwhile, the energy boom is for real: As domestic oil production has jumped (5 mbd to 8.8 mbd), rail shipments of oil have surged. Rail Traffic – Carloads Originated Petroleum Coal Other Commodities Y/Y Percent Change, 6-month Moving Average 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% Sep-90 Sep-94 Sep-98 Sep-02 Sep-06 Sep-10 Sep-14 Source: Macrobond Financial 37 And finally, the U.S. manufacturing renaissance is for real and should be sustained. Boston Consulting Group Manufacturing Cost Competitiveness 1 Out of the 25 largest exporters, the U.S. is now the 2nd most competitive, behind China. European firms are looking to shift production to the U.S. 2 U.S. manufacturing costs are 10-25% lower than all other top 10 goods-exporting countries (except China). 3 The gap between the U.S. and China is narrowing: In 2004, U.S. manufacturing costs were 14% higher, compared to only 5% today. 4 On current trends, U.S. manufacturing will be less expensive than China’s by 2018. Source: Boston Consulting Group, NPR, “Study: U.S. Manufacturers Gaining Competitiveness,” 04/25/14 38 In conclusion: U.S. growth seems on track, but turbulence abroad creates risks. Getting capacity utilization above 80% is key. The U.S. economy is healing. 2015 should be the best year since 2006. The Fed may face pressure to raise rates sooner than planned. U.S. potential growth may be better than the 2% rate pessimists fear. Russia and China and Ebola present geopolitical worries. Capacity utilization reaching 80% and a strong housing rebound are probably necessary for an acceleration in business investment. Source: Getty Images, CosmeticsDesign 39